We make extreme efforts to not run afoul of any law, not even by mistake or accident 1 2 3 .

We are interested in truth, free academic research, in protection and happiness for children 5.

We are against unnecessary witch hunts that demonize and imprison people with unnecessary rigor and that criminalize a huge percentage of the (male) population.

The biggest of all taboos: to research, study or discuss adult-child sexuality.

We have been warned. We will be called pedophiles. We may suffer vigilante action. We may suffer government prosecution. We should not mess with the topic adult-child sex.

Yes we are talking about real children under 12 years of age, not just 17 year old adolescent young adults, re-defined as "children" by feminist dogma and by the *United Nations.

The Rind Study serves as a warning: a prestigious, peer reviewed meta analysis, published in one of the most prestigious journals of the American Psychological Association: probably the only piece of peer reviewed academic research condemned by unanimous vote by both the United States Senate and Congress.

The authors’ stated goal was “…to address the question: In the population of persons with a history of CSA [child sexual abuse], does this experience cause intense psychological harm on a widespread basis for both genders?” Some of the authors’ more controversial conclusions were that child sexual abuse does not necessarily cause intense, pervasive harm to the child;^[3] that the reason the current view of child sexual abuse was not substantiated by their empirical scrutiny was because the construct of CSA was questionably valid; and that the psychological damage caused by the abusive encounters depends on whether the encounter was consensual or not.  Wikipedia on Bruce Rind 

The US Senate and Congress have decided, once and for all, by dogmatic fiat: "child sexual abuse" is is extremely traumatic under all circumstances.  Academic research must not arrive at any different conclusions.

Such a shocking interference of religious and moral zealots with scientific truth has not happened since Galileo Galilei: a few centuries ago, the catholic church decreed the "scientific truth" that the sun revolves around the earth.

The Trauma Myth

Susan Clancy inadvertently stumbled over the unpopular truth, as published in

The Trauma Myth: The Truth About the Sexual Abuse of Children–and Its Aftermath .

All hell broke loose. I was bombarded with accusations that I was hurting victims even more than they already had been and that I was a friend of pedophiles. I was also vilified by many in my own scientific community. Some colleagues and graduate students stopped talking to me. A well-meaning professor told me to pick another research topic because I was going to rule myself out of a job in academia. Some felt my research had a political agenda, one biased against victims. I was invited to give a talk about my research at Cambridge Hospital—home of the tremendously influential sexual abuse treatment program Victims of Violence. No one from the program showed up. Clancy (pp. 77-78).

Researchers refuse to discuss issues in a seminar?! The most convinced adversaries never counter with true research, with true arguments?

This is the sad state of affairs. A dogma does not need to be discussed scientifically. The Bible has the definite answer. The US senate made the scientific decision.

And Human-Stupidity has the insanity to question and analyze the dogma.

Human-Stupidity is open to science. Just prove me wrong, using science.

1. If unbiased free academic research can show that 17 year olds get traumatized for life for having sex with older people, we will support age-of-consent laws.
2. If the Rind study, and Susan Clancy can be proven wrong, by free unbiased academic research, we will support draconian decade-long punishments for all childhood sexuality. 
3. We would stand corrected if the voodoo theory could be proven true, by free unbiased academic research: if it were proven that looking at photos of lightly clothed 15 year olds, downloaded for free from the internet does irreparable harm to the minors depicted. If that harm is so perverse that looking at the photos ruins the model’s life forever. And that downloading free photos truly stimulates the rape and abuse of innumerous children. Then we might agree that life in prison without parole is a proper punishment for possession of a few hundred photos, which are nothing else then 0′s and 1′s in files on a computer hard drive.

But against all odds, Milton Diamond, in peer reviewed research, proved the opposite: freely available child pornography reduces sex crimes against children, because many pedophiles can satisfy themselves merely by perusing pictures.

Certainly, scientific research should not be manipulated and repressed by religion, feminism, or personal feelings. It is relevant to understand Robert Kurzban‘s description of how people invent non-existing victims to justify their pre-conceived opinions.

You creep! Adult-child sex is disgusting and wrong! Period.

I don’t disagree. You have all right to protect your children. Or to promote laws that criminalize adult child sex. BUT

• Don’t falsify academic research to further bolster your claim and to justify an absurd police state with extreme draconian punishment. Base your policy on free unbiased science.
• And don’t break the law engaging in vigilante action.
• And don’t prosecute and punish thought crimes like manga drawings of child sex, or possession of Homer Simpson cartoons. Nor persecute and harm law abiding pedophiles like Jack McClellan.
• And join me in my fight against the dangerous child obesity epidemic that kills and sickens Millions of children and adults every year. Let us fight REAL child endangerment that truly hurts children, instead of protecting children from trumped up imaginary voodoo theories.

Why do you obsess, or even care about adult child sexuality and child pornography?

• We were born and trained in scientific method and curiosity.
  • We learned the scientific research method: form hypotheses, test them, find alternative explanations, devise tests to verify or disprove these alternative explanations.
• We have a firm belief that it is important to know the truth. Positive illusions, false beliefs, and religion are often useful for individuals,  but not as a method of science.
• We have compassion.
  • We see the damage that is being done by the child and teenage sexuality witch hunt and the child porn insanity.
  • Similarly to the war on illicit drugs, thousands go to jail unnecessarily and hundreds of millions get criminalized
  • Yes, a considerable percentage of adolescents have sex before 18 year of age. In states without Romeo and Juliet laws,  every single instance of such sex is a felony    * Girl 13, charged as sex offender and victim at the same time
  • We are in favor of respect for the law. Few, clear, necessary laws that are respected. How can one respect senseless laws that make a large percentage of the Californian population felons. 99% of them go unpunished while a small percentage gets their life ruined with draconian prison sentences followed by life long sex offender registrations for crimes like having sex with his future wife.
  • Yes, forensic analysis could find suspicious child porn on almost any computer, especially by the European and Australian rules of "apparently underage" child porn which includes barely legal young looking 18 year olds and small breasted 23 year olds with pony tails.
  • This spreads fear and terror in the populace
  • It might be a civil rights issue, an undue restriction of children’s liberty, that it is a felony for children and adolescent to to engage in consensual sexual behavior, or simple doctor play
• Most accusations against teachers in Wales are dropped : this is why we obsess with this. To prevent innocents from being terrorized.  If true non-forcible child abuse is not very traumatizing, then abuse accusations would not be so extremely serious. The potential abuse would be treated as a medium transgression, not as worse then murder. Then teachers would not be so terrorized by a simple accusation, be it true or false.
• There is a limit to truthfulness:
  • we do believe that the ‘Armageddon’ Super Virus Recipe Should Be Kept Secret – For Years.Here knowledge itself is deadly. This is very different. Here knowledge gives power to terrorists.

We believe that neither the Bible nor the  US senate or US congress are sources to scientific knowledge and truth

We at Human-Stupidity are fanatically interested in the truth.

• We don’t accept dogma, even if the dogma supported and enforced by the US Congress and Senate . Even when threatened with prosecution for thought crimes, our curiosity and quest for truth does not stop.
• We are driven by curiosity. We want to know the truth. At any price.

Admit it you pervert: you are a pedophile, you want to abuse our pre-pubescent children! Why else would you defend pedophilia and child pornography?

We have absolutely no interest in pre-pubescent children.

We are not even "law abiding pedophiles" like  Jack McClellan. Jack McClellan is a self professed pedophile who admits sexual attraction to 8 year olds, but explains that he does not act on his attraction because he is a law abiding citizen.  This was enough for him to get restraining orders, threats, humiliation and aggression at the Steve Wilkos talks show. His naïve honesty pretty much ruined his life.

