Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception

Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime.

admin — Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:04:04 +0000

The beating last month of a 15-year-old girl in the transit tunnel at Westlake Center as security personnel watched without intervening is prompting a review of King County Metro’s policies for its unarmed guards.

The incident — which was partially captured on surveillance video — happened about 7:15 p.m. Jan. 28 and involved a large group of teens and young adults, according to the King County Sheriff’s Office. Another 15-year-old girl is allegedly the one who can be seen on the video assaulting the victim, kicking her head several times while she is on the pavement.

Two security guards stand over the victim while she’s being pummeled and do not intervene. At one point in the video, one guard is seen raising his arm toward the assailant, who ignores him.

Source, more details, comments:
seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011027703_webbeating09m.html

A girl gets attacked by a thug girl. Before that the victim had tried to hide behind 3 security guards, to no avail. The guards had orders not to interfere. Even when the girl was on the floor, repeatedly getting her head stomped by the attacking girl. Another guy from her gang robbed the girl’s bag with her iphone and other belongings.
Warning: graphic content. Gratuitous REAL violence.

Topic 1: human rights of criminals

If the guards interfered and hurt a thug, they would stand accused of hurting the perpetrator. The guard could face dismissal, ruinously expensive lawsuits, jail. It is safer for the guards not to interfere. And this is what the official security company policy is.

The academic armchair political correctness human rights & feminist crowd has perverted our justice system. Redneck country cowboys still have healthy human reactions, but they risk getting jailed.

Topic 2: Child Porn witch hunt: depicting life threatening violence against children: legal. Depiction of nudity or healthy sexuality: a heinous felony.

Showing an underage girl getting life-threatening stomps on the face, while on the floor, that is normal news cast on prime time TV. Now mere possession of a movie of the same girl posing nude, or, God beware, masturbating, or making love with her boy friend, that would be a heinous crime. Production or televising such “child porn” would yield 3-25 years in prison. Criminal violence against children may be shown.

Compare:

Supreme Court oks indefinite detention for possession of photos. But violent robbers get freed.

Female quotas on death row? Unsuccessful male losers overlooked by feminist zeal!

admin — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:07:33 +0000

Males are overrepresented in jail, death row, war death, work accidents, accidental death & involuntary middle age virginity, reproductive failures, mental retardation. Feminist and men’s right’s activist fail to request female quotas in jail. Isn’t it funny? We need quotas in politics, management, Universities. But no quotas among homeless and war dead? No gender equality on Titanic life boat seats!

Compare: Germany plans mandatory female quotas in top management

some women systematically looked up at the top of society and saw men everywhere: most world rulers, presidents, prime ministers, most members of Congress and parliaments, most CEOs of major corporations, and so forth — these are mostly men.
The mistake in that way of thinking is to look only at the top. If one were to look downward to the bottom of society instead, one finds mostly men there too. Who’s in prison, all over the world, as criminals or political prisoners? The population on Death Row has never approached 51% female. Who’s homeless? Again, mostly men. Whom does society use for bad or dangerous jobs? US Department of Labor statistics report that 93% of the people killed on the job are men. Likewise, who gets killed in battle? Even in today’s American army, which has made much of integrating the sexes and putting women into combat, the risks aren’t equal. This year we passed the milestone of 3,000 deaths in Iraq, and of those, 2,938 were men, 62 were women.

One can imagine an ancient battle in which the enemy was driven off and the city saved, and the returning soldiers are showered with gold coins. An early feminist might protest that hey, all those men are getting gold coins, half of those coins should go to women. In principle, I agree. But remember, while the men you see are getting gold coins, there are other men you don’t see, who are still bleeding to death on the battlefield from spear wounds.
Is There Anything Good About Men? by Roy F. Baumeister

Men outnumber women both among the losers and among the biggest winners

Men take high risks. They reap high rewards, and pay with death, injury, abysmal failures. Feminists are envious of the winners, and oblivious of the losers. They want to get the gold coins without risking their lives in the fight.

Evolution built this higher risk, higher variance even into genetics of male physical features: There are more men that are extremely tall, extremely intelligent, etc and there are more men then women at the bottom, with the lowest IQ, shortest height, etc.

Today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men.

Over half the males but very few females were reproductive failures

Today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men. [ . . ] Recent research using DNA analysis answered this question about two years ago [2005].

I think this difference is the single most underappreciated fact about gender. To get that kind of difference, you had to have something like, throughout the entire history of the human race, maybe 80% of women but only 40% of men reproduced.

In evolutionary times, in the “EEA” 100 000 years ago, only very few women failed to reproduce, but about 60% of the men were total evolutionary failures. They are the end of their genetic line. Every man or women know that some guys are girl magnets, while others barely stand a chance: Nerds, socially inept, shy, ugly, handicapped. And even nowadays, with legally enforced monogamy, there still is serial monogamy after divorce, and affairs, both practiced mainly by successful men.

In terms of the biological competition to produce offspring, then, men outnumbered women both among the losers and among the biggest winners. [ . . . ] Experts estimate Genghis Khan had several hundred and perhaps more than a thousand children. [...] For him, the big risks led to huge payoffs in offspring. My point is that no woman, even if she conquered twice as much territory as Genghis Khan, could have had a thousand children.

And thousand’s of wanna-be Genghis Khan’s died before they had a chance to reproduce. And others were snubbed by women.

Feminists look for equal rights without equal risk & equal losses.

Most cultures have tended to use men for these high-risk, high-payoff slots much more than women. I shall propose there are important pragmatic reasons for this. The result is that some men reap big rewards while others have their lives ruined or even cut short. Most cultures shield their women from the risk and therefore also don’t give them the big rewards

Men outnumber women both among the losers and among the biggest winners

The danger of having no children is only one side of the male coin. Every child has a biological mother and father, and so if there were only half as many fathers as mothers among our ancestors, then some of those fathers had lots of children.

Look at it this way. Most women have only a few children, and hardly any have more than a dozen — but many fathers have had more than a few, and some men have actually had several dozen, even hundreds of kids.

In terms of the biological competition to produce offspring, then, men outnumbered women both among the losers and among the biggest winners.

Workaholics are mostly men.

Likewise, I mentioned the salary difference, but it may have less to do with ability than motivation. High salaries come from working super-long hours. Workaholics are mostly men. (There are some women, just not as many as men.) One study counted that over 80% of the people who work 50-hour weeks are men.
That means that if we want to achieve our ideal of equal salaries for men and women, we may need to legislate the principle of equal pay for less work.

