Humans, in spite of great brain and social capacity, get totally irrational and blind on certain issues. Frequently this is due to dogmas, taboos, religion, political correctness, old habits. etc. Maybe someone’s hidden agenda is the source for some such manipuative selective (self)-deception .
It took the pope until 1992, 13 years after Neill Armstrong stepped on the moon, to recognize that the Galileo Galilei was right and the earth was not stationary. And people still take the pope seriously when he prohibits the use of condoms in Aids-struck Africa and threatens to excommunicate who turns off the artificial feeding of a girl after 20 years in brain dead coma.
People who normally are highly intelligent (like the pope) become totally irrational, unconscious, self-deceived on issues related to dogmas, taboos, religion, habits, political correctness. Not only at Galileo’s time, even today the taboos go as far as to repress scientific research
- Persecution of researchers on racial differences in intelligence. This is a tough issue, because equal intelligence of all races is a dogma shared by liberals who would agree with most of my other points. So any research that points to different intelligence in the races must be repressed. But, we claim we are an open-minded scientific society. As long as scientific results don’t contradict our dogmas.
- Racial differences in intelligence: James Watson, Nobel Prize winning geneticist persecuted for scientific truth
- Race differences in intelligence: how research changed my mind to overcome the “all races are equal” dogma.
- 71 fastest runners on earth: 1 white Christophe Lemaitre & 70 blacks. Are races equal?
- Henry L. Gates, Jr., arrest: racial profiling necessary for safety, political correctness discourages neighborhood watch
- Repression of research violating dogmas:
Bill Clinton condemned the “Bell Curve” (about racial differences in intelligence) without even reading it. The US senate condemned, with a 99:0 vote, prestigious research in the American Psychological Association journal showing that in cases of sexual “child abuse”, no damage can be found if no violence has been employed and the victim has at least average intelligence.- Scientific Publications Condemned and Repressed by US Congress and Senate
- Racial differences in intelligence: James Watson, Nobel Prize winning geneticist persecuted for scientific truth
- Child pornography witch hunt:
under the guise of saving a few abused children, the entire interpol hunts down some poor loners who pay for a web site with teen sex photos. They get arrested with the entire might of interpol, and get their life destroyed.- As collateral damage parents get prosecuted for naked photos of baby in a bath tub, of infant suckling on mom’s breast.
- Adolescent teenagers get on sex offender lists for sexting: taking photos of themselves naked on their cell phones and sending the photos to a friend. This constitutes producing and distributing child pornography (actually it is neither child nor pornography, but adolescent nude self portraits).
- Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photos
- Years of Jail for “clicking on child porn link”.
- But cutting off her husband’s dick entitles to an excuse • • • • Lorena Bobbit who cut off her husband’s dick never received punishment and was entitled to an excuse by her husband(!!)
- Supreme Court oks indefinite detention for possession of photos. But violent robbers get freed.
- Nude adolescent photos worse then TV showing killing children, bullying, gang violence, street crime against children
- Abuse of language to mislead:
Words get distorted, worse then Göbbels in Nazi Germany. Adolescent nude non-sexual phots are called “child pornography”. Consensual sex with teenagers is called “rape”. A new law in Brazil defines inappropriate touching as “rape”. This use of a clearly defined term “rape” for actions that is clearly NOT rape, as defined by popular language for centuries, is a clear misuse of language, meant to arouse more anger against the alleged perpetrators.
• When a “Rape” is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word “Rape”. & the Perversion of Language |
• Female evolutionary Superiority in social manipulation causes feminist Language Distortions’ universal acceptance |
• Feminist arguments against prostitution debunked - Pedophile witch hunt & obsessive repression of teenage sexuality.
An enormous legal apparatus, under the guise of protecting 5 year olds from clear obvious abuse (no extra law is needed for that because penetrating a 5 year old is severe bodily harm) ends up arresting 17 year old girls for sending their own nude photos to their boy friends.- A 17 year old boy Ganarlow Wilson got a 10 year jail sentence for getting a blow job from a 15 year old girl, similarly
- Marcus Dixon got jail for having consensual sex with a peer.
- An Italian tourist got jailed in Fortaleza (Brazil) for kissing (2 pecks) his 8 year old daughter
- Dangerous pedophile hunters threaten harmless pedophile
- Prohibiting the use of embryos for stem cell research.
Throwing the embryos into the garbage, that is allowed. This nonsense has diminished after Bush left office, but the religious right still thinks the rights of a lump human cells with an imaginary soul trump the right for health and cure of adults with diseases. - Religion & Atheism:
Religion is the source of many of our aberrations in thought, logic, and policy. I am too scared to even mention the most violent religion on earth. Christianity is past the crusades and witch burnings.
- Darwins Theory of Evolution: in spite of overwhelming scientific support with not one single counter-example. The churches see, correctly, that with Darwin’s theory, there is no more pressing need for a God-Creator, so they do their best to invent Creationist nonsense to confuse the non-scientific public.
- Repression of drugs as harmless as marijuana
at the cost of waging wars in Colombia, jailing a considerable percentage of the population. The drug war is similar to underage sex witch hunt.
Czechs may possess 15 g of marijuana, 1 g of cocaine, 1.5 gram of heroin, 4 ecstasy pills, 5 units of LSD, 2 g of amphetamines - at the same time allowing alcohol and tobacco to kill thousands of people.