We are normal healthy people that have no sexual interest whatsoever in pedophilia. No sexual interest whatsoever in pre-pubescent children.

Only those who don’t engage in illicit behavior can afford to publicly defend Child Porn or child sexuality

If we were engaging in any illegal child sexual pursuits, or even just interested in collecting child pornographic images, we would be wise enough to shut up.

Nambla (North American Man Boy Love Organization) members have suffered arrests and prosecution. Many of Nambla members actually engaged in actual pedophilia, or consumed child porn and thus were vulnerable to arrest and prosecution. Now they wisened up and keep a low profile. Even their web site nambla.org is not easily accessible (Google is your friend if you want to try). I will refrain from linking to it, though Nambla.org actually has some interesting articles.

We take extra precautions to stay away from all underage minors

To avoid any potential misunderstanding, trouble, or intentional CP entrapment,  we ID check any friend, visitor, or client that looks under 35 years of age. Thus nobody under 18 years of age would ever get close to us. Except when accompanied by a responsible parent, with proper ID. Yes it is embarrassing when I have to kick out a friend’s underage brother or sister. Yes it is sad that we refuse to teach professional skills by tutoring a bright 16 year old boy, even with parental consent. Self preservation is important, especially when outing ourselves with such heretic writings.

Why would one "defend" pedophilia if one is not a pedophile?

• Why would one oppose medieval witch hunts, if one is not does not believe in sorcery and is not interested in witchcraft? 
• Why would high ranking police and law enforcement be in favor of liberalizing drugs if they don’t consume drugs? 

We oppose imprisonment of harmless people for victimless crime

We would like to keep prisons free for violent dangerous criminals. We don’t see the need to cruelly lock up for non-violent people who copy files in the privacy of their home. We oppose overcriminalization.

Free scientific research from emotional and religious barriers

We don’t need to falsify science to prohibit the sale of dog meat

Is it necessary to falsify and prevent scientific research to justify penalties for indecency with children? Are people afraid they can not justify the draconian laws if the truth be known? Why are people afraid that damage will be done if academic researchers are allowed to say the truth, without political interference (see Rind Study and Susan Clancy),

We prohibit the sale of dog and horse meat. We don’t need to invent false science about the terrible danger of eating dog meat. We can prohibit dog meat for sentimental reasons, without hiding behind junk science. But there are no decade-long prison sentences for illegally selling dog meat.

We believe if the lies get uncovered, the manipulative language removed, punishments should be much less severe.

Child porn laws prescribing punishment for possession of pictures or possession of drawings should be revised. Or rather unceremoniously scrapped. Let freedom of expression and freedom of press prevail.

• Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime.

We want science to inform us how to best protect the well being of children

We want to protect children: Legalizing child pornography reduces child sexual abuse, as Milton Diamond has proven conclusively. We are more concerned with child food porn, junk food promotion that really leads to chronic disease and premature death in hundreds of million people world wide.

Lots of child pornography is nothing more then adolescent erotica(copine scale, Knox vs. USA) with 17 year old "children". Children get victimized not so much by child porn itself, but by child pornography and sexting prosecution.

People get punished with years, decades 1, or life in prison for having copies of computer files that consists of 0′s and 1′s. While pictures of child mutilation, child murder, shaking babies to death are common staple on YouTube.

• Adolescent girl-fights with injuries: cheer on! Nudity, love and sex: crime and victimization
• Children loved non-nude solo modeling, were traumatized by federal government child porn hysteria: "Photo sessions were the highlight of my life"!
• Child Porn on Australian WTV television (and in video stores and academy award winning movies "The Tin Drum")?
• Julie Carr performed oral sex with baby daughter: 17 years jail; filmed it: 20 years. Too harsh compared to 4 years for baby killer?
• Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (40 years)
• Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail
• Eek! A Male! Pedophile hysteria hurts and kills children
• Cruel child porn laws kill, "destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
• Hollywood movies glorify criminal heroes: how romantic!

Children can make career in organized crime, as executioners and murderers. The liberal law guarantees them virtual impunity. Here is an especially extreme case:

The teenager accused of double murder in Marazion, was arrested provisionally and will be held for 45 days. After that date, if the process is not judged in a timely manner, he will be released.  Teen killer 

It is absolutely impossible to get a verdict in 45 days. The police inquiry alone takes longer. He already has accusations for other murders that still are in the phase of police inquiry. 

Now if he were judged and convicted, the most he could get is: 3 years of educational measures and his criminal past wiped clean after age 18 (or 2?).

Liberal political correctness is a crime against honest law abiding people. Imagine you contract a 21 year old after getting a clean police background check. But in reality he has killed half a dozen people, but his record has been wiped clean, as required by law!

There is no prison for minors. Only educational measures. From what I remember, career criminals will be mixed with truants, orphans and other harmless children, under the pretense that this will be good for the criminals. In reality, of course, it seriously damages the good children.

The minor was sent to the Educational Center of passare, remaining until  passage of the stated time [of 45 days]. The internation was ordered by District Judge Maranguape. Teen killer 

"The ECA (Statute of the Child and Adolescent) came to protect and ultimately benefit juvenile delinquents. The statute is turning teenagers into proxies of crime," states the judge of the Fifth Child and Youth Court in Fortaleza, Manuel Clístenes de Façanha e Gonçalves.
According to the magistrate recidivism is very high, and the crimes tend to be more severe, every time the boys re-offend.

No wonder. A criminal gets caught, is treated with velvet gloves, and then released. As most prisons, the detention centers in Brazil are rough on petty criminals and heaven for hardened, tough strong and well connected career criminals.

So once he got the official confirmation that even when caught, he will not be punished. That is the best reinforcement he can have. Yes, the petty criminal who stole a chocolate can benefit from such measures. But not the paid executioner of a drug gang who gets 300 dollars for one murder.

He points out that minors do not take seriously the measures imposed by the Child and Adolescent Statute.

Of course. 40 days of humane internation, mixed with harmless non-criminal children and free food and shelter. For murder. And only when caught. A summer camp! And, of course, the criminal’s name and identity is kept secret.

"The ‘safe passage’ that exists in the minds of minors was installed by the ECA, which is not being able to resolve the situation. It is a law that imposes no fear, no sense of responsibility," the judge regrets Cleisthenes.

Back to our story

In Greater Fortaleza, summary executions committed by minors are determined by the ‘heads’ of trafficking

"I know I’ll spend a little time in prison, and when I leave, I will kill three more, up there at the Cemetery  …"
The cold and determined account is given by a boy of just 14 years, seized by the police on the morning of last Wednesday (May 2nd) in the Municipality of Marazion, in the Metropolitan Region of Fortaleza. Anderson (real name) is in his early teens, but it carries on his back charges of at least eight murders and two attempted murders and assaults. The last two crimes of death attributed to Anderson occurred on the morning prior to his arrest in that city.

Coldness

The double murder took place inside a grocery store, the district of Marazion/ There were killed, shot, merchant Celson Paulo Miranda, 42, owner of the small establishment, and retired third sergeant Keple Miranda de Oliveira, 73. Teen killer 

Seized along with others accused of involvement in two murders, Anderson showed all his coolness. He confessed involvement in the crime and revealed the police that he had received in exchange for the executions, the murder weapon and the amount of R $ 500 reais [US$ 280]. He showed no regret. The mastermind who ordered the crime was also arrested in the police operation.
Cases like the ‘boy’ Anderson are not rare in the scenario of rising crime in the country involving teenagers and even children.
At just 14 years, the boy has killed several people, did not play dumb before police, .He promised to kill more,and  sure will be free of all criminal records when he reaches the legal age (18 years).

