Posts Tagged political correctness

Lower age of consent to 13. Who is in support of Barbara Hewson?

It is very courageous for Barbara Hewson to out herself as a *child sex apologist. She draws a lot of negativity, unfortunately, very few people agree with her.

Among all the bad press, here a few positive voices

 

Lowering the age of consent merits open debate, not closed minds

[Hanson] made light of what she regards as trivial sexual touching of young people by adults, saying that making an issue of it distracts people from really serious abuse, such as rape. Her view is that there are qualitatively different forms of sex abuse and they shouldn’t be lumped together.

Positive reactions to Barbara Hewson’s proposals are rare. Who dares to favor "child abuse", teenage sexuality, to protect "dirty old men"?

Child Abuse Moral Panic: a dozen great articles from Spiked Magazine

Age of Consent Should Be 13 Says Prominent Barrister | The Antifeminist

Scientific Evidence That Men Dig Barely Legal Chicks

scientists have found that men DO NOT prefer maximally fertile women.

An interesting suggestion how to implement age of consent laws

Ok, fix specific age at 12 or 13, the normal age of puberty (though apparently it is shifting). Make consent completely impossible below this age. From 13 to 18, when the person is legally a minor, give parents authority to demand any relationship stop, without making that relationship automatically illegal. Then, from 13 to 15, impose a maximum age difference of 7 years (beyond which consent is assumed to have been obtained through coercion), where a high burden of proof is needed to make consent valid. Between 3 and 7 years of age difference, decide on a case by case basis (to see if consent was obtained through coercion) and below 3 years of age difference, make it legal. How’s that for specificity? permalink

Judgy Bitch has very refreshing strong opinions:

Should 13 year olds be having sex? Probably not. They shouldn’t be fame whores, either

 

, , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Lower age of consent to 13: Barbara Hewson faces outrage

Lower age of consent! Such a daring proposal by prominent barrister Barbara Hewson exposes her to death and rape threats by the vicious political correctness and sexual panic crowd of today and subjects her to fierce criticism.  In today’s lunacy of ever expanding sex crimes, ever rising age of consent3, a rare voice of reason gets drowned out quickly by the ruling powerful moral panic mongers, led by feminists.

Human-Stupidity wonders where she got the courage to voice such taboo opinions. We encourage all to read Barbara Hewson’s original article and to promote and encourage her views. One such rare positive blog is the antifeminist.

Outrage at barrister who called Stuart Hall’s crimes ‘low level’

  • Barbara Hewson also said aged of consent should be lowered to 13
  • She described Operation Yewtree arrests as a ‘grotesque spectacle’
  • Claimed disgraced Stuart Hall’s crimes were ‘low level misdemeanors’
  • NSPCC said her ‘outdated and simply ill-informed’ views ‘beggars belief’
  • Dr Brooke Magnanti, formerly know as prostitute  Belle de Jour is also fairly negative, in spite of her positive experience with older men she titles her article Making sex legal at 13 is pure lunacy

    Ironically I became very aware of this reality as a second-year student at university, dating someone twice my age. In our case, the problem was not that he took advantage of me – far from it – but rather that the age difference meant our expectations and hopes for dating were very different. To me, he was a cool, smart guy with his own flat and car. Score! What it took me much longer to see is that he was losing out by getting involved with someone who expected casual dating, not a potential long term partner. Not too long after we split, he married…someone his own age. (We’re still friends by the way. At least he saved me from having to ever date any 18-year-old boys.)

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Lower age of consent to 13: Barbara Hewson faces outrage » continues here »

, , , , , , ,

2 Comments

Lower age of consent to 13. Yes! Barbara Hewson, lone voice of reason

      Barbara Hewson has the courage to make such suggestions in today’s sex hysterical climate. Unfortunately, she is alone, against the hysterical masses, the mainstream press and loud feminists and so called child protection agencies.

      the most remarkable facet of the Savile scandal is how adult complainants are invited to act like children. Hence we have witnessed the strange spectacle of mature adults calling a children’s charity to complain about the distant past.

      The acute problems of proof which stale allegations entail also generates a demand that criminal courts should afford accusers therapy, by giving them ‘a voice’. This function is far removed from the courts’ traditional role, in which the state must prove defendants guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

      Constitutional rights to due process have been abolished for men.