Men are more extreme. In almost all qualities, men are over-represented at the top. And feminists don’t notice: men are over-represented at the bottom. How come feminists are not asking for 50% quotas in jail inmates, 50% female quotas on death row? 50% women quotas in workplace deaths and in war deaths!?

To maximize reproduction, a culture needs all the wombs, and only few penises.

To maximize reproduction, a culture needs all the wombs it can get, but a few penises can do the job. There is usually a penile surplus. If a group loses half its men, the next generation can still be full-sized. But if it loses half its women, the size of the next generation will be severely curtailed. Hence most cultures keep their women out of harm’s way while using men for risky jobs.

No equal rights and gender neutral quotas for life-boat seats on the Titanic!

On the Titanic, the richest men had a lower survival rate (34%) than the poorest women (46%)

Women want equal rights, but less work, less risk, and special privileges. And modern man got fooled. He overlooked the dark side of the disadvantaged male.

Men take risks, women play safe

why was it so rare for a hundred women to get together and build a ship and sail off to explore unknown regions, whereas men have fairly regularly done such things? [...]
For women, the optimal thing to do is go along with the crowd, be nice, play it safe. The odds are good that men will come along and offer sex and you’ll be able to have babies. All that matters is choosing the best offer. We’re descended from women who played it safe.

For men, the outlook was radically different. If you go along with the crowd and play it safe, the odds are you won’t have children. Most men who ever lived did not have descendants who are alive today. Their lines were dead ends. Hence it was necessary to take chances, try new things, be creative, explore other possibilities. Sailing off into the unknown may be risky, and you might drown or be killed or whatever, but then again if you stay home you won’t reproduce anyway. We’re most descended from the type of men who made the risky voyage and managed to come back rich. In that case he would finally get a good chance to pass on his genes. We’re descended from men who took chances (and were lucky).

All quotes from the excellent paper by eminent Psychologist Roy F. Baumeister: Is There Anything Good About Men?

“Do Men Work More Hours Than Women?” and related posts (villainouscompany.com)

Lorena Bobbit forgives her husband (she cut off his manhood 16 years ago)

admin — Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:28:26 +0000

The woman that mutilated her husband, cut off her husband’s dick and threw it out of the car window, forgave her husband, after the husband expressed remorse and asked for forgiveness . And poor Lorena stressed how much her husband had hurt her. No remorse. Yes. You are reading right! The mutilator did not ask forgiveness, no, she forgave! Must see the video.

The back story: In June of 1993 after having a fight, Lorena cut off her husband’s manhood with a knife while he was asleep, then fled and threw it out of her car window. Later, Lorena’s trial was carried live, and after the stunning testimony, she was ultimately found not guilty by reason of temporary insanity.
theinsider.com/news/2098643_John_Lorena_The_Shocking_Bobbitt_Reunion

This is how far feminist inequality attitudes and laws got us. Can you imagine a man that mutilates his wife, cuts off her breasts, gets acquitted. And then shows no remorse but demands and gets an excuse from his victim? The final proof for gender inequality in our days. Men can be castrated, arrested. And women who cut off her husband’s dick get no punishment and demand excuse for his insensitivity!

“[At] our own wedding reception, he left me alone,” says Lorena. “We didn’t have a honeymoon, so to speak, because you left me at our own wedding to flirt with girls.”

“Basically I learned to be a pick-up artist when I was married,” says John, “and that’s something I shouldn’t have done.”

“I’m really sorry,” adds John in a bombshell apology. “There was a lot of neglect there; I wasn’t there for you. You needed me to be there. I wasn’t emotionally, physically — it was a very confusing hard time you went through.”

“That means a lot to me,” says Lorena. “I forgive you, but I never forget. I’m not angry anymore. I’m free. I remember the things, that past hurt, and obviously it hurts you too.” theinsider.com/news/2098643_John_Lorena_The_Shocking_Bobbitt_Reunion

This is why men get repressed by women. No man says anything. No man’s movement! If it were the other way around, the entire world press would be up in arms. Headlines all over. Feminists calling news rooms, making demonstration, heads of government making statements. But a man getting mutilated by a women? Serves him right, he deserves it. Womanizer. Hurt her feelings.

Does this need a Human-Stupidity analysis?

Feminists managed to totally pervert laws, and the general human undersanding of law, order and justice. As I said in other posts, female capacities to subvert press, organisations and public opinion is nothing more then awe inspiring. Men are stupid victims of the common unconscious manipulation.

Readings from Human-Stupidity.com

When a “Rape” is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word “Rape”. & the Perversion of Language
Supreme Court oks indefinite detention for possession of photos. But violent robbers get freed.
Teenage Sexuality
Years of Jail for “clicking on child porn link”. But cutting off her husband’s dick entitles to an excuse
Rape Laws: dismantling of due process explained step by step

Unproven Rape charges: Famous German Weather Anchorman Joerg Kachelmann released after 4 months instant jail

admin — Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:03:47 +0000

A high profile rape accusation case in Germany, unknown in the English speaking world. A famous TV weather anchor man spent 4 months in jail due to a simple accusation of his girlfriend of 15 years, that he raped her. During this time the accuser had to change some of her statements, as they turned out to be false.

Very scary: unproven allegations by a potentially vengeful girlfriend get you instant jail for 4 months, ruining your work, your reputation, and your carreer. Women are given power that nobody else has. Murder attempts, robberies, arson, none of these crimes get you into jail for uncorroborated accusations. Note that 30 years ago, before feminist brainwashing, one would question why one needs to rape a women you had a 15 year consensual affair with?

TV meteorologist Joerg Kachelmann is free to enjoy the summer sun until he comes on trial in September for allegedly raping his ex-girlfriend. An appeals court said it now comes down to “his word against hers.”

Swiss-born television meteorologist Joerg Kachelmann was released Thursday from police custody while awaiting trial on the charge of aggravated rape.

The regional appeals court in Karlsruhe explained that the prosecution only had one witness and that the case came down to “his word against hers.”

The court believed that Kachelmann was not a flight risk and that the evidence against him did not warrant keeping him in pre-trial custody. http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5848070,00.html

Weatherman Kachelmann released from jail

Published: 29 Jul 10 14:51 CET
Online: http://www.thelocal.de/national/20100729-28829.html

Four months after he was arrested for allegedly raping his girlfriend, weatherman Jörg Kachelmann was released from custody on Thursday.