• STATUTE OF THE CHILD AND ADOLESCENT
• Children’s Rights: Brazil
• Making child rights constitutional in Brazil
• Brazilian child and adolescent statute: workers’ views about their practice*`
• A. BRAZIL’S INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS IN REGARD TO CHILDREN
• A Brazil: 30% of the youths in conflict with the law are serving sentences in detention centers

• Kids in Brazil: Great Law Not Enough

Nafissatou Diallo had accused Dominique Strauss-Kahn of rape. Feminist pressure ahs dismantled due process specifically in rape accusations. So Dominique Strauss-Kahn was imprisoned upon a mere unproven and uncorroborated accusation. Were he a mere mortal without a million dollar dream team of lawyers, investigators, and bail payments, he probably would not have escaped and spend decades in prison. But still, his career was over. Thanks to this unproven accusation by Nafissatou Diallo, a proven liar and embezzler. Add to this some other accusations of improper and somewhat aggressive pursuit of women. Such harassment laws, also espoused by feminists, protect women from the terrible trauma of being pursued with too much zeal by men.

Human-Stupidity keeps wondering why feminism is not about female empowerment, about finding the inner strength so they could deal with verbal behavior without needing protection of a police state.

Were it not for Nafissatou Diallo, and feminist rape and harassment legislation, Strauss Kahn would have remained his party’s favorite and is likely to have been in the race and might have become French president. Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s arrest paved the way for a goal that had long eluded the political career of 57-year-old French Socialist François Hollande: to square off against President Nicolas Sarkozy in next month’s election. The international monetary fund got a different chief with different policy regarding the Euro. A hedge fund manager could have made Billions had he foreseen Strauss-Kahn‘s arrest and the subsequent fluctuations of the exchange rate.  Many powerful men have been marred and destroyed by women’s allegations.

Such legal liability is now in the process of being incorporated into the ECA statute of adolescent and children’s rights.

The intent of giving emotional support is noble. Human-Stupidity deplores the overcriminalization and total regulamentation of all aspects of human behavior under the threat of heavy civil liabilities.

Due to the importance of such decisions to Libertarians,  the men’s rights (and feminist) movement, we translated two newspaper articles in their entirety.

Translation: Superior Tribunal in Brazil orders father to pay compensation for emotional abandonment 
(STJ condena pai a indenizar filha por abandono afetivo)

SAO PAULO – The Third Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) ordered a father to pay R $ 200 thousand [US$ 110 000] to his daughter for "emotional distance". The decision is unprecedented. In 2005, the Fourth Chamber of the Supreme Court had rejected moral damages for emotional distance.

The case judged originates from São Paulo. The author of the case obtained judicial recognition of paternity and filed suit against the father because he had suffered material and emotional neglect during childhood and adolescence. The trial judge dismissed the petition and attributed the father’s distance to "aggressive behavior" of her mother towards the father. The woman appealed to the appeals court and said the father was "wealthy and prosperous." The Court of São Paulo (TJSP) reversed the judgment and set the compensation for R$ 415,000.

On appeal to the Supreme Court, the father argued that there was no abandonment, and even if he had done so, there would be illegal to be financially indemnified and the only possible punishment for failing with such obligations fathers would be the loss of family power.

Minister Nancy Andrighi , the of the court’s third chamber, however, understood that it is possible to demand compensation for moral damage caused by emotional abandonment by parents. "Love is optional, care is duty," she said in the sentence. For her, there is no reason to treat the damage to family relationships differently from other civil damages.

"Many, based on axioms that focus on the existence of special circumstances in family relationships – feelings and emotions – many deny the possibility to indemnify or compensate for damage arising from failure of parental obligations parents have to fulfill," said the minister. "However, in family law there are no legal restrictions on the application of the rules relating to liability and the consequent duty to indemnify / compensate."

The minister pointed out that moral damages in family relationships may involve subjective questions, such as affection, sorrow or love, making it difficult to identify the elements that traditionally compose the material damage indemnifiable: damage, the authors fault and causation. However, it is understood that parenthood carries objective omotional bonds with legal consequences and constitutional minimum duties to be fulfilled.

"Here we do not talk or discuss love but rather the biological and legal enforcement of caring, which is a legal duty, a consequence of the freedom of people to generate or adopt children," the minister argued.

In the analyzed case, the minister stressed that her daughter has overcome the emotional difficulties causedtreatment as "second class daughter," who was not offered the same conditions for further development that was given to the later born children. Not while presumption of paternity was "evident", nor after the judicial recognition of paternity.

The daughter finally gained employment, founded a family with children and was able to "grow reasonably right." However, the feelings of hurt and sorrow she endured, caused by parental neglect can be characterizing as damage. The amount of compensation set by the lower court TJ-SP, however, was considered high by the supreme STJ, which reduced it to R$ 200,000 [US$ 110 000], a figure that should be inflation adjusted since November 26, 2008, trial date by the court in São Paulo.1

Affectional neglect and abandonment of children may be considered an illegal act
(Abandono afetivo de filhos poderá ser considerado ato ilegal )

BRASILIA – The Committee on Constitution, Justice and Citizenship (CCJ) approved on Wednesday, a change in the Child and Adolescent Statutes (ECA) to enforce financial reparation of damage by a child’s father or mother who fails to provide emotional support to children, be it by the living together, or by periodic visits.

The text states that the non-custodial parent of the child or adolescent will be required, by the Civil Code, not only to visit and accompany him or her, but also to watch their financial maintenance and education.

In addition to the duties of financial support, custody and education of minor children, the proposal amends the ECA statutes to also demand of parents the duty of having presence in their children’s life and giving material and moral assistance. It is important to stress that this aspect will be considered in the judgments of having given up guardianship and having suspended or given up family rights.

Elementary school principals will have the responsibility to inform the child protection agency in cases of neglect, emotional abuse or emotional abandonment. The current law requires educators to report only cases of physical abuse of students, repeated unjustified absences, high levels of repetition of school years and school dropout.

1. Abandono moral – Fundamentos da Responsabilidade Civil
2. Experts question the punishment of parents for moral abandonment – as in the law to be votede by the Brazilian senate. (Especialistas questionam punição de pais por abandono moral prevista em projeto que tramita no Senado)
3. Pai deve indenizar filho por abandono afetivo

These war heroes, ready to die for their country, are taken overseas and kept away from women, confined among men, for months on end. Pent-up sexuality due to suchanti prostitution  policy may cause higher rates of harassment, date rape, forcible rape. Young immature soldiers may embark on premature marriages, whose consequences and failures will come to financially and emotionally haunt the men for the rest of their life. Heterosexual men might reluctantly engage in homosexuality just to relieve pressure, similar to prisons situations.

Women are now allowed in the armed forces. Harassment charges prevent soldiers from joking and bonding like they used to for millennia. Add to this the danger of date rape accusations or false rape charges and the low level of evidence needed to be convicted of rape.

• Frightening case: Men in the military accused of sexual assault have to prove their innocence  21 comments

All this might sap morale of troops, reduce fighting capacity and discourage army enrollment.

18 USC § 1384 prohibits American military to solicit prostitutes, Adult men, ready to die for their country,  but not allowed to take care of their pent up sexual urges. 1 year in prison for visiting a legal brothel and helping the local economy? High testosterone levels make men courageous fighters, and make them more sexual.

For what reasons, and to what deleterious effects does the US government interference in the life of millions, preventing them from perusing legal sex work in other countries.

