Swedish Rape Epidemic avoidable. Feminists’ silence deafening. (Part 1)

No rape epidemic, no race riots, no car burnings
without refugees, without uncontrolled immigration
Encouraging smugglers and human traffickers to bring in Millions of foreigners from totally different cultures has “saved” maybe 1% of the African population. It brought race riots, 400 000 (!) burned cars in France [91], 1000 burned cars at each New Year’s in Paris alone. It destroyed the virtually crime free peace of large parts of Europe. Women live in fear of rape epidemics. Poorer countries, and small towns will be invaded by rape epidemics and crime shortly.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading »
Swedish Rape Epidemic avoidable. Feminists’ silence deafening. (Part 1) » continues here »

5000 rape per year epidemic caused by politically correct refugee and immigration policy in Sweden.
Rape epidemic diversity will  spread to small towns, more countries. Feminists don’t care. click for larger picture. See which countries pledge to house many refugees that likely will cause car burning and rape epidemics: mainly Sweden, Germany

  1. Sweden has one of the highest rates of rape in the world [50]. 5000 forcible rapes per year. Virtually all forcible violent rapes are committed by immigrants. [60 61  64 65 66 67 68 70 71 72 73]
  2. Thus: There would be no rape epidemic, virtually no forcible rapes, riots and car burnings [80 81 2013 82 2015 2014a b c]  in Scandinavia, had they not invited refugees and immigrants from Muslim and African countries.
  3. All Swedish municipalities that have not previously “welcomed” refugees will be forced to do so. [90]  The inevitably ensuing rape epidemics in formerly idyllic safe villages can still still be avoided.
  4. EU plans to force European Nations to accept Migrants [10 11]. This will bring rape epidemic culture and violence culture [91] to all European countries. Even those that have not yet been diversity enriched (Portugal, Spain, Eastern Europe). Feminists don’t protest the further spreading of rape epidemic culture.

 

rape epidemic in sweden vsother countries lower rape rates
Sweden has one of the highest rape rates in the world. The violent forcible rape epidemic is due to Muslim and African immigrants. It is taboo, even illegal, to state these truths, to quote such statistics.

Police interview: All outdoor rapes in Oslo are committed by immigrants (Muslims)| YouTube

Feminists don’t protest about violent gang rapes. Feminists obsess about objectifying gaze, gender mainstreaming, sexist language, marital rape, consensual sex when drunk, women’s choice to be a sex worker.  But violent gang rapes by minorities, not of interest to feminists.

 

No rape epidemic, no race riots, no car burnings

without refugees, without uncontrolled immigration

Europe encourages smugglers and human traffickers to bring in Millions of foreigners from totally different cultures. This has “saved” maybe 1% of the African population. It brought race riots, 400 000 (!) burned cars in France [91], 1000 burned cars at each New Year’s in Paris alone. It destroyed the virtually crime free peace of large parts of Europe.  Women live in fear of rape epidemics. Poorer countries, and small towns will be invaded by rape epidemics and crime shortly.

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Swedish Rape Epidemic avoidable. Feminists’ silence deafening. (Part 1)” »
Swedish Rape Epidemic avoidable. Feminists’ silence deafenin… » continues here »

Share

Feminist protest against sexist Barbie house in Berlin

Barbie dream house opened in Berlin. The little children are happy. Feminists are aghast and protest against sexist Barbie. Her curves are unattainable by the average woman, thus Barbie ought to be abolished.

We suspect that children will be seriously traumatized seeing pictures of Barbie crucified and burned alive by a naked woman that looks like Barbie. Feminists burn witch Barbie at the stake., for being too attractive.   We are speechless and rest our case.

Video in German

barbie-crucified-burnedIn pictures: Berlin Barbie doll house attracts fans and foes |BBC

‘Pink stinks’: Protests greet Berlin’s Barbie Dreamhouse

Share

Nordic Countries to criminalize antifeminist speech.

Criminalize anti-feminist statements in the public debate, just as hate speech is criminalized today. A tax-funded Nordic expert group of 35 experts on anti-feminism and right-wing extremism proposed this in a report to the Norwegian government.. N1

make-criticism-of-feminism-a-hate-crime-25.3.2013Opposing feminism will soon be a crime?

  1. Feminism already falsifies academic research, even with violence
  2. abolished  due process in legal proceedings against men
  3. re-introduced debtor’s prison.
  4. Feminism is now planning the final solution of the male question.

Soon all opponents of feminism  can be persecuted by the feminist grand inquisitor?

– We believe that the legislation is too weak to counter the wave of anti-feminist threats, says CEO Reforms Are Saastad to NRK.no.  Nyheter

Norway secretary of state is looking at the proposal favorably:

State Secretary Ahmad Ghani Zadeh believes that it is appropriate to punish threats and harassment based on sex, as proposed by the committee. […]

It is necessary to look at. I think it is a very good initiative that comes from expert committee, commenting Ghani Zadeh.

