Posts tagged ‘Teenage Sexuality’

    "Sex Researchers suggest not to worry about the flood of nude movies on the internet"

    In its cover story, German magazine "Der Spiegel" shows how Germans are more relaxed about sexuality: in spite the world wide porn hysteria, science was unable to show that the availability of internet porn is damaging to adolescents or children. 

  • derspiegel-coverFeminist Alice Schwarzer advises women to drop boy friends  that insist on porn consumption. If all women followed such feminist advice, there would be no relationships left in this nation.
  • Canadian sex researcher Simon Lajeunesse failed to find 20 young men that were not yet polluted by the ever present porn flood. "We could not find a single one", he said.
  • In every school yard, every computer, cell phone, game console is a potential porn player.
  • Even more so, every owner of a cell phone is a potential porn producer or porn star. Women take a leading role sending their own photos and movies to their partners or their crushes. This is called "sexting".
  • At the end of relationships, some disgruntled men posts such porn on the internet. This genre is called "revenge porn".
  • 18th century archeologists found huge amounts of smut images under the ashes of Pompeii: man with man, women with woman, gods with goats, anal, oral, vaginal. These shocking images were shamefully hidden in secret museums and could be watched only by men who could prove legitimate research interest.
  • Research is unambiguous: 12, 13 year olds are not endangered, not damaged by porn. They don’t start sex earlier, don’t have more partners, have no more pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, abortions then earlier generations without the internet sex. Sex information even has a potential positive effect as sex education.
  • The English "children’s commissioners" report concluded, in 2013, that a causal relationship between porn and risky behaviors can not be shown.
  • Meta researcher Eric Owens reports in the New York Times that no conclusions can be drawn. A few studies find negative effects, such as violent porn may influence children from already problematic families, or Porn creating negative body images. Others find the opposite.
  • Human-Stupidity Analysis

    1. The negative effects are probably false, a confirmation bias. After all, the powerful feminist and religious dogmatics are eager to prove that porn is terribly damaging.  Porn must be really harmless to children and adults, if a large part of research results dodges feminist and religious dogma and finds no harm, even in adolescents.
    2. As Human-Stupidity would expect, "Der Spiegel" reports that moral panic and sex laws in themselves are detrimental:  giving minors access to porn is a felony. Thus educators and teachers can not teach responsible use of porn, nor clarify doubts, by watching porn with the minors.

    More details from "Der Spiegel"

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Internet Porn harmless for adolescents, sex researchers find’ » »
    Internet Porn harmless for adolescents, sex researchers find » continues here »

    Children Adolescent boys traumatized by sex laws. Meredith Powell, a drop dead gorgeous, bubbly, friendly, young teacher flirted, kissed, gave blow jobs and maybe even more. Meredith Powell is every boy’s wet dream.

    Meredith Powell, child rapist sexual predator

    Legal System destroys the lives of boys and Meredith Powell

    An anonymous person, deluded by feminist and religious conservative sex laws, or just jealous, turned their secret public. Now the young men’s private lives are under world wide scrutiny. They feel the guilt of being the cause of their teacher’s arrest.

    Powell, who has taught in the Tacoma Public Schools district since 2012, was busted after district officials received an anonymous tip. They forwarded the tip to local police.

    Police say the trysts began after a drunken Powell responded to a text from a former student one night, reports The News Tribune. The student told Powell he was “turned on thinking about her.”

    The student took the initiative to be "raped". Yes, he wanted to be "raped" and be "traumatized"

    She replied that “he was hot, too.”

    That was unwise. But was it terribly traumatizing for the student? See [sexual predator] Meredith Powell Photos 

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Gorgeous 24 year old Meredith Powell rapes children, age 15-17, who begged to be raped’ » »
    Gorgeous 24 year old Meredith Powell rapes children, age 15-17, wh… » continues here »

    Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it were not

     

    Although a man who was 32 wasn’t breaking the law by having sex with a 17-year-old girl in 2008, he was by photographing the act, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

    Marshall Hollins was convicted in Stephenson County of making child pornography and sentenced to 8 years in prison.

    Is this not sad? It brings me to tears.

    A good black man’s life destroyed, a girl’s boy friend taken away. All to protect her from "abuse". 

    Where is Al Sharpton?

    Where is President Barack Obama. I know, if he had a son, it would be a street fighting thug like Trayvon Martin. Where are men’s rights activists?

    Where are the feminists, for the girl’s rights to have a boy friend, and to have her pictures taken?

     

    He admitted he had sex with the girl when she was 17, which is the age of sexual consent in Illinois.