We don’t outlaw soldiers’ use of IPhones or Nike sneakers, under threat of imprisonment, just because there are some irregularities in their factories.

Instead, we try to solve the problem. We inspect companies, encourage them to engage in fair labor practices. Similarly we could encourage correct practices in prostitution.

• Blackmailing of US personnel by foreign agents is less a danger when prostitution visits are legal. 1 year prison terms with dishonorable discharge make any soldier that ever visited a prostitute a potential target of blackmail. Even those who do not frequent prostitutes can be blcackmailed with threats of false accusations of prostitution. Any girl friend, any prostitute he did not hire can allege he offered or gave her money.
• Health problems, VD can be controlled by information and careful sexual practices.
• Sex trafficking is mostly a lie. Where it exists it can usually be fought by legalizing prostitution and work visas for willing qualified foreign prostitutes.

Unfortunately, the Antifeminist seems right again: the feminist sexual trade Union wants to raise the price of sex, so women can get the maximum benefit and commitment out of men, in exchange of sex and promise of sex.

All other arguments are phony excuses backed by exaggerated and falsified data. Remember Robert Kurzban about finding non-existent victims to justify our pre-conceived beliefs.

Human-Stupidity is against pre-conceived dogma, in favor of truth, knowledge and research. Thus we suggest a few ……..

Politically incorrect academic research projects

How does prohibition of prostitution in general, but especially in military personnel deployed overseas cause problems?

What is the impact on military  men (and civilians) if all their sexual outlets get cut off systematically, under the threat of imprisonment? Does this

• increase levels of depression
• incite immature young men and adolescents to get married, with all the subsequent dangers of traumatic divorce, life-long wage slavery, alimony, child support
• cause rape and serious date rape due to lack of sexual outlets and pent-up sexual frustration

• (compare Milton Diamond‘s research on how legalized pornography reduces sex crimes)
• cause heterosexual men in the military to seek homosexual relations, just like prisoners?

• What are the psychological effects of reluctant homosexual acts on heterosexual men?
• impact morale of the military and reduce fighting readiness
• discourage men from enlisting for the military
• encourage women to become gold diggers, to exploit the marriage, divorce and harassment industry to earn money, because their chances of openly and honestly charging money engaging in prostitution is curtailed?
• Is there research how sex tourism, prostitution visits impact men’s well being, by measuring levels of life satisfaction, productivity, depression, serotonin.
• How did soldiers’ vacations to Subic Bay, Angeles City and Bangkok brothels impact morale, well being and fighting reediness?

Anyone has information and links on Northern European countries sponsoring visits to prostitutes for social security recipients as a means for emotional health? There should be some research backing such policies.

In most countries, nobody ever would get funding for my proposed projects. This is another reason we need men’s studies to counteract repressive anti-scientific women’s studies ideologies.

• 18 USC § 1384 – Prostitution near military and naval establishments
• Troops say proposed UCMJ change unfair in prostitution-legal Germany
• Secret Service and US military: Why prostitution can end careers

Secret Service and US military: Why prostitution can end careers

It’s only quite recently that prostitution has been specifically addressed in military law. It also violates the Secret Service code of conduct. That’s why last week’s scandal in Colombia is damaging careers and ending some while raising questions about human trafficking.

[...] It’s only quite recently that prostitution itself (and the related issue of adultery) have been specifically addressed in military law and regulation – the reason ten US service members may be in trouble now for their connection to the scandal involving US Secret Service agents and supervisors alleged to have been with prostitutes while on assignment to help protect President Obama at the Summit of the Americas in Cartagena, Colombia, last week.

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), hiring a prostitute wasn’t specifically banned until 2006 – as part of the Bush administration’s effort to combat human trafficking, which frequently is connected to prostitution (including the involvement of underage girls).

Distortion of scientific research and outright lies, perpetrated by feminist ideologues and religious zealots thus has serious impact. Lies about trafficking, lies about how women can not intentionally choose to be prostitutes justify laws that are world changing. Seriously restrict freedom and happiness of men, and seriously restrict the freedom of women to pursue money and happiness with honest work.

It makes no difference if prostitution is legal – as it is in parts of Colombia, near the largest NATO base in Germany, parts of Nevada, and other areas around the world where thousands of US service personnel are posted – purchasing sex still is outlawed by the US military. 2

18 USC § 1384 – Prostitution near military and naval establishments

whoever engages in prostitution or aids or abets prostitution or procures or solicits for purposes of prostitution, or keeps or sets up a house of ill fame, brothel, or bawdy house, or receives any person for purposes of lewdness, assignation, or prostitution into any vehicle, conveyance, place, structure, or building, or permits any person to remain for the purpose of lewdness, assignation, or prostitution in any vehicle, conveyance, place, structure, or building or leases or rents or contracts to lease or rent any vehicle, conveyance, place, structure or building, or part thereof, knowing or with good reason to know that it is intended to be used for any of the purposes herein prohibited shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

The Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force and the Federal Security Administrator shall take such steps as they deem necessary to suppress and prevent such violations thereof, and shall accept the cooperation of the authorities of States and their counties, districts, and other political subdivisions in carrying out the purpose of this section.

Troops say proposed UCMJ change unfair in prostitution-legal Germany

RHEIN-MAIN AIR BASE, Germany — Troops stationed in Germany are seeing red over the Pentagon’s proposal to add an anti-prostitution charge to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and it’s not just the glow from the local red light district.

Military personnel and their families on Rhein Main Air Base, only minutes from one of the largest red light districts in the world, are angered by the Department of Defense announcement to change the UCMJ. Those interviewed largely agree that Germany is not the place to enforce such a law.

Unlike other overseas military installations across the world where sex trade and human trafficking runs rampant, in Germany, prostitution is legal. There are licensed brothels, called Eros Center, where working girls can rent their own rooms for the day. There are no madames.

Germany women choose prostitution as a profession and are taxed as regular workers, according to Frankfurt Web sites.

“Where are we talking about?” asked Pfc. Marty Conyers of the 464th Replacement Detachment on Rhein-Main when asked if troops should be punished by one-year confinement and a dishonorable discharge if convicted for paying for sex. Conyers said the anti-prostitution law would be unfair to troops in Germany, because it is legal here.

Army Sgt. Adam Z. Pastor, who just arrived at the replacement detachment on Rhein-Main and is waiting to go to his next unit, agreed, saying the addition to the UCMJ would be “harsh.”

“It would be different if it were some third-world country that had no jobs and no opportunity, and women were forced into it,” Pastor said. “It’s a little bit pushy to enforce that law here.”

He added that if DOD officials were making the addition for safety reasons, they should think again. “Right off the bat, if it’s an issue of safety, there are condoms and stuff like that that soldiers can use.”

Spc. Tasha Smith added that the working women in Germany are regularly tested, so there should be nothing stopping troops from using Eros Centers if they choose to.

“It’s a legal job, and if a girl wants to make money that way, she should be able to get her customers,” Smith said.

‘Juicy bars’ said to be havens for prostitution aimed at U.S. military

Prostitution and indentured servitude are everyday realities at many of these popular hangouts for American soldiers, according to past and present bar girls, many of whom were enticed from the Philippines to work in the South Korean bars with false promises that they could earn legitimate incomes as singers and entertainers.

“If you don’t sell a lot of drinks, [the bar owners] are going to push you to go out with a customer to make money,” said Jenny, a former bar girl who asked not to be fully identified. “I was shocked the first night I worked there.”

And it’s all happening right under the noses of U.S. military officials and the South Korean and Philippine governments, women’s advocacy groups assert.

