Archive for category Men’s Rights & Feminism

Gynocentrism (male chivalry) was the norm, not Patriarchism

Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on

  • "women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." (Hillary Clinton). Well, sure – losing family members to horrible deaths is so much worse than actually having to die those horrible deaths.
  • The traditional idea under discussion is male sacrifice for the benefit of women, which we term Gynocentrism. This is the historical norm, and it was the way of the world long before anything called ‘feminism’ made itself known
  • men perfectly accustomed to the idea of dying for the sake of their women. It is an idea that has outlived nearly every other, and endures to this day in our American Empire. That men should sacrifice themselves utterly – their very essence, their being and their identity, to save women that they do not even know – is neatly encapsulated in that popular phrase, ‘women and children first.’
  • feminism equals female supremacism
  • The feminist movement is taken very seriously indeed by those with the power to enforce its core aims:
    • (1) The expropriation of resources from men to women.
    • (2) The punishment of men.
    • (3) To increase (1) and (2) in terms of scope and intensity indefinitely.

The quotes above are from a very interesting lecture series:

Gynocentrism Theory 

                       (all lectures above in the RSS link)

  1. Staring Out From the Abyss   Lecture No. 1
  2. The Same Old Story   Lecture No. 2
  3. Refuting the Appeal to Dictionary
  4. Pig Latin
  5. Anatomy of a Victim Ideology

 

 

Staring Out From the Abyss  (Lecture 1)

This weblog aims to encourage the intellectual crystallization of what we are calling the Men’s Rights Movement, by taking a narrow lens across a broad range of topics. This weblog is dedicated to the elucidation of Gynocentrism Theory.

What is Gynocentrism Theory? To put it simply, it is a system which explains social relations between the sexes. It supersedes Patriarchy Theory, the cornerstone of all feminist thought. Now memetic, Patriarchy Theory has proved a remarkable tool in denying men their rights, including their most basic human rights to dignity and bodily integrity, on the pretense that all men are oppressors (or at least, allied with oppressive men from whom they receive benefits) and that all women are victims of male power. Gynocentrism Theory is the articulation of many years of effort by various thinkers in the Men’s Rights sphere to describe a vision of the world which more accurately reflects the experiences of men – and many women, too.

 

The Same Old Story   Lecture No. 2

Allow me to clarify. The traditional idea under discussion is male sacrifice for the benefit of women, which we term Gynocentrism. This is the historical norm, and it was the way of the world long before anything called ‘feminism’ made itself known

.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
Gynocentrism (male chivalry) was the norm, not Patriarchism » continues here »

Share

, ,

4 Comments

Age of Consent is Misandry (jayhammers.blogspot.com)

Posted by Devils Advocate in Men's Rights & Feminism, Teenage Sexuality on

The arbitrary age of consent is not about protecting women/girls. It is about valuing females and their virtue over males and their freedom. The intent of the laws is to stop older men from having sex with younger women and that is how it is enforced. It was never intended to stop younger men from having sex with older women. This is only possible in a society that values females over males, the same society that has so many other examples of legalized discrimination based on sex as long as that sex is male – violence laws such as VAWA, domestic violence laws, family court, accusations of sexual assault & harassment, all criminal sentencing, military conscription, circumcision, etc. We live in a society where misandry runs rampant, unchecked, and enforced by the law.

RIP Jayhammers.blogspot.com

Jay Hammers closed down his famous Men’s Rights blog, jayhammers.blogspot.com for private reasons. Unfortunately, he did not just cease to publish, but took down the entire blog. With Jay Hammers gracious permission, I repost Jay Hammers “Age of Consent is Misandry”.

Jay Hammer’s “Age of Consent is Misandry” is a provocative, politically incorrect and irreverent article. The language is often strong and alienated even lots Men’s Rights’ activists.

We at Human-Stupidity.com repost  Jay Hammer’s “Age of Consent is Misandry” as a historical document, without further comment. We do invite comments at the end of this post!

  • reddit.com/domain/jayhammers.blogspot.com has the history of his blog, including lots of reddit’s members comments. We would be happy if Jay Hammers gave permission to repost more of his articles.
  • Human-Stupidity.com is not exclusively dedicated to men’s rights. Human Stupidity focuses on exposing blind dogmatism, unjust witch hunts and wants to raise awareness and honest conscious discussion. Sometimes the truth is offensive, sometimes a point that counters conventional dogma can be driven home with blunt openness instead of careful maneuvering.