Birkenstock said he was now preparing for the main trial, which begins on September 6 in Mannheim. Kachelmann is accused of threatening his long-term girlfriend with a knife and raping her. He denies the charges.

Germany’s weather star arrested on rape charges

He is the Teutonic equivalent of Britain’s Michael Fish and a household name in Germany. But Jörg Kachelmann, a hugely popular television weatherman, has shocked millions of his viewers after being arrested on charges of brutally raping his long-standing girlfriend during an argument.
ndependent.co.uk/news/world/europe/germanys-weather-star-arrested-on-rape-charges-1926999.html

Men’s Rights & Feminist Abuse Reading List

admin — Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:26:03 +0000

I found most of these articles through reddit.com/r/MensRights/. Highly recommended! Please mark my articles for reddit, digg, delicious etc too if you like them!

Consensual sex, followed by rape, followed by consensual sex

Every man is in danger of getting rape accusations at all times. From long term girlfriends, wives, dates, or strangers. Feminists made the world a mine field for men.

Just in case you don’t get the gist of this: the women agreed to several sex acts, then was raped once, and then did a few more consensual sex acts. And of course all this without corraborating evidence like videotapes or witnesses. No man can be safe, if he has a sex life. Except if he is gay.

Judge Lacava said after the consensual sex the pair had a shower together. While the woman was still in the shower Hronas made demands of her in a domineering voice. The woman became scared as Hronas’s voice and demeanour changed, the court heard. Judge Lacava said the rape was “spontaneous and opportunistic” but Hronas did not ask the victim’s consent. A jury found Hronas guilty of one count of rape. The court heard after the rape the pair engaged in further sex acts. http://www.smh.com.au/national/internet-date-led-to-sex-then-rape-20100730-10z4f.html

Poor Homeless Man’s inheritance confiscated to pay alimony for kid he did not father

The homeless man has his only chance in life to get money from an inheritance, but merciless feminists and a justice system slanted to help women at the expense of innocent men will destroy this guy’s chance at happiness and money.

Seventeen years later, in 2008, Tate asked the probate court to intercept tens of thousands of dollars Wilburn was about to inherit from his deceased mother, based on the 1991 support order. Wilburn’s family tracked down 22-year-old Alexis and asked her to take a DNA test, which excluded Wilburn as Alexis’ biological dad. Wilburn’s family hired an attorney, who filed a motion challening the support order. Alexis swore under oath that Wilburn never acted as her dad and she only saw him a few times in her life. The court denied the motion, ruling Wilburn should have challenged the order sooner, despite the fact that he was homeless and living under a bridge. On appeal, the Third District Court of Appeal upheld the order on the same grounds, and the California Supreme Court has now declined review. “This is totally unjust,” said Angelucci. “It is wrong to force a man person to pay child support for a child that is not his, especially when he never acted as the dad.” http://www.eworldwire.com/pressreleases/211794

Innocent prisoner freed after 27 years

Cleared and released, Green still has questions for rape victim who misidentified him

This story and more shocking press news follow here

[..] the 45-year-old Green is still as anxious as he was in 1983 to understand why the victim of a sexual assault fingered him as the perpetrator, an accusation finally refuted for good when DNA revealed four other men as her attackers.

“She knew I wasn’t the one,” Green said Friday evening, only hours after walking out of Harris County Courthouse a free man. “She shouldn’t have picked me. She had said it wasn’t me a week earlier.”

Green said he was told by a prosecutor that the woman, who is not being named by the Chronicle, is truly sorry and promises to write a letter to Gov. Rick Perry urging that Green be granted a pardon as quickly as possible. chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7130279.html

The release of a Houston man exonerated by DNA tests of a rape for which he has spent 27 years in prison is being delayed by one day.

Forty-four-year old Michael Anthony Green had been set to get a bond during a court hearing Thursday. But his attorney, Bob Wicoff, said officials decided to delay Green’s release by one day because he became upset while waiting in a holding cell. dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D9H8RNV81.html

ISRAEL: Arab man convicted of rape after posing as Jew to seduce woman

Would a woman be convicted of rape for using a pushup bra and lying about her age? Of if she says she is 18, but in reality is underage. Of course not. But a man gets punished for lying about his nationality or religion. And not a light misdemeanour for lying, no, a rape conviction.

Sabbar Kashur, 30, an Arab resident of Jerusalem, pretended to be a Jewish bachelor looking for a relationship. He met a Jewish woman and they went to a nearby building to have consensual sex, according the account in the Haaretz newspaper. He split before she’d finished putting her clothes back on. She filed a criminal complaint for rape and indecent assault, which authorities took seriously. Sure, it wasn’t “classic rape by force,” reasoned Jerusalem District Court Judge Tzvi Segal, but if the woman “hadn’t thought the accused was a Jewish bachelor … she would not have cooperated.” The court rejected a plea bargain to serve community service and sentenced Kashur to 18 months in prison. latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2010/07/iisrael-arab-man-convicted-of-rape-after-posing-as-jew-to-seduce-woman.html

An Arab man convicted in Israel of rape because he pretended he was a Jew when he had consensual sex with a Jewish woman has called the verdict racist. [. . . ]
Kashur was arrested and charged with rape and indecent assault, but the charges were later replaced by a different charge of “rape by deception”. bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-10717186

Gideon Levy, a liberal columnist with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, said the “rape by deception” law would have been applied differently if a Jewish man had sex with an Arab woman under false pretences. english.aljazeera.net//news/middleeast/2010/07/201072191017847251.html

Rape victims accusations MUST always be believed, Feminists demand! Lie detector tests are only for alleged perpetrators.

Feminists believe women never lie. Well intended laws work fine initially, until people figure out how to abuse them. So, vengeful women found the perfect way how to get even. “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned”. Rape accusations, child abuse accusations, are rampant as shown in the false rape society blog and a powerful means to punish a man, to get child custody, etc. As shown in the false rape society blog, women caught red-handed for such a heinous crime get away with a slap on the wrist. And note this is the tip of the iceberg, in most cases it is not possible to prove the lie, and the man is always “gulity until proven innocent”.

• Forcing victims to take a polygraph test violates the federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).

