Posts tagged ‘rape laws’

I renounce all my female legal and societal privilege, in in an irrevocable, legally binding notarized declaration.  As a strong, empowered woman, I am deeply offended by unequal treatment on the basis of gender on issues, like lifetime alimony, child support, DNA testing and paternity fraud, "domestic violence only against women act", rape shield and harassment laws. I can not change feminist anti-male laws. But I can renounce my female privilege [12] [13] [14] and I suggest every honest egalitarian woman to do the same. 


I hereby irrevocably renounce any privileges I enjoy by virtue of my female gender [6]
and I refuse to engage in discrimination against men [7].  Especially
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘I renounce my Female Legal Privileges’ » »
I renounce my Female Legal Privileges » continues here »

Share

10 Reasons False Rape Accusations are Common by AVoiceForMaleStudents is a very detailed analysis that lists most evidence, be it scientific data or statements by unbiased experts in the field.

police will occasionally show off-the-cuff candor. After investigating a woman’s claim that turned out to be false, Captain Randy Lewis of Rexburg PD told reporters that “we run into that all the time” [2]. After a similar investigation Captain Lynn Mitchell of the U Police said “Rape is a very ugly, violent crime which law enforcement and the community take very seriously. However, there are many fraudulent reports of rape each year” [3].

After a woman falsely accused a man of rape in Orlando, FL, police told local news reporters that false reporting “has reached an epidemic level” [4]. They then made a point to ask the community stop making so many false rape claims because it was draining precious resources from the criminal justice system [5].

Sgt. Sandra Tomeo of Plano PD told reporters for the Plano Star Courier that false rape accusations were “a common occurrence,” citing numbers indicating that ~47% of rape accusations made to Plano, TX police were demonstrably false [6].

Rarely do we discuss the large number of men that are in prison because they could NOT prove their innocence against a false rape accusation. There is no due process in rape accusations, so many men are in prison because they were not lucky enough to videotape the sex act, or to get a loving kiss by the lying victim right in front of a surveillance camera.

Add to this the men that are in prison due to absurd feminist re-definition of *rape. Regret is not rape: lessons from an old-school Feminist

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Over 40% of rape accusations are false’ » »
Over 40% of rape accusations are false » continues here »

Share

Feminist rape hysteria re-defines and extends rape definitions with manipulative language, abolishes due process, and infantilizes women whose enthusiastic consent is frequently invalid. The goal is to convict as many men as possible, for the most flimsy and unproven accusations, even if the alleged crime stems from the 1970’ies. False rape revenge accusations are always to be believed and to be taken at face value, liars almost never punished.

Britain’s Spiked-Online is one of the few sites opposing the rape hysteria. We recommend clicking on the links to read the  following articles in their entirety, also Barbara Hewson‘s writings.

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 declared that consent must be ‘active, not passive’; in rape cases, consent is now taken to mean agreement rather than the absence of a refusal. So if a woman goes along with sex, but doesn’t make it explicitly clear that she is actively consenting to it, it can be deemed to be rape. The government has even moved towards ensuring that no agreement can be taken as consent if it is given under the influence of alcohol.  [1]

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Rape Hysteria’s legal proceedings questioned by Spiked Online’ » »
Rape Hysteria’s legal proceedings questioned by Spiked Onlin… » continues here »

Share
Teacher Horst Arnold served his 5 year prison term for rape to the very last day. Soon thereafter a high court declared him obviously innocent and the accusations blatantly false. Still, he was not reinstated to the job he had lost. His false accuser, still anonymous, escapes financial damages by infinite appeals, using government paid lawyers. The real victim of her false accusations has to pay legal fees and thus threw the towel. The false accuser still receives government pension but applied legal trickery to make sure the victim of her accusation can never get at that money.

 


The teacher Heidi K. falsely accused her now deceased colleague Horst Arnold of rape. Arnold had five years in prison, was acquitted recently. Shortly thereafter, he died. Now it is official: Heidi K. will not have to pay damages to his daughter.

  • Even now, the false accuser’s last name is secret. "Heidi K". She is photographed with her face covered.  And the falsely convicted victim’s name is public.  It is disgusting.
  • The case of the teacher Horst Arnold,  accused wrongly of rape,  was one of the most spectacular miscarriages of justice in recent history. His colleague, Heidi K. had brought him to court, he was jailed, was later acquitted, but died shortly afterwards.

    The formerly in shape sports teacher died a broken man, having lost his house, money, job, reputation and health after an unjust 5 year prison term

    Horst Arnold’s daughter Heidi K. sued for damages. Now it is official: Heidi K. will not have to pay. Heidi K. gave up, due to excessive legal costs and small chance to actually receive the financial compensation.