    • * r/mensrightsmovement: Reddit Men’s Rights Movement

    • www.reddit.com/r/mensrightsmovement/ is a new group at reddit, and an appropriate place to advance the discussion of issues about this post. r/MensRightMovement “Welcomes sex positive points of view” and “Sees the legislative creep of sex offender hysteria to be one of the greatest abuses of men’s rights by feminists.”

    Age of consent laws are designed to punish beta males. A beta male in his 20s, unsuccessful with women his own age who are infused with a sense of feminist entitlement and deride all but the top alpha males who take interest in them, who seeks companionship with a younger, sexually mature female who desires him, should not go to prison for acting on that which is normal male sexuality. A society that criminalizes this is a society that values females over males and treats women as if they are children.

    If we are to treat women as children then we should be consistent. Young women who have sex with older men are as much victims as women who have sex with a pick-up artist after meeting at a club. In both cases, feminists are angry because the woman has been “fooled” into having sex with a less than ideal mate in terms of value. In the first case, the male appears to be of higher value than he really is because he is older and more experienced. In the second case, the male appears to be of higher value than he really is because he has learned the elements of attraction. In both cases, women are presumed (by feminists) to have no responsibility for their own actions and to be little more than children, than animals who are guided only by instinct.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
    Age of Consent is Misandry (jayhammers.blogspot.com) » continues here »

    Share

    , , , , , ,

    20 Comments

    Hanna Rosin on the rise of women (TED talks)

    Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on

    Quite a shocking speech. Hanna Rosin fails to mention the constant discrimination against men and boys, and against masculine traits and behaviors, from kindergarten on.

    But, judging from her speech, men clearly need to be protected and have affirmative action, as a disadvantaged class.
    Share

    , ,

    5 Comments

    Meteorologist TV weather anchors prone to false rape charges? Heidi Jones and Joerg Kachelmann

    Posted by Devils Advocate in Men's Rights & Feminism on

    WABC’s Heidi Jones, who anchors the station’s weekend evening weather coverage and fills in on “Good Morning America,” was charged Monday with filing a false report, a Class A misdemeanor. If convicted, she could face up to a year in jail or a $1,000 fine.  Meteorologist Heidi Jones Charged With Filing False Rape Report

    TV weather anchors and meteorologist. What a coincidence. Unpredictable and falsely predicted thunderstorms and typhoons. And false rape accusations. Heidi Jones and Joerg Kachelmann are both weather anchors, but are on opposite sides. Heidi Jones is a false rape accuser. Joerg Kachelmann is accused of rape, and we believe the accusations are false, out of revenge.

    What is it about meteorologist  weather anchor women or weather anchor men to get involved in false rape charges?  We already reported on a famous german TV weather anchor man that is a victim of rape charges that are most likely false
    Why we think TV weather anchor meteorologist Joerg Kachelmann’s rape charges are false?

    A good looking, famous, TV anchorman (not of a small network but the main German TV station), playboy with 10 girl friends. His official girl friend finds out he has others and they split, after many many years.

    What is more likely:

    • The successful playboy with many girl friends rapes her exactly when they part?
    • The woman is angry and revenge-bent because the guy cheated and now split

    Add to this a few contradictions in the woman’s testimony, a computer with old photos of self inflicted blue ematomes seem to have been a training for the later rape hematomes.

    Unproven Rape charges: Famous German TV Weather Anchorman Joerg Kachelmann released after 4 months instant jail (human-stupidity.com)

    Meteorologist false rape accuser Heidi Jones denies prior accusations

    Now “poor” rape accuser is back-pedalling. The police understood her wrong, she did not file rape charges!!

    Dumb dumb police. Or lying lying meterologist? You form your own opinion.

    The following video is just a regular weather report by Heidi Jones. Just to see what a false rape accuser looks like. Unlike Joerg Kachelmann, whose  face was over German speaking TV, after his accusation, I cannot find many images of her AFTER her accusation and recanting.
    NY meteorologist says she never claimed rape

    NEW YORK — A meteorologist on ABC’s local New York station accused of false reporting says she

    never told police she was the victim of a rape or an attempted rape.

    Heidi Jones was given a desk appearance ticket for false reporting after police said she made up claims she was sexually assaulted in Central Park and later harassed by the same man. Police say she admitted fabricating the claims after they investigated the incident.