• Polygraph testing can be intimidating for rape survivors who already have difficulty in coming forward. Cleveland Rape Crisis Center president and CEO Megan O’Bryan tells Ms.:

We want to create a culture where survivors are supported in coming forward. Forced polygraph testing sends a message that survivors’ stories are not believed.

This sort of order contributes to the fact that sexual assault is a vastly underreported crime. The National Center for Victims of Crime (NCVC) indicates that a mere 39 percent of rapes or sexual assaults are reported to law enforcement agencies.

msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/03/19/judge-orders-rape-survivors-to-take-lie-detection-test

No reason to believe monogamy comes naturally to human beings.

Few mainstream therapists would contemplate trying to persuade a gay man or lesbian to “grow up, get real, and stop being gay.” But most insist that long-term sexual monogamy is “normal,” while the curiosity and novelty-seeking inherent in human sexuality are signs of pathology. Thus, couples are led to believe that waning sexual passion in enduring marriages or sexual interest in anyone but their partner portend a failed relationship, when in reality these things often signify nothing more than that we are Homo sapiens. This is a problem because there is no reason to believe monogamy comes naturally to human beings. In fact, for millions of years, evolutionary forces have cultivated human libido to the point where ours is arguably the most sexual species on Earth. http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/07/27/ryan.promiscuity.normal/index.html?hpt=C2 Many state laws made the crimes misdemeanor offenses or less severe felonies. The laws also addressed educating youth about the consequences of sexting. Read more: http://www.newsok.com/3-face-charges-in-texhoma-sexting/article/3480534

I found most of these articles through reddit.com/r/MensRights/. Highly recommended! Please mark my articles for reddit, digg, delicious etc too if you like them!

Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photos

Devils Advocate — Sun, 01 Aug 2010 07:18:39 +0000

More child porn insanity! Children nowadays need legal counsel to know if and how they can photograph themselves or have relations with other teenagers, or else they can spend years in jail and remain the rest of their lives on sex offender lists.

US court on ’sexting’: Child porn or child’s play?
01/15/2010 PHILADELPHIA (AP) — The first criminal case involving “sexting” reached a U.S. appeals court on Friday — a case that asks whether racy cell-phone photos of three girls amount to child pornography or child’s play.

A county prosecutor in northeastern Pennsylvania threatened to pursue felony charges if the girls skipped his “re-education” course on such topics as sexual predators and “what it means to be a girl in today’s society.”

The photos show two 12-year-olds in training bras at a sleepover and a topless 16-year-old stepping out of the shower.[. . . ]

“You’re going to see more provocative photos in a Victoria’s Secret catalog,” [ . . . ]
newsok.com/us-court-on-sexting-child-porn-or-childs-play/article/3432301

Feminist “Logic”

Analogies

“Naked pictures of children on the Internet draws predators the same way a swamp draws mosquitoes,” argued lawyer Michael Donohue of Scranton, who represents the prosecutor’s office. Authorities must sometimes protect children from themselves, he argued. newsok.com/3-face-charges-in-texhoma-sexting/article/3480534

“Texas Chainsaw Massacre” movies really attract chainsaw murderers like a swamp draws moskitoes.

Cop Killer rap music really incites violence against police and school authorities.Soccer stadiums attract violent hooligans like a swamp draws mosquitoes. Let us close down all soccer stadiums.

Photos of knives, swords, and guns attract murderers.

Actually, the analogies are much more convincing then the lawyer’s statement in column 1, which is devoid of any logic or scientifc support. Pure manipulative nonsense. It is intriguing how utter nonsense is socially acceptable whenever it is backed by feminism and women’s studies. No clue about logic and scientific method. But absolute masters in manipulating public opinion.

Here is the root of the insanity. Unproven hysterical statements, with no scientific backing, are the excuse for a witch hunt. Feminists use real predators, real rapists, kidnappers and child murderers as an excuse for their political goals. So innocent girls photographing themselves naked get arrested! Why should it be a crime to photograph yourself? Maybe it is also a crime for the girls to look into the mirror?

I dare to say something really taboo: what is the problem if dirty old men like to look at nude adolescent pictures and do absolutely no harm whatsoever. Why should they get 10 years in jail?

So even if it were true that naked pictures of children on the internet draw predators. For what? To look at photos in the privacy of their home? What is the problem? Maybe this is positive, so they don’t go out trying to check out what real adolescents look like naked.

Compare:

Supreme Court oks indefinite detention for possession of photos. But violent robbers get freed.

Pedophile witch hunt & underage sex law excesses: why the witch hunt and how to change it?

Nude adolescent photos: a Crime. Videos of lynching, killing, beating adolescents are legal Prime Time TV.

Years of Jail for “clicking on child porn link”. But lynching videos are legal.

There must be a special evolutionary skill how feminists manage to convince male law makers to support their warped feminist “women studies” logic (Feminist arguments against prostitution debunked)

County officials say they are trying to address the pervasive problem of teens sexting, or exchanging sexually explicit photos and e-mails on their cell phones. According to one study, 20 percent of U.S. teens admit they have done it.

The American Civil Liberties Union considers the images in the Pennsylvania case harmless.

“We’ve been mystified how anybody can look at these photos and say these are second-degree felonies,” Witold J. Walczak, the ACLU of Pennsylvania’s legal director, argued Friday in the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

Either way, he said, officials are flipping the intent of child-pornography laws — to protect children — by going after the victims. It’s unclear who first disseminated the photographs. Each girl insists she did not.

“Turning them into sex offenders is an odd way to protect kids,” Walczak said after the oral arguments. [ . . .]

School officials in Tunkhannock, about 130 miles north of Philadelphia, found the images in late 2008 on cell phones confiscated from junior and senior high school students. They ranged in age from 11 to 17.

Read more: newsok.com/us-court-on-sexting-child-porn-or-childs-play/article/3432301

3 face charges in Texhoma ’sexting’

Published: July 29, 2010

TEXHOMA — Three men have been charged with the possession and distribution of obscene images of an underage girl, a Panhandle prosecutor said. He also said he isn’t sure punishments fit the alleged crime.

Eduardo Cisneros, 18, Diego Guzman, 18, and Cruz Holguin, 19, were charged in Texas County on July 16 with distributing nude photos of a 17-year old girl by phones and email, the prosecutor said.

“It’s a crime, and it needs to be addressed,” Texas County District Attorney Michael Boring said.

