- Assisted Suicide & Right to die
- Child Porn Witch Hunt
- Faulty Science
- Human Rights
- Inspiring Intelligent Solutions
- Intelligent Design (Creationism)
- Irrational Drug Policy
- Men's Rights & Feminism
- Political correctness
- Race & Intelligence
- Religion & Atheism
- Social Rules & Habits
- Teenage Sexuality
- Unhealty Lifestyle
- Victimless Crime
Archive for category Men’s Rights & Feminism
Unproven, or even false accusations of a single woman can destroy the world’s most powerful men and change the course of world history. Feminism has given enormous power to any woman to derail the most powerful men in the world.
- Al Gore, Nobel prize winner (peace) and ex-Vice-President of the USA, falsely accused of rape
- Julian Assange, (of Wikileaks fame) accused by feminists of broken condom "rape". The entire might of the USA could not derail him, but 2 women could get him imprisoned.
- Dominique Strauss-Kahn, IMF chief and French Presidential Candidate lost the leadership of the International Monetary Fund and likely the presidency of France. His arrest caused an instant decline of the Euro. Hedge funds could have made billions overnight. His successor at the IMF has a very different policy regarding the Euro bailout which potentially involves more then a Trillion (one million million) Euros. The future of the Euro, the currencies of entire nations probably were changed by the accusation of a habitual liar who already had lied about prior rapes
- Oscar Pistorius, paralympic world record holder in 100, 200 and 400-metre events: "South Africa’s legless Blade Runner has been charged with assault after a woman claimed he bruised her leg at a party. Double amputee Oscar Pistorius spent Saturday night in jail after being accused of assaulting the 19-year-old woman". The charges were soon dropped..
- Franco Porzio, Olympic champion in Water Polo, was accused by his second wife. His first wife came to his defense.
- Jörg Kachelmann, Germany’s prominent famous TV weatherman spent months in jail upon the mere unproven accusation of an ex-girlfriend. He remained in jail even after she had been caught with various lies.
- Theo Theophanous,an Australian Labor minister, lost his high government job, his reputation and much of his savings. His accuser had waited for 10 years and was shown to be notoriously unreliable. But the character assassination had already taken its toll.
- Moshe Katsav, ex president of Israel, got a 7 plus 2 year prison sentence, because "The judges said they found the rape victim’s testimony “completely credible” and Mr. Katsav’s “false.” [NYT] Time [H]. As usual, accusations were not leveled immediately after the alleged crime, when it was still possible to find proof.
- We can not affirm that Katzav is innocent. But like Strauss-Kahn, it looks that he is a powerful womanizer but not necessarily a rapist
- If he really forcibly raped the woman, he deserves the jail time. Even more so because then he was incredibly stupid.
- a) Rich powerful men have so many options to get sex with admirers (groupies) or affordable prostitutes.
- b) And if he was really guilty , why would he be so incredibly stupid to renege on a plea bargain that would have saved him prison time?
- Mel Gibson,Hollywood actor, accused by his girl friend and defended by his ex-wife
- Bill Clinton, US president. whose presidency was marred by the Paula Jones harassment accusations.
- So what if he really made some indecent proposal to Paula Jones? Weakness as a weapon: The Sexual Harassment Industry makes a point that maybe women should be empowered to withstand innuendo, cat calls, objectifying gaze.
- The Paula Jones case led to the inquiries into Clinton’s private sex live, which led to the Lewinsky scandal. It was unfortunate that he lied, but most men and women lie about love affairs, and it should not have been anyone’s business who he has sex (or blow jobs) with
- Monica Lewinsky rarely gets credited for having stood by her man and tried her best to protect Bill Clinton.
- Sexually more liberated Brazilians could not understand why Clinton suffered so much harassment.
- Brazilians also could not understand why the most powerful man on earth could not score a more attractive girl friend then Monica Lewinsky.
- Long gone were the times, where the most powerful man on earth (John F. Kennedy) could have a secret tryst with the most desired woman on earth (Marilyn Monroe) 1 2 3 ABC
- In Brazil there was a minor scandal when the country’s president was photographed with a carnival princess and Playboy Cover who had no panties on. "An adorable girl," the President dreamily mused to reporters a couple of days later. … Later "the Globo television network broadcast a recording of the President cooing, "I am in love with you," to Miss Ramos over the telephone"
- Christian von Boetticher, 40, designated leader of the conservative Christian Democratic Union in Schleswig-Holstein, who was set to lead Chancellor Angela Merkel’s party in its fight to retain power the north German state next May, has resigned after intense internal party pressure over his consensual and perfectly legal love affair with a 16-year-old girl. The girl did not even accuse him.