Though some utterances are gender neutral, we know that feminist threats and violence against men, are never opposed by courts and governments. On the contrary, women can avail themselves of proxy violence through police and common men.  With impunity they can engage in false rape accusations, defend Lorena Bobbitt, put men in debtor’s prison etc.

The proponents of the anti-anti-feminism laws honestly state that they fight ANTIFEMINISM

What is anti-feminism?

Reforms leader admits that the definition is difficult, but in the report they write the following:

Anti Feminism is:

  • attitude, behavior and action.
  • opposition to feminism and equality.
  • a desire to recreate a hierarchical social order in which heterosexual men are privileged.
  • resistance to challenge gender, sexuality and race categories. Nyheter

With such laws, University of Toronto feminists would not need to resort to violent blockades. Rather they could get Warren Farrell arrested, so he can not speak about male suicide and feminist repression. After all, he is against "equality", against quotas for less qualified women and against equal pay for unequal work. He also wants privilege for heterosexual men who choose more relevant career in STEM fields and work harder.

Men who harass, bully and threaten female debaters and feminists over the internet belong Into the category of "anti-feminists" . We can also include men debating equality through unfair and aggressive statements. NRK.NO

Women who harass, bully and threaten Erin Pizzey, of course, belong into the category of state sanctioned feminists. This is why feminist extremists  SCUM writers and "all men are rapists" hate authors are never mentioned nor prosecuted.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Nordic Countries to criminalize antifeminist speech.” »
Nordic Countries to criminalize antifeminist speech. » continues here »

Share

How feminists corrupt Domestic Violence research & warp world politics and legislation

The truth does not prevail. Not even in scientific research. What are the reasons, that the entire world, United Nations. the US government, European Union and many other nations often sincerely believe patently wrong fact? Then, in profound self deception, believing in politically correct falsehoods, patently unjust, wrong and detrimental laws get enacted.

Human-Stupidity is NOT an anti-feminist site per se. It just happens that feminism is based on systematic logical falsehoods. Human-Stupidity postulates that the evolutionary arms race gifted women with special verbal manipulation skills to offset male superiority in physical strength and economic power in the EEA.  We hesitate to mention other such falsehoods, because the anti-feminist men’s rights movement will disagree and hate us for our commitment to the truth in other fields tainted by political correctnessRace and iq, world economics, faulty or correct science, evolution, Creationism, irrational drug policy, child porn, teenage sexuality  are other topics where self deception, politically correct dogmatism causes rampant scientific dishonesty.

Our posts about Robert Kurzban‘s theory of hypocrisy, about, evolutionary psychology, faulty science, unhealthy lifestyle tend to get ignored. Interestingly, humor often tells the naked truth, like a court jester.

True to our motto: Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception we quote this excellent article:

How feminists corrupt Domestic Violence research

ostrichPlease read the original paper by distinguished academic researcher Dr. Murray Straus. We will cite only a few points:

Processes Explaining the Concealment and Distortion of Evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence

[…]Graham-Kevan’s paper raises the question of how an explanatory theory and treatment modality could have persisted for 30 years and still persists, despite hundreds of studies which provide evidence that PV has many causes, not just male-dominance. The answer is that it emerged from a convergence of a number of different historical and social factors. One of these is that gender symmetry in perpetration of partner violence is inconsistent with male predominance in almost all other crimes, especially violent crimes. Another is the greater injury rate suffered by female victims of PV brings female victimization to public attention much more often.

Cartoon_of_a_Woman_Slapping_a_Man_on_the_Cheek_clipart_imageDr. Murray Strauss omits the evolutionary based male chivalry and female victimhood as an instrument of power.

Methods Used to Conceal and Distort Evidence on Symmetry in Partner Violence

Method 1. Suppress Evidence

Among researchers not committed to that ideology, many (including me and some of my colleagues) have withheld results showing gender symmetry to avoid becoming victims of vitriolic denunciations and ostracism (see Method 7 below). Thus, many researchers have published only the data on male perpetrators or female victims, deliberately omitting data on female perpetrators and male victims

Method 2.  Avoid Obtaining Data Inconsistent with the Patriarchal Dominance Theory

In survey research, this method of concealment asks female participants about attacks by their male partners and avoids asking them if they had hit their male partner.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “How feminists corrupt Domestic Violence research & warp world politics and legislation” »
How feminists corrupt Domestic Violence research & warp world … » continues here »

Share

"Reclaim the night" money-slut walk in gang area @2am. We don’t deserve to be told to leave our cash and Rolex at home to avoid being victimized.

We will get drunk first and then walk with cash, Rolexes, gold jewelry in the inner city gang area.