“But the only option is to charge them with possessing obscene materials and child pornography.”

There are no state laws that specifically address underage “sexting”- related crimes, he said.

Child porn-related convictions would result in the men having felony records. They also would be required to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives.

Older sexting stories

Published on: Oct 19, 2009

six Pennsylvania high school students are facing child pornography charges after three teenage girls allegedly took nude or semi-nude photos of themselves and shared them with male classmates via their cell phones.

The female students at Greensburg Salem High School in Greensburg, Pa., all 14- or 15-years-old, face charges of manufacturing, disseminating or possessing child pornography while the boys, who are 16 and 17, face charges of possession

convictions would have “serious, serious implications,” including forcing them having to register as sexual offenders for at least 10 years.

a survey of 1,280 teens and young adults found that 20 percent of the teens said they had sent or posted nude or semi nude photos or videos of themselves.

Source: MSNBC

Follow up: community service as punishment

Great. The judge showed common sense and convicted them to minor penalties instead of putting them into jail for 5 years and on sex offender lists for 25 years.

GREENSBURG, Pa. — Criminal cases against Greensburg Salem High School students who were caught “sexting” have been resolved in juvenile court.

All six students — three boys and three girls — were sentenced to curfews and community service, and they each got their cell phones back. [. . . ]
“I think it’s actually really foolish for both the school district and the prosecuting attorneys to make an issue of this thing,” defense attorney Dante Bertani said. “I mean, it’s girls sending pictures of themselves to their boyfriends.”

Still, Bertani said there’s no doubt that naked pictures of children are child pornography.

http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/19022180/detail.html

Of course, that still leaves questions:

why should there be any punishment for taking your own photo, naked or not? why can’t you give your own photo to your boyfriend, husband, father?
what would be the problem if these photos were in possession of adults, even adults who derive sexual excitement from them? The presumption that these adults will go out raping teens are even more far fetched then the idea that spectators of “Terminator” or “Death Wish” will go out shooting people. Also as late as the 1970’s, mainstream world press would print nude photos of girls as young as 15 (british “page 3 girls”, “Blue Lagoon”) and greek art statues show penises of 4 year old boys.

Rape Laws: dismantling of due process explained step by step

admin — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:20:18 +0000

How all due process got dismantled in rape accusations. Feminst power at its best.

Feminism overrides the constitution! Amazing! Rules of due process, presumption of innocence, “innocent until proven guilty”, are fundamental or constitutional law in most countries. Feminists managed to override constitutional guarantees, as they managed to change thousand year old definitions of legal terms like “rape” and “child” (see: Female evolutionary Superiority in social manipulation causes feminist Language Distortions’ universal acceptance ).

All the following content was shamelessly copied from falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/07/if-presumptively-innocent-are-given.html I could not say it any better, and shortening it is a pity.

Prior to the great wave of rape reforms starting in the 1970s, rape advocates reported, with seemingly infinite invention, that women were too scared, too embarrassed, too certain of its futility to report their own rapes. The sexual grievance industry insisted that rape was underreported, and that reforms were needed to do justice to countless women who suffered in silence the brutal indignity of rape. So we kowtowed to the sexual grievance industry to solve “the problem.”
First, we adopted laws that eliminated the requirement of corroboration, which de facto served to flip the old law on its head: now, women don’t need any corroboration of their claims, but men and boys are arrested based solely on even the far-fetched say-so of any woman or girl if they can’t produce corroborating evidence of their innocence.
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we adopted rape shield laws that forbade almost any evidence of the accuser’s prior sexual history with persons other than the accused, a rule that resulted in innumerable innocent men and boys being sent to prison for alleged rapes that never occurred.
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we adopted laws that eliminated the requirement of force, and innocent men and boys who misunderstood the acquiescence of a woman were sent to prison.
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted laws that eliminated the mens rea requirement for rape. Historically, in a rape prosecution, the guilty defendant must have had the intention to have intercourse with a woman without her consent. Too stringent, said the sexual grievance industry, and the requirement was lightened or dropped altogether.
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted laws (in the UK and a handful of US states) that legally forbade naming rape accusers. In the US, the news agencies and outlets have, by common consensus, agreed not to name rape accusers. The mere allegation of rape by the anonymous female, without any other evidence and no matter how far-fetched, invites a man’s name to be splashed all over the newspaper, TV, radio and Internet for the world to titillate at the details of his humiliation.
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted laws that lengthened and even eliminated statutes of limitations for rape, and now, men are sometimes accused of and charged with alleged rapes that occurred 20, 30, 40 or more years after they supposedly occurred, effectively foreclosing the accused from mounting a meaningful defense because the evidence of their innocence has long disappeared.
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted VAWA which, among many other things, pays the legal bills of alleged victims of sexual assault. VAWA pays none of the legal bills of men accused of rape, the presumed innocent — even those who were falsely accused. In the UK, it’s worse. They compensate alleged rape victims, even the ones not subjected to any physical force, no matter how slight their injuries; the UK does not compensate men falsely accused of rape, no matter how egregious their harm. Sometimes false rape accusers are compensated.
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted laws that exempted rape accusers from taking polygraph tests as a condition to proceeding with the rape investigation. In contrast, using polygraphs on men accused of rape is routine, and often if men don’t submit to them, even flimsy charges won’t be dropped. (Moreover, polygraphs are routinely used to insure that sex offenders (predominantly male) are adhering to the terms of their probation, and a refusal to take the polygraph will land the person refusing in jail.)
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted Fed.R.Evid. 413 and many states adopted similar laws. Unlike any other criminal charge, including murder, assault, even planning the World Trade Center attacks, a rape trial in federal court and in various states allows evidence of the defendant’s commission of prior offenses (specifically, his prior offenses of sexual assault) to show that he has a propensity for committing the crime at issue. This rule, which is unique in all of American jurisprudence and widely condemned by legal scholars, allows the jury to hear about the defendant’s prior acts whether or not the defendant takes the stand. Even accusations of prior sexual offenses that occurred years before — and even crimes for which the defendant was acquitted — are admissible if the alleged act is proven by just a preponderance of the evidence (far lower than beyond a reasonable doubt). This is sometimes all a jury needs to convict the man or boy of the crime at issue.
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted rules on college campuses making it easier and easier to expel males accused of sexual wrongdoing, with kangaroo courts and inquisitorial hearing processes. Many college campuses adopted rules that say rape accusers can’t be charged with underage drinking in connection with their accusation, thus providing yet one more motive to lie about rape for any young woman looking to evade an underage drinking charge.
But surely these massive reforms must have cut into underreporting of rape? Surely after decades of one reform after the next to encourage women to come forward, the women must be lining up, right?
Well, no, we are told. Nothing has ever worked to curb alleged underreporting, and underreporting is supposedly still rampant. As but one example, on college campuses, the supposed hotbed for modern rape, more than ninety five percent of students who are sexually assaulted supposedly remain silent, we are told. All the rape reforms, all the bending over backwards to get victims to “come forward” have been a waste of time. [ . . . ]
In one of the most despicable assertions ever uttered in the rape context, Chair of Women Against Rape Ruth Hall said the following: “There will be lots more rape victims” if the presumptively innocent accused of rape are afforded anonymity until they are charged.” Now alleged underreporting is being wielded in a last ditch effort to stop the plan for anonymity for the presumptively innocent. This plan, you must know, will not grant anonymity until conviction but only until a man is charged. It is, thus, the most modest reform imaginable to protect innocent men, scarcely a reform at all, if truth be told. But to the sexual grievance industry, any support for the presumptively innocent is too much support.

