Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception
- Stupidity-Dogmas
- Assisted Suicide & Right to die
- Child Porn Witch Hunt
- Economics
- Faulty Science
- Human Rights
- Inspiring Intelligent Solutions
- Intelligent Design (Creationism)
- Irrational Drug Policy
- Men's Rights & Feminism
- Political correctness
- Prostitution
- Race & Intelligence
- Religion & Atheism
- Social Rules & Habits
- Teenage Sexuality
- Unhealty Lifestyle
- Victimless Crime
- Science
- Drugs
- Humor
- Uninformedness
Posts Tagged witch hunt
The Child Sex Trauma Myth. #1: You must be a pedophile, if you defend child porn and pedophiles
Posted by admin in Child Porn Witch Hunt, Teenage Sexuality on May 13, 2012
We are not pedophiles. We have no interest in children or their indecent depictions.
We make extreme efforts to not run afoul of any law, not even by mistake or accident 1 2 3 .
We are interested in truth, free academic research, in protection and happiness for children 5.
We are against unnecessary witch hunts that demonize and imprison people with unnecessary rigor and that criminalize a huge percentage of the (male) population.
The biggest of all taboos: to research, study or discuss adult-child sexuality.
We have been warned. We will be called pedophiles. We may suffer vigilante action. We may suffer government prosecution. We should not mess with the topic adult-child sex.
Yes we are talking about real children under 12 years of age, not just 17 year old adolescent young adults, re-defined as "children" by feminist dogma and by the *United Nations.
The Rind Study serves as a warning: a prestigious, peer reviewed meta analysis, published in one of the most prestigious journals of the American Psychological Association: probably the only piece of peer reviewed academic research condemned by unanimous vote by both the United States Senate and Congress.
The authors’ stated goal was “…to address the question: In the population of persons with a history of CSA [child sexual abuse], does this experience cause intense psychological harm on a widespread basis for both genders?” Some of the authors’ more controversial conclusions were that child sexual abuse does not necessarily cause intense, pervasive harm to the child;[3] that the reason the current view of child sexual abuse was not substantiated by their empirical scrutiny was because the construct of CSA was questionably valid; and that the psychological damage caused by the abusive encounters depends on whether the encounter was consensual or not. Wikipedia on Bruce Rind
The US Senate and Congress have decided, once and for all, by dogmatic fiat: "child sexual abuse" is is extremely traumatic under all circumstances. Academic research must not arrive at any different conclusions.
Such a shocking interference of religious and moral zealots with scientific truth has not happened since Galileo Galilei: a few centuries ago, the catholic church decreed the "scientific truth" that the sun revolves around the earth.
The Trauma Myth
Susan Clancy inadvertently stumbled over the unpopular truth, as published in
The Trauma Myth: The Truth About the Sexual Abuse of Children–and Its Aftermath .
All hell broke loose. I was bombarded with accusations that I was hurting victims even more than they already had been and that I was a friend of pedophiles. I was also vilified by many in my own scientific community. Some colleagues and graduate students stopped talking to me. A well-meaning professor told me to pick another research topic because I was going to rule myself out of a job in academia. Some felt my research had a political agenda, one biased against victims. I was invited to give a talk about my research at Cambridge Hospital—home of the tremendously influential sexual abuse treatment program Victims of Violence. No one from the program showed up. Clancy (pp. 77-78).
Researchers refuse to discuss issues in a seminar?! The most convinced adversaries never counter with true research, with true arguments?
This is the sad state of affairs. A dogma does not need to be discussed scientifically. The Bible has the definite answer. The US senate made the scientific decision.
And Human-Stupidity has the insanity to question and analyze the dogma.
Human-Stupidity is open to science. Just prove me wrong, using science.
If unbiased free academic research can show that 17 year olds get traumatized for life for having sex with older people, we will support age-of-consent laws. - If the Rind study, and Susan Clancy can be proven wrong, by free unbiased academic research, we will support draconian decade-long punishments for all childhood sexuality.