“Three governments are to be blamed for their irresponsibility,” said Yu Young-nim, director of My Sister’s Place, a social service agency that helps Philippine bar girls forced into prostitution in South Korea. “The Philippine government for not working hard to create job opportunities for its poor people, the Korean government for not managing and controlling jobs [given to immigrants] and the U.S. government for neglecting its responsibility to supervise its soldiers and for not helping these victims.”

Officially, none of what often transpires inside the juicy bars is supposed to be happening.

The U.S. Department of Defense has a strict policy against prostitution and human trafficking that requires military officials to “deter activities of DoD Service members, civilian employees, indirect hires” and others “that would facilitate or support [sex trafficking] domestically and overseas.”

And in practice, U.S. military officials have long placed South Korean “glass houses,” where prostitutes sit in storefronts like meat hanging in a butcher shop window, off-limits.

But no such blanket prohibition exists for juicy bars, despite their history of trouble. About 50 entertainment establishments — U.S. officials don’t identify juicy bars or use the term — have been declared no-go zones for U.S. Forces Korea personnel due to prostitution and human trafficking violations. Another 19 outside Osan Air Base were almost added to that list earlier this year for similar reasons before they collectively agreed to clean up their acts.

Blacks are much more likely than nonblacks to have an opinion about Zimmerman’s guilt. Overall, 72% of blacks say Zimmerman is definitely or probably guilty of a crime; 1% say he is not. Nonblacks also say Zimmerman is guilty, by 32% to 7%, but well over half of nonblacks say Zimmerman’s guilt is unclear from the available information.

Blacks are more certain about their opinions than are nonblacks. Blacks who say Zimmerman is guilty of a crime are significantly more likely to say he is definitely guilty than probably guilty, while nonblacks tilt more toward the "probably guilty" choice.

Additionally, 72% of blacks say racial bias was a major factor in the events that led up to the shooting death of Martin, with another 13% saying it was a minor factor. Nonblacks, on the other hand, are significantly less certain, with 31% saying racial bias was a major factor, 26% saying it was a minor factor, and 25% saying it was not a factor at all Gallup

Human-Stupidity Analysis: different attitudes by race (that doesn’t exist)

Amazing how white and black Americans have totally different perception. The truth can only be one. And the same evidence is known to all. Are racist whites biased and unjustly anti-Black?

Or maybe Blacks (and Liberals) have been taught that Blacks are always victims and never responsible for any negative fate. Not for lower educational and financial attainment of Blacs, their higher criminality. There always is a white repressor to blame. "I am misbehaving and having bad school results because there was slavery in 1860". If it is possible to distort the scientific race and iq discussion, how much easier is it to get a distorted view of a criminal case. As a matter of fact, Whites hide and distort black criminal tendencies. So, if anything, Whites already are biased in favor of Blacks. Add to this the proven lower IQ of Blacks, which makes it more difficult to understand complex issues and see through Al Sharpton’s manipulations.

Of course, media manipulation, like selective editing of the 911 call to make Zimmermann look racist, using 4 year old photos of Trayvon when he was 12 and a mug shot of Zimmermann when he weight 50(?) lbs. more serves to get people up in arms against Zimmermann. To top it off,  spanish speaking and Peruvian Latino race Zimmermann is called a member of the evil white race.

Liberals and the biased manipulative press reports probably account for the 31% of non-blacks that believe Zimmermann is guilty. Gallup should also have reported if these 31% consist largely of people who don’t follow the news and thus are the less informed.

And yes, Human-Stupidity already mentioned valid issues on both sides: the cover-up of criminal thuggery of a son of a Sanford policeman, as well as media neglect of black on white assaults in that same city in the same time period.

We are just mentioning the tip of the iceberg, much more thorough analysis is needed.  Why do the races (which allegedly are socially constructed and don’t exist) have such clearly different opinion in the Trayvon Martin – George Zimmermann case, as in the OJ Simpson and Rodney King case.

In the Rodney King case we can see the tendency to assign human rights protection to a heavily drugged felon who endangered people in a reckless car chase and violently fought of police. In the Trayvon Martin case Human-Stupidity keeps pointing out that it is taken for granted that a black man can punch anyone for slight provocation such as following at a distance.

U.S. public opinion about the Trayvon Martin case in Florida reflects the same type of racial divide found in 1995 surveys asking about the murder trial of O.J. Simpson in Los Angeles. In one Gallup poll conducted Oct. 5-7, 1995, for example, 78% of blacks said the jury that found Simpson not guilty of murder made the right decision, while only 42% of whites agreed.

The situation in the Trayvon Martin case is different from the Simpson situation, however, because the victim, rather than the alleged perpetrator, is black. Still, both situations, even though 17 years apart, apparently tap into the same deeply felt views of the average black American that the criminal justice system in America is biased against blacks. Underscoring this conclusion, a 2008 Gallup Minority Rights and Relations survey found that 67% of blacks said the American justice system was biased against blacks, a viewpoint only 32% of non-Hispanic whites agreed with. [...]

The average black American has strong views on the case, perceiving that Zimmerman is guilty of a crime and that race has played a major factor in the case. Nonblacks, by contrast, are much less likely to think Zimmerman is guilty and are substantially less likely to believe that race was a factor.  Gallup

See also

• Trayvon, Racism, and the Media Narrative 
• 101 PIECES OF EVIDENCE THAT PROOVE O.J. SIMPSON MURDERED NICOLE.
• Rodney King 

Human-Stupidity Analysis

Unfortunately, the Gallup data lacks more detailed analysis. Whey don’t they differentiate non-blacks? Whey don’t they publish, separately, the opinion of those that actually follow the case? The opinion of those who don’t follow the case might be different and less relevant. This lack of proper analysis is equally annoying as the lack of the US Department of Justice to separate white Latino and white murder perpetrator prevalence.

The most interesting question at this point in the Trayvon Martin case may be who believes the Party line and why.

The tenets of our New Faith are naturally different from dialectical materialism, though our version shares its radical environmentalism (in the older sense): humans are largely if not entirely shaped by their environment, except for homosexuals, whose proclivities are innate.  The first commandment of the faith is relativism: there are no significant differences among sexes, ethnicities, religions, and races.  Disparities in standards of living are the result of Western oppression; the perception of these and other differences is "orientalism."

The second commandment is "tolerance."  If you question commandment number one, you are guilty of a hate crime and need to be punished by "diversity training," the more benign version of the "re-education" dissidents were subjected to in the Soviet Empire.

We disagree with the attitude of the following article, but value it for the interesting links it provides

Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman and the blurry line between conservative media and the far-right

On March 19, Beck’s website, The Blaze, speculated without much evidence that Martin could have been suspended from school for drug possession, “sexual harassment”, or “arson”. TheMiami Herald spent four paragraphs listing ‘suspicious’ facts about Martin’s bags (like “women’s jewellery” and a “burglary tool”) and on the same day, The Daily Caller, co-founded by Dick Cheney, published a compilation of tweets reportedly culled from Martin’s deleted Twitter account, by an ‘undisclosed source’. The Conservative Review immediately branded the teen“a criminal thug on his way to a life in prison”.

The campaign of character assassination didn’t stop with the right wing media. On March 25, a Twitter news site run by another Fox News contributor, Michelle Malkin, posted a picture of an entirely different Trayvon Martin which had appeared one day before on the neo-nazi websiteStormfront.

On March 29, a white supremacist hacker called ‘Klanklannon’ took up the work of Cheney’sCaller and leaked private messages he claimed belonged to Martin. The hacker invited people to log into Martin’s gmail account and see for themselves, having helpfully changed the password to ‘niggerniggernigger’.

