In Britain, as in most countries, women retire at age 60, earlier then men (age 65). A clearly blatant sexist discrimination.
Analysis from the Men’s Network showed that men live 13 years in retirement whilst women enjoy 20 years. No mention from Saga and Unions Together on that point?
Women live a few years longer (Interim Life tables), work shorter years (due to child rearing vacations), contribute less to retirement funds. Women don’t pay appropriately higher retirement contributions during their work life, rather men pay for women’s longer retirement. In Brazil, to get full retirement benefits, women need to contribute for 30 years, men for 35.
Men pay for female privileges in early retirement and shorter work life (due to sexist legislation)
It says EU law prevents it from increasing men’s pension age before women’s,
Amazing. Why would there be such a clearly sexist law discriminating against men?
but surely that is a reason to delay the increase for everyone until 2020 rather than punish women? It’s certainly no justification for increasing women’s pension age by even more than that of men.
‘How could I foresee such a discriminatory bombshell?’| Telegraph
Rectifying or reducing 70 years of legally codified female entitlement and male discrimination is punishing women?
Today’s men have been indoctrinated with feminist religious dogma from kindergarten on (Generation Y, raised on nothing but feminism, will be a nightmare for men). Thus men, like sheep, swallow any absurd feminist entitlement attitudes and allow such drivel to be published.
Since 1948, state pension has been paid to women at 60 and men at 65, it is only in 2018 that this injustice against men will be rectified, some 70 years later. And Altmann says pension policy is always against women. Unbelievable. I wonder what the male members of Saga think of her ‘balanced’ statement.
A good look at this and other issues about the effect on the genders was produced by Mark Easton of the BBC.
Blatant large scale financial discrimination against men. Men paying women’s retirement benefits, and in exchange retiring later. Where are the million men marches for gender equality?
Equality means equality and men have been the most discriminated group when it comes to state pension age. For anyone to claim otherwise shows they have no sense or belief in what equality really means. They purposely only have one eye open.
THE SCANDALOUS STATE PENSION AGE HYPOCRISY | The Rights Of Man
Why do men retire later then women
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women to retire older then men to have equal duration of retirement and years worked” »
Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women …
» continues here »