Race a social construct? Pretty women weigh in on YouTube

Race a social construct? (Great race realistic documentation)

HeyRuka on Race

Cute girls that talk about important complex topics get lots of visitors at YouTube. Above you see a very intelligent girl that correctly demonstrates racial differences. Most of the votes she gets are negative. She also has lots of interesting texts linked at her YouTube video (click on "show more")

Racial Truth is not pleasant

Human Stupidity gets attacked by some of our friends for the race realistic issues. People think we have an axe to grind, to prove white supremacy. No. First of all, Asians are supremely intelligent. And second, Human-Stupidity stands for truth, no matter how unpopular. Like many race realists, we would love Blacks to as successful, rich, intelligent, and low crime as Asians.

May the US inner cities flourish, may Africa surpass Japan, Korea, Taiwan and China. May African immigrants in Europe contribute to the advancement of physics and medicine and win Nobel prizes. The way Jews did.

Unfortunately, in spite of all well intent, this does not happen. See Affirmative Action injustice at Law Schools.

Mistaken arguments of race egalitarians

The next girl is not only pretty, she also has very interesting well founded opinions. But miserably fails on race and IQ issues. She is an example for the fallacy of politically correct thought. If you really know the topics, you can see the fallacies. If not, read my posts and the lengthy discussions about race and iq.

We are not racists, but …….. (Falling prey to fallacies and PC)

ZOMGitsCriss

She posted lots of interesting links at YouTube

Walter E. Williams: How much can discrimination explain?

To recover from the diatribe, an intelligent Black making intelligent arguments.

Attacking Race Realism (personal attacks)

xxxThePeachxxx in another convinced example of political correctness. For the well informed, she shows lot of negative examples of anthropology fallacies and PC. The typical argument that interbred half breeds prove that pure bred dog or human races does not exist. And being funded by the Pioneer fund makes results biased. But being at a politically correct anthropology department would not bias results?

The arguments are far off, but so are the arguments of valued researchers like Graves. You may skip this video, it is not very intelligent, but typical of the fanatic majority.

y xxxThePeachxxx: personal attacks, citing PC scientific consensus

 

Should Gravity be taught in School (Miss USA contestants)

It is always good to check the opinion of pretty women. Now some stupid and less stupid comments by Miss USA contestants about the teachings of Gravity in school.

In case you did not get the irony, they were really asked Should Evolution be taught in School? (Miss USA 2011 – 51 Delegates Interview)

 

More on Race and IQ 

Author: Human-Stupidy (Admin)

Honest Research, Truth, Sincerity is our maxim. We hate politally correct falsification, falsification, repression of the truth, academic dishonesty and censorship.

22 thoughts on “Race a social construct? Pretty women weigh in on YouTube”

  1. To the miscreant who made this site:
    Typically people who need to cling to their race and make claims of their racial superiority are seriously lacking in their successes, abilities, social status, and likely penis size, in their personal lives. I guess the chinese were rather racially inferior when the mongols took them over, or when the English, French, Germans, and Americans took over parts of their territory, or they were feeling a little racially under the weather as the Japanese raped their country, and when they accepted hundreds of millions of dollars in material and aid from the Americans to resist them. And i guess the Japanese were just racially not up to par when the Americans showed them how to industrialize, and when the japanese thought they had it all figured out, attacked everyone else.
    Let’s see how far your racial superiority takes you in the forests of the amazon when left just to your awesomeness. You can decline to follow the advice of the jungle-dwelling savages just cuz you’re so racially fantastic, and survive on pride alone.

    Reply

    1. @DgalitarianJay, thanks for the video. Old but valuable.

      Race does not exist but among 1000 babies, Asians have 4 twin births, white 8, blacks 16 and some black tribes 56. Any of the hair splitting definition arguing opponents have disproven that number? Twin births are socially constructed?

      Ovaries react to social expectations in society? Probably out of luck to find excuses here. Everything later one can find excuses (which could be true but can be tested scientifically)

      Gestation time. Different among races. Socially constructed? Blacks are born earlier? maybe better nourished? I thought it was the opposite.