Meanwhile, the conservative National Review had the nerve to fire contributing editor John Derbyshire on April 8 for looking beyond the controversy to the wider issues at stake. “Avoid concentrations of blacks not all known to you personally,” he wrote in an article for Taki’s Magazine, responding to Trayvon-inspired race debates by describing ‘the talk’ he gives to his kids. “Do not attend events likely to draw a lot of blacks,” he went on (each point was backed up by a link to a crime or scandal which happened to involve an African-American). Avoid amusement parks if they are “swamped with blacks,” he warned; “Do not settle in a district or municipality run by black politicians.”

In the Fox-News-o-sphere’s focus on Trayvon and its implication that Zimmerman needed “protecting” from a dangerous thug is the germ of the idea that brought Nazis to Sanford. Anything in Martin’s life that was remotely ‘suspect’ (or, often, youthful) became evidence that he was a threat – better evidence, apparently, than prosecutors could ever provide.

More links on Trayvon Martin – George Zimmermann

The real George Zimmermann (Donations accepted)

by Human-Stupidity

• A US Black is 7 times as likely to kill a White, then a White to kill a Black
• Trayvon Martin & George Zimmermann: was it self defense?
• Trayvon Martin, racial profiling, political correctness
• Trayvon Martin, black rage and political correctness

by Wagist.com

At the very beginning of his 911 call, Zimmerman tells the operator that there have been a lot of break-ins recently.  In fact, there were eight burglaries in the previous fifteen months.  Where the intruders were identified, most were young black males, including two who invaded the home of a young mother and tried to break into the bedroom she had locked herself into with her infant son.  This must have been a terrifying experience, but it was not of interest to the MSM.  Zimmerman met with the woman afterward.

Is Twin Lakes in Sanford an anomaly?

Like the 911 calls, Justice Department statistics are a click or two away. 

Between 1976 and 2005, African-Americans, 12.6% of the population in the last census, committed 52.2% of all homicides.

That is, over the 30-year period, African-Americans committed murder at about 7.33 times the white rate.  (Whites here include Hispanics.)

Of homicides committed by strangers, on average, 18.77% involved blacks killing whites, while in 5.08% of the cases, whites killed blacks.  African-Americans were therefore nearly 3.7 times more likely to kill a white than a white to kill a black

Actually, it is worse if you look at the criminality of the individual person. There are about 5.6 times more Whites 72.4% then Blacks 12.6% . So very few blacks kill 3.7 times more whites then 5 times as many whites kill Blacks. Thus an individual Black is about 20 times as likely to kill a White then an individual White to kill a Black person.  And considering that Hispanic Whites commit a larger percentage of crime then non-Hispanic whites (63.7%) the numbers get even bigger compared to non-Hispanic Whites.

My math might be off. It looks like Blacks are “only” 7 times as likely to kill a White, compared to Whites killing Blacks (homicide tables). It would be interesting to find the table that separates the Hispanic and the non-Hispanic Whites.

So racial profiling is totally justified. Yes, Blacks kill Blacks too, and certainly honest reputable Blacks are afraid of adolescent gang toughs and probably strive to avoid and fear a group of Blacks more then a group of Whites.  In spite of alleged racism that would make Blacks fear Whites.

To provide some raw numbers, in 2005, the last year for which the DOJ statistics are available, 10,285 African-Americans committed murders.  As 8.8% of these were “black on white,” there were, assuming only one death per murderer, 905 whites killed, almost 2.5 per day.  In the same year, again assuming one killing per perpetrator, 267 blacks were murdered by whites (3.2% of 8,350 killings).

Crime is a young man’s métier.  The vast majority of the 52.2% of U.S. murders committed by African-Americans are the work of the roughly 2% of the population who are black males between the ages of 15 and 25.

Would these figures, courtesy of Eric Holder, surprise most Americans?  

Not if you scroll down to the comments in local papers below stories of murders, like this one on March 31.

Not if you judge by demographic trends since the 1960s.

But this is a subject that cannot be mentioned by the national media.  With rare exceptions, when blacks kill whites, it’s local news.

One of the exceptions was Eve Carson, student body president of UNC, killed by two African-American men on March 5, 2008.  Another white student, Lauren Burk, a freshman at Auburn, was kidnapped and killed by a black man the day before, but because of Carson’s position, her record of public service and academic accomplishments, and, no doubt, her attractiveness, the story was picked up.     American Thinker

Black on White crime is routinely white washed, the race hidden behind the Euphemism “Man beat up by group of Youth”. So readers get a wrong impression.

• Anti-White Hate Crimes and Media Censorship
• Q&A: “Black Youth Flash Mobs” Are Police Downplaying Anti-White Hate Crimes?
• Justice Department Statistics About Black On White Race Violence
• HORROR!… Black Youth Mob Beats, Strips & Robs Tourist in Baltimore As Onlookers Laugh & Joke (Video Reposted)

The crime: a racist joke

The crime? Black comedian Felipe Hamachi had called a black musician "monkey".  At a comedy show where all guests had signed a waiver, that they are aware that they can be the target of offensive humor and jokes. The musician was not a paying guest and had not signed the waiver. Rather he worked in the show, but had mingled with the paying public. Legal officials stated that the waiver was legally invalid, as nobody can sign away their human rights. A comedian that can not make jukes without offending a large portion of the  population should change his profession.

The district attorneys will "take the measures they deem appropriate in relation to stand-up that offend blacks, women, homosexuals and people with disabilities"   Prosecutors handling case of Black musicians who was called monkey/ original

One commentator stated:

All humor has a "victim". Prohibiting jokes about blacks while those about Portuguese, blondes, Japanese and several other groups are allowed, it is more racist than the offensive joke itself.

and another

The solution is to prohibit and put in jail all who satirize the minorities with jokes involving physical, religious, racial, social characteristics, sexual orientation etc., as for the victims of the jokes, this is not funny. This covers topics such as: Portuguese idiot, dumb blonde , the sissy affected gay, the fat glutton, the Italian mafia, the Scottish drinker,  the stingy Jew, the Japanese small dick, old pervert, priest sex, the money grabbing minister , lazy Bahia people, the gay gaucho, the Rio rascal, the police bastard, a black criminal, the sly blind man. Legal protection against satires is needed for short people, the bald, the obese,, crippled, the spinsters, and alcoholics  Humor Criminalmente Incorreto

Human-Stupidity analysis

We could not have said it better then the above commentator.  Political correctness protects "easily offended people" and thus stifles free speech, artists, photographers (child porn laws) world wide.

See also

• No Freedom of Speech in Brazil
• Cicarelli | Wikipedia: Cicarelli was granted legal injunctions against YouTube and other websites^[3], leading to several Brazilian ISPs blocking YouTube. In January 2007 after a legal decision, YouTube was blocked in Brazil for two days, resulting in 5.7 million users being blocked^[4]. This decision was criticized by internet watch groups. This happened when Cicarelli worked as a host on MTV Brazil, provoking a torrent of nearly 80,000 emails protesting against the blockade and her legal actions.

• Stand up apresentado por Frota é acusado de racismo
• Piada considerada racista causa confusão em show de Frota

• Secretaria da Justiça apura se houve racismo em show de humor

• Casa que fez show com piada racista pode ser fechada // translation

Did Zimmerman kill Martin in self-defense?  There are some indications that he may not have, but others that he may have.  So I ask myself what makes sense.  I doubt Zimmerman is just a crazy loon who likes killing people, so I think it’s most likely that Martin, a 6’2" or 6’3" football player, was beating his old, out of shape ass, and that’s why he shot him.  Blurry video won’t discount this.  I’m basically making the same judgment I did with the DSK case.  Did it make any sense that DSK would rape that slut?  Hell no!  So it didn’t happen. 