- We would stand corrected if the voodoo theory could be proven true, by free unbiased academic research: if it were proven that looking at photos of lightly clothed 15 year olds, downloaded for free from the internet does irreparable harm to the minors depicted. If that harm is so perverse that looking at the photos ruins the model’s life forever. And that downloading free photos truly stimulates the rape and abuse of innumerous children. Then we might agree that life in prison without parole is a proper punishment for possession of a few hundred photos, which are nothing else then 0′s and 1′s in files on a computer hard drive.
But against all odds, Milton Diamond, in peer reviewed research, proved the opposite: freely available child pornography reduces sex crimes against children, because many pedophiles can satisfy themselves merely by perusing pictures.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
The Child Sex Trauma Myth. #1: You must be a pedophile, if you def… » continues here »
Children loved non-nude solo modeling, were traumatized by federal government child porn hysteria: "Photo sessions were the highlight of my life"!
Posted by admin in Child Porn Witch Hunt on March 18, 2012
"We were not victims. The only people that ever victimized me was the federal government themselves" (sic) 5:54
Child porn "victims" decided to speak up: ."I loved modeling. It was the highlight of my life" 1.00 The models were best friends with the photographer, were profoundly scarred by the photographer’s arrest and the judgmental panic hysteria of neighbors, friends and school mates. The life of the photographer, his children and family were ruined by long prison sentences.
Around 2003, the US repressed, with heavy prison sentences, child modeling sites with non-nude children and with adolescents dressed in light clothes like swimsuits and lingerie. These sites were careful to stay legal, to have no nudity, semi-nudity nor sexual behavior. To no avail. The harmless fairly innocent photos were determined to be child pornography.
Of course, such expanded child pornography definitions can criminalize department store child swimsuit catalogues (so much that Human-Stupidity thought it wiser NOT to even repost catalogue photos) or parent’s nude baby photos in the bath tub
Tuscaloosa County photographer sentenced to federal prison in child modeling porn case
A Tuscaloosa County photographer was sentenced today to serve five years and seven months in federal prison on child pornography charges for providing pictures of underage Birmingham area girls in provocative clothing and sexually suggestive poses to a child modeling website.
After his release from prison Jeff Pierson, 47, also will have to serve 10 years on supervised release by the U.S. Probation Office and register as a sex offender, U.S. District Judge Scott Coogler ordered at today’s hearing. Coogler ordered Pierson to report to prison on March 9. [...]
A few of the girls who had their photos taken by Pierson were at today’s hearing. Coogler offered them a chance to make a statement in the courtroom but they declined.
Now the girls are making statements. Several of the 16 "victims" speak out in a campaign to clarify they enjoyed the photo sessions and were in no way traumatized. Or rather, how they were severely traumatized by the hysteria in press and the police prosecution.
I understand. That’s why I can’t get some models to join our campaign. They agree with us and support us but they don’t want this to be a part of their lives anymore, and I don’t blame them. But I will do everything I can to set the record straight and any webe models (even if they weren’t my dad’s) who want to join this campaign are more than welcome. 4
Speak out campaign: former child erotica models declare
they enjoyed the modeling and were in no way traumatized.
Video: A girl and her family, victims of child porn hysteria.
Normal department store child lingerie photos can become child porn, when collected in ways that indicate that the interest is not in the clothing (See Copine scale, also Knox vs. USA). The children do not get victimized by millions of viewers of their newspaper ad. But according to the voodoo theory they get victimized when the same photos are being watched by a photo collector with potential prurient interest. Remember, Dr. Milton Diamond has proven the opposite, that availability of child erotica and child porn reduces actual child abuse crimes.
You can see some of the webeweb photos in question (at your own risk to potentially pollute your computer cache with child porn) by doing a Google image search for webeweb. Human-Stupidity will not risk posting these photos or even linking to them. Google is better equipped to fend off malicious prosecution.
Video Playlist: Speak Up: WebeWeb – Child Erotica – Sandy Models:
Child porn hysteria victims speak up
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Children loved non-nude solo modeling, were traumatized by federal… » continues here »
Teacher Sex with 14 Year Old: 40 year Prison in USA, Acquittal in Germany
Posted by admin in Teenage Sexuality on February 20, 2012
Germany: High court acquitted teacher for 22 sex acts with 14 year old student.