    False accuser gets 5 1/2 years in prison for 5 year imprisonment of an innocent man

    Here is the good news: Heidi K got a 5 1/2 years prison term as a notorious and patholgical liar, pending appeal. (German). She  still remains anonymous and shamelessly uses government-paid lawyers to avoid paying her victim’s heirs. She was sentenced for false imprisonment. She could not be prosecuted for false accusations due to statute of limitations.

     

    Perverted Justice system imprisons innocent men with no due process 

    This begs the question: how has feminist rape hysteria managed to totally pervert due process in  our justice system , that any psychologically deranged woman can get a decent law abiding man into prison with the most absurd and incoherent rape accusations.

    In the original rape trial "the prosecution could not present any conclusive evidence, but the court believed Heidi K., amd followed their presentation in full. [...] She had Charisma and could convince people. In her tears, evidence seemed to crystalize" [4] Impeccably groomed Heidi K. had taught class, minutes after the alleged rape in a much frequented room, after an alleged escape over a fire ladder and vomiting. Her anal fissure was found in her second medical exam, non-existent in the first exam. She alleged to have been threatened by the accused, a week after the fake rape. But the accuse had a good alibi he was in prison. In spite of such glaring inconsistencies, Horst Arnold was convicted. Felow teachers became suspicious only after several more years of Heidi K. telling fabulous stories that would make Baron von Münchhausen blush. The erroneous expert witnesses, and shoddy justice officials suffered no punishment at all. [4 5]

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to falsely imprisoned Horst Arnold’ » »
    Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to fals… » continues here »

    Share

    "Please stop", he begged her. "I already came, I am tired, I need to sleep". To no avail. 19 year old Maria (name has been changed) will not take no for an answer. She straddles his face, pushes her pussy onto his mouth, taking his breath away: " Make me come!"  she demands of the groggy, sleepy, half drunk Paul (name has been changed). After one screaming orgasm, she puts a condom on his member and rides herself, cowgirl style, to another orgasm, over Paul’s protests.

    During the first 290 rapes (or "sexual assaults" , in some jurisdictions) Paul did not know he was a victim of rape, or felony sexual assault. That the constant barrage of sexual assaults by a gorgeous 19 year old blonde was deeply traumatizing for him. and would scar him for life. He was unaware that he was a date rape or marital rape survivor.

    He already knew that feminists had re-defined rape.  That consent could be withdrawn at any moment. That "No means No". That a man got convicted for 5 second *rape because he stopped only 5 seconds after the hitherto consenting girl said "stop".

    Still Paul was unaware that he was a rape victim. He thought that rape hysteria was a feminist ruse.

    Then he started reading avoiceformen and r/mensrights. The leading men’s rights web sites. There he found out that MRA actually agree with most of the feminist rape hysteria,  as long as pretty 25 year old female cheer leaders also get punished [4] for having sex with  220 pound 17 year old adolescent football player hunk victims.  

    He read how boys and men are frequent rape victims:  Boys raped more often than girls. Eivind Berge The Antifeminist

    Paul is still getting raped almost daily, but now he is aware that he is a victim of a terrible crime. Paul is asking for your advice:

    1. Is he actually getting raped or sexually assaulted?
    2. Is he traumatized for life
    3. Should he go to police and press charges against his abuser?
    4. Will he be believed? You know, women never lie about rape. But will they think men lie about rape (sexual assault).
    5. Should he record the sex act and his protests, to have PROOF of the vile crime he suffers from?
    6. Should he just enjoy the sex and then, a few years later, file charges of rape, like many women do nowadays? Or 40 years later, like in the Saville case
    7. He actually likes the sex in the morning. It is rape only in the evening. If she goes to prison for many years, he will miss it.  (this is not a joke; there was a case where a woman pressed rape charges. Among 30 sex acts, only #25 and #18 were rapes, the others, she confided, were consensual)

    Please answer the questions  in the comments below

     

    Further comments and questions

    1. Be aware, if the "victim" was a woman, the male "rapist" would be convicted, no doubt.
    2. Should MRA (men’s rights activists) be only concerned to make sure that a woman "rapist" would be treated with equal rigor. Or should MRA actually be concerned to keep men out of prison for travesties like 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it cost him 8 years in prison. Note too that feminists are seriously concerned with keeping female husband assassins out of prison and successfully do so: How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls’ Licence to Kill) .
    3. According to Human-Stupidity’s research, most sexually active heterosexual men suffered "rape" episodes like the above. Remember: once you say now, even in the slightest way, consensual sex becomes RAPE: Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to go home", says California Supreme Court..
    4. Please report if you were victim or perpetrator of such rape, or if this never happened in your life.
    Share

    Unlike advocates for other races,
    white advocates are called “racists” instead of "civil rights leaders"

    How dare one to call Al Sharpton a racist. Instead of hiring a white fire fighter, demanding special privileges to hire Blacks that otherwise would not qualify for a job. That, of course, is defense of "civil rights".