This money-slut walk is in response to a police recommendation, not to carry large amounts of cash. We object to such victim blaming. The money is ours. We can carry it wherever we want. No matter if we are drunk or not.

These money-slut walkers are simple fighting for their right show off their money

These ‘slut walk’ women are simply fighting for their right to be dirty

Its my hot money, I do what I want

moneyMen and women march through East Los Angeles high crime neighborhood during the money-slut walk, which organizers described as a demonstration against those who blame the victims of robberies.woman-moneybagMexican Street Gang

slutwalk_1891529c
Women march through downtown Boston during the ‘SlutWalk’ in Boston, which organizers described as a demonstration against those who blame the victims of sex crimes
True liberation is men or women carrying the cash they want and abandon credit cards and modesty

True liberation is women wearing what they like and abandoning the Hoover.

For the right to carry money bags anywhere, anytime, any alcohol level

street_gangs_la 220107mexicans4gangs2-744750

 

The Toronto policeman who in January told a "personal security class" at York University that "people should avoid showing off their money and carrying large amounts of cash in order not to be victimized" said nothing unusual. What made news was what happened 10 weeks later, when a thousand people hit the streets of East Los Angeles in a "money slut walk".

The Toronto policeman who in January told a "personal security class" at York University that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized" said nothing unusual. What made news was what happened 10 weeks later, when a thousand people hit the streets of downtown Toronto in a "slut walk".   Telegraph.uk

Nor do I deserve to be told to leave my Rolex and my money at home to avoid being victimized! (Nobody tells me what do do!) Nor do I deserve to be told that I should cover up to avoid being victimized Nobody tells me what to do

Judgybitch has some good avice: Don’t want to get robbed on holidays? Don’t dress as a tourist and some other advice (if you don’t want to get raped.)

Share

Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women to retire older then men to have equal duration of retirement and years worked

In Britain, as in most countries, women retire at age 60, earlier then men (age 65). A clearly blatant sexist discrimination.

Analysis from the Men’s Network showed that men live 13 years in retirement whilst women enjoy 20 years. No mention from Saga and Unions Together on that point?

Women live a few years longer (Interim Life tables), work shorter years (due to child rearing vacations), contribute less to retirement funds. Women don’t pay appropriately higher retirement contributions during their work life, rather men pay for women’s longer retirement. In Brazil, to get full retirement benefits, women need to contribute for 30 years, men for 35.

Men pay for female privileges in early retirement and shorter work life (due to sexist legislation)

It says EU law prevents it from increasing men’s pension age before women’s,

Amazing. Why would there be such a clearly sexist law discriminating against men?

but surely that is a reason to delay the increase for everyone until 2020 rather than punish women? It’s certainly no justification for increasing women’s pension age by even more than that of men.  
‘How could I foresee such a discriminatory bombshell?’| Telegraph

Rectifying or reducing 70 years of legally codified female entitlement and male discrimination is punishing women?

Today’s men have been indoctrinated with feminist religious dogma from kindergarten on (Generation Y, raised on nothing but feminism, will be a nightmare for men). Thus men, like sheep, swallow any absurd feminist entitlement attitudes and allow such drivel to be published.

Since 1948, state pension has been paid to women at 60 and men at 65, it is only in 2018 that this injustice against men will be rectified, some 70 years later. And Altmann says pension policy is always against women. Unbelievable. I wonder what the male members of Saga think of her ‘balanced’ statement.

A good look at this and other issues about the effect on the genders was produced by Mark Easton of the BBC.

EQUALISATION OF STATE PENSION AGES AFTER 70 YEARS OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MEN IS STILL ATTACKED

Blatant large scale financial discrimination against men. Men paying women’s retirement benefits, and in exchange retiring later. Where are the million men marches for gender equality?

Equality means equality and men have been the most discriminated group when it comes to state pension age. For anyone to claim otherwise shows they have no sense or belief in what equality really means. They purposely only have one eye open. 
THE SCANDALOUS STATE PENSION AGE HYPOCRISY | The Rights Of Man

Why do men retire later then women

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women to retire older then men to have equal duration of retirement and years worked” »
Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women … » continues here »

Share

Jezebel sucks: feminist excuse female child killer LaShanda Armstrong, instantly delete dissent

LaShanda Armstrong killed herself, tried to kill her four children. One managed to escape her grip.
Jezebel-sucks.com is trying to psycho-analyze the poor woman.

Blame Husband’s infidelity

Bossip.com even finds a way to blame the father’s infidelity for it: The serial cheater who berated his longtime girlfriend just before she drowned herself and their three kids in the Hudson River won’t face any charges in the tragic deaths

Jezebel-sucks deletes dissent

Human-Stupidity posted a comment on Jezebel that this is a psycho assassin infanticidal mother. We mentioned that feminists would not look for psychological explanations if the father were the assassin like father shot family dead.
It took Jezebel.com-sucks 8 entire minutes, at 7 am, to delete our comment. Admirable efficiency. Dissenting opinions are not welcome. 