It voided a 2 year suspended sentence proffered by two lower courts
A a German appeal court voided of a lower court’s suspended 2 year sentence for a 32 year old male teacher. He had sex with a 14 year old student on 22 occasions. The court decision is final. The court justified the decision:
- Sex with a 14 year olds is not a crime. Article 176 of the German penal code only covers sexual abuse of children under 14 years , unless it is paid (Art. 182) [6].
- According to the Penal Code Art 174 [6], sexual abuse of wards occurs only when a minor under 18y has been entrusted to the offender "for the education, training or supervision". The student was not entrusted to the accused, because he only covered for the teacher’s absence and only gave very occasional classes to her. If he were her regular teacher, he would have been convicted [6].
USA: 40 years for the same crime: for female teacher’s sex with 14 year old boy
Female teacher Shannon Alicia Schmieder (39) in Coweta, Georgia received a 40 year jail sentence for sex with a 14 year old boy [2][3]. This fills some men’s rights proponents with glee: finally a woman gets a taste of the bitter "age of consent" medicine concocted by feminists and religious zealots: the same high jail terms men routinely get sentenced to. Making love carries the same prison term as as murder or manslaughter [4]
The randomness of adolescent sex laws
Teenage sexuality is plagued by arbitrary laws which vary a lot over time and over places [1]. So much that children need a lawyer before playing doctor [8].
Human-Stupidity never made it a secret that we don’t think that the might of the state needs to interfere in such consensual adolescent affairs. We think that it is the parents’ have the duty to supervise and educate their children and that parents have a right set limits for them [5]. German law is inspired by sensible sex positive realists.
Teacher still faces disciplinary action and protests
The teacher still faces disciplinary action from the school. "Der Spiegel" calls the verdict "controversial". Sensationalist yellow press Bild calls it a "scandalous verdict" [6]. Parent organizations, press organs and the German Child Protection Association vehemently protests [6].
Human-Stupidity Analysis
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Teacher Sex with 14 Year Old: 40 year Prison in USA, Acquittal in … » continues here »
"Tanning bed pervert" nailed for kiddie porn production. Decades in prison for secretly watching and filming?
Posted by admin in Child Porn Witch Hunt on October 12, 2011
A peeping Tom rigged a tanning bed so (female) adults and children alike could be watched and filmed by him. This is bad taste, and quite common. He deserves a lesson. He probably needs some therapy. From the story below, it seems they don’t even prosecute him for peeping and filming adults. For that transgression he probably would receive a deserved and measured punishment.
The punishment for violating the privacy of adults is negligible compared to the draconian child porn prison terms he faces. For peeping and filming minors, he is likely to suffer enormous and disproportional punishment. Decades for each count of child pornography "production" could add up to a century.
The victims did not even notice they were filmed. So they did not suffer great harm (except for the Voodoo theory of child porn victimization). No, I am not saying that there should be no punishment.
But does it make sense to punish him as strictly as for child kidnapping for ransom?
- Do you prefer your child to be secretly watched and filmed by a shy immature pervert or be kidnapped?
- Don’t you prefer your kid to be secretly filmed on the tanning bed 100 times, then to suffer one single instance of kidnapping? I would be more concerned about the cancer risk from 100 tannings.
Wouldn’t you rather have your kid secretly filmed on a tanning bed then to fall victim to any of the following
- The neighborhood gang extorting an adolescent’s or child’s lunch money
- School bullies sticking a kid’s head in the toilet or beating the child (even if only lightly)
- Drunk drivers running over children on the street
- Bicycle robbers that dangerously push children off bicycles
- Dog owners that don’t keep their dogs leashed, locked, muzzled and thus get children bitten?
- A flash mob roaming the neighborhood, setting ablaze buildings
All the above crimes carry much lower penalties. So why does our perverted filming peeping Tom get so much higher penalties then those who truly endanger and traumatize our children?
This peeping Tom erred, committed a puerile immature mistake. Unlike many other victims of the child pornography witch hunt that are totally innocent
This peeping Tom is an example of compulsive people who might be helped to refrain from acting out their urges with real children, if they had easier access to legal child "pornography": depictions of harmless photos and videos of adolescents in tanning beds.