      What this infantilising of adult complainants ultimately requires is that we re-model our criminal-justice system on child-welfare courts. These courts (as I have written in spiked previously) have for some decades now applied a model of therapeutic jurisprudence, in which ‘the best interests of the child’ are paramount.

      It is depressing, but true, that many reforms introduced in the name of child protection involve sweeping attacks on fundamental Anglo-American legal rights and safeguards, such as the presumption of innocence. This has ominous consequences for the rule of law, as US judge Arthur Christean pointed out: ‘Therapeutic jurisprudence marks a major and in many ways a truly radical shift in the historic function of courts of law and the basic purpose for which they have been established under our form of government. It also marks a fundamental shift in judges’ loyalty away from principles of due process and toward particular social policies. These policies are less concerned with judicial impartiality and fair hearings and more concerned with achieving particular results…

      The therapeutic model has certain analogies with a Soviet-style conception of justice, which emphasizes outcomes over processes.    Yewtree is destroying the rule of law

      Courageous words for a famous lawyer

      Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
      Lower age of consent to 13. Yes! Barbara Hewson, lone voice of rea… » continues here »

      , , , , , , ,

      5 Comments

      UN demands Germany repress free Speech. Political Correctness rules the world

      When former Berlin politician Thilo Sarrazin made critical remarks about Muslim immigrants four years ago, many found them offensive, though prosecutors rejected complaints, citing free speech laws. A UN committee disagrees, however, and has accused Germany of violating an anti-racism convention.
      Battling Racism: UN Body Reprimands Germany over Sarrazin Comments

      An United Nations committee, empowered by an international treaty, DEMANDS Germany to take legal action against free speech of prominent dissident Thilo Sarrazin, a former Central Bank chief.

      Political correctness is installing a world wide dictatorship, undoing human liberties, civil and human rights dozens of generations of men fought to attain. This is a return to the middle age inquisition.

      A United Nations committee has reprimanded Germany in strong language, saying that the country had violated an international anti-racism convention.

      At issue are controversial statements made in 2009 by Thilo Sarrazin, a former finance senator for the city-state of Berlin, about Turks and Arabs, who he said sponged off the state and were incapable of integrating, among other things. But a complaint submitted to public prosecutors in Berlin was rejected on grounds that the comments were permissible under Germany’s freedom of expression law. An appeal to the decision was rejected as well.

      According to the UN’s Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), however, this constituted a violation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, because it failed to conduct an "effective investigation" into the matter.

      "This is a historic decision," said the TBB Turkish Union, the cultural organization that submitted the case to the committee, in a statement on Thursday. "CERD has determined that Mr. Sarrazin’s comments touch on a feeling of racist superiority or racial hatred and contain elements of incitement to racial discrimination."
      Battling Racism: UN Body Reprimands Germany over Sarrazin Comments

      Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
      UN demands Germany repress free Speech. Political Correctness rule… » continues here »

      , , , , , , , , ,

      No Comments

      Nordic Countries to criminalize antifeminist speech.

      Criminalize anti-feminist statements in the public debate, just as hate speech is criminalized today. A tax-funded Nordic expert group of 35 experts on anti-feminism and right-wing extremism proposed this in a report to the Norwegian government.. N1

      make-criticism-of-feminism-a-hate-crime-25.3.2013Opposing feminism will soon be a crime?

      1. Feminism already falsifies academic research, even with violence
      2. abolished  due process in legal proceedings against men
      3. re-introduced debtor’s prison.
      4. Feminism is now planning the final solution of the male question.

      Soon all opponents of feminism  can be persecuted by the feminist grand inquisitor?

      - We believe that the legislation is too weak to counter the wave of anti-feminist threats, says CEO Reforms Are Saastad to NRK.no.  Nyheter

      Norway secretary of state is looking at the proposal favorably:

      State Secretary Ahmad Ghani Zadeh believes that it is appropriate to punish threats and harassment based on sex, as proposed by the committee. [...]

      It is necessary to look at. I think it is a very good initiative that comes from expert committee, commenting Ghani Zadeh.

      Though some utterances are gender neutral, we know that feminist threats and violence against men, are never opposed by courts and governments. On the contrary, women can avail themselves of proxy violence through police and common men.  With impunity they can engage in false rape accusations, defend Lorena Bobbitt, put men in debtor’s prison etc.

      The proponents of the anti-anti-feminism laws honestly state that they fight ANTIFEMINISM

      What is anti-feminism?