- The 20 Most Scandalous Sexual-Harassment Cases of All Time
Parts of this article were translated from the Italian I trofei di caccia del femminismo: le teste dei maschi infangati o distrutti da accuse di Donne.
51 year old actor Doug Hutchinson marries 16 year-old Courtney Alexis Stodden, with her mother’s consent. In the videos you can see a harmonious loving couple. But, all hell breaks loose. Doug is a creepy pervert, Alexis Stodden is a poor victim (or a whore) and her mother is a pimp. Had Doug not gotten legal advice, he would have fallen prey to immense complexity of laws regarding adolescent sexuality and would be in prison as a child rapist as a punishment for his love affair.
Here’s the deal — Hutchison is 51 years old, and his new bride Courtney Alexis Stodden is a mere 16 years old!!! That’s right. She’s just a child and yet their "consensual" marriage to one another is as legal as they come apparently, thanks to none other than Courtney’s own mother!
Way to be a pervy creep and ruin a young girl’s life, Hutchison! Way to look out for your daughter, Moms! Is anyone sane in this really freakish situation?
How do people know that a happy marriage with a mature loving men will ruin a girl’s life? Nowadays, Romeo and Juliet would both be arrested, and the "Blue Lagoon" heroes (t least the boy) would be jailed after their return to "civilization".
- Dirty Old Men Marry Jailbait, Sexually Liberated Cougars Marry Young Men
- Michel Temer (70), new Vice-President of Brazil was 63 when he married Marcela Temer at age 20. Borderline Pedophilia or healthy human sexuality?
Her parents should have been arrested for letting a 51 year old PERVERT MOLEST their MINOR CHILD! Because mo matter how "old" she looks, she is just that…a child! For them to marry means that at some time he was putting the "moves" on her, or even dating her! That is ILLEGAL in most states here! GAG! I JUST THREW UP IN MY MOUTH AT THE THOUGHT! YouTube commentator
Evolutionary psychologist explains
Evolutionary psychologist Robert Kurzban explains the human propensity to meddle in other people’s private lives, to outlaw victimless sex "crimes"
- FIRST comes an inner moral feeling (which usually serves to increase one’s own reproductive fitness).
- THEN, after the fact,we find some logical reasoning to justify our moral feelings. We invent victims even if there are none
Kurzban explains how, in a small community, everyone gains reproductive advantage by restricting other people’s sexual liberty.
Finding victims where there are none
In the above YouTube video, we see a happy couple with conservative attitudes about virgin marriage. Cruel, anti-teenage sexuality age-of-consent laws frequently destroy such a love affair with cruelty
Thousands of men, and a few women men have their life destroyed in similar situations. A unholy union of religious conservatives and repressive feminists decide, against Álexis’ will, that she is a poor victim. That adolescent Alexis Stoddenis a child  that can not consent* to sex. But in some jurisdiction she magically has maturity to consent to sex with boys of similar age, while in other states 2 adolescents are raping each other when engaging in consensual sex. Systematic language manipulation changes the meamings of words like rape*, consent*, child*, pedophile* etc. Our language has been distorted so much, that: had Doug fondled her, before marriage, with full consent, he might have as well raped her forcibly, it would be the same. The same punishment, and the same press reports ("Actor sentenced for raping child"). Doug Hutchinson was wise enough to avoid this, but thousands of men languish in jail for consensual sex with adolescent "children". The Antifeminist has feminism-is-sexual-trade-union-theory to explain such institutionalized cruel interference in private bedroom affairs.
"We’re aware that our vast age difference is extremely controversial," the couple said in a statement released by their spokesperson. "But we’re very much in love and want to get the message out there that true love can be ageless."
According to the Clark County, Nevada Marriage Bureau, both marriage license applicants must be at least 18 years of age. But minors (below the age of 18) are able to obtain a license with the consent of a parent or legal guardian — reasoning that at least one of Stodden’s parents approves of their daughter’s May-December marriage.
Hutchison’s young wife is a former beauty pageant queen and hopes to become the next big thing out of Nashville. Marrying a much older D-list actor is certainly one way to do it — although the couple insists that their union is based purely on genuine love.