We can not know if he was interested in actual true children because we invented manipulative language to confuse on purpose, confuse adolescents with children
"Tanning bed pervert" nailed for kiddie porn production
Doyce Dean Griffis of Starke, FL, is charged with seven counts of production of child pornography, two counts of receiving child pornography, and one count of possession of child pornography.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
"Tanning bed pervert" nailed for kiddie porn production…. » continues here »
Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail
Posted by admin in Child Porn Witch Hunt on January 20, 2011
A young man got arrested for possession of child porn, depicting a 12 year boy old masturbating. It is his own video: he recorded himself when he was 12 years old. Mandatory minimum jail sentence: 2 years.
Think hard: maybe you took some indecent photos of yourself. Or your family album contains nunde photos mom took when you were a toddler. Burn your childhood pictures while you still are out of jail!
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was… » continues here »
History of illegal drug witch hunt vs. drug legalization in Portugal & Holland
Posted by in Drugs, Irrational Drug Policy on November 28, 2010
The world wide repression of “illegal drugs” with all its terrible side effects originates from the USA.
“Harry J Anslinger was head of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Narcotics which enforced the prohibition of alcohol in the U.S.A. from 1919 to 1933. When prohibition was repealed, Anslinger, in order to keep and justify his existence and job, created the Orwellian lies about a new killer drug – marihuana. [...] In 1937 Anslinger had a hearing conducted before Congress which resulted in the Marihuana Tax Act and henceforth the whole legal injustice took off.” THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE ILLEGAL DRUG LAWS AND WHY THE DRACONIAN PENALTIES ?
All irrational witch hunts seem to originate in the USA.
All irrational witch hunts seem to originate in the USA(child porn witch hunt, teenage sex witch hunt, anti prostitution witch hunt, and illegal drug witch hunt). And the USA imposes the witch hunt upon the rest of the world.
Why is this so? Who has the answers?
Drug Liberalization in Portugal and Holland: a success
Portugal just reports clear successes with legalization of drugs. Holland legalization of drugs and most of teenage sex is a resounding success.
“Portugal decriminalized possession of all drugs in 2001. The outcome, after nearly a decade, according to a study published in the November issue of the British Journal of Criminology: less teen drug use, fewer HIV infections, fewer AIDS cases and more drugs seized by law enforcement. Adult drug use rates did slightly increase — but this increase was not greater than that seen in nearby countries that did not change their drug policies. The use of drugs by injection declined.”
Read more: Portugal’s Drug Experience: New Study Confirms Decriminalization Was a Success
“The Dutch are known for their liberal attitudes toward sex and drugs: while not officially legal, marijuana use and sale in “coffee shops” is tolerated in The Netherlands, as is prostitution, most notoriously in the street windows of Amsterdam’s red light district. Pragmatism, the Dutch have long believed, is better than punitive prohibition — and they’ve got lots of data on their side.While 12% of the American population has smoked marijuana in the last month, for example, the same is true of only 5% of citizens of The Netherlands.”
Read more: What the U.S. Can Learn from the Dutch About Teen Sex
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
History of illegal drug witch hunt vs. drug legalization in Portug… » continues here »
Mr. Emerson loses medial practice, driver’s & medical license & becomes jobless, homeless, indebted, due to adulterous wife’s unproven accusations
Posted by in Men's Rights & Feminism on September 6, 2010
Mr. Emerson was a private practice physician. A series of unproven allegations by his adulterous wife, (and later by a female WalMart cashier) got him into jail, made him lose his medical license & practice, lose the children, obliged him to pay child support to his ex-wife. Without his medical license he was unable to pay child support and got $ 70 000 in debt with his adulterous wife. He lost his drivers license due to nonpayment of child support. Of course he could never see his daughter.
Years later, when his then 15 year old daugher (who got spanked by her step father) wanted to move in with her father, he got another anonymous child abuse complaint regarding the 3 year old kid of his girl friend. Mr. Emerson spent multiple times in jail, lived with his father or friends as a favor, lived under a bridge, Over 10 years of ordeals. Life ruined. Because of accusations of an adulterous wife. And a legal system that suspended due process and inverted the burden of proof in most feminist issues like child sexual abuse, wife beating, child porn, etc.
Human-Stupidity.com analysis: Mr Emerson’s life was ruined by government and legal system
-
extreme feminist laws protecting women, inversion of burden of proof (guilty until proven innocent), no due process.