    A lawyer for Jones said Friday the meteorologist never said she was the victim of an attempted rape, as was reported in the media. The attorney did not clarify what Jones says she told police.

    The lawyer says the characterization of the case as a ‘false rape claim’ is an attempted character assassination. Jones has been suspended from the station pending an internal investigation.

    UPDATED: New York TV meteorologist arrested for false rape claim (The false rape society)

    Share

    , , , , ,

    1 Comment

    “Emotional terrorist” or the “violence prone” women (Erin Pizzey)

    Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on

    Pizzey differentiates between genuine battered women and violence prone women or “emotional terrorists”. Unconsciously, these women seek or create hostile or violent relationships.

    A battered person is the unwilling and innocent victim of his or her partner’s violence; a violence prone person is the unwilling victim of his or her own violence  […] A clear distinction to be made between a woman who has accidentally become involved with a violent partner and who now wishes to leave and never return again, and a woman who, for deep psychological reasons or for own, seeks out a violent relationship or a series of violent relationships, with no intentions of leaving.

    […] Opposition against my work with violence prone women and against the theories growing from this work has arisen among certain circles women working in the field of family violence who self identify as “feminists”. […] It is this circle women, clinging fast to a  specific set of political and rhetorical beliefs, who have attempted to suppress my theories.  (The emotional terrorist and the violence-prone by Erin Pizzey)

    Emotional Terrorist and the Violence-Prone by Erin Pizzey $9.99 B003Y5H7YK (Kindle edition)
    (download Kindle for PC from amazon.com and get the free preview chapter of this book. Very informative)

    Erin Pizzey opened the very first women’s shelters, where women victims of domestic violence could flee to.  To her own surprise she found, that a large percentage of these women were not genuine battered women that needed help to get out of violent relationships.

    In domestic violence, men are always at fault. Erin Pizzey breaks a taboo: from her own vast experience running women’s shelters, she discovered a type of women that either seeks, provokes, or creates the violent environment.
    Important: See all 5 videos

    Many readers will discover that they encountered women of this type before, be it in news about domestic violence, be it their own girl friend or wife, or their own mother.

    Pizzey’s findings counter the feminist dogma, that the women is always the victim, and the man is the perpetrator. Feminists countered Pizzey with extreme hostility. Feminists managed to get her book removed from most libraries. Her books are very hard to find.

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    Conventional wisdom about domestic violence and divorce is based on feminist dogma, on false premises. Hence, the real problems will never be solved and false solutions harm innocent children and men.

    The “guilty” emotional terrorist is a victim of her own unconscious rage and a victim of inept society: society, police, therapists and the lawt help the emotional terrorist to get her revenge but fail to help her to cure her real deep seated emotional behavior. She creates her own misery, all life long. She destroys her family, harms her husband, and might set up her children to become as disfunctional as she is.

    Further Human Stupidity Analysis
    1) It is also worth analyzing, if the concept of equality in relationships has not failed.  Constant bickering and arguing is not productive. Conflicts need to be solved and cannot be dragged on forever. It seems, that if one person yields, and the other person has the final say, that is the only way how a family relationship can work.

    In every enterprise, in court, everywhere, the boss (or a majority vote), make definite decisions which must be respected by the over-ruled minority. In the EEA (environment of evolutionary adaptedness) , the classic stone-age family structure, this would, most likey be the man, or the larger family or tribal unit.

    There is significant research in psychology, that in happy life long couples, there always is one dominant partner who has the final say.  (yes, this could be the woman)
    2) PS:I differ from Pizzey here: It is quite plausible that this emotional terrorist behavior has a genetic component. There certainly are women, who, in spite of adverse childhood, do not become “violence prone”. And some violence prone women might have helped to actually create their own traumatic childhood, by their own unruly temperament.

    The emotional terrorist

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
    “Emotional terrorist” or the “violence proneR… » continues here »

    Share

    , , , ,

    5 Comments

    Shrink 4 men: feeling emotions of men victimized by spouses and biased laws

    Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism on

    A Shrink 4 men makes us feel the emotions of men victimized by spouses and by the law de-program our mind that has been warped by decades of incessant feminist brainwashing. Powerfully written by a female psychotherapist specialized in healing men’s wounds. Priceless.

