The US senate condemned, with a 99:0 vote, prestigious research in the American Psychological Association journal. The meta analysis showed that in cases of sexual “child abuse”, no damage can be found if no violence has been employed and the victim has at least average intelligence. Yes, even we are shocked, but we are committed to science, not to dogma. Bill Clinton condemned the “Bell Curve” (about racial differences in intelligence) without even reading it. There is strong Repression of research violating dogmas. Underage sex with post-puberty girls (and boys?) was widely legal 150 years ago.
More hysterical nonsense about Cliff Richard and Jimmy Savile. Britain’s witch hunt continues. Famous entertainers get prosecuted for "crimes" they allegedly committed 40 years ago, during the sexually liberated 1960’ies and 70ies. They get charged with alleged "child sex" with 15 year old more than willing "children", or, more absurdly, *rape charges by women who somehow were not able to clearly say "no". These men were so famous, they needed security guards to keep the screeching teenage girls away.
The source accused the police of organising a “fishing expedition”, claiming that the raid had been carried out in an attempt to generate the maximum amount of publicity. Telegraph
The prosecution is based mainly on "mutual corroboration": if 4 women, independently, allege the same type of crime, it must be true. In the case of a common violent criminal this is likely to be true. In the case of a celebrity known by 30 million women, it is quite likely that a few psychologically imbalanced women join the fray. After all, they can earn fame and money. Prosecution is also based on "recovered memories", long debunked by Elisabeth Loftus. And on rape accusations that are most likely false. Cliff Richard, like Rolf Harris and Jimmy Savile, is famous enough that his case was quoted in German "Der Spiegel". Thanks to the antifeminist and his commentators for furnishing further details on the British celebrity sex hysteria.
The friend said: “The whole thing is appalling because what they are doing, they are just going in there making as much noise about it as they can and seeing if anyone comes out of the woodwork to back it up. And if they don’t, they will still have wrecked someone’s life.” Telegraph
It is amazing that the sex hysteria persecution goes against fairly decent men, and not against the 70’ies rock bands that were famous for sexual debauchery with adolescent groupies. Maybe the purpose of these sex witch hunts is to instill fear in the common decent man?
In the sexual liberation of the 60’ies, 70’ies, age of consent was considered repression of the past. A faction of the German Green PartyGerman Green Party openly favored abolition of age of consent laws, the maligned Rind Study showed that no damage can be shown to arise from *consensual_ underage sex.
When will anyone learn that if you carry out a police-media trawl of any and every celebrity, then inevitably a line of variously motivated complainants comes forward? This is just as would be expected no matter how clearly innocent is the target. And they don’t come much more obviously innocent than Cliff Richard.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Cliff Richard’s celebrity persecution for 1980’ies sex crimes” »
Cliff Richard’s celebrity persecution for 1980’ies sex… » continues here »
Ian Thorpe pedophile: Olympic Gold medalist thanks supporters after swell of praise at announcement [Satire] The Independent
Ian Thorpe: I’m finally comfortable saying I am pedophile.
I like 15 year old young women [Satire] The Guardian
We cite the The Guardian article with just slightly changed wording for satirical purposes.
We have to make it very clear that Ian Thorpe is NOT attracted to mature looking 17 or 15 year old women (a crime). This is just a satire to show how homosexuality has become a heroic act, while normal heterosexual attraction to young women years past puberty is a heinous crime.
In an interview with British broadcaster Michael Parkinson screened in Australia, the gold medal winner says that he has dated over 21 year old women in the past but that he is a pedophile.
The correct word would be ephebophile. But thanks to feminist and leftist language manipulation, the word "pedophile" now is incorrectly being used for attraction to 17 year old women, not just to 7 year olds.
Scores of celebrities and members of the public have heaped support on the 31-year-old for his bravery. [The Guardian]
Nor do athletes and celebrities get much support when falsely accused of rape.
Some campaigners have said they pine for the day when nobody cares about a public figure’s sexuality, while others said that his move will provide comfort to those battling with their own.
Barry Taylor, President of the Gay and Lesbian International Sports Association told Ninemsn: “There are a lot of people out there who are distressed at times around their sexuality, but when they have other high-profile people like Ian to look up to they feel okay.”
“For many elite athletes they are told not to come out because it will be a death knell in their career.
Normal heterosexual sexuality can be a death knell.
- Tiger Woods, hypocrisy, moral condemnation of promiscuity
- Tiger Woods: Breach of (Unfair) Contract? Hypocrisy & (Self)-Deception
- Tiger Woods: why can’t he have open marriage and have fun?
Recently a mediocre US football player boosted his carreer by coming out of the closet and saying he is gay. Were he heterosexual, nobody would admire him for his courage. Would he like 17 year old women, he would be arrested.
A few decades ago US police warned Andre Agassi not to touch his underage girl friend tennis star Anna Kournikova while in California.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Ian Thorpe: I’m finally comfortable saying I am pedophile. I like 17 year old young women [Satire]” »
Ian Thorpe: I’m finally comfortable saying I am pedophile. I… » continues here »
Brandan Eich donated US$ 1000 to proposition 8 that won the majority of the votes! That un-PC action was his undoing.
Last week, Bill Maher stirred the pot even more, suggesting that Eich’s resignation was the result of pressure from a "gay mafia." Not surprisingly, Maher’s remarks have since sparked heated social media debate — and some lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights advocates say his words are ripe for misinterpretation.
"What happened in the Brendan Eich situation was actually not as a result of pressure that came from within the LGBT movement," said Freedom to Marry‘s John Becker, who’s also a HuffPost Gay Voices blogger. Noting that Maher has been an outspoken ally to the LGBT community in the past, he added, "This is all about internal pressure from within the Mozilla community itself."
Brendan supported the majority opinion, the proposition that won the popular vote. For this he got mobbed. PC is so pervasive, the gay lobby did not need to act, the political correctness crown acted on their own.
"Inequality: California’s Proposition 8 essentially banned same-sex couples from getting married until it was deemed unconstitutional" 2
Activist and political consultant Scott Wooledge echoed those sentiments, saying that Eich’s resignation was partly due to "pre-existing opposition" from within the Mozilla group, as evidenced by the fact that three board members stepped down ahead of the CEO’s appointment.
Though shalt not oppose gay marriage
The slightest opposition to the complete full unabridged gay agenda gets punished. Teachers get dismissed for opposing teaching homosexuality
Putin’s Olympics almost got boycotted for his opposition to indoctrinate minors with homosexual propaganda. Political correctness always goes a slippery slope. Protect gays from violence was the noble initial motivation. Preventing free speech of people who want to restrict any privilege of gays is the end result. And hate speech laws that formally punish free speech and thought crimes, under the guise of preventing true hate speech that calls for violent action.
PC is amazing: in the 1970’s there were two movements. One to legalize homosexuality and sodomy, and the other to legalize adolescent/child sex. Homosexuality became a protected activity, so much that any doubt is a thought crime. Pedophilia became the worst of all crimes, so everything even remotely connected to it is totally taboo (child porn, teenage sexuality) and a thought crime. The age of consent goes upwards, world wide, so even harmless natural post-pubertal sex of 17 year old "children" and their photos become more and more criminalized.