There is one major difference: We knew that Dominique Strauss-Kahn is a highly respectable, intelligent, successful man that had his act together and does not act irresponsibly and irrationally. We don’t know that much about George Zimmermann. He might be a bit loony or out of control. But, the main suspicion is that Zimmermann might have "irritated" Trayvon Martin which prompted Trayvon Martin to righteously attack the racist.

We don’t know for sure, cannot jump to definite conclusion

So I keep warning. We can not be so sure of George Zimmermann’s innocence.  But we can be sure of the press and the black opinion makers being biased and too quick to condemn Zimmermann and to call for his lynching (New Black Panthers)

Now I could be wrong, maybe Zimmerman instigated things, but I doubt he HIT Martin first, so Zimmerman isn’t totally to blame either way.  Also note that there’s a tinge of anti-gun rhetoric in all this, they want to take away our right to bear arms and defend ourselves, which is an essential right.

Source: all quotes from an author that wants to be unnamed

Presumptive right to violent "retaliation" in case racial profiling or racist slurs

There is a possibility that Zimmermann instigated the fight, by being a bit harsh or unfriendly. By the usual narrative that gives a black boy the right to whoop his white (?) or Hispanic ass. Whereupon Zimmermann would have to defend himself.

Now the second question is, did Zimmerman target Martin because he was black?  And this answer is clearly no.  The media simply wishes to paint the narrative that a "white" (Zimmerman is actually Hispanic and Jewish, not of the supposedly evil Caucasian group) killed a poor innocent black child who in the picture in the media looks 12 years old -

Manipulative use of photos to manipulate public opinion 

Yes, the photo manipulation is eerie. Can’t the media find any other photos then Trayvon Martin when he is 14 (or actually you can find slide shows with photos where he is 5, or where he carries 2 year old babies). What about a photo from 2012 or 2011? How come the media will not publish any of these? And why does it show mug shots of George Zimmermann? And call him white, even though in the US "Hispanic" is a racial term, a socially defined "race". Isn’t race supposed to be socially constructed anyway?

actually he was a 17 year old 6’2"+ football player who clearly had some muscle strength, wore a thug disguise (hoodie etc.) in a neighborhood that had been repeatedly robbed, probably was a thief and talked like a thug, hell his pictures were even doctored to make him look more innocent and angelic.

Right. How old is this boy? 14? 13? Sure not 17 years old!? Why do they keep showing these photos below? and only these  photos below? Were above photos used, the impression would be quite different.

Now there still are rumors that some or all above Trayvon photos are fake. Which would leave open the question: Can nobody in the world, even his own family, locate any photos of Trayvon Martin from the last 3 years? Or are they all thuggish so they hide them?

How come Trayvon could not out-run Zimmermann?

And how come that tall trained football player could not outrun the fat out of shape older Hispanic? So he was cornered and had to whoop him? or got attacked by a law abiding neighborhood citizen who was fast enough to outrun and catch the football player. Why could Trayvon not just have run home? Is this gated community so huge that he could not run home quick enough?

There always is this unspoken assumption that Trayvon Martin has the right to physically attack and whoop George Zimmermann just for the sin of him being a racist, for the sin of racial profiling.

So the biggest issue is that the liberal media is demonizing Zimmerman and whites (even though he’s not white) to spread racial hatred against whites and promote white liberal guilt, and they are endangering the lives of Zimmerman doing so, as are the marchers who have rushed to judgment demanding Zimmerman be arrested, presuming he’s guilty just like they do those accused of rape.  This is a lynching.  Anyway Zimmerman didn’t realize the guy was black until later, and he had full rights to suspect a guy dressed in a hoodie at night in that neighborhood.  Had nothing to do with his race.  Zimmerman isn’t a racist.  Just like you had to question everything you hear in the media about DSK during his false rape fiasco, you have to question everything you hear in the media about this case.  They keep coming up with new shit about how Zimmerman wasn’t injured, Zimmerman wasn’t the one screaming, police reports were changed, blah, blah, blah, they keep coming up with more excuses to find Zimmerman guilty.  Where was this evidence before?  Nowhere.  It’s only here because people are buying into the hysteria that Zimmerman the evil white guy who isn’t white killed some poor innocent black "child" because he was black.  The hateful anti-white anti-male liberals don’t give a shit about the truth anymore than they did during Duke Lacrosse, in fact I’m sure the case has a lot of parallels, that would be the one to compare to, but I’m not super-familiar with it myself.

Testimony of neighbor who saw Trayvon on top of Zimmermann who yelled for help (Video)

The above witness statement stems from a resident witness, out of his house, early on. As we use common sense, this is much more credible then later unknown witnesses that suddenly say the opposite. But, we have to weigh all sides to be sure.

• So #1: Zimmerman probably killed Martin in self-defense, which is his right.

I agree but feel compelled to repeat

We don’t know for sure, cannot jump to definite conclusion

So I keep warning. We can not be so sure of George Zimmermann’s innocence.  But we can be sure of the press and the black opinion makers being biased and too quick to condemn Zimmermann and to call for his lynching (New Black Panthers)

• #2: Zimmerman definitely didn’t kill him because he was black,

If anything it was started by racial profiling, which is illegal but statistically justified. And Trayvon’s likely outrage and "justified retaliation" attack. It really is very unlikely that Zimmermann hunted down Trayvon. But there could have been some mutual taunting and escalating.

Blacks calling for vigilante "arrest" and lynching remains unopposed and unpunished

• #3: The media and liberals are making this guy’s life a living hell, just the same as if he had been falsely accused of rape, think of what he’s going through,
• #4: The New Black Panther Party has threatened his life and Spike Lee tweeted the wrong address and endangered some old folks (probably white), why the fuck aren’t they arrested? 

This of course is scandalous. Black idols and Black organization calling for vigilante harassment or worse for George Zimmermann. The rule of law is not enough for them. Isn’t the case getting investigated? Is he a flight risk? He only is a risk for being murdered. And we keep saying: what will they apprehend him for? Police does not want him. So black activists will "arrest" George Zimmermann in order to lynch him.

• Open letter to AG Holder: Investigate New Black Panthers for criminal conspiracy
• Rush to judgment on George Zimmerman reminiscent of mob behavior
• Why are ‘racial justice’ advocates silent on other 17-year-old?
• Gun Talk Radio: I discussed the Trayvon Martin shooting on Sunday with host Tom Gresham.

“Where there is no justice, there will be no peace. Soon the law of retaliation may very well be applied,” the Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan tweeted ominously. 9

Blacks calling for lynching of probably innocent whites is perfectly ok.

Basically it’s all a bunch of bullshit designed primarily to push the "whites are evil, blacks are victims" narrative, which allows the elite to get the black vote more easily, since blacks can blame all their ills on whites,

Right.

Curiously, as Obama’s political base in "stand your ground"-free Chicago* prepares for a Trayvon Martin march today, the names of last weekend’s 10 dead/49 wounded [only in Chicago] seem destined  for obscurity. Evidently these lacked an important exploitable factor. 9

From crime statistics, we can be sure that Blacks are over-represented among the culprits in these cases. And nobody cares. Only about this one case.

just like women blame all their ills on men, and so they feel no remorse when the law advantages them, affirmative action for example.  And this hatred by blacks against whites results in things like prison rape,  10 as well as all the other black-on-white truly racially motivated violence the media completely ignores (there are some links I provided).  "Racism perpetrated against white inmates by black inmates is indicated to be the single causal factor in prison rape. Both quantitative and qualitative data indicate a prevalence of predominantly black rapists and white victims nationwide for the last 40 years. Literary evidence shows ‘black racism’ to be the common denominator in most prison sexual assaults and rapes of predominantly white inmates." 