    I want to help men (and women) break free of the female-dominated pop psychology stranglehold of the last 30 years that’s confused both men and women and caused untold relationship damage. About Dr Tara J. Palmatier, PsyD

    Shrink4men, a site by by a female psychotherapist helps to deprogram men (and women). Somehow we all have been brainwashed into excusing female on male violence as funny, inconsequential and excusable. In every single Hollywood film, a woman slaps a man in the face, throws dangerous household items at him. Female violence, is just socially acceptable. Female murder is being excused and (almost) socially acceptable. Female verbal, behavioral and emotional abuse is totally acceptable and never gets punished, neither by law nor even by social disapproval. Constant verbal and emotional abuse is creating a dangerously stressful environment for the husband victim, and of course, for the children.

    We were surprised to recognize character traits of former girlfriends of ours in Why Some High-Conflict Personality Women Kill. Societal brainwashing is so strong that even we were unaware of the deep injustice and emotional violence we had been victimized by.

    Reading this and some other random articles from shrink4men, you will recognize and understand the psychology of the trend to victimization of criminals in sensational trials, culminating in Lorena Bobbit demanding and getting an excuse for having caused her to cut off her husband’s penis?

    Thank God, most women do not to the point of killing, but many, many women share the initial phases where they justify female against male abuse, and they managed to convince men, law makers, police and judges that their emotional abuse is justified. And any reaction of men against this abuse has become criminalized. Shrink4men shows real male suffering, making the abuse tangible and understandable.

    Why some HCPs [High-Conflict-Personalities] slide down the slippery slope of emotional abuse to violence and murder:

    1. HCPs are always right. No matter how egregiously vindictive and destructive her behavior, an HCP believes she’s right. She’s always right. If she trashes you to the kids, destroys your property, tries to get you fired and/or badmouths you with outrageous lies to anyone who will listen—you deserve it. In her warped mind, she probably sees herself as delivering some kind of twisted vigilante justice when she harms, smears, bullies and attacks others. You wronged her (probably just in her own mind), so you must pay.  (Source: Why Some High-Conflict Personality Women Kill)

    Can you recognize that these basic traits are in many women, and women can play them out without getting corrected by anyone. Her girl friends reinforce her behavior. Many feminists thrive on vengeful behavior. Law enforcement does not criminalize such behavior, it does not even protect men with restraining orders or separation help. Law enforcement only jails the man if he snaps after such abuse and reacts with violence.

    2. No empathy or selective empathy. This allows the HCP to hurt others without batting an eye. She doesn’t seem to feel remorse for hurting people she’s splitting black (a person she sees as all bad), unless she’s confronted with her bad behavior by someone whom she wants to think well of her, then she feigns remorse. In which case, she’s remorseful about getting caught; not about whatever abusive, inappropriate or criminal thing she’s done.

    Additionally, any admission of wrong-doing or remorse is usually followed with a BUT . . . (insert reason why her bad behavior is really someone else’s fault—usually the victim’s). This individual typically only has empathy for her own pain and for people whom she’s currently splitting white (a person she sees as all good).

    3. It’s never her fault. It’s always someone else’s fault. As previously noted, the person she’s been victimizing typically gets blamed. “Yeah, I punched him, but his stupid nose got in the way of my fist, so it’s his own damned fault.” It’s not a stretch to see how someone like this could just as easily justify homicide.

    “He was exposing MY children to his new whore and I’d rather MY children be with God.” Or, “He broke my heart. He made promises to me. He swore to be with me until death us do part. Now he knows how it feels. He deserved it.” Or, “I killed his children to punish him.” To this day, former socialite stay-at-home-mom Betty Broderick still feels no remorse for killing her ex-husband, Dan Broderick, and his second wife, Linda Kolkena, and blames her victims for their own murders despite the fact Betty broke into the couples’ home and shot them repeatedly while they slept. (Source: Why Some High-Conflict Personality Women Kill)

    These links are worth repeating:

    6. Knowing the difference between right and wrong or “The rules don’t apply to me.” Many HCPs don’t seem to know the difference between right and wrong. Well, they believe they’re always right and everyone else is wrong, but it’s not really the same thing, is it? Many HCPs can judge the behavior of others to be right or wrong or immoral, but they don’t appear to be able to do the same with their own behavior. For example, “It was wrong for Joe to cheat on his wife because all men are lying, cheating scum, but I had my reasons for cheating on my husband. It’s my husband’s fault I cheated on him.”

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    To overcome the profound unconscious brainwashing  by decades of feminist literature, movies, laws, it is good to read at least half a dozen of the articles in Shrink4men. The articles are written in the same emotional tone feminists write.  Shrink4men may be the one blog that can de-program avid feminists.

    It helps to emotionally understand and feel the suffering and injustice inflicted on men, and on children (Parental Alienation). Just reading the topic already helps to de-program your mind.

    Disclaimer: the following comment will draw the ire of all feminists and half of men’s rights activists. This opinion is is purely the responsibility human-stupidity.com and in no way endorsed by shrink 4 men

    If you are among the 90% that disagree with this comment, please resist attempts to dismiss this entire article with all the incontestable shrink 4 men truths, just because of one “stupid” comment human-stupidity irresponsibly and imprudently felt compulsion to add.
    At the risk of alienating most readers, we feel compelled to state:

    Societal insensitivity towards the suffering of men jailed and jail raped for 20 years for mere possession of pictures and movies, or for fondling or consensual sex with adolescents is a further consequence of the brainwashing described by shrink4men

    • Of demonizing men,
    • exaggerating female suffering,
    • justifying female revenge and excusing female abuse
    • ignoring male suffering

    Compare

    Shrink4Men is exactly what Human-Stupidity.com is about: profound de-programming of deeply unconscious beliefs, Human Stupidity: irrational brainwashed dogmatism in otherwise intelligent people. This is why I took the unusual liberty to copy the entire index.

    Shrink4Men Index

    November 2010

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
    Shrink 4 men: feeling emotions of men victimized by spouses and bi… » continues here »

    Share

    , , , , ,

    No Comments

    Generation Y, raised on nothing but feminism, will be a nightmare for men.

    Posted by admin in Men's Rights & Feminism, Stupidity-Dogmas on

    “watch out for generation y, they will be a nightmare for men”.  Those feminist women who indicated Generation Y as being a nightmare for men are correct. Things have hit a tipping point in our culture by that time. Children from that generation onwards have been raised on nothing but feminism. By the time of Generation Y, feminists have taken over academia, media and the law, they control public discourse. Feminism by the time of Generation Y is more than a revolutionary movement; it is the culture itself. It is Western culture. the-spearhead.com/2010/11/02/feminists-who-cares-if-its-your-kid/#comment-50531

    I repost this comment, because it is very scary and very shocking. The consequences of feminism are scary and shocking enough. It is very scary to imagine that this is just the beginning!  An entire generation grown up with feminist indoctrination from kindergarten to university. Feminist dogma, feminist thinking, feminist warped logic became part of their mind.

    A scary article. Feminism has barely begun! It will take over completely. Due process will disappear even further for men.  Women will get even more power to get men evicted from their home and jailed for unproven accusations of rape and child abuse, jailed for non-payment of child support even if the child is not theirs, and worse.

    Feminists think about these things. They plan generations ahead. I have heard many feminist women tell me “watch out for generation y, they will be a nightmare for men”.

    Yes they do, well said. Radical feminism – the basis and instinct of all feminism – is based upon this sophisticated, long-term thinking approach. (Radical) feminism is about progressively eliminating all male power – oops, “the patriarchy”. Eliminating anything which could possibly lead to male power in any and all forms.

    There’s nothing wrong with this approach per se – it’s necessary. What wrong is the group exercising this approach – feminist females – and that they are allowed free reign to do so. In the absence of masculinist men adopting a long term revolutionary radical mindset (to empower men and keep females in check), feminist females will instead adopt that approach. Life is zero sum; the battle of the sexes is real. (Christian/Enlightenment liberal philosophy about the possibility of universal equality and liberty is bunk.)

    Likewise there’s nothing wrong with “social engineering” – the negative connotion it has among men’s rights types is unfounded.

    Those feminist women who indicated Generation Y as being a nightmare for men are correct. Things have hit a tipping point in our culture by that time. Children from that generation onwards have been raised on nothing but feminism. By the time of Generation Y, feminists have taken over academia, media and the law, they control public discourse. Feminism by the time of Generation Y is more than a revolutionary movement; it is the culture itself. It is Western culture.

    (Note that this phenomenon of feminism taking over the culture is exclusive to regions based on Liberal Democratic Capitalism.)
    Source: the-spearhead.com/2010/11/02/feminists-who-cares-if-its-your-kid/#comment-50531

    This comment was on Spearhead, and even on this men’s right site was voted down into invisible oblivion.  I am not sure how much I support the rest of the comment. I reposted the most interesting part.  So please go on reading the rest of the article on the-spearhead.com/2010/11/02/feminists-who-cares-if-its-your-kid/#comment-50531

    Human-Stupidity.com Analysis

    Human-Stupidit.com has shown that feminism and its laws are a prime example of warped thinking, unconscious distortions and manipulative speech. The fact that an entire generation grew up conditioned by feminist thinking is extremely scary to everybody who thinks that feminism has already gone overboard.

    The effects can already be observed. Moderate men’s rights writers get kicked out of websites and, amazingly, even get kicked off men’s rights websites. Speaking against feminism might soon be included in hate laws and totally banned. Nowadays research on issues like adolescent and child sexuality is even more taboo than research about gender and race differences.

    Share

    , ,

    13 Comments

    Meredith Maran (My lie): False accusations due to “repressed-memory”-of-child-abuse witch hunt

    Posted by Devils Advocate in Men's Rights & Feminism, Teenage Sexuality on

    Meredith Maran’s recent book “My Lie” describes how Meredith accused her own father of child abuse and rape. She was fooled into this by then fashionable feminist witch hunt invention of “repressed memory”, that a third of all kids were sexually abused and just had forgotten. She is sorry for it, but does not quite see the monstrosity of how she almost destroyed her father’s life.

    “I allow an innocent man to sit in prison if it meant keeping children safe”
    (Meredith Maran)

    In the middle of the book, while you are still deeply in the mind-set of being molested, there’s a notion you agree with that if one innocent man goes to prison, but it stops a hundred molesters, it’s worth it. Do you still agree with that notion?

    I’m fairly close to a man still in prison, and really believe he is innocent. I know how he’s suffered. I know he’s 80 years old and in ill health. He’s spent 20 years in prison, for no reason. If every elementary school child is now taught how to protect themselves from sexual abuse — and even more to the point, some father or preschool teacher who feels the urge to molest a child will be inhibited from doing so because they think there are guys still in jail for doing that — but innocent people are in prison, do I have to make that choice? It is a Sophie’s choice kind of thing. Would I allow an innocent man to sit in prison if it meant keeping children safe?

    So would you make that choice?

    I think so.

    Source of this monstrosity: salon.com/books/int/2010/09/20/meredith_maran_my_lie_interview/

    Meredith Maran did not learn. She has a little pity for a guy whose life has been totally destroyed by 20 years of jail in spite of his innocence. No total outrage. No desire ti fight for justice (to make amends for her own injustice).

    She still suffers from brainwashing by more recent feminist fables. Meredith Maran  is sorry she destroyed her father’s life. But Meredith wants to totally destroy the life of a totally 100% innocent guys in order to save children from some indecent fondling? In this blog I make it a point that even the true culprit of indecent fondling of a (real) child deserves much lighter punishment then decades in jail. But Meredity wants that the totally innocent guy rots and gets raped in jail?

    I use the word “real” child, denoting 3, 5 or 10 year old, because feminist laws
    nowadays define 17 year olds as “children”

    A child molestor is a guy who talks to children in creepy ways, who has indecent wandering hands. A guy who takes photos.  An old grandpa who is getting a little too cozy. Or a 20 year old having sex with a 15 year old. Some reason for concern, yes. But feminist propaganda confounds senile grandpas with slight errors of judgment and violent penetrative toddler mutilators and (real) infant rapists.

    I use the word “real” rapist, because all the above indecent behaviors
    nowadays are officially called “rape”, causing total confusion.
    • When a “Rape” is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word “Rape”. & the Perversion of Language

    Child molestation might not be harmful!!?

    Feminists  either totally invent or vastly exaggerate the damage that is being done my low level child molestation. Where is the proof? Inconvenient science gets officially repressed and condemned:

    So much that the entire US senate condemned a prestigious peer reviewed study by a 99-0 vote.
    Scientific Publications Condemned and Repressed by US Congress and Senate

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Read the rest of this entry » »
    Meredith Maran (My lie): False accusations due to “repressed… » continues here »

    Share

    , , , , ,

    No Comments

    Switch to our mobile site