    In a 5-2 ruling, the high court said that although the law allows 17-year-olds to consent to sex, they are still minors, making photos or video of such sex child porn.

    This is nothing new:

    The two dissenting justices said that because the photos don’t show an illegal act, they shouldn’t be illegal.

    The dissenting minority has a bit of decency and common sense.

    ‘There was nothing unlawful about the production of the photographs taken by defendant in this case because the sexual conduct between defendant and (the girl) was entirely legal,’ wrote Justice Anne Burke, who was joined by Justice Charles Freeman.

    ‘The photographs are therefore not child pornography as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court for purposes of the First Amendment.

    Due to voodoo theory and falsified research about the child sex trauma myth (Rind Study), the US supreme court made an EXCEPTION to constitutional rights of the First Amendment.

    In the above case, no "*child" has been harmed through an illegal act, so there should be no reason to make an exception to constitutional first amendment rights.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it cost him 8 years in prison’ » »
    Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was … » continues here »

    The Antifeminist is ready to throw the towel. One of the lone sex positive MRA’s who oppose the long draconic prison terms for millions of men for doing things men have done for tens of thousands, if not millions of years:

    • having sex with fertile post pubertal 17 year old women or
    • looking at cave paintings of girls who could be under 18 years. 2 3

    Well, it is time as antifeminism will be illegal hate speech all over the world

    The antifeminist‘s biggest despair is the treason by the men’s rights movement, who support draconian prison terms for millions of men, and support ever growing sex offender lists …..

    as long as pretty 25 year old female cheer leaders also get punished [4] for having sex with  220 pound 17 year old adolescent football player hunk vicims.  As the antifeminist would put it: equal injustice for all is the goal of most MRA.

     
    Human-Stupidity encourage discussion in the comment section below.

     

    Human-Stupidity.com is ne of the last free unconsored places on the internet, after we got kicked out from AVoiceForMen and shadowbanned in Reddit. We appreciate free speech laws enshrined in the US constitution! Citing the  antifeminist’s despair.

    The legislative creep of feminists is ultimately going to embrace us all, it will not stop of its own accord, and it will require an army of angry young men to defeat it.  After 6 years, it’s evident to me now that I can never hope to attract here an army of angry young men, and the best I will get is a handful of ungrateful, creepy, aspie young men who are more of a burden than an asset.

    I have to stress that the word " angry" does not mean we support or call for violence.

    The other reason for my despair is the evident reality that Paul Elam and his co-bandits have effectively killed the men’s rights movement and turned it into a mirror version of that very same corrupt feminist financial industry that we have been fighting.  Now, turning the MRM into a donations industry is not in itself a bad thing, given that we face an enemy with a trillion dollars of financial backing.  But as I said, they have simply created a mirror version of feminism, and in their ‘equality of injustice’ stupidity, and desire for ‘liberal progressive rights’ legitimacy, have chosen to adopt the same values of feminism and applied them to men (and boys) unable to grasp (or rather to admit) that those values were chosen because they served feminists and women, not men and boys.

    Thus the MHRM, although still doing some very good things for men, is now financing itself, and trying to legitimize itself, through the forced abusive victim labeling of even 17 year old boys who have sex with partners 5 years older than themselves (who in most cases would be other men). And hand in hand with that goes the validation of the entire feminist abuse industry that is behind the never ending legislative creep that now sees almost 2 million men in the USA and Europe on the sex offenders register, increasingly under undeniably insane feminist anti-sex laws and facing ever more draconian and degrading punishments, both in prison and after.

    And the real violent forcible rapists hide behind the inumerous consensual sex offenders, Who had sex with women that enthusiasticaly consented but were a bit drunk, or 17 years old.

    But what is even worse, is that these ‘men’s human righVoicts activists’ appear to be supporting the feminist mind rape of teenage boys and validating the persecution of millions of decent men as a means to fund a lavish lifestyle for themselves : http://manboobz.com/2014/01/06/a-voice-for-mens-paul-elam-finally-admits-that-hes-been-pocketing-an-unspecified-chunk-of-site-donations/

    We actually don’t mind if activists who dedicate their life to a good cause, get financial support from donations. We do mind if MRA’s actively attack, threaten, malign and ban other MRA’s (Men’s rights activists) fornot condoning the feminist sex crime industry.

    I don’t want to share in any responsibility for the forced mental anguish of millions of boys, based only upon feminist logic and self-interest, nor for the real violent anal rape of potentially millions of men under injust feminist laws accepted and validated by these frauds and traitors.  I want to be able to sleep at night, and I don’t want to go to hell.  My journey in the men’s rights movement over the last 6 years has been one of ever greater disillusionment, and maybe its time to admit that the road is going nowhere.