      Haven’t watched the rest yet, but I doubt Dr Suzuki will explain away twin births

      Great contributor, EgalitarianJay. Just very interesting that you arrive at different conclusions.

      Reply

      2. Great Video about Race differences. Nothing really new has happened in the last 20 years.

        Phlippe Rushton makes a host of enormous scientific arguments. Dr Suzuki really disappoints by resorting to emotions and some extremely weak and wrong counter arguments to 1-2 out of 100 proofs Rushton had put up. His main argument was that Rushton should be removed from his job.

        Rushton even taught students how to scientifically validate or disprove his arguments. His scientific rigor and argument reigned supreme.

        I am inspired to put this video up as an example for Human Stupidity. The obvious plain truth, supported by 60 different proven race differences. Talked away by empty talk of a PhD with a political agenda.

        Anyone wants to analyze the faulty logic of Suzuki? Like all Rushton says is wrong, but whatever he alleges Lewontin says is the unassailable truth. This proves Rushton is wrong.

        Reply

      3. Admin,

        After spending some time reading Rushton’s work and the rebuttals to it I am able to see through his propaganda. I take it that you’ve watched the full video.

        Here’s my brief interpretation of what occurred:

        Rushton recited the scientific findings of his research and presented them as the evidence for his theory. Suzuki in addition to lambasting Rushton for peddling pseudoscience and arguing that his work should not even be dignified with a response presented the fallacies of his argument and the data that invalidates it.

        Suzuki’s argument was that Rushton comes to his conclusions based on confirmation bias. He gathers data from numerous sources and presents them as evidence supporting his theory and then ignores or makes excuses for facts that do not fit the theory.

        A prime example of this is that Rushton claims Northeast Asians are more intelligent than Europeans and Africans because Mongoloids selected for higher intelligence due to living in cold climates. If that is true Native Americans, the most recent derivatives of Northeast Asians should have also been exposed to this selection pressure for high intelligence prior to settling the American continents but they have lower average IQs. Rushton cannot explain this. He dismisses it as an anomaly.

        Rushton cannot refute any of Suzuki’s arguments about how actual data on genetic diversity invalidates his theories and chooses to fixate on what he calls political arguments and emotional outrage over the calls of him to be fired. Most of the audience’s questions were not serious so they were not useful.

        I regard Suzuki as the winner of this debate because he was able to make a positive argument Rushton cannot refute. It is true that he ignored Rushton’s data on twinning rates etc. and the reason is because none of that stuff proves his hypothesis. Just like Graves Suzuki recognizes that it is very easy to reach conclusions when you selectively collect data that appears to support your point view.

        Regarding twinning rates Admin, other scholars have noted that there are environmental variables that impact twinning rates such as smoking and nutrition. The fact that twinning rates vary considerably within geographic populations and have changed considerably over long time periods indicates that variation in rates are not due to immutable evolutionary differences between populations which is the argument that Rushton wants to make.

        Rushton wants to claim that any variation in biological or behaviorial data between ethnic groups is due to racial biology when it can easily be explained by environmental factors. Rushton is not a geneticist and does not know how to test his evolutionary theories which have been debunked by actual geneticists and evolutionary biologists.

        Rushton is basically a data miner who makes his argument by attempting to present a plethora of data that in his mind could plausibly support his theories and shows no regard for the credibility of sources nor controls for variables to make the case that he has actually identified data that reflect genetic differences.

        Suzuki actually did very well at dismantling Rushton’s arguments in this debate.

        Reply

  4. EgalitarianJay… :
    Like or Dislike: 0  1Racism is an evil and destructive ideology that should not be taken seriously. Racists should be greatful that normal people give their arguments any attention at all.
    Racists are people who should be made fun of and laughed at. There is no element of truth to racist ideologies. If you are racist by default you are wrong.

    I think “anti racism” is truly destructive. Look at all of the rapes in white nations, ruined Detroit, welfare, all the high IQ whites never given a chance in favor of some dumb negroes.

    Reply

  5. Dude, think. We just tend not to think of hardships endured by soldiers the same way as we think of hardships endured by civilians.

    It might not be FAIR or RIGHT, but it’s not *conscious* intent or a conspiracy.

