When technological progress could be of disadvantage for feminists, they use their manipulative skills to outlaw its usage. Recent technological advances in DNA paternity tests could uncover female adultery and liberate a cuckold from life long payments. To avoid this, feminists’s infinite creativity invented a baby’s “right to her/his genetic material” to prevent a father from taking a bit of blood, saliva or hair from his putative offspring for genetic testing. Feminist women want to maintain the status: before the advent of DNA testing, women managed to hide the offspring of adulterous relations and made the cuckold husband paternity and pay for the resulting offspring. Now most countries create obstacles to paternal DNA testing, so cheating wives do not get discovered.
The Conspiracy Against Cuckolds. Women are sure of maternity. They know for sure the baby is hers. Men can’t be sure. Feminists are against gender equality, they want to prevent men from being sure about paternity.
Summary
Women who actually introduce cuckold babies into her family, make her husband pay for her infidelity, defraud the men out of huge amounts of money. This female fraud is treated leniently. The female adulterous fraudsters are even are protected by laws that make it difficult for cuckolded fathers to do genetic testing.
In some countries fathers who do paternity test on their putative offspring risk 3 years in jail.
We propose equal rights. Women are sure about maternity, so mandatory paternity testing at birth is the only way to level the playing field and have equality of information.
Human-Stupidity analysis
As always, women want to have their cake and eat it. Whenever they are at a disadvantage, they want equality. Whenever they have a privilege, they want to keep it. No equality.
When paternal certainty gets them child support money, they enforce laws for DNA testing: Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support.
When uncertainty favors a cheating adulterous wife, they instate other laws that punish putative fathers for DNA testing.
It never ceases to amaze me that women get men to enact and enforce their lopsided laws. Most likely this is not a planned conspiracy by feminists, but evolutionary inborn ‘feelings” that translate into concerted action by big groups of females, (Female evolutionary Superiority in social manipulation causes feminist Language Distortions’ universal acceptance )
What damage is done if a woman cheats? 20 years of expense for her husband to feed a cuckold baby!
A cheating wife can make a man invest his life’s work and savings into a child that is not his. This is one of the worst frauds there can be. 20 years of work, a major part of a man’s life, stoled, due to fraud. This fraud should be a felony with long mandatory prison term.
That is real cheating! Amazing, cuckolding a man with a child that is not his is not regarded high treason! And now we have the technology to prevent this cheating, to protect men from the worst effect of their wive’s infidelity.
A man who goes to a prostitute, who has enough money, harms nobody. Except the pride of his wife.Maybe reduces a little the time and money alotted to his wife and kids. But his wife will never pay for a man’s girlfriend’s offspring.
Modern paternity tests threaten female cheaters, so protective laws were enacted
Amazingly, the feminist influenced legal system managed to undo the technological progress. The female cheater is often protected by law, which makes paternity tests difficult or illegal.
The Conspiracy Against Cuckolds: Cheating women get legal protection.
[Snce 2006] all men who suspect they may be the father of a child, but who do not have parental responsibility, will be banned from testing a child’s DNA. The new Human Tissue Act will make it a criminal offence to test a bodily sample, including for paternity testing, without proper consent
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article554070.ece
- And as usual, women manage to come up with some amazing logic, that the 6 month old baby has a right and interest in his/her genetic material. And stupid men just lap up such drivel and buy it. I am amazed!
Yes: up to 3 years in jail when a British man does genetic testing on his own child!
www.hta.gov.uk/licensingandinspections/consentanddnafaqs.cfm
http://www.easydna.co.uk/dnanews.php/human-tissues-act-paternity-testing
This drakonian law is from Britain. But in most countries, genetic testing by cuckold fathers is getting complicated. In Germany, a similar law to impose jail sentences on fathers was defeated.
In Germany, even if a cuckold father takes a genetic test and sees he is not the father, this test is invalid. And it is not grounds enough to do a court ordered test. Father will be forced to go on paying for the kid his adulterous wife bore from another man.
Insanity! Absolute injustice against the man. The woman commits large scale fraud to get large part of a man’s earnings for her boyfriend’s son. And the law protects the adulterous woman and her boy toy. Insanity enshrined in legal code. Amazing!
All this DNA secrecy with the intent to protect family peace and the well being of the children.
Amazing how feminists win all wars, and men are just the lambs who accept all injustice.
Why not 3 years in jail for deceiving a man and make him pay for a child that is not his?
A woman who makes a cuckold dad work for 20 years to pay a few hundred thousands $, €, £, for a child that is not his, causes severe financial and emotional damage to a man. Then later on, society wants to protect the child by preventing dad from knowing he is not the father. Well, the culprit for any trauma to the child is the lying cheating woman.
Does she get 3 years in jail for that? For causing trauma to her husband and her child? No. the law protects her. It makes it hard or impossible for a man to find out the truth about her cheating. And if he finds out he usually is required to go on paying.
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “"Mother’s baby. Father’s maybe." Mandatory DNA testing at birth can instate gender equality.” »
"Mother’s baby. Father’s maybe." Mandatory …
» continues here »