Content shamelessly copied from falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/07/if-presumptively-innocent-are-given.html

This fits very nicely with other blog articles here

Female evolutionary Superiority in social manipulation causes feminist Language Distortions’ universal acceptance

“Once Fallen” Derek Logue about sex offender registration

“Human Rights” protect criminals to the detriment of law abiding citizens

Change.org sucks: “womens rights” feminists censor & silence dissent

When a “Rape” is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word “Rape”. & the Perversion of Language

Supreme Court oks indefinite detention for possession of photos. But violent robbers get freed.

Absurdity of Underage Sex Entrapment

Feminist arguments against prostitution debunked

“To Catch a Predator” witch hunt by NBC Dateline & “Perverted Justice”

Child porn & underage sex witch hunt analyzed

25 hottest sex offenders any boy wishes to become a rape victim of

I showed in prior posts that many real problems, serious problems could be solved if they were attacked with the same vigor that feminists applied especially to “crimes” against females. These problems could be solved if attacked with the same vigor: bullyism, mafia intimidation, and the global health threat number one, child obesity. Feminsts are so concerned with the well being of our kids and are not concerned about millions of children condemned to an unhealty life of obesity, diabetes and premature death. See some of my suggestions how attitudes similar to the above measures could solve the deadly world health crisis of obesity from childhood into adulthood.

71 fastest runners on earth: 1 white Christophe Lemaitre & 70 blacks. Are races equal?

Devils Advocate — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:19:10 +0000

Christophe Lemaitre 9.98 First White Man To Run Sub 10 Seconds

The lone white man running 100 meters in under 10 seconds. 70 blacks and one white are in the select group of Athletes that run 100 meters in under 10 seconds. Even on the European Championship, he is the only white guy!

Maybe he could be the first white man in decades to qualify for the 100 meter finals? Maybe the races are not equal? Or are whites and Asians just disadvantaged and discriminated in running? See some politically correct attempts to explain away the obvious:

Nearly all the sprinters who have beaten the 10-second barrier are of West African descent (with the exceptions of Australian runner Patrick Johnson, French sprinter Christophe Lemaitre and Namibian Frankie Fredericks).[4][5][6] No sprinter of predominantly Asian or East African descent had officially achieved this feat[7][8][9][10], though unofficially the Polish Marian Woronin surpassed the barrier with a time of 9.992 seconds[11], until French athlete Christophe Lemaitre ran in 9.98 on July 9, 2010[12]. Colin Jackson (a mixed race athlete and former world record holder in the 110 metre hurdles)[13] noted that both his parents were talented athletes and suggested that biological inheritance was the greatest influence, rather than any perceived racial factor. Furthermore, successful black role models in track events may reinforce the racial disparity.[8] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10-second_barrier

A misunderstanding: some people argue that the fact that there is one guy among 70 blacks is proof that the races are equal. Nobody argues that the races are totally different, it is the famous bell curve: there is a small difference in the mean, and a large difference at the extreme ends at the Bell curve. Just as there are no white top 10 world championship 100 meter runners, there are no black Math or Physics Nobel Prize winners.

Also very funny: those black racists, who gleefully defend black superiority in 100 meter running, are not aware that by the same logic and theory (see Rushton, below) Blacks are less intelligent and more prone to crime.

More articles on Race on Human-Stupidity.com. Rushton asserts that research shows blacks to have more testosterone and more fast twitch muscles. According to Rushton’s racial theories, r-selected populations excel in short time mating strategies, where fighting and running skills are advantagous while k-selection favors more social organisation and long term planning.

[Rushton] asserts that Negroids use a strategy more toward an r-selected strategy (produce more offspring, but provide less care for them) while Mongoloids use the K strategy most (produce fewer offspring but provide more care for them), with Caucasoids exhibiting intermediate tendencies in this area.

He further asserts that Caucasoids evolved more toward a K-selected breeding strategy than Negroids because of the harsher and colder weather encountered in Europe, while the same held true to a greater extent for Mongoloids. Rushton argues that the survival challenges of making warm clothes, building durable shelter, preserving food, and strategically hunting large animals all selected genes for greater intelligence and social organization among the populations that migrated to cold climates. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race,_Evolution,_and_Behavior

The complete top 71 list of under-10-second-runners follows below

source of the list below: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10-second_barrier

