A mother-of-two caught naked in bed with a 14-year-old schoolboy who bragged about the affair on Facebook has been jailed.  Susanne Divers, 26, befriended the boy after meeting him at a party and later began an affair that lasted more than a month. He was so smitten he boasted on the website: ‘I’ve got the best girl in the world.’— Read more: Mother of two, 26, is jailed after being caught naked in bed with 14-year-old schoolboy lover (Daily Mail)

It is pretty clear how this 14 year old boy was damaged by the woman predator. So much that he bragged all over, and wanted to commit suicide when she tried to break up. The repressive teenage sex laws were to blame for the breakup attempts. So the laws actually are detrimental to teenagers.

Over 200 comments to the above article agree mainly that the law is wrong. Most commenters would not have the courage to say that the law is also wrong if the “victim” were female happily agreeing and consenting to a relationship with an older guy.

If society were not so totally convinced by the dogma of gender equality, then it would even be worth analyzing if there should be different measures for both sexes. Some fathers might actually be proud if their 14 year old son had an affair with a 26 year old woman, but most parents would be much more concerned if their 14 year old daughter had an affair with a 26 year old man. Maybe human instinct is a better guide then equality laws.

Food for thought.  Form your own opinion.

Disclaimer (Female privileges or equality)

My comment in the left column did not intend to alienate men’s rights activists. But I got flak by some highley esteemed activists who thought I was betraying them because am favoring privileges for women.

This quick comment was a suggestion to open-mindedly consider different alternative thoughts, not a dogmatic statement or final solution. Human-Stupidity is about awareness and anti-dogmatic attitude, not about definite dogmatic solutions.

See also the comments below for alternative ideas and interpretations.

I am not in defending the the actual system:

  • whenever it behooves women, they have equal rights
  • whenever it is advantageous, they have unequal privileges

Rather, in order to have old fashioned female privileges in one place, they would have to accept old fashioned male privileges elsewhere. Actually

  • I am against the dogma of the sexes being totally equal (they are not)
  • I am against excessive, unnecessary and draconic interference by law makers and courts into private matters, sexuality

See yesterday’s post about the father who castrated his teenage daughter’s lover.

Share

11 Comments

  1. rhayat1 says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    Normal people call that “getting lucky”, not “being victimized”. Meanwhile, as they prosecute this young woman, and make both of their lives a living hell, murderers and rapists are on the loose.

  2. Max says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    This is a photo of Mrs. Divers:
    http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/8899/susannedivers.jpg
    Honestly, could you find any 14-yrs old boy who would mind having an affair with her?

  3. theantifeminist says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    But the reasons for the double standards are transparently obvious : 1/ virginity in your daughter was virtually essential to a family’s survival throughout most of history and 2/ girls can get pregnant, boys can’t.

    Neither of those reasons are valid today. In fact, whatever moral force or ‘justification’ they might still have, they are vastly outweighed by compensating reasons more pertinant to today’s values – for example, teenage boys are less mature than girls, and boys will fuck anything at that age and so are less able to give rational, ‘informed’ consent.

  4. theantifeminist says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    By the way, I grew up watching ‘channel seventeen’, a porn franchise featuring nothing but 16/17 year old girls being banged (usually with other teens, but often with much older guys). This was perfectly legal then (only 10 years ago). It was clear that the girls were enjoying it. A girl looking at the camera clearly having an orgasm and screaming ‘oh god, oh yes, oh yes’ is quite a strong indicator in a rational and sane world, that she is fully consenting and in no way undergoing an experience that could be remotely considered traumatic.

    The only reason why women will say that 17 year old girls are being abused is because it is in the sexual interest of every woman over 17 to say that (i.e. and thus convince leglislators to make it illegal and restrict the sexual competition).

    Men, on the other hand, aren’t sexually threatened by teenage boys. Men don’t fear their wives dumping them for the 17 year old boy next door. Men are attracted to youth, innocence, and beauty. Women are primarily attracted to men with status and power, which teenage boys tend not to have.

    Girls having sex with older men are no more victimised than boys. Women lie, and say that they are, because women are sexually threatened by young girls. Men say girls are victimised, on the other hand, because of primal fatherly instincts regarding maintaining the virginity of their own teenage daughters. (and of course, in today’s hysteric and hypocritical society, often to deflect attention away from what they might have just been googling for).

  5. admin says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    antifeminist, your comments are very valid.

    DNA testing and birth control allow us to rationally change old moral concepts that are ingrained in our stone age psychological attitudes and our 2000 year old religious rule books.

  6. Boycott American Women says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

    I have started a new blog called Boycott American Women, please add a link to it on your blog, thanks

    http://boycottamericanwomen.blogspot.com/

  7. rianne says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Kendra Hoffpauir, 25-year-old woman from Leesville, Louisiana, has been sentenced to seven years at hard labor, with four years of that term suspended for inapproriate relationship with a 15-year-old boy.

    Hoffpauir was originally arrested on Jan. 16, 2009 after the parents of a 15-year-old juvenile reported to Vernon Parish Sheriff’s Office detectives that Hoffpauir had been inappropriately involved with the juvenile. She was charged with felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile.

    Hoffpauir admitted to engaging in sex with a 15-year-old boy, and plead guilty to two counts of indecent behavior with a juvenile and one count of carnal knowledge. Several other charges were dismissed.

    http://naughtyneighbors.zoeoez.com/2010/09/10/kendra-hoffpauir-louisiana-2/

  8. rianne says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Gloria J. Murphy, a 55-year-old woman from Dayton, Ohio, was arrested in January 2009 for allegedly having sex with a 12-year-old boy. Sexual encounter between adult woman and the boy started late Wednesday and and lasted into the early hours the next day, according to local police.

    At least 3 neighborhood children were having a sleepover with their parents permit at the Murphy’s house. Murphy offered children celebrating her 55th birthday alcohol and then took the 12-year-old to her bedroom. When other kids returned home next morning, they told their mother that Murphy had served them alcohol and that she had sex with one of the boys. Mother called cops.

    Other than appointments to the probation department or for medical treatment, “you’re not going to be out of the house,” said Huffman, who also designated Murphy as a Tier 2 sex offender.

    Murphy, of 5440 Rawlings Drive, pleaded guilty Oct. 23 to one count of sexual imposition of a person under age 13. Her other charge, rape of a child under age 13, was dropped under the terms of a plea agreement.

    http://naughtyneighbors.zoeoez.com/2009/12/11/gloria-murphy-ohio-2/

  9. George Spiteri says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

    I actually agree with “The Antifeminist”-(comment #5) when she says “But the reasons for the double standards are transparently obvious”.

    A fourteen year old boy having sex with a 26 year old women doesn’t have the same psychosocial repercussions as if it was the other way around. In addition to the getting pregnant element, there are physiological differences as well, for instance: Most women perceive the act of consensual sex as an outgrowth of love or an expression of strong emotion, where men perceive it as a means to an end where climax is the ultimate goal—void of much emotion. There are exceptions to these rules of course, but you get my point—it’s a lot more wrong when a 26 year old man seduces a 14 year old girl into having sex.

  10. To justify our moral judgments, we invent victims even if there are none | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    […] Sex laws traumatize 14 year old school boy who was happy to have affair with 26 year old woman. He did not think he was a victim of his adult lover. […]

  11. pandu says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    oh , lucky kid…..i am jealous of him. he should thank that angel woman , who offered him explore heaven at the beginning of teenage. oh my god. Please don’t sue her. Rape of a male child by a woman IS NOT A CRIME. It is a PRIVILEGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Leave a Reply