-
together with a vengeful wife and power seeking government attorneys
-
It is sad if any good law abiding citizen can get ruined by government & vengeful women
Timothy Joe Emerson’s ordeal
Half of the complaints against Mr. Emerson were unproven, the other half obviously wrong or ridiculous:
We are also astounded to find that going through a cashier’s checkout line at Wal-Mart once or twice a week [based on testimony and cancelled checks provided by Joe Emerson] can be construed as a basis for a stalking complaint.
| The story began in 1998. According to court records his then wife, Sacha, was having an affair with her hairdresser and petitioned for divorce on August 28, 1998, and requested a restraining order against Dr. Emerson, claiming he had threatened her paramour during a telephone call. [ . . . ] All quotes from: www.ejfi.org/emerson.htm
|
Note that about half of the hundreds of married men who have contacted the Equal Justice Foundation have been charged with domestic violence or abuse after finding their wives were having an affair. Allegations of domestic violence or abuse are a standard tactic in a divorce today with virtually no recourse for the husband. Under current laws such false allegations are standard as they give the adulterous wife the house, the car, the kids, the bank account, and anything else she wants with no questions asked, i.e., due process is a thing of the past. She will also almost certainly receive child support even if the child(ren) prove not to be her husband’s. And there is no penalty for her perjury. |
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Mr. Emerson loses medial practice, driver’s & medical li… » continues here »
Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photos
Posted by in Child Porn Witch Hunt, Teenage Sexuality on August 1, 2010
More child porn insanity! Children nowadays need legal counsel to know if and how they can photograph themselves or have relations with other teenagers, or else they can spend years in jail and remain the rest of their lives on sex offender lists.
US court on ‘sexting’: Child porn or child’s play?
01/15/2010 PHILADELPHIA (AP) — The first criminal case involving “sexting” reached a U.S. appeals court on Friday — a case that asks whether racy cell-phone photos of three girls amount to child pornography or child’s play.A county prosecutor in northeastern Pennsylvania threatened to pursue felony charges if the girls skipped his “re-education” course on such topics as sexual predators and “what it means to be a girl in today’s society.”
The photos show two 12-year-olds in training bras at a sleepover and a topless 16-year-old stepping out of the shower.[. . . ]
“You’re going to see more provocative photos in a Victoria’s Secret catalog,” [ . . . ]
newsok.com/us-court-on-sexting-child-porn-or-childs-play/article/3432301
Feminist “Logic” |
Analogies |
| “Naked pictures of children on the Internet draws predators the same way a swamp draws mosquitoes,” argued lawyer Michael Donohue of Scranton, who represents the prosecutor’s office. Authorities must sometimes protect children from themselves, he argued. newsok.com/3-face-charges-in-texhoma-sexting/article/3480534 | “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” movies really attract chainsaw murderers like a swamp draws moskitoes.
Cop Killer rap music really incites violence against police and school authorities.Soccer stadiums attract violent hooligans like a swamp draws mosquitoes. Let us close down all soccer stadiums. Photos of knives, swords, and guns attract murderers. |
Actually, the analogies are much more convincing then the lawyer’s statement in column 1, which is devoid of any logic or scientifc support. Pure manipulative nonsense. It is intriguing how utter nonsense is socially acceptable whenever it is backed by feminism and women’s studies. No clue about logic and scientific method. But absolute masters in manipulating public opinion.
Here is the root of the insanity. Unproven hysterical statements, with no scientific backing, are the excuse for a witch hunt. Feminists use real predators, real rapists, kidnappers and child murderers as an excuse for their political goals. So innocent girls photographing themselves naked get arrested! Why should it be a crime to photograph yourself? Maybe it is also a crime for the girls to look into the mirror?
I dare to say something really taboo: what is the problem if dirty old men like to look at nude adolescent pictures and do absolutely no harm whatsoever. Why should they get 10 years in jail?
So even if it were true that naked pictures of children on the internet draw predators. For what? To look at photos in the privacy of their home? What is the problem? Maybe this is positive, so they don’t go out trying to check out what real adolescents look like naked.
Compare:
There must be a special evolutionary skill how feminists manage to convince male law makers to support their warped feminist “women studies” logic (Feminist arguments against prostitution debunked)
Recent Comments