All quotes from an un-named friend and colleague.

Stereotyping Certain Races as Having a Greater Propensity to Commit Crimes Is Absolutely Prohibited. Some have argued that overall discrepancies in crime rates among racial groups could justify using race as a factor in general traffic enforcement activities and would produce a greater number of arrests for non-traffic offenses (e.g., narcotics trafficking). We emphatically reject this view. It is patently unacceptable and thus prohibited under this guidance for federal law enforcement officers to engage in racial profiling.  4

Of course, ignoring common sense and inconvertible crime statistics are an impediment to police work. It violates the human rights of law abiding citizens by exposing them to more crime. And violates the human rights of old white ladies that needlessly get searched so police don’t look racially biased when searching young Arab or black men.

• UK: Police stop and search innocent white people to balance race figures, terror watchdog says

On the bright side, a German court recently acknowledged the right of police to search suspects by skin color, when on trains usually used by illegal immigrants.

Statistically, the black man with skittles and hoodie below has a 10-100 time greater chance of being a violent criminal then our two protesters above and aside. 6 

That suspicion, of course, would not warrant shooting a black man for his  skin color. But it might be justified to be more careful and to check him out. Even the politically correct protesters and even honest law abiding blacks would change to the other side of the street, were they to encounter a group of such black people.

Generations of blacks have now been told they are victims, whites are evil and blacks are entitled to free money, housing and everything else when very few blacks alive today have ever faced systematic discrimination. If they have faced discrimination it is because responsible blacks are grouped with the great many blacks in America that cause such tremendous crime and problems.

 If Whites are held responsible for actions committed by members of my race centuries ago [slavery], shouldn’t it be fair for law abiding Blacks to be held responsible for the black thugs and criminals? It’s simple logic but not so easy under the laws of political correctness.

50 years of welfare, social programs and excuses has had a tremendously negative effect on the black race in America. Blacks under perform nearly across the board when compared with other races. Why? Political correctness, liberal politics, ignorance and hate. It is easier for blacks, as a whole, to blame their station in society on white people for slavery than it is to blame themselves for making bad life decisions. Most people who are not black are taught actions have consequences. Young blacks are taught they can do or say whatever and they will be excused. This is why we are seeing a growing number of brazen attacks by groups of young blacks on whites these days. These young black thugs believe there will be no consequences. But there are consequences, even in the ridiculous world of political correctness. That is why such a large percentage of prisoners are black. Political correctness tells us it’s because of racist judges, police and laws…but the realistic know it is simply because so many blacks commit crimes. 8

Whites, and men, are not protected classes

Black on white crime gets whitewashed and ignored 1 2 3 4 5.

Here are some more shocking statistics: More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year. Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks. [...]On a per-capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crimes than Whites.   6

Whites don’t have race consciousness as blacks do. Whites don’t show up in thousands to defend other whites. Not as victims, much less if they are actual criminals like Rodney King. Similarly men would never defend male criminals as women feminists defend female criminals like Lorena Bobbitt, Mary Winkler, Rita Graveline and Susan Falls.

Sometimes cute white poodles might bite, and a big vicious guard dog can be friendly and might not bite. Furthermore, the dog suffers from trauma and discrimination because it spent a lot of his life chained and did not get pampered by a luxury owner like little poodle.

Similarly, it is very unfair to discriminate against sausage dogs in the races. After all,

•  Running skills are socially constructed and race is only skin deep?

Trayvon Martin vs. George Zimmermann: premature rush to conclusions

The rush to judgment among some prominent voices on the left assumes George Zimmerman is responsible for a terrible hate crime, and that isn’t fair to Mr. Zimmerman. He hasn’t even been charged, much less been afforded the due process to which all Americans are entitled. This is not a defense of Mr. Zimmerman; it is a defense of a sacrosanct Constitutional process being short-circuited by assumptions and rage.

On the other hand, some prominent conservative voices want to label it all a tragedy exploited by race-baiting pimps and leave it at that. They are unwilling to entertain the possibility that the black community’s rage in this case might be fueled by an otherwise valid perception that, in general, innocent black men too often are presumed guilty by a racially biased criminal justice system.

Responsible voices should insist that the black community’s rage is, at best, premature in this particular case.  9

Trayvon Martin vs. George Zimmermann Link List

• Trayvon Martin, black rage and political correctness- Race and IQ  Human-Stupidity.com

• http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2120504/Trayvon-Martin-case-He-suspended-times-caught-burglary-tool.html
• http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-03-26/news/os-trayvon-martin-zimmerman-account-20120326_1_miami-schools-punch-unarmed-black-teenager
• http://www.examiner.com/charleston-conservative-in-charleston-sc/zimmerman-was-on-the-ground-being-punched-when-he-shot-trayvon-martin
• http://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2012/03/25/the_death_of_trayvon_martin_is_there_nothing_progressives_wont_exploit/page/full/
• http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2012/03/26/trayvon-martin-was-a-worthless-thug-the-lynching-of-george-zimmerman/
• http://www.examiner.com/charleston-conservative-in-charleston-sc/full-911-audio-shows-zimmerman-a-more-positive-light
• http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/03/trayvon-martin-rip.html
• http://deconstructingleftism.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/i-dont-care-about-trayvon-martin/
• http://onestdv.blogspot.com/2012/03/trayvon-martin-case-and-refusing-to.html
• https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001791912868
• http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2012/03/26/meanwhile-in-mississippi/
• http://www.amerika.org/politics/burning-again/
• http://www.infowars.com/sen-schumer-exploits-trayvon-martin-case-in-call-to-outlaw-stand-your-ground/
• http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/03/was-trayvon-burglar.html
• http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/03/trayvon-martin-and-george-zimmerman-reaffirming-the-national-religion/
• http://www.vdare.com/articles/gop-wouldnt-challenge-black-voter-fraud-in-2008-why-would-it-challenge-trayvon-martin-lynch
• http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/index.html#/v/1531279830001/race-and-the-media-in-the-martin-case/?playlist_id=86923
• http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/index.html#/v/1531279818001/trayvon-martin-case-takes-an-intense-turn/?playlist_id=86923
• http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/la-na-nn-trayvon-martin-case-20120326,0,3121664.story
• http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-national/open-letter-to-ag-holder-investigate-new-black-panthers-for-criminal-conspiracy?CID=obinsite
• http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rbesp/victimblaming_not_just_for_women_xpost_from/c44gns2
• http://lewrockwell.com/barnett/barnett48.1.html
• http://nation.foxnews.com/spike-lee/2012/03/28/spike-lee-terror-tweet-forces-elderly-couple-out-their-home
• http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/is-it-legal-to-offer-a-bounty-for-the-capture-murder-of-a-person/
• http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2012/03/why-was-trayvon-martin-photo-altered.html
• http://www.reddit.com/r/circlejerk/comments/ri4qv/treyvon_martin_the_poet_nggas_get_fake_when_sht/
• http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/ri3hp/treyvon_martin_the_poet_my_teacher_told_me_that_i/
• http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/ri3hp/treyvon_martin_the_poet_my_teacher_told_me_that_i/c46000u
• http://www.cotwa.info/2012/03/rush-to-judgment-in-trayvon-martin.html