- As in hate speech laws[note]Hate speech is speech that violates PesseKodex12.1’s restrictions. Hate speech laws enforce #TrueSpeech restrictions upon everyone, under penalty of the law.[/note] *[note] This is why “Kill the [South African White] Boer” or “kill all white men”[22,23,24,25] is not hate speech, while “My daughter was raped by a Pakistani Muslim” is hate speech. In dishonest PC fashion, “Hate Speech” has nothing to do with what the normal person understands as hate.[/note], it is not allowed to say anything negative about a “protected group” aka “minority”[note]some of the confusion about “majority minority”, about minorities that are in numerical majority, can be avoided by this term “protected group”. [/note]
- It is irrelevant if the disallowed “content” is factually true (#TrueSpeech).
- It is ok to encourage hate against an unprotected group[note] “White Kills Black” is Fit to Print. [/note]
Reprinted with permission from Sincerity.net
“Community standards”[note]It would be interesting to compare community standards, and their interpretations, from 8 years ago, when social networks still subscribed to free speech and #TrueSpeech[/note] are just another version of the #PCGagOrder re-formulated[note]Racism taboo ⇔ PC gag order [⇔ PresseKodex12.1 ⇔ Stylebook ethics] (are all equivalent) The root cause of our societal lies, dishonesties, subsequent misunderstandings, and deadly policy mistakes * *, is any one of these: the racism taboo or …[/note]. Community standards are another WRITTEN PROOF of repression of #TrueSpeech with PesseKodex12.1’s restrictions
“Encouraging hatred” is interpreted very widely[12]. with typical PC dishonesty. Negative facts might encourage “hatred” against “protected groups” aka “minorities”. The #PCGagOrder is officially enforced by YouTube and FaceBook. Forbidden to say anything negative about minorities, to avoid stirring up prejudices. This #PCGagOrder is enforced by Hate speech laws, and social media.
“We also don’t allow any content that encourages hatred of another person or group of people based on their membership in a protected group”
That interview was one of fourteen videos that YouTube banned from the E. Michael Jones channel on YouTube in June. As with other thirteen, the only explanation YouTube gave was that the video violated its rules concerning hate speech, I.e., “We also don’t allow any content that encourages hatred of another person or group of people based on their membership in a protected group.” YouTube’s notice did not identify the offending hate speech or the “protected group.” Source