‘I Didn’t Want To Appear Racist’ and thus did not pursue child abuse and rapes perpetrated by Pakistanis, say British police.
Up to 1,400 children were sexually exploited in Rotherham. Children as young as 11 were trafficked, beaten, and raped by large numbers of men between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, a review into child protection has revealed.
How could this have happened? A clue is given by the report’s authors, who state that ‘several staff their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist’.
So "minorities" have free reign to pursue rape, child abuse, and statutory rape, whole sale and over decades!
Feminist women are only interested in exotic types of *consensual rape, date rape, rape culture of drunk college girls repenting what they did the evening before. Race is no boundary, black athletes routinely get persecuted, prosecuted, and convicted. But if rape is exclusively perpetrated by a "protected class", then feminists shut up.
Real, violent rape is of no interest to feminists. Very interesting.
In Rotherham there is a real-life “rape culture.” But you will not learn anything new about it from Salon, the Daily Beast, Jezebel, or Slate. It has gone unmentioned at Feministing, Bitch Media, or the Feminist Majority Foundation. There have been no outraged op-eds from Jenny Kutner, Jessica Valenti, or Samantha Leigh Allen.
Hate speech laws started with the good intention to prevent inciting violence: "Kill Blacks, gays, …..". Since then they went down a slippery slope, where a harmlessly uttered private opinion can ruin careers
Donald Sterling punished for slight offense to over-sensitive Blacks
Geert Wilders in court for offending Muslims (who threaten his life and already killed Theo van Gogh)
Sadly, "privileged whites" heaping bananas on a black soccer player’s car is a much worse crime then "repressed Blacks expressing justified anger" throwing cobble stones or Molotov cocktails onto police and burning down neighborhoods of London, Paris, or Los Angeles.
"Underprivileged groups" have the privilege to use violence with impunity. "Privileged White heterosexuals" have no free speech rights and get imprisoned for non-violent speech. Our legal system is back to the middle ages. Of course, academic researchers like J. Philippe Rushton or Arthur Jensen also get threatened with impunity, and the New Black Panther party can publicly threaten the life innocent "white" Hispanic George Zimmerman.
A former local election candidate for the far-right Front National (FN) in France has been sentenced to nine months in prison for comparing the country’s justice minister, who is black, to an ape.
Anne-Sophie Leclere provoked a storm last year when she compared Christiane Taubira to an ape on French television and posted a photomontage on Facebook that showed the justice minister, who is from French Guiana, alongside a baby chimpanzee. The caption under the baby ape said "At 18 months", and the one below Taubira’s photograph read "Now".
Leclere was an FN candidate in Rethel, in the eastern Ardennes region, for the 2014 local elections, but the FN soon dropped her and went on to do well in the March polls.
On Tuesday, a court in Cayenne, French Guiana’s capital, sentenced her to nine months in jail, banned her from standing for election for five years, and imposed a €50,000 (£39,500) fine. French Guiana is an overseas département of France and is inside the European Union.
French Guiana in South America is part of the European Union? Amazing. And a court in South America censors speech in Europe. Shocking. And they can not find a lawyer in South America who would defend her? Appalling!
It also handed the FN a €30,000 fine, putting an end to a case brought by French Guiana’s Walwari political party, founded by Taubira.
The court went well beyond the demands of prosecutors, who had asked for a four-month jail sentence and a €5,000 fine.
A political statement by South American judge who enjoys his power over European politics. Shocking
Clippers owner Donald Sterling banned for life from NBA, fined $2.5 million by NBA.
A disgruntled girl friend illegally recorded hundreds of hours of private conversation.
With effort she managed to coax Donald Sterling to state a personal preference that he prefers her not to post photos of herself with Blacks on instagram and not bring Blacks to his games.
Otherwise he says, she can to whatever she likes, go with Blacks, have sex with them, love them, anything. Donald Sterling loves Blacks, pays millions to Black players and coaches, has White players under-represented in his team.
She tried her best to get him to say bad things about Blacks, but she did not manage. He only voiced a personal private preference for his girl friend’s public behavior.
Donald Sterling did not say anything politically incorrect about race and iq, black crime, the need for white quotas in black dominated US pro sports, or the problem of non-mulatto Black coaches in the NBA. Or criminal involvement of players:
Still, Donald Sterling was seriously punished for private conversations in his own house, No sanctions for recording in violation of state law. 
Nevertheless, when nonsense like stupid racial remarks by Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and Clippers boss Donald Sterling can consume the nation’s conversation for a full week, it does raise a far more disturbing question:
Is America still a serious country?
Black Privilege: Blacks promoting genocide and killing of Whites is acceptable
- Though shalt not dispute or oppose teaching of homosexuality in schools
- PC madness: Steve Martin’s Lasonia joke offensive to Blacks
- Though shalt not dispute or oppose teaching of homosexuality in schools
- Obama-with-banana picture: freedom of expression in Russia vs. PC madness in USA
- Olympic political correctness: though shalt not pose with weapons, befriend rightists or joke about Blacks
- Olympian Voula Papachristou banned for a joke ‘very bitter and upset’. Dictatorship of political correctness destroys lives and freedom.
- Racist joke by stand up comedian: theater owner arrested in Brazil
- Trayvon Martin, black rage and political correctness
- Brazil votes to criminalize homophobia. Political correctness threatens freedom of expression & research
- Medical research and treament for Blacks hampered by "race does not exist" dogma
- Geert Wilders in court for offending Muslims (who threaten his life and already killed Theo van Gogh)
Arthur Jensen, a University of California, Berkeley professor whose scholarly contributions to the field of psychological measurement were often overshadowed by the furor over his findings on race-based differences in intelligence, has died. He was 89.
Arthur Jensen died on Oct. 22, 2012.