We wish the happy Courtney Alexis Stodden and Doug Hutchinson good luck in their planned reality TV show
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Why the moral outrage about 51y actor Doug Hutchinson’s marr… » continues here »
One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guilty, jailed, slandered without due process, escaped. Others are not so lucky!
One in two rape accusations (over 50%) are false: Dominique Strauss-Kahn escaped the inquisition. Others are not so lucky. They get convicted, falsely. We wish we could say Dominique Strauss-Kahn escaped unscathed. But he suffered tremendously. He lost his job. Speculator could have made Billions, because the value of the Euro dropped due to his arrest, and other unexpected stock market irregularities occurred.
Have we handed lone rape accusers too much power to destroy the presumptively innocent? Power to change the course of world politics! The politics of the World Monetary Fund. French Presidential elections, the future or Europe and the Euro currency. All influenced by a lone woman’s accusations. For an initial arrest it does not matter how dishonest or mentally unstable the accuser (alleged victim) might be.
Let us remember the thousands of men that are less lucky then Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
For every Strauss-Kahn, there are dozens of men that don’t escape unjust persecution
One in two rape accusations are false. Like Strauss-Kahn, thousands of men are presumed guilty, jailed and smeared without due process. They can not afford to spend millions of dollars for bail, a dream team of lawyers, detectives, and their own guards for domestic prison as Dominique Strauss-Kahn did. We only hear of the few lucky ones that escape. The Jörg Kachelmann rape case in Germany similarly ruined a successful public man’s career, had a man spend months in jail, because of unproven uncorroborated accusations by a woman, who also was caught red-handed lying about important facts.
"Of course, if she is a liar, that still does not mean she was raped. " Yes, but in that case, she’d better bring a long a tape recording proving the act of rape against her clear resistance. In our legal system, where men accused of sexual offenses are presumed guilty until proven innocent, they have to provide proof of their innocence. In the famous Hofstra false rape case the male victims of false rape accusations were only freed after providing video recording that showed that the sex act was totally consensual and very different then described in the false accusations.
For every acquitted man, there are dozens of unjustly imprisoned victims of false rape accusations.
Now consider this, how many men take video recordings of their sex acts so that they can later prove the consensual nature of their sex acts? Can you imagine: for every man that can prove his innocence, how many men stay in jail and go to prison, upon unproven, wrong allegations of sexual misconduct? Remember: One in two rape accusations are false.
No wonder, that with such medieval legal practice
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guil… » continues here »
Way over 50% of rape accusations are false. 7.4% blatantly enough to prosecute (Bavarian Police research report)
1894 complaints of rape and sexual assault were filed to police of the state of Bavaria in 2000. The consensus estimate of all responsible officials is that way over 50% of accusations are false. Even when accusations are very dubious, police still file rape/sexual assault proceedings with prosecutors. Only in 7.4% of the complaints (1 in 13, N= 140) they propose legal action against the accuser for evidently false accusations, when there is clear proof or confession. The results of this meticulous 320 page research about rape and sexual assault in Bavaria replicate a less rigorous study in Schleswig Holstein state in 1994/1995, where 7.6% of complaints led to filing of false police report.
The following 320 page study analyses police inquiries of rape and sexual assault, and how police forwards these cases to prosecutors. It is based on all 1894 such complaints in the state of Bavaria/Germany in the year 2000. It deserves to be translated into English in its entirety.
Police officials agree that way over 50% of accusations are false
Even highly dubious and unlikely accusations will be forwarded to prosecutors for rape/ sexual assault prosecution, and not for prosecution for false accusations. This is why statistics show such low numbers for false rape accusations.
Only 7.4% of accusers are recommended for prosecution as false accusations (due to clear evidence or confessions)
64% of rape/sexual assault cases dropped by prosecution for lack of evidence are considered false accusations by the police official in charge of the initial complaint
Thus 1/5 to 1/3 of all cases were identified as patently false accusations, by the responsible police officials.