    Reply

  6. Ooops, I made a mistake…

    FRANK: This is collection of “Appeal to…” fallacies not to mention a non-sequitur. It does NOT follow that the argument of an “evil” person is by default wrong. If an outright professed “Neo-Nazi” argues that Israel has a questionable human rights record is he wrong because he is a “Neo-Nazi?” Or should his arguments be judged on its merits?

    Reply

  7. EGALITARIAN JAY: Racism is an evil and destructive ideology that should not be taken seriously. Racists should be greatful that normal people give their arguments any attention at all.

    Racists are people who should be made fun of and laughed at. There is no element of truth to racist ideologies. If you are racist by default you are wrong.

    FRANK: This is collection of “Appeal to…” fallacies not to mention a non-sequitur. It does follow that the argument of an “evil” person is by default wrong. If an outright professed “Neo-Nazi” argues that Israel has a questionable human rights record is he wrong because he is a “Neo-Nazi?” Or should his arguments be judged on merits?

    Reply

  8. Racism is an evil and destructive ideology that should not be taken seriously. Racists should be greatful that normal people give their arguments any attention at all.

    Racists are people who should be made fun of and laughed at. There is no element of truth to racist ideologies. If you are racist by default you are wrong.

    Reply

  9. EGALITARIAN JAY: I debated AstrialCow recently and she ended up blocking me from her channel because she said I was misrepresenting her arguments. In truth she simply was threatened by the level of debate I was bringing to her channel.

    FRANK: At least that is your personal interpretation of her actions Jay.

    EGALITARIAN JAY: Ruka was however exposed as being a supporter of White Nationalism and had been communicating with Stormfronters and racialist Youtubers like MrHerrIQ who helped her construct her video. MrHerrIQ is unquestionably a racist. I have caught him using racial slurs before.

    FRANK: Of course, this has no bearing on the truthfulness of Ruka’s arguments.

    EGALITARIAN JAY: At the end of the date these people have ideological reasons for why they are promoting this research. The hereditarian Race & IQ researchers themselves have a racist agenda. It’s very obvious when you consider the funding and the background of the researchers themselves.

    FRANK: As said above this has no bearing on the truthfulness of the arguments being provided. You have an openly “anti-racist” agenda and use sources who openly have a drum to bang against “racism” (I.E. Wise and Graves).

    Should that be reason enough to dismiss any argument you put forward?

    Reply

  10. I debated AstrialCow recently and she ended up blocking me from her channel because she said I was misrepresenting her arguments. In truth she simply was threatened by the level of debate I was bringing to her channel.

    The debates surrounding Heyruka were interesting.

    I personally enjoyed ThePeach’s presentation.

    She destroyed Heyruka’s arguments.

    I debated Ruka as well and she was a bit narcissistic. She really could not respond to any of the scientific arguments and kept whining about being called a racist although she was capable of being polite when people were polite to her.

    Ruka was however exposed as being a supporter of White Nationalism and had been communicating with Stormfronters and racialist Youtubers like MrHerrIQ who helped her construct her video. MrHerrIQ is unquestionably a racist. I have caught him using racial slurs before.

    At the end of the date these people have ideological reasons for why they are promoting this research. The hereditarian Race & IQ researchers themselves have a racist agenda. It’s very obvious when you consider the funding and the background of the researchers themselves.

    Reply

  14. Whatever one’s views on race realism, Ruka seems to be using it merely as a rationalization for her normative cause: racialism.

    I wrote the following comment on another video of hers and her home page; she refused to let it through.

    “If you’re serious about researching race, this is a good, nuanced read….

    http://www.jonentine.com/reviews/straw_man_of_race.htm

    Also, in regard to racial pride: you do realize that taking on the beneficial things your genetic cluster/ race has done entails taking on the fuck-ups as well right? Collective pride and collective guilt are two sides of the same coin.”

    Reply

  16. EGALITARIAN JAY: I recommend this video.

    FRANK: The video has been included above with the admins commentary: “xxxThePeachxxx in another convinced example of political correctness. For the well informed, she shows lot of negative examples of anthropology