Arthur Jensen said genetic differences accounted for IQ gap between whites, blacks.
Arthur Jensen had stumbled over the truth. The inconvenient truth, that must not be said, because it contradicts political correctness‘ decrees. Publishing and interpreting taboo scientific findings caused a lot of hostility towards Jensen.
One of the most provocative figures in 20th-century psychology, Mr. Jensen died Oct. 22 at his home in the Northern California town of Kelseyville. He had Parkinson’s disease and other ailments, said his son-in-law Joe Morey.
This is Black culture? Just found these scary videos, with hundreds of thousands of views each.
Any doubt that a white boy, venturing into a group of these people would be an instant victim of racial profiling ??
Add such bad cultural influence to the widely proven genetic differences in IQ and criminality (see links below) and you get terrible results.
These videos show the "justified Black rage" about 200-year-ago slavery that entitles Blacks to riot, burn down entire cities and violently attack in "self defense" when suspected of a crime
Rap music is an example how to have financial success without need for high IQ. Whites with similar lyrics languish in European prisons for violating hate speech laws, like the authors of "Affen nach Africa" (Apes back to Africa).
I now understand Reverend Manning‘s concerns about the Black Race and the immorality of rap.
"South Africa has become the world’s biggest ghetto, because wherever Black people are in charge, they turn it into a Ghetto.". "Covering up the truth does not cure the problem: Black people are the problem". […] Wherever they are the mayor, in Detroit, Philadelphia, Baltimore, in Washington, they turn them into Ghettoes" bemoans Reverend Dr. James David Manning at 38 min.
If a white man said such things there would be black riots
Reverend Dr.James David Manning tells the naked truth. He says what no white man could ever say. He speaks the truth, with profound sadness. He is a well meaning black man who wants the best for his fellow Blacks, He bemoans Black attitudes of crime, lack of industriousness, abandonment of wives and children, and attitudes of blaming whites and slavery, instead of blaming themselves. He wants to fix Blacks, he wants them to thrive, to be productive and successful.
Reverend Dr. James David Manning uses tough love. He wishes the Best. But he thinks truth is the way.
This is so refreshingly different from political correctness that creates speech codes (like the press hiding the race of criminals) and hides or outright falsifies data and prevents academic researchers from telling the truth and silence even eminent Nobel Prize Laureate geneticist James Watson.
He wants them to take care of family, raising healthy moral kids with a full family, improve the lot of Blacks. He wants them to do more then request government handouts and blame slavery for Black poverty, Black crime, and failure.
An Australian airline’s policy prohibiting black passengers from sitting next to kids traveling alone has fueled a social media firestorm and caused the company to review the rule..
Which raises more questions such as:
Should black men be allowed to sit next to white women?
Blacks are a protected class and must not be discriminated against. So you know that these headline is just a "joke" to get your attention.
But "males" are not a protected class. One can discriminate at will against men. So watch how the following headline looks much more acceptable. In our headline we just changed the word "male" for "black"
This identical question is from reputable and politically correct CNN.com:
An Australian airline’s policy prohibiting male passengers from sitting next to kids traveling alone has fueled a social media firestorm and caused the company to review the rule.
It is unusual that this is causing a firestorm. Because such policies have been in force everywhere. Including rules that fathers get accosted for photographing their own daughters or for shopping in little girls’ lingerie departments.
We need to get across to anyone willing to listen that under the guise of protecting children, policies like this do terrible damage to them. When we institutionalize the notion that men aren’t fit to be around children, we do nothing but solidify eons-old gender stereotypes that keep men from assuming their proper roles as co-parents and that confine them to the workplace. And since someone has to take care of the children, that task will continue to fall to women, as it always has. No one benefits from this wrong-headed policy, least of all our kids.
Virgin Airlines ordered Fireman Johnny McGirr to sit away from unaccompanied minor and change seats with a woman
An Australian airline is reviewing its policy prohibiting men from sitting next to a child flying alone after a Sydney fireman complained about being removed from his seat on a flight earlier this year.
It is well-known that while flying home on Virgin Australia from Brisbane in April, a 33-year-old man was forced to move his seat because he was sitting next to two boys he estimated to be aged between eight and ten, and it is against the airline’s policy for men to sit next to unaccompanied children. USA Today
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Should black passengers be allowed to sit next to unaccompanied children? (Virgin Airlines ordered Fireman Johnny McGirr to sit away from unaccompanied minor)” »
Should black passengers be allowed to sit next to unaccompanied ch… » continues here »
Blacks are the only participants in Olympic 100 m running finals, be it men’s or women’s final dashes. We dare to say the obvious, though politically incorrect and taboo.
We tried to search Google about the races (Black, White, Asian, Hispanic) of the finalists, but this is hard to find. The runners here look black. It is not politically correct to mention race, much less to ask why all the finalists are Black. Wikipedia told us
Ivet Lalova the tenth fastest woman in 100 metres history, the fastest white woman in the world, and finished fourth in the 100 metres and fifth in the 200 metres at the 2004 Summer Olympics.
Talking about race is a politically incorrect no-no, so much that
One may not talk about black race, iq, crime, or racing prowess.
We do predict confidently:
Among the top 70 under 10 second runners, the only White man is Christophe Lemaitre.
When Blacks are under-represented in academic pursuits, in elite colleges, in top CEO ranks, then automatically discrimination is the presumed culprit. Race and IQ is a taboo topic. So conventional wisdom would deny any relation between race and running ability. In other words, the only acceptable explanation for lack of Whites and Asians is: Whites and Asians must be discriminated against in 100 meter running.
Whites and Asians should demand protective racial quotas. 50% of Olympic finalists should be White and Asians. Just as police officers, CEO’s, students at elite colleges have black quotas. And women in Norway and Sweden have quotas for CEO’s and politicians.