Human-Stupidity concludes that false rape is under-reported at least 7-fold
6) Faking of or false suspicion of rape or sexual assault
In 2000, among all events, that initially appeared to police to be a cases of rape or sexual assault, only 7.4% were were registered as faking of a crime or false suspicion. In almost all of these cases there is strong evidence of these crimes [of falsehood]. Cases that remain doubtful and unclear after police inquiry will be handed to prosecutors as accusations of rape or sexual assault. (p. 176)
Police rarely send prosecutors accusations for false rape or sexual assault. This seems in stark contradiction to the [high] frequency estimates (by officials and police responsible for sexual crimes) of such false accusations . These [officials] estimate that such crimes have a very high occurrence, but don’t have statistical research data collections to back up such estimates. One department chief maintains:
"All officials dealing with sexual crimes are in agreement, that way over half the sex crimes reported to police are fake. Many such accusations cause an assumption of a sham or false accusation. But proof is not strong enough to prosecute [the accuser]. (p. 177)
The authors explain, that even in cases where there are very strong doubts about the truthfulness of the accusations, police will only file an accusation of rape or sexual assault, and not one of false accusations. This is why the statistics seem to contradict the above "over half" false accusation statement.
Let this sink in. There are clearly more false accusations then there are true accusations. Police authorities from the Christian conservative state of Bavaria/Germany agree that most rape/sexual assault accusations are false!
The report makes clear that proof of false accusations is very difficult, absent a confession of the alleged victim. In all these cases, there will be prosecution for rape/sexual assault and not for false accusations, even if there is significant doubt as to the veracity of the accusations.
While the serious psychological and social consequences of rape and sexual assault have been the subject of various investigations, knowledge about the impact on the falsely accused is lacking. The data for our project do not permit us to arrive at definite empirical conclusions. [...]
When accusations are dropped due to lack of corroborative evidence and witnesses, then, in spite of very significant doubts about the crime description by the alleged victim [...] there always remains a residual suspicion because the accused can not totally disprove the accusation. (p. 180)
[...] adding 1754 cases recorded as rape or sexual assault for the year 2000, and 140 false accusations, yields 1894 transactions which the police initially considered rape or sexual assault. Only 7.4% resulted in charges of false accusations of rape or sexual assault. [... results in the state of Bavaria] correspond exactly to the results of a survey (without scientific rigor) in the state of Schleswig Holstein. For the years 1994/1995 it showed a 7.6% rate of shams and false accusations demonstrated "beyond reasonable doubt". (p. 182)
There is a 1 in 13 rate of obvious false accusations. (7/4%)
The authors speculate that under the assumption of a 3 to 10 fold under-reporting of rape, that would result in a 1 in 38 (3 fold under-reporting) or one in 125 (10 fold under-reporting). On the other hand, some of the cases passed to courts as rape or sexual assault end with a conviction for false accusations.
False accusations of rape/sexual assault are under-reported 7-fold
The above conclusions are false.
- First there is no scientific basis to assume 3 to 10 fold under-reporting of rape
- don’t forget, that police experts only report 7.4% false rapes in spite of strongly suspecting false accusations in way over 50% of the accusations. As mentioned, if in doubt, police file only for rape/sexual assault, even if they are convinced the complaint is false.
So there is an over 7 fold under-reporting of false rape accusations by police! (7 * 7.4% = 51.8%, which is less then "way over 50%"). Police do file rape accusations with prosecutors, even if they clearly believe the rape has not happened. And police do not file a false rape accusation, even when they are convinced that such a crime has happened. Probably they should file BOTH rape and false rape accusations at the same time!?
Clearly false rape is an under-reported crime. We need to encourage the victims of false rape accusations to come forward and counter-sue. As quoted in the report, it is the consensus that there are more false accusations then true accusations. Men’s Right activists can learn from feminists. They can demand the same treatment for alleged victims of false rape accusations as feminists have demanded and gotten for alleged rape victims.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Way over 50% of rape accusations are false. 7.4% blatantly enough … » continues here »
Government-emitted ID proves she is 20. Men could not know she is 15, but will go to prison for underage sex, child porn
There is no safe way to have sex or watch porn
A girl has a 100% valid state ID, with her photo and signature, and social security card. The ID proves she is 20 years old. You engage in sex with her, Film it. Sell it. Due to strict liability statutory rape laws there is no way how you can escape prison after it turns out the girl is 15 and conned the state into falsely giving her an ID. People who distribute your perfectly documented porn, of course go to prison. Even the press is unaware that 100 000 men who downloaded it, with perfect proof of being over 18 years of age, also can go to prison.
Conclusion: to have sex, watch porn, you at least need to get a US$ 30 000 background check of your partner, A detective has to get birth records, school records, interview parents and teachers. Even that is not 100% secure. Thus: never have sex, never engage in fondling or indecent behavior and never look at any nude or indecent pictures. Ever.