    We beg the antifeminist to continue. We offer to take over the site, and leave it dormant as a document, if he decides to rescind responsibility.

     

    While being represseb by the men’s rights movement

    We still have the support of a few respectable main stream people

     

    These sex persecutions of men are accompanied with life long sex offender listings, vigilante death threats. As normal criminals hate "sex offenders", these male victims of feminist and religious zealot sex laws almost certainly will suffer beatings and ass rape in prison by HIV positive felons for crimes such as

    These feminists and their MHRA don’t even mind increasing real sex abuse of children: Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii)

     

     

    2013 Was Bad, 2014 Will Be Worse

    The Worst of 2013

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘TheAntiFeminist.com closing down? MRA (Men’s right) support incarceration of men for normal male sexuality’ » »
    TheAntiFeminist.com closing down? MRA (Men’s right) support … » continues here »

    Barack Obama Jr. was likely conceived when his mother was still 17 years old. [1]

    According to federal law this is below the age of consent. A 17 year old *child is unable to consent, which automatically makes any act of sex rape.  "Rape is rape is rape"  (according to Barack Obama’s pal and Vice President  Joe Biden).

    Luckily, the age of consent in Hawaii is 16. So if sex occurred in Hawaii, it was not rape.

    Of course, in these modern days, Barack Obama Sr. still could be charged with crimes as diverse as grooming a child over the internet, sexting, crossing state lines with intent to have sex with a minor,

    Barack Obama Sr. already had shown prior preference for jailbait. Kenyan age of consent for unmarried people is 16. Kezia, born 1940,  was 14 when 18 year old Barack Senior married  her in 1954, in exchange for a dowry of 14 cows

    In 1954, Obama married Kezia Aoko[22] in a tribal ceremony. Wikipedia

    Kezia had her first baby at age 18. Maybe conceived at age 17.

    Anyone can do the math if Kezia Obama’s first child was conceived while the mother was still 17?

    Had Barack Obama Senior been a US resident, it would have been a felony to fly to Kenya with the intent to have sex with an underage girl under 18.

     

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    We think it would behoove the US government to re-consider many age of consent, sexting, child porn laws, that put many men in prison for consensual sex with post pubertal adolescents.

    Many men languish in prison for the same acts that the father of President Barack Obama committed: sex with adolescent jail bait.

    Consider that Barack Obama, the President of the USA was likely conceived by an unmarried 17 year old woman. The president’s father, Barack Hussein Sr. also had a predilection for underage girls as young as 14, the age he married his first wife Kezia.

    The fact that the President’s father was a clear bigamist, married to 2-3 women at the same time would suggest to pursue bigamist US citizens with more leniency.

     


    The American Dream Love Story:
    Barack Obama’s Mom Was 17 When Barack Sr., A 24-Year-Old Married Man, Knocked Her Up

    Let’s ask a question that I haven’t seen before:

    How old was Ann Dunham when Barack Obama Sr., an already married 24-year-old, impregnated her?

     

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Barack Obama Sr., bigamist, pedophile, child rapist?’ » »
    Barack Obama Sr., bigamist, pedophile, child rapist? » continues here »

    An immense amount of money and time has been spent by the Italian legal system, and the world press, to  protect a 17 year old woman from getting lots of money, possibly in exchange for consensual sex.

    • Having sex with a 17 year old is perfectly legal in Italy (age of consent is 14).
    • But, giving her tens or hundreds of thousands Euros makes it illegal. This is a terrible crime.
    • Paying for sex (prostitution) is also legal in Italy
    • The "victim" denies sex has ever happened.
    • Prostitution laws were made for short term sex for money exchanges. Berlusconi seems to have a quite long and regular relation with this girl

     

    Sex laws traumatize children

    Courts, and the world press, publicly call "Ruby the Heart stealer" a prostitute.  This is certainly traumatizing, As usual, our repressive sex laws, devised by the sexual trade union, traumatize the very people they are meant to protect.

    Dancer Karima El-Mahroug – known as "Ruby Heartstealer" – has staged a protest outside a court in Italy to deny claims she was paid for having sex with former PM Silvio Berlusconi. [...]  Prosecutors say Ms Mahroug and Mr Berlusconi had sex on 13 occasions.

    Surprisingly, no feminist support for Miss El-Mahroug’s suffering. Feminist support seems to be reserved for women who cut off penises (Lorena Bobbitt), or who murder sleeping husbands

    Berlusconi probably deserves punishment for other behaviors. But helping a post pubertal girl to riches should not be a problem for the legal system.