Sprinters who have broken the 10-second barrier
#	Date first broken	Athlete	Time 000(s)	Nationality	Continent^[1]	Best (year)^[2]	Notes
1	001 !14 October 1968	Hines, Jim	9.95 (A)^[3]	United States	North America	9.95 (1968)
2	002 !11 August 1977	Leonard, Silvio	9.98 (A)	Cuba	North America	9.98 (1977)
3	003 !14 May 1983	Lewis, Carl	9.97	United States	North America	9.86 (1991)
4	004 !3 July 1983	Smith, Calvin	9.93 (A)	United States	North America	9.93 (1983)
5	005 !5 May 1984	Lattany, Mel	9.96	United States	North America	9.96 (1984)
6^[5]	006 !24 September 1988	Christie, Linford	9.97	United Kingdom	Europe	9.87 (1993)
7	007 !20 May 1989	Stewart, Raymond	9.97	Jamaica	North America	9.96 (1991)
8	008 !16 June 1989	Burrell, Leroy	9.94	United States	North America	9.85 (1994)
9	009 !25 August 1991	Mitchell, Dennis	9.99	United States	North America	9.91 (1991)
10	010 !25 August 1991	Fredericks, Frankie	9.95	Namibia	Africa	9.86 (1996)
11	011 !11 September 1991	Cason, Andre	9.99	United States	North America	9.92 (1993)
12	012 !4 April 1992	Adeniken, Olapade	9.97	Nigeria	Africa	9.95 (1994)
13	013 !18 April 1992	Marsh, Michael	9.93	United States	North America	9.93 (1992)
14	014 !18 April 1992	Ezinwa, Davidson	9.96	Nigeria	Africa	9.94 (1994)
15	015 !21 May 1993	Effiong, Daniel	9.99	Nigeria	Africa	9.98 (1993)
16	016 !22 July 1994	Drummond, Jon	9.99	United States	North America	9.92 (1997)
17	017 !22 April 1995	Bailey, Donovan	9.99	Canada	North America	9.84 (1996)
18	018 !15 June 1995	Surin, Bruny	9.97	Canada	North America	9.84 (1999)
19	019 !21 April 1996	Boldon, Ato	9.93	Trinidad and Tobago	North America	9.86 (1998)
20	020 !12 June 1997	Greene, Maurice	9.96	United States	North America	9.79 (1999)
21	021 !12 June 1997	Streete-Thompson, Kareem	9.96	United States	North America	9.96 (1997)
22	022 !12 June 1997	Montgomery, Tim	9.96	United States	North America	9.92 (1997)
23	023 !20 June 1997	Spencer, Percival	9.98	Jamaica	North America	9.98 (1997)
24	024 !13 July 1997	Ogunkoya, Seun	9.97	Nigeria	Africa	9.92 (1998)
25	025 !9 August 1998	Henderson, Vincent	9.95	United States	North America	9.95 (1998)
26	026 !11 September 1998	Thompson, Obadele	9.87 (A)	Barbados	North America	9.87 (1998)
27	027 !5 June 1999	Myles-Mills, Leonard	9.98	Ghana	Africa	9.98 (1999)
28	028 !13 June 1999	Chambers, DwainD	9.99	United Kingdom	Europe	9.97 (1999)
29	029 !2 July 1999	Gardener, Jason	9.98	United Kingdom	Europe	9.98 (1999)
30	030 !5 July 1999	Harden, Tim	9.92	United States	North America	9.92 (1999)
31	031 !2 June 2000	Miller, Coby	9.98	United States	North America	9.98 (2000)
32	032 !2 June 2000	Williams, Bernard	9.99	United States	North America	9.94 (2001)
33	033 !21 June 2000	Obikwelu, Francis	9.97	Nigeria^[4]	Africa	9.86 (2004)
34	034 !12 April 2002	Crawford, Shawn	9.99	United States	North America	9.88 (2004)
35	035 !21 April 2002	Johnson, Joshua	9.95	United States	North America	9.95 (2002)
36	036 !4 May 2002	Lewis, Brian	9.99	United States	North America	9.99 (2002)
37	037 !27 July 2002	Collins, Kim	9.98	Saint Kitts and Nevis	North America	9.98 (2002)
38	038 !5 May 2003	Johnson, Patrick	9.93	Australia	Oceania	9.93 (2003)
39	039 !19 July 2003	Aliu, Deji	9.98	Nigeria	Africa	9.95 (2003)
40	040 !15 August 2003	Capel, John	9.97	United States	North America	9.95 (2004)
41	041 !15 August 2003	Gatlin, Justin	9.97	United States	North America	9.85 (2004)
42	042 !15 August 2003	Grimes, Mickey	9.99	United States	North America	9.99 (2003)
43	043 !12 October 2003	Emedolu, Uchenna	9.97	Nigeria	Africa	9.97 (2003)
44	044 !12 June 2004	Powell, Asafa	9.99	Jamaica	North America	9.72 (2008)
45	045 !14 June 2005	Zakari, Aziz	9.99	Ghana	Africa	9.99 (2005)
46	046 !25 June 2005	Burns, Marc	9.96	Trinidad and Tobago	North America	9.96 (2005)
47	047 !25 June 2005	Brown, Darrel	9.99	Trinidad and Tobago	North America	9.99 (2005)
48	048 !5 July 2005	Pognon, Ronald	9.99	France	Europe	9.99 (2005)
49	049 !22 July 2005	Scott, Leonard	9.94	United States	North America	9.91 (2006)
50	050 !25 May 2006	Fasuba, Olusoji	9.93	Nigeria	Africa	9.85 (2006)
51	051 !21 July 2006	Gay, Tyson	9.97	United States	North America	9.69 (2009)
52	052 !18 August 2006	Brunson, Marcus	9.99	United States	North America	9.99 (2006)
53	053 !24 April 2007	Atkins, Derrick	9.98	Bahamas	North America	9.91 (2007)
54	054 !8 June 2007	Dix, Walter	9.93	United States	North America	9.91 (2008)
55	055 !26 July 2007	Francis, Samuel	9.99	Qatar	Asia	9.99 (2007)
56	056 !28 September 2007	Spearmon, Wallace	9.96	United States	North America	9.96 (2007)
57	057 !10 May 2008	Padgett, Travis	9.96	United States	North America	9.89 (2008)
58	058 !17 May 2008	Bolt, Usain	9.76	Jamaica	North America	9.58 (2009)	World Record
59	059 !18 May 2008	Thompson, Richard	9.93	Trinidad and Tobago	North America	9.89 (2008)
60	060 !28 June 2008	Martin, Rodney	9.95	United States	North America	9.95 (2008)	^[14]
61	061 !28 June 2008	Jelks, Mark	9.99	United States	North America	9.99 (2008)	^[14]
62	062 !28 June 2008	Patton, Darvis	9.89	United States	Nortrh America	9.89 (2008)	^[14]
63	063 !28 June 2008	Williams, Ivory	9.94	United States	North America	9.94 (2008)	^[14]
64	064 !22 July 2008	Carter, Nesta	9.98	Jamaica	North America	9.91 (2009)
65	065 !15 August 2008	Martina, Churandy	9.99	Netherlands Antilles	North America	9.93 (2008)
66	066 !16 August 2008	Frater, Michael	9.97	Jamaica	North America	9.97 (2008)
67	067 !24 May 2009	Bailey, Daniel	9.99	Antigua and Barbuda	North America	9.91 (2009)
68	068 !7 June 2009	Rodgers, Michael	9.94	United States	North America	9.94 (2009)	^[15]
69	069 !11 July 2009	Blake, Yohan	9.96	Jamaica	North America	9.93 (2009)	^[16]
70	070 !28 August 2009	Clarke, Lerone	9.99	Jamaica	North America	9.99 (2009)
71	071 !9 July 2010	Lemaître, Christophe	9.98	France	Europe	9.98 (2010)

All these runners have run 100 m under 10 seconds at some time. Check out here if you find an Asian or white runner here.