      Reforms leader admits that the definition is difficult, but in the report they write the following:

      Anti Feminism is:

      • attitude, behavior and action.
      • opposition to feminism and equality.
      • a desire to recreate a hierarchical social order in which heterosexual men are privileged.
      • resistance to challenge gender, sexuality and race categories. Nyheter

      With such laws, University of Toronto feminists would not need to resort to violent blockades. Rather they could get Warren Farrell arrested, so he can not speak about male suicide and feminist repression. After all, he is against "equality", against quotas for less qualified women and against equal pay for unequal work. He also wants privilege for heterosexual men who choose more relevant career in STEM fields and work harder.

      Men who harass, bully and threaten female debaters and feminists over the internet belong Into the category of "anti-feminists" . We can also include men debating equality through unfair and aggressive statements. NRK.NO

      Women who harass, bully and threaten Erin Pizzey, of course, belong into the category of state sanctioned feminists. This is why feminist extremists  SCUM writers and "all men are rapists" hate authors are never mentioned nor prosecuted.

      Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
      Nordic Countries to criminalize antifeminist speech. » continues here »

      , , , ,

      4 Comments

      More proof of George Zimmermann’s self defense and innocence. A book review.

      George Zimmerman declines ‘stand your ground’ hearing.

      "We decided to focus on the idea that George wants to have a jury of his peers decide his case," O’Mara told reporters, according to the Associated Press. "And it’s going to be, I think, a more accepted result for everyone who has to accept the result — that he gets an acquittal at trial, more so than an immunity hearing given by a judge."

      Everyone knows that no judge can afford to let Zimmermann go, or else risk rioting, looting, and lose re-election. So he can not easily be acquitted:

      George Zimmermann killed Trayvon Martin, after getting his nose broken, the back of his head seriously banged up. In violation of the iron legal maxim "Don’t talk to Cops" he totally cooperated with police, proving that he was acting in self defense. Not one lie, no contradiction was found in his testimony.

      An outcry of Black fanatism, including president Obama’s infamous meddling in a police case: "If I had a son he would look like Trayvon", caused the case to be re-opened. George Zimmermann was evicted from his college, is in hiding from unpunished New Black Panthers mob violence,  He is totally broke from legal expenses.

      The reason for Florida’s "stand your ground" laws was exactly to spare good men – who act in self defense – the ruinous expense to hire a lawyer.

       

      Forensic evidence both supports, casts doubt on Zimmerman claims

      • based on the times and distances Zimmerman said he covered, Zimmerman would have still been on the phone with Sanford police when he claims he was attacked by Martin;

      Interestingly, Michael Knox desperately tries to look unbiased. Because the facts are so overwhelmingly in George’s favor. So he finds every little straw that casts light doubt upon George. If George stopped a while to look around, that is enough to explain why he was not back to his car.

      • had Martin walked directly to his destination, his father’s girlfriend’s townhome, he would have made it there safely before Zimmerman ended his nonemergency call to Sanford police;

      It is harder to explain why Martin had backed up and returned, instead of just simply going home.

      • Martin was in fact leaning over Zimmerman when the fatal shot was fired, just as Zimmerman has maintained.

      To reach that last conclusion, Knox examined both a Florida Department of Law Enforcement report on the gunshot’s impact to the hooded sweatshirt Martin was wearing and the autopsy report describing the gunshot wound to the body.

      The medical examiner determined the gunshot was fired from "intermediate range," but the hoodie showed a "contact" shot, indicating the muzzle of Zimmerman’s gun was touching or extremely close to the fabric when the shot was fired.

      Knox explained that the loose fitting sweatshirt was farther away from the body because of gravity, which pulled it down as Martin was situated above Zimmerman.

      That is consistent with Zimmerman’s claim that he was on his back struggling with Martin when he reached for the gun, pointed it upward and fired, Knox said.

      "We look at the physical evidence and then we say, ‘What does it tell us?’" said Knox, who before his 2010 retirement testified often for the same state attorney’s office that was specially appointed by the governor to prosecute Zimmerman.

      Knox also says that Zimmermann could have gotten back to his car before the struggle, and Trayvon Martin could have easily gotten home. Of course, neither of the two would be obliged to do so. And Zimmermann had more reasons to stand, linger, wait and look. Trayvon Martin would have more reason to walk a quarter of a mile to get home and out of the rain.

      More than 2:30 passes between the time Zimmerman hung up with Sanford police (7:13:39) and when a neighbor who heard the commotion connected with a 911 operator (7:16:11). The struggles continues on that call for 45 seconds, until the fatal gunshot is heard at 7:16:56.

