Judge throws out George Zimmerman’s libel suit against NBC

A Sanford judge today put an end to George Zimmerman‘s libel suit against NBC Universal.

Circuit Judge Debra S. Nelson ruled that the former Neighborhood Watch volunteer is entitled to no money from the media giant.

George Zimmerman was ruined by undue and unjust persecution due to the perverse manipulation of public opinion by the press and the justice department. Like most PC (political correctness) lies [3] , this also remains unpunished.

She issued a summary judgment in the network’s favor, meaning that unless an appeals court reverses her, the case is now dead.

Zimmerman had filed suit two years ago, accusing NBC of falsely portraying him as a racist in a series of broadcasts shortly after he killed Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black 17-year-old, in Sanford.

Editors shortened audio from a 911 call Zimmerman made to a police dispatcher the night of the shooting, making it sound as if Zimmerman volunteered that Trayvon was black and that he racially profiled the Miami Gardens teenager.

PDF of decision

Human-Stupidity has reported totally biased press reporting and travesty of justice in the George Zimmerman case. One of the worst being the omission of the following photos

1) This

george_zimmerman_head_right-after-shooting

usa-george-zimmerman-trial-bloodied-face2) and George Zimmerman, his face bloodied, immediately after his fatal confrontation with Trayvon Martin.

Please read our lengthy writings about the George Zimmerman / Trayvon Martin self defense case.

Especially here we show more photo manipulation by the press:

Exaggerated version of media bias in George Zimmerman Trayvon Martin case

George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O’Mara’s toothless defense is the culprit

The blatant misrepresentation of George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin‘s picture was only surpassed by biased media reporting, undue interference by none less president Obama, illegal action by the prosecution (hiding of evidence), unpunished death treats and lots of serious beatings to innocent’s under the guise of "This is for Trayvon".

They even lied about the ice tea: Articles: What the Media Choose Not to Know about Trayvon// Press Perpetuates ‘Iced Tea’ Myth in Coverage of Zimmerman Verdict and Trayvon Martin Demonstrations // Was Trayvon Martin using a street drug called “Lean?”

Also compare the vigor with which cruel violent hoodlums were defended, declared innocent, and recompensed, just because they were Black and Hispanic, and the victim was white: "The Central Park Five": Hoodlum robber rapists unjustly rewarded with US$ 40 million | Human Stupidity 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘George Zimmerman’s libel suit against NBC dismissed’ » »
George Zimmerman’s libel suit against NBC dismissed » continues here »

Share

Wikipedia has a quite frank discussion of child porn laws. Even Human-Stupidity is cited.  

We reprint the entire Wikipedia article here because we fear this will be repressed and edited out. Further down, after the reprint we point out where we would go much further then this Wikipedia article dares to tread.


Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Main article: Laws regarding child pornography

While laws criminalizing child sexual abuse now exist in all countries of the world,[1][2] more diversity of views exists on questions like exactly how young those depicted in pornography should be allowed to be, whether the mere possession of child pornography should be a crime, or whether sentences for such possession should be modified.

Specific laws

In 1999, in the case of R. v. Sharpe, British Columbia’s highest court struck down a law against possessing child pornography as unconstitutional.[3] That opinion, issued by Justice Duncan Shaw, held, "There is no evidence that demonstrates a significant increase in the danger to children caused by pornography," and "A person who is prone to act on his fantasies will likely do so irrespective of the availability of pornography." [4]

Academic Milton Diamond has shown that availability of child pornography REDUCES child abuse, because pedophiles can act out their fantasies and possibly masturbate to fantasy child porn acts. His suggestion is, for this purpose, to create specific artificial child pornography under circumstances that does not traumatize children.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia’ » »
Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia » continues here »

Share

"Fünf vom Central Park": Unschuldig Verurteilte erhalten 40 Millionen Dollar Entschädigung lügt der Spiegel zusammen mit den linken anti-rassistischen Gutmenschen. Kein Mitleid mit der brutalst massen-vergewaltigten und ins todesnahe Koma geprügelten Frau. Nein, es darf nicht sein dass die Meute die massenweise Leute im Central Park anfiel, ausraubte, und vergewaltigt, schwarze und Hispanische Männer waren.

Die verurteilten Verbrecher hatten gestanden, und es war mit vielfachen Zeugenaussagen bewiesen, dass sie nicht nur die Frau vergewaltigt und schwerstens mit Eisenstangen verprügelt hatten. Sie hatten auch diverse andere Leute verschlagen und ausgeraubt.

Dann gestand ein vielfach verurteilter Mörder und Serien-Vergewaltiger dass er die Frau vergewaltigt hatte. DNA bewies dass das wahr war. Die Frau war von bis zu einem Dutzend Männern vergewaltigt worden. Es ist also völlig falsch, aus dem Geständnis zu schliessen dass diese Männer unschuldig wären.