Follows a very racist comedy spoof. I definitely don’t support the majority of the overblown racist comments that are meant as comedy. But check yourself if you can find a grain of truth.

A few more world championship runs with only blacks : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u18_-87Pb6U

Fathers’ rights movie censored by Amnesty International due to feminists’ protest

admin — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:24:29 +0000

The right to be a father

A very feeling movie, about men who are forbidden to see their kids. The movie is quite tame, it does not even mention that men of course have to pay half their income in exchange for not being allowed to see the kid.

The final version of the documentary about the discrimination against fathers in custody cases, and the mayhem it causes in our societies.
Produced by Sara Sivesson, Jerry Wallén, Sandra Atas and Oskar Krantz at the John Bauer high school in Sweden. The film was made as an entry in a Amnesty International contest regarding human rights.

Rumors are that women’s groups protested the movie and Amnesty International thus did not allow the movie in their contest. Another example of the amazing clout feminists wield to manipulate institutions to act in the feminist interest, making special rules and exceptions for feminist issues that the institution would never make for any other issues.

Amnesty sponsored a film competition, but when some finalists produced a film that angered feminists, the film was pulled from Amnesty’s YouTube site. Amnesty denies that pressure from an Uppsala women’s shelter was responsible for suppressing the film, but the shelter itself is gloating about its political clout.

The film, created by four high school students and titled, The Right To Be a Father, is a powerful depiction of how children are taken from their fathers by Sweden’s feminist family courts. Separating children from their fathers is not only a bedrock principle of the war against “patriarchy,” but also the bread-and-butter of the lucrative child custody industry, so it is not surprising that the sisterhood would come down hard on the heresy that feminists violate human rights.

The film was nominated for the final stage of the competition. Amnesty posted it on YouTube, and the creators were invited to the film gala in Gothenburg. “But our film was never shown at the festival, and the day after it also disappeared from Amnesty’s YouTube channel,” says Sara Sivesson, one of the creators. [. . . ]

This is not isolated. In recent years Amnesty has become a mouthpiece for the radical feminist agenda, to the point of pushing programs that violate human rights. Amnesty’s campaign against “domestic violence,” for example, is a prescription for criminalizing the innocent on a huge scale.

Even on its face, “domestic violence” is a matter not of human rights but of crime. No one suggests that ordinary theft or assault, when not perpetrated by government agents, are “human rights” violations. They are crimes for which the criminal justice system either provides or it does not. If not, the system is dysfunctional, but it has nothing to do with “human rights.”

But this is precisely what is wrong with the trumped-up hysteria over “domestic violence” (and most accusations are indeed trumped-up): It exists precisely to circumvent the legal safeguards and protections for the rights of the accused that make free countries free. Newfangled gender crimes like “domestic violence” exist to punish those who cannot be convicted with evidence.

Why can alleged assailants not be charged and tried according to standard laws against violent assault? Because domestic “violence” criminalizes almost anything, even if it is not violent or even physical.

In domestic violence cases there is seldom a trial, almost never a jury, and no one is ever acquitted. One study published in Criminology and Public Policy found that everyone arrested for domestic violence receives some punishment. Special “domestic violence courts” now exist for the express purpose of processing more convictions. www.lewrockwell.com/baskerville/baskerville13.1.html

Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception

Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime.

Topic 1: human rights of criminals

Topic 2: Child Porn witch hunt: depicting life threatening violence against children: legal. Depiction of nudity or healthy sexuality: a heinous felony.

Female quotas on death row? Unsuccessful male losers overlooked by feminist zeal!

Men outnumber women both among the losers and among the biggest winners

Today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men.

Over half the males but very few females were reproductive failures

Feminists look for equal rights without equal risk & equal losses.

Men outnumber women both among the losers and among the biggest winners

Workaholics are mostly men.

To maximize reproduction, a culture needs all the wombs, and only few penises.

No equal rights and gender neutral quotas for life-boat seats on the Titanic!

Men take risks, women play safe

Related articles

Lorena Bobbit forgives her husband (she cut off his manhood 16 years ago)

Readings from Human-Stupidity.com

Unproven Rape charges: Famous German Weather Anchorman Joerg Kachelmann released after 4 months instant jail

TV meteorologist Joerg Kachelmann is free to enjoy the summer sun until he comes on trial in September for allegedly raping his ex-girlfriend. An appeals court said it now comes down to “his word against hers.”

Weatherman Kachelmann released from jail

Germany’s weather star arrested on rape charges

Men’s Rights & Feminist Abuse Reading List

Consensual sex, followed by rape, followed by consensual sex

Poor Homeless Man’s inheritance confiscated to pay alimony for kid he did not father

Innocent prisoner freed after 27 years

Cleared and released, Green still has questions for rape victim who misidentified him

ISRAEL: Arab man convicted of rape after posing as Jew to seduce woman

Rape victims accusations MUST always be believed, Feminists demand! Lie detector tests are only for alleged perpetrators.

No reason to believe monogamy comes naturally to human beings.

Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photos

Feminist “Logic”

Analogies

3 face charges in Texhoma ’sexting’

Older sexting stories

Follow up: community service as punishment

Rape Laws: dismantling of due process explained step by step

How all due process got dismantled in rape accusations. Feminst power at its best.

71 fastest runners on earth: 1 white Christophe Lemaitre & 70 blacks. Are races equal?

Christophe Lemaitre 9.98 First White Man To Run Sub 10 Seconds

Fathers’ rights movie censored by Amnesty International due to feminists’ protest

The right to be a father

Related articles by Zemanta