       

      The evidence against George Zimmermann?
      Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
      More proof of George Zimmermann’s self defense and innocence… » continues here »

      , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

      6 Comments

      George Zimmermann – Trayvon Martin re-visited: Black youth DeAndre Felton was killed in clear self defense

      DeAndre Felton was killed by a white man in clear self defense. No arrest was made. All people present, including DeAndre’s friends confirmed that he had attacked his killer with the intent to create trouble.

      In spite of such clear evidence, we can see the typical black posturing about the "poor kid" that was killed, without mentioning the child’s criminal intent and attitude.

      The evidence favoring George Zimmermann  is not quite as strong, though his story proved consistent and non-contradictory.

      Of course, we must not defend racial profiling nor mention a long list of black criminality which is a multiple of white violent criminality

      Police Report: Witnesses gave consistent accounts as to what happened prior to. during, and after the
      incident. They alleged that DeAndre Felton and the 13-year-old male had been with
      them, as a group, at the Westfield Shopping Town Plaza (Meriden Square) on Lewis
      Avenue prior to the incident. When the mall closed, the group gathered in the parking lot
      of the mall, where DeAndre and the 13 year old, whom the witnesses claimed were both
      "high," made statements to the effect that they wanted to "look for trouble" and "beat
      someone up."

      According to the witnesses, the group walked across Lewis Avenue and entered the north
      parking lot of Midstate Medical Center. As they began to exit through the pedestrian
      access gate leading to Kensington Avenue, Felton and the 13 year old suddenly broke
      away from the group and began running east along Kensington Avenue, where they
      jumped a male from behind and began assaulting him. The witnesses disclaimed any
      prior knowledge that this attack was going to take place. Moments later, Felton and the
      13 year old ran back to the group, where they collapsed from stab wounds. The other
      male involved in the incident ran away in the opposite direction.

       

      Black mob picks on ‘The Wrong Guy’: ‘Knockout Game’ results backfire when ‘victim’ is armed  2 

      "The plan was I was going to go to his house and get picked up there to meet his parents," she told Eyewitness News. Standish said her cousins were with Felton and Jones when they were stabbed.

      "They said they (Felton and Jones) were looking for trouble," Standish said.    3

       

      Striking similarities with George Zimmermann case

      Sounds very much like George Zimmermann. The killer was very cooperative, says police. Police was convinced that it was self defense. Witnesses consistently testify the "youth" were looking for trouble and attacked.

      And no, black activist don’t bemoan the criminal attitude of the black youth. Rather the usual blabbering that the poor little child is innocent, even though his own friends implicated him as a drugged violent aggressor.

      Blacks are always victims. Even if everyone can testify that they were the attacker. No sense of justice. Fellow Blacks get defended unconditionally, no matter how heinously criminal they are.  Very rare the attitude of reverend Manning, the rare Black who blames Blacks for their own misfortune they bring about themselves.

      Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
      George Zimmermann – Trayvon Martin re-visited: Black youth D… » continues here »

      , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

      3 Comments

      George Zimmermann cannot have a fair trial, due to unchecked black intimidation, black violence, black racism, and biased press

      George Zimmermann cooperated totally with police and clearly convinced them that he was attacked and injured by Trayvon Martin and had to kill him in self defense.. Due to black pressure, including US president Obama, who said, if he had a son, he would look like Trayvon Martin, who seems to have a long history of schools suspension for drug use, graffiti, and more. We wish Obama’s sons had better character, and the chief executive  would not interfere in legal court cases..We also wish Barrack H. Obama were concerned with  the  violent New Black Panther Party and various black hate criminals that have severely beaten whites in revenge for Trayvon Martin.

       

      Judges are not free to dismiss the case or to acquit, for fear of riots, losing re-election and for their own safety

      Quote from the video:

      "Because this case has created so much anger and tension and dissension in our country, I don’t think that this judge, at a hearing is going to dismiss the case. [...] For a judge to throw the case out before it gets to a jury of his peers would just be the unthinkable, it would cause so much national anger"

      Say it! Blacks would riot, loot, burn down large parts of the cities, ironically the parts where they live, like in the Rodney King case.

       

      Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
      George Zimmermann cannot have a fair trial, due to unchecked black… » continues here »

      , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

      No Comments

      Switch to our mobile site