There seems to be some kind of contradiction and inconsistency. Also allowing advertising for junk food that created a world wide health menace of obesity from early childhood on: - Obesity, unhealty food, sedentary lifestyle:
due to misguided evolutionary mechanisms (hunter gatherers don’t have McDonalds, chocolate, unimited all you can eat buffets) we tend to eat wrong and be lazy to make unnecessary moves. Add to this industry greed, …. and we have a health epidemic. - Negating right to die for the terminally ill.
We are a liberal society that respects self determination and individual dignity. And we are not a religious state, so why do religious people want to force incurable cancer sufferers to rot and die slowly? If we let our dog die like this, the humane society would sue us for cruelty with animals. And of course it is totally taboo to discuss the cost of keeping an almost dead person “alive” for another half year. - Victimless crimes:
Why does government and police interfere when consenting adults decide to buy and sell sexual services? Are we not a free country? Is anyone harmed by this? And why are people in jail for planting two flower pots of marijuana in their own back yard for their own consumption? But booze and cigarette stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange? - Prohibition of prostitution:
under the guise of protecting women from “abuse”, Cambodjan brothels get closed, leaving the sex workers jobless and without income. Seems the “victims” are unable to decide for themselves, they need the law and self appointed feminists to decide for them. Basically, consenting adults are not allowed to sell and buy sexual services. For the majority of men who don’t have much sexual success, prostitution could be psychological comfort: - Men’s Rights & Feminism:
I ran across a very compelling theory, that middle aged unattractive feminists conspire to eliminate competition by young attractive women (especially minors), cheap sex (prostitution), pornography and even sex dolls, so man have no other sexual outlet and are thus forced to stay with unattractive women even though it costs them half their income and property. This is why this brand of feminists do not oppose the burka, do not favor self determination in prostitutes, …
• Female quotas on death row? Unsuccessful male losers overlooked by feminist zeal! - Rape hysteria and false rape accusations:
- Human Rights:
The well meant intention to dignify human life has led to absurd protection of criminals in detriment of public security and protection.- Somali pirates rewarded with asylum in Europe in Holland or Britain.
• Problematic Human Rights: captured Somali pirates are usually released
• Pirates with Grenade Launchers Attack British Ship. Captured and set Free by Portuguese Navy
- Old white middle class white ladies in Britain get searched for bombs, just to avoid charges police might racially profile young arab muslim men.
• UK: Police stop and search innocent white people to balance race figures, terror watchdog says
- law abiding citizens in self defense and police doing their duty risk getting sued by criminals
• Why a doberman is better then a security guard or policeman
• “Human Rights” protect criminals to the detriment of law abiding citizens
• Killer’s human rights: German killers sue Wikipedia to have their names expurged
• Henry L. Gates, Jr., arrest: racial profiling necessary for safety, political correctness discourages neighborhood watch - vicious killers on death row can complain about cruelty in execution that take 3 minutes to die (while law abiding citizens are not allowed to die humanely in a hospital but die agonizing deaths taking weeks)
- Should society really spend billions on safeguarding criminals. Maybe the old fashioned methods like execution, whipping, cutting off hands etc. should be reconsidered? (I am playing devil’s advocate, I am not whole-heartedly suggesting these solutions)
- Somali pirates rewarded with asylum in Europe in Holland or Britain.
•
I found so many false claims on this page that it is impossible they are all mistakes.
Which means the person who created the page deliberately lied. Not even the person who created this page believes the stuff on this page – so why would anybody else be stupid enough to believe it?
Sad little person. Do better.
Everything about sexuality trying to make into a crime, so-called sex “abuse”,sex “trade”sex “offense”, sex “trade”,sex “shop”, sex “abuse” etc. how laughable. Women self-deluding themselves about men. Feminists are disgusting pieces of garbage who are hypocrites who should have had their own asses exterminated. America did not need a womens so-called movement.
Women in the U.S.A. are completely stupid about how to accept compliments about their bosoms and cleavage as well as rearends. As well a zillion of them throughout our planet are unable to live in peace with men who whistle at them, etc. Gullible women who to easily believe in every lie they are told, even telling lies about mens compliments. Self-deceiving oneself about compliments.
Feminists are corrupters who have corrupted women by the millions to mislead them through Satan to think that if someone says you have nice tits automatically is “unwanted” and supposedly is being irritated sexually, what a stupid way to say bothered to insinuate that one is being supposedly sexually harassed, how absurd. The womens movement are deceivers who twist truth and make their refuge.
UM are you suggesting this articles addition of one L at the end of NEIL armstrongs name invalidates the article and makes the author a retard? i think someone else might be lacking in intelligence and i dont think its the author….. >.>
wtf are you talking about 1992 and 13 years after NEIL, not NEILL armstrong walked on the moon. are you a fucking retard?
Give the guy a break! There is a lot of research in his post and a few honest mistakes can be overlooked.
Walk on the moon was in 1969 . . 1992-1969=23 . . . . The “1” and “2” key are next to each other. Or, ‘not carrying the one’ during a quick mental subtraction would have produced the same error.
Or, the “13” error could have come from this ->”Vatican officials said the Pope will formally close a 13-year investigation into the Church’s condemnation of Galileo in 1633″
There was a bit of hyperbole in the original post to suggest it was the Pope who finally recognized that the earth went around the sun instead of the other way around. The author should have used “Vatican” instead of “Pope”. Also, the “recognition” was not referring to astronomy, but to recognize and apologize for the wrong done by the Vatican to Galileo in 1633.