Society could not function if such strict liability without mens rea were the norm.
In early 2010, Tyler Chanel Evans, a 19-year-old exotic dancer, took under her wing a pretty, homeless girl who said her name was Bieyanka. The girl had been standing for hours outside a convenience store with an overstuffed duffel bag. A few days later, the waif stole Evans’s expired learner’s permit and copied her social security number.
All quotes from Teen porn star Bieyanka Moore’s disaster, unless stated otherwise.
Bieyanka, it seems, outwitted many people. She wasn’t 20 as she had told Evans, but a 15-year-old runaway from Palm Beach Shores. She persuaded the State of Nevada — perhaps with an adult’s help — to improperly issue her a driver’s license in Evans’s name. And using that license, she duped Miami pornographers into illegally hiring her to have sex onscreen. Teen porn star Bieyanka Moore’s disaster
A 15 year old girl steals the identity of another girl that helped her when she was lost. Government gives her a legal driver’s license stating her age is 20.
MyspaceTyler Chanel Evans– the real version.Lawyers for RK Netmedia, owner of porn site Reality Kings, still refuse to concede that a 15-year-old runaway who went missing last year is the same person who starred in one of its hardcore films. But the evidence is getting pretty conclusive. … More >>
Then she uses that government ID to do porn movies, and, obviously, to have sex. Whose fault is this?
Of course, the people who have sex and who make porn movies. Behooves them right: why do they do porn movies? They should be in jail anyway! And you should not have sex with someone not your wife and who looks under 35? [*1] [*2]. Before sex, Human-Stupidity.com recommends not only an ID check, but a background check ,by a detective, of school records, birth hospital records and more.
Strict liability and mens rea: go to prison even if you did all possible precautions to avoid a crime
The lawsuit against RK Netmedia, which Sherrita Smalley filed in Miami-Dade court this past December, is still developing. Attorney Grossman says Imber’s LLL Advertising will soon be added as a defendant. Florida criminal law decrees that "a minor’s misrepresentation of his or her age… may not be raised as a defense" in statutory rape prosecution.
The liability is said to be strict because defendants will be convicted even though they were genuinely ignorant of one or more factors that made their acts or omissions criminal. The defendants may therefore not be culpable in any real way, i.e. there is not even criminal negligence, the least blameworthy level of mens rea. Strict liability (criminal)
Strict liability abuse in sex "crimes". No pharmacist goes to prison for filling prescription of doctor with false diploma
Much less will the pharmacist go to prison if the diploma was correctly signed by a State University registrar.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Government-emitted ID proves she is 20. Men could not know she is … » continues here »
He was a good husband. Out of the blue, his wife filed for divorce. She probably cheated on him before. So he snapped. He drugged her and tied her to the bed, while unconscious. Then he waited, to make sure she was awake and would feel the mutilation. He cut off her breasts and ground them up in the garbage disposal. Isn’t that funny? She sure will never die of breast cancer! Then he cut off her clitoris, and glued her vagina shut with ample quantities of super-glue. Teaches the slut a lesson!
Then, in a TV talk show, a group of men makes fun of the story. Isn’t it hilarious? The spectators have hearty laughs and giggles. Of course, it is not the same as cutting off a man’s penis, because a penis is softer then a woman’s breast. One moderate man actually says she did not deserve it, but he can think of a woman’s crime where he would do just the same.
If a woman divorced him, got 50% of his salary (before taxes) and gots him jailed for non-payment. Then he would discover he was cuckolded, the child was not his kid, and the courts still held him responsible for payment because he had acted as a good father and he was too trusting to do a DNA test early enough. Then the rage is understandable and she really deserves it. She still will recover and can take care of the bastard child.
Participants and audience laugh and giggle. They all agree, full of understanding.
He realized every man’s secret dream. All men secretly dream of sexually mutilating a woman, to teach her a lesson.
I just inverted the sexes, for demonstration purposes.
Men are not that vile. Never ever would a male talk show host, audience, guests condone such barbarity against women, or make fun of it. Only women are that mean, violent and vengeful to joke and make fun of male mutilation! It is the secret fantasy of many women to cut off a man’s penis. (People say this statement is misogynistic. I did not make this up, watch the video to believe that those woman have a good time joking about this abuse of a man)
Lorena Bobbitt cut off her husband’s penis and later demanded and got an excuse. Of course, she got no jail sentence for that. She was justified because he was a philanderer and cheated. She had real fan clubs. Go ahead and google "Lorena Bobbitt jokes". John Waine Bobbitt never went as far as many women to, he never got a baby from a mistress, much less made his wife pay and care for a baby that was not hers. He just, allegedly, cheated. Amazingly his penis was found and re-attached.