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Armstrong, 25, drowned along with 5-year-old Landon, 2-year-old Lance and 11-month-old Lainaina. Only her 10-year-son Lashaun escaped the tan van turned death trap NY Daily News

Of course we, unwisely, could not refrain from mentioning that if the father had slightly fondled the kids in wrong ways, they would not try to find deep motivations in the father’s past but rather want to jail him for 20 years.
(no, we don’t condone inappropriate fondling of children, but we think that assassination is a much more serious crime. See our teenage sexuality and child porn witch hunt topics)

River Murder-Suicide Mom’s Tragic Final Moments

Tragic final moments of the murderer?  a multiple child assassin? What about the tragic moment of the drowning kids? And the grieving father?

Anna North — A day after a Newburgh, New York mom killed herself and her children by driving into the Hudson River, interviews with survivors reveal some clues about her emotional state — and the family problems she was struggling with. River Murder-Suicide Mom’s Tragic Final Moments | Jezebel sucks

Her emotional thought? that is the fist thing feminists at Jezebel-sucks think after a multiple child assassination. Pre-meditated. Even announced it on Facebook!

lashanda-armstrong-facebook

According to her surviving son, ten-year-old Lashaun, she told her kids "I’m sorry, I’m going to do something crazy," and "If I’m going to die, you’re going to die with me." But just before Lashaun escaped the sinking van, she grabbed his pant leg and said, "I made a mistake."

jezebel-sucks-ashandra-armstrong-suicide3While your car is sinking you hold your kid by the pant legs to have a chat? Probably she tried to hold him by the pant leg so he would drown too. My suspicion is confirmed by the MSNBC TV report. Obviously she was not sorry enough so she would try to save the kids.

Initial reports made it sound like Armstrong had intentionally let Lashaun out of the car, but it now appears that he slid out through a window and swam back to shore,

No, she wanted to kill the fourth child too.

The newspaper quoted Ryan as saying that Lashaun’s mother held her children as the minivan slipped into the river, saying: "If I’m going to die, you’re going to die with me." MSNBC

It is the father’s fault!

It is unbelievable. We thought Jezebel was bad. It can get worse:

Epitome Of A Bad Father: Deadbeat Dad Won’t Face Charges Even Though His Restraining Order Violation Drove Ex To Drown Herself And Their Kids

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Jezebel sucks: feminist excuse female child killer LaShanda Armstrong, instantly delete dissent” »
Jezebel sucks: feminist excuse female child killer LaShanda Armstr… » continues here »

Share

"Objectifying gaze" makes helpless women lose math ability. Feminist researchers want to persecute men, not empower women

"Objectifying gaze" (ogling women’s breasts) causes women to helplessly lose their math abilities and get significantly lower math test results. Women who suffer through an objectifying gaze perform worse on math tasks right afterwards. But, interestingly, they are also more willing to accept an invitation by the "perpetrator" of the gaze.

Such findings yielded Feminist research psychologist Professor Dr. Sarah J. Gervais from the University of Nebraska a coveted feminist prize: the Georgia Babladelis Best Paper Award, Psychology of Women (division 35 of the American Psychological   Association), 2010-2011. 

Women Can’t Think When You’re Looking At Our Tits

A blogger’s refreshingly short summary of Dr. Gervais’ research.

Maybe women’s psyche needs to be empowered, so their intelligence does not get derailed by a simple short ogling stare. Empowering women, of course, is not the goal of feminist study. Rather, new laws are needed to further punish and curtail male behavior. Harassment laws already severely restrict free speech at the work place (Freedom of Speech and Appellate Review in Workplace Harassment Cases)

Video showing Objectifying Gaze Research and an interview

Compare  a very insightful Sexual Harassment spoof on YouTube.

Original Research paper

Gervais, S. J. Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (in press).  When what you see is what you get:  The consequences of the objectifying gaze for men and women.  Psychology of Women Quarterly. (abstract, entire pdf)

Winner: Georgia Babladelis Best Paper Award, Psychology of Women (division 35 of the American Psychological   Association), 2010-2011.

Human-Stupidity Analysis

Professor Sarah Gervais’ Subtle Prejudice Lab analyzes subtle prejudice against women while engaging in serious prejudice against men (who need control and punishment) and women (who need protective laws instead of empowerment)

Download objectifying gaze research video with Dr. Gervais

Why women who are ogled at work do not perform as well in the office

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “"Objectifying gaze" makes helpless women lose math ability. Feminist researchers want to persecute men, not empower women” »
"Objectifying gaze" makes helpless women lose math abili… » continues here »

Share