    “My former radical beliefs alienated me from some of my own family. My children were bullied by blacks in public schools. I told my seven year old daughter that the reason black kids were sometimes mean to her was because of her own white privilege, and that she must have acted superior or treated them rudely. I told her I was ashamed to have a daughter like her. I forced her to attend a dangerous predominately non-white school because of my own narrow ideological convictions. To her I apologize. What I did was nothing less than child abuse, and after several school shootings and racial incidents between blacks and Hispanics, I am truly thankful she is still alive. Ideas have real consequences, and my former views can and do cause great harm. All too often, children pay the price for their parents progressive values. That’s one reason that I felt I could not fail to speak out. A sense of moral obligation compels me to give this talk.”

    speciesism01Similarly, demanding hiring female fire fighters who don’t have the strength to do the job, is a noble feminist goal of ‘equality’

    Of course, there is an easy solution to the problem: Have some competent male fire fighters self identify as females and Blacks. After all, gender and race are socially determined and thus every individual is free to choose.

     

    When asked "what is your gender", feel free to always choose "female"

    I am of the male sex. Whenever a form asks my gender, I reply "female". After all it is my prerogative to decide on my gender identity, and I would not want to be associated with the patriarchy.

     

    Six Year Old Transgendered Girl Suffers From Hate Crime In School Restroom

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Anti PC Humor and Satire: Diversity Chronicle jokes about Political Correctness’ » »
    Anti PC Humor and Satire: Diversity Chronicle jokes about Politica… » continues here »

    Share

    Feminist and PC (political correctness) language abuse have no bounds: a false rape accuser is a "victim", often her face is still pixelated in photos, to protect her victim identity.

    Rarely is it said that she is the lying perjuring aggressor, who wreaked havoc on the life of an innocent falsely accused man, and wasted  police time pursuing a false  crime report. Of course, by feminist creed, women are never to blame for their crimes and misdeeds.

    Campus activists say their university perpetuated ‘victim blaming’ because of the way it handled — a false rape claim:

    Campus activists say their university perpetuated ‘victim blaming’ because of the way it handled — a false rape   claim

    We pause to allow you to do a double-take. The president of the Feminist Action League is upset because a crime alert regarding a false sexual assault put emphasis on "something other than the attack."  Um, there was no attack. And note that the president of the Feminist Action League is not upset because a crime alert was issued over a false sexual assault claim.

    It is typical for political correctness and lying feminist theory that facts don’t count. The woman is a victim, always, no exception. If she is a murderess, she is a victim and suffers from battered woman syndrome. If she made a false rape report, the man can learn from the experience of being in jail and getting threatened and possibly raped by hard core criminal inmates.

    The school newspaper has written an article using the false report to help raise awareness about . . . sexual assault.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘False rape accusers are "victims" in need for protection and anonymity’ » »
    False rape accusers are "victims" in need for protection… » continues here »

    Share

    The main stream of the men’s rights movement is not worried about men’s sexual freedom. Notable exceptions are the antifeminist and sites linked in his right side bar.

    The following post is about the internal rift between the father’s rights main wing of MRA, and the few true men’s rights activists that want to free men from persecution for normal male sexuality.

    Google "Paul Elam jury nullification" 1 2.3 4 6 7 You find Paul Elam at avoiceformen would want all of these forcible rapists set free, because in today’s climate they can get no due process. I thought he was pretty courageous to suggest jury nullification, because really, men can not get due process when accused of rape. Most likely Paul wants to make a provocative statement, to cast light on unjust *rape laws.

    But I wonder:

    Does Paul Elam’s Jury Nullification apply only to violent sex offenders?

    The rest of the sex offenders also suffer from lack of due process . Rarely their "crimes" are proven beyond reasonable doubt. Non-forcible *rape, or child abuse, reported long after the fact are hard to prove with good corroborating evidence.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Paul Elam’s Jury Nullification applies only to VIOLENT sex offenders?’ » »
    Paul Elam’s Jury Nullification applies only to VIOLENT sex o… » continues here »

    Share