Catherine Kieu, 48 learned from Lorena’s mistake. Her husband would not get his penis back. She planned meticulously. She drugged him first, tied him up. Made sure he was awake to see and feel the punishment he deserved. After cutting off the penis, she ground it up with the sink’s electric garbage disposal. So she could be sure he never will use it again. A wonder she did not grind it while it was still attached. Or put it through a meat grinder, so he could look at it afterwards? She left him tied up. It is amazing that he did not bleed to death. She was very nice to call police, so after a long delay he finally got medical attention and would stay alive, so he could live the rest of his life without a penis and ponder what he did wrong. He must have done something to hurt her, make her angry, to deserve it.
It is not clear if she destroyed his testicles, too. In that case, our hero would also have to extract the woman’s ovaries, to make the above example equal to Caterine’s crime.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Man cut off wife’s breast and super-glued her vagina. » continues here »
We do have loop holes in our sex offender laws. Obviously, Hugh Hefner preying on a woman 60 years younger is a perversion. This is just disgusting. We need laws against that. Sex or marriage with anyone more then 3 years older or younger should be a felony. That is, if the older party is male, of course. Sexual liberation of Cougars, of the protected class "female" may not suffer consequences for their actions. May be, in this case, a 21 year old young man is taking advantage of a 51 year old woman who is unable to consent due to her irrational attraction?
Or at least violation of the "half age plus 6 years" rule should be made a felony. So 84 year old Hugh Hefner could not abuse any woman younger then 84/2 + 6 = 42 + 6 = 48 years, or would be punished for statutory rape of a 47 year old, incapable of consenting to sex with an old geezer like Hugh Hefner. He should be in jail for objectifying women in Playboy Magazine, anyway.
Our sex offender laws are not being enforced. Anyone that
has illicit sex with rapes an under 18 y old minor in California needs to get tried and arrested. Yes, that includes minors too, in California two 17 year olds are not allowed to have sex with each other. That, finally, would allow us to imprison a few million men in California, and only a few women (because in couples, men tend to be the older one of the two).
He 84 y, she 24 y (60 years age difference)
Love really must be blind — at least, for 84-year-old Hugh Hefner’s new twenty-something fiancé. Playboy Playmate Crystal Harris, 24, told ‘Entertainment Tonight’ she hardly recognizes the 60-year age gap between herself and her husband-to-be.
‘I don’t notice the age difference with Hef at all,’ Harris said. ‘If anything, I have to keep up with him!’ Harris said Hef’s energy level often surpasses the blond bombshell, who was Playboy Playmate of the Month in December 2009 NY Daily News
But the 83-year-old Playboy publisher took his tried-and-true May-December romance to a whole new level when he started dating then-19-year-old twins Kristina and Karissa Shannon, in 2008 [83-19= 64 years difference] The girls went on to star in ‘The Girls Next Door,’ but the media mogul and the Shannon twins parted ways in early 2010, so Hef could focus on his other blond girlfriend, 23-year-old Crystal Harris.
Don’t miss our articles on
Women Cougars marrying young men is sexual liberation
When a repressed class violates old norms and robs the cradle, then this is sexual liberation, very different from horny perverted men marrying young women. Go girl, liberate yourself and all women from age restrictions!
When Madonna and her ten-years-younger husband, Guy Ritchie, called it quits in 2008, the eternally youthful material girl wasted no time rebounding with an even younger boy-toy. Madge started dating 23- year-old Brazilian model Jesus Luz in 2009, and the pair has been spotted all over the globe since.
Ick Factor: Jesus’ mother is 14 years younger than Madonna. NY Daily News
The Cougar queen
Hulk Hogan’s ex-wife, Linda Bollea, takes the cake as the cougar queen. Linda, 51, and her 21-year-old boyfriend Charley Hill, started dating when he was only 19! But the duo’s matching platinum ‘dos aren’t the freakiest thing about this relationship …
Ick Factor: The Hogan kids, Brooke and Nick, are 21 and 19, respectively. In fact, Charley is a former classmate of Brooke’s.
Read more: NY Daily News