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Berlusconi’s worst crime: to give money to a 17 year old. For sex she denies ever happened’ » »
    Berlusconi’s worst crime: to give money to a 17 year old. Fo… » continues here »

     

    2) What is the legal age for military service?

    The legal age for military service in Amsterdam is 21 years old. In February 2013, Amsterdam is to become the first municipality in the Netherlands to officially increase the legal age for military to fight in war from 18 to 21 years. Increasing the legal age is part of a set of measures designed to tackle abuse in the war industry and strengthen the position of soldiers. The City of Amsterdam believes that people aged 21 are better able to make a well-considered decision about fighting and killing in combat than those aged 18 as well as being better able to cope with serving in a war zone.  2

    "In the Netherlands, voluntary military service is a legal profession. Forced military service is illegal." 3

    This was just an April’s fools joke. In most of human history in most countries in the world men were forced to serve in wars, with not much concern for age.

    "In the Netherlands, voluntary prostitution is a legal profession. Forced prostitution is illegal." 3

    Countries with mandatory military service include Denmark and Austria. Nobody, of course, is concerned with psychological problems of involuntary or voluntary draftees into military combat and killing service. No concern with Post Traumatic Stress disorder, freedom of choice, when it concerns MEN.

    But feminist activists never stop preventing women against their will from their own choices.

    Age of consent 70 years: The future of prostitution

    The ever rising age of consent

    It is no joke that the prediction of the antifeminist regarding sexual trade union policy has become true: a country where the age of consent is 16, the age for prostitution is 18,  20 year olds are not allowed to choose to work as prostitutes in Amsterdam. The Deutsche Welle, in a mistaken Freudian slip, advances the (soon to become true?) news that it has been increase to 23 years of age.

    Will the age of consent for prostitutes eventually, be increased to 70, the age of The Fokkens sisters on the picture?

    2) What is the legal age for prostitution?

    The legal age for prostitutes in Amsterdam is 21 years old. In February 2013, Amsterdam is to become the first municipality in the Netherlands to officially increase the legal age for prostitutes to work in the profession from 18 to 21 years. Increasing the legal age is part of a set of measures designed to tackle abuse in the prostitution industry and strengthen the position of prostitutes. The City of Amsterdam believes that people aged 21 are better able to make a well-considered decision about working as a prostitute than those aged 18 as well as being better able to cope with working in the industry. 2

    Watch Fokkens sisters video trailer!

    Louise And Martine Fokkens, Amsterdam’s Oldest Prostitutes, Retiring At 70 Years Old

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Holland increases minimum age for combat soldiers to 21’ » »
    Holland increases minimum age for combat soldiers to 21 » continues here »

    It is very courageous for Barbara Hewson to out herself as a *child sex apologist. She draws a lot of negativity, unfortunately, very few people agree with her.

    Among all the bad press, here a few positive voices

     

    Lowering the age of consent merits open debate, not closed minds

    [Hanson] made light of what she regards as trivial sexual touching of young people by adults, saying that making an issue of it distracts people from really serious abuse, such as rape. Her view is that there are qualitatively different forms of sex abuse and they shouldn’t be lumped together.

    Positive reactions to Barbara Hewson’s proposals are rare. Who dares to favor "child abuse", teenage sexuality, to protect "dirty old men"?

    Child Abuse Moral Panic: a dozen great articles from Spiked Magazine

    Age of Consent Should Be 13 Says Prominent Barrister | The Antifeminist

    Scientific Evidence That Men Dig Barely Legal Chicks

    scientists have found that men DO NOT prefer maximally fertile women.

    An interesting suggestion how to implement age of consent laws

    Ok, fix specific age at 12 or 13, the normal age of puberty (though apparently it is shifting). Make consent completely impossible below this age. From 13 to 18, when the person is legally a minor, give parents authority to demand any relationship stop, without making that relationship automatically illegal. Then, from 13 to 15, impose a maximum age difference of 7 years (beyond which consent is assumed to have been obtained through coercion), where a high burden of proof is needed to make consent valid. Between 3 and 7 years of age difference, decide on a case by case basis (to see if consent was obtained through coercion) and below 3 years of age difference, make it legal. How’s that for specificity? permalink

    Judgy Bitch has very refreshing strong opinions:

    Should 13 year olds be having sex? Probably not. They shouldn’t be fame whores, either

     

    Subscribe to Human-Stupidity Blog

    Receive an email notification whenever Human-Stupidity.com has a new post.