Weiterhin waren sie wegen diversen Überfällen, Raub, und Gewalt verurteilt worden.

Diese Männer freizusprechen und sie noch mit Entschädigungen zu belohnen ist eine Schande, die von anti-rassistischen Gutmenschen mit viel Lügen durchgesetzt wurde.

Und dann wurde noch ein Film gemacht, der alles verdrehte. Das ganze Urteil war politisch. Den Gutmenschen war es wichtiger, Minderheiten freizusprechen als einer extreme schwer misshandelten Frau Gerechtigkeit zukommen zu lassen. Diese Männer hatten alle viel mehr auf dem Kerbholz, mit klaren Beweisen. Alles wird verschwiegen.

Der Spiegel hat meine Kommentare wegzensiert und nicht veröffentlicht. Sonst würde ja noch die ganze Lügengeschichte kaputt gemacht werden.

Ähnliche Lügen hatte der Spiegel über George Zimmerman und Trayvon Martin aufgetischt.

Details und Beweise in meinem englischen Artikel

"The Central Park Five": Hoodlum robber rapists unjustly rewarded with US$ 40 million

Share

Ken Burns’ THE CENTRAL PARK FIVE: The New TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD—Fiction Designed To Induce White Guilt

[See also:“It Was Fun”—Robert K. Tanenbaum vs. the Central Park Five, 25 Years Later]

“It Was Fun”—Robert K. Tanenbaum vs. The Central Park Five, 25 Years LaterKen (The Civil War) Burns’ 2012 documentary The Central Park Five, nominally about the Central Park Jogger Case, has become this generation’s To Kill a Mockingbird—now regularly assigned by Leftist educators to brainwash impressionable school kids and induce white guilt. As is typical for Burns, a story about black and Hispanic crime is transformed into a morality play set in the notorious bastion of white racism that is New York City.

Needless to say, the actual facts of the case tell a more complicated (and damning) story. But unfortunately, Burns’ agitprop may facilitate yet another $250 million-plus racial extortion payment in the form of a predatory civil suit against the city—and, ultimately, cripple law enforcement

Political correctness and "civil rights" managed to get a 40 million reward for criminals, by omitting and distorting facts about heinous crimes. Similar to the Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman hoax.

It is shocking that feminists obsess about all kind of non-violent and consensual *rape, but are quiet about a heinous mass rape with mutilating beatings with iron pipes.


A 43 page legal analysis and summary is here:

In addition to their convictions for the rape and assault on the female jogger, the
defendants were also convicted of crimes with respect to other attacks occurring that
evening; Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, Raymond Santana and Yusef Salaam were
convicted of riot, the robbery and assault of John Loughlin and the assault upon David
Lewis. Kharey Wise was convicted of riot. Another defendant, Steven Lopez, who was
a central defendant in the case of the female jogger, arranged a plea bargain whereby
he pleaded guilty to the assault on Loughlin and received a sentence of 1 ½ to 4 years.

In addition, Michael Briscoe, Jermaine Robinson, Antonio Montalvo and Orlando
Escobar pleaded guilty to various charges of riot, assault, robbery and attempted
robbery with respect to the attacks upon Antonio Diaz, Loughlin and Lewis.
Justice Tejada ruled, as the District Attorney recommended, that the convictions on
these charges against the defendants, as well as those involving the female jogger,
should be vacated, although the newly discovered evidence of Matias Reyes’s rape of
the female jogger related only to that event. We understand the legal position
underlying Justice Tejada’s ruling, that the existence of new evidence regarding the
most significant charge against the defendants may have affected the juries’ ability to
consider evidence regarding the other charges. However, we believe that there is no
reason, on the merits, to think that a jury fairly presented with the evidence against the
defendants would come to a different conclusion than was reached before.

 

Ann Coulter: What You Won`t Read In The Papers About The `Central Park Five`

By Ann Coulter on April 24, 2014

[See also “It Was Fun”—Robert K. Tanenbaum vs. The Central Park Five, 25 Years Later, and Peter Brimelow`s 1989 London Times reaction Beasts In The Park]

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘"The Central Park Five": Hoodlum robber rapists unjustly rewarded with US$ 40 million’ » »
"The Central Park Five": Hoodlum robber rapists unjustly… » continues here »

Share
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Soccer World cup would gain from diversity: dwarfs, transsexuals, mature, women need quotas’ » »
Soccer World cup would gain from diversity: dwarfs, transsexuals, … » continues here »

Share

 

Fathers rights defenders at AvoiceForMen call themselves MHRA, men’s human rights activists. They defend the rights of fathers and family men, and even some rights for boys. Glaringly absent is the defense of sexual rights for men and boys. Feminists and religious zealots have united to create draconic sex laws. The declared goal of the suffragettes was to use the power of the vote to increase the age of consent and to close brothels and to end prostitution.

These clueless male equal rights feminists MHRA put up this nice touching movie about a 16 year old boy with his jailbait girlfriend. No mention about the serious dangers this boy is in:

MHRA put up this nice touching movie about a 16 year old boy with his jailbait girlfriend. "A 16-year old’s tribute to Father’s Day". No mention about the serious dangers this boy is in, due to the sex laws MHRA and feminists wholeheartedly agree on.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘MHRA clueless about sex laws: AvoiceForMen victimizes boys’ » »
MHRA clueless about sex laws: AvoiceForMen victimizes boys » continues here »

Share

"Family Court" tramples due process, puts men into life long indentured slavery, confiscates property worth Millions and Billions, confiscates future income and pension, re-instated debtor’s prison where men are imprisoned for a decade for non-payment of spousal support to the slave owner. "Family Court" accepts hearsay as proof enough to kick a man out of his home (SAID: Sexual Allegations in Divorce). Ex parte (one party accusation) orders are based on the flimsiest of evidence or upon mere accusations, "temporary" orders allow unconstitutional orders to be extended for years on end. "Protection from Abuse" (restraining) orders, like all other abominations of family court, abuse mostly men and confer special rights upon women.  Human Rights are enforced for criminals, but not for law abiding family men.

We recommend you read the entire post we excerpt here

American Family Courts, the First Amendment, and Violations of Free Speech

Family Court.  What a friendly sounding name. A court for families, so open and inviting.

A place where families are welcome and invited, a place for families to bring their troubles and disagreements, where there are people specially trained to help them with their problems, and where issues can be resolved in a fair compromise, so that everyone can be happy. […]

How true. What a promising nice name

And yet, nothing could be better Orwellianly named than this institution; there is nothing friendly about it. It is a snakepit of anguish and despair, impacting millions of people each year.

By re-casting all familial issues into a mutated type of civil court action variously termed  “special proceedings”, and by radically recasting the concepts of just what a judicial court is, e.g., its procedures, discretions and evidentiary standards, the state had effectively done away with all the inconvenient and expensive due process and constitutional protections required in every other American court.

While retaining the traditional powers of a judicial court – enforcement, fines and imprisonment – none of the checks and balances against those powers were concomitantly retained. Expedience of process and the legitimization of raw state power was the goal.

In creating these special “People’s Courts”  – not-quite-criminal, not-quite-civil – dozens of  due process protections were sloughed away leaving a raw, grinning changeling in its place.

Domestic violence abuse is based on falsified science and enforced by unconstitutional family court. SAID: Sexual Allegations in Divorce is a potent weapon thanks to complicity of family courts. Debtor’s prison longer then a decade has been reinstated under the guise of "contempt of court".

Constitutional procedural protections against self-incrimination, right to an attorney, presumptions of innocence, right to jury were done away with.

Inviolable substantive rights to federal parenting guarantees, property and liberty, became optional concerns and subordinate to statutory directives. Legal financial obligations to others persons were created out of whole cloth and determined from the flimsiest allegations.

The rights to financial and medical privacy were extorted away, as was the Constitutional right to free travel.

Astonishing. Men can get deprived of their passports to prevent them from fleeing their indentured wage slavery. Fugitive slave laws are still in effect world wide: Robert Sand: ‘Most wanted deadbeat dad’ arrested in Thailand for owing millions to his slave owner wife.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘American Family Courts’ wholesale destruction of constitutional rights’ » »
American Family Courts’ wholesale destruction of constitutio… » continues here »

Share

#1 Google and #2 Apple, the world’s most valuable, profitable, successful companies have rapidly grown while deprived of the benefits of racial and gender diversity.

Imagine how much more profitable these companies could have been if white men had not made irrelevant products and bad decisions. Diversity is strength!

Having a diversity of perspectives leads to better decision-making, more relevant products, Google diversity report 

  1. Had Google and Apple embraced diversity,  hired lots of women and Blacks, had they been led by minorities, Google and Apple would be much more valuable then they already are. They would not merely be the two most valuable companies in the world.
  2. White men created the two most successful enterprises in the world. White men are especially capable and successful.

Please chose (1) or (2)

Economic success is racist! Economic success favors White men!

(2) must not be true because it is racist and sexist.  Occam’s razor is racist. The obvious easy explanation must not be true.

the data — which in Silicon Valley usually reigns supreme — shows that diversity on groups benefits research, development, innovation and profit. [New York Times]

The data:

The two companies with the best profit, innovation, development and research are led by white men and lack diversity. This proves that diversity benefits company success.

Had they only hired Blacks with lower IQ (see Bell curve) these companies would not be such failures.

Racist white male patriarchy’s logic needs to be abolished in favor of political correctness own logic

 

How the Asians Became White 

Asians are around 30% in these companies, according to  Google diversity report. Numbers about Jews are glaringly absent.

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘White men and lack of diversity ruined Google & Apple’ » »
White men and lack of diversity ruined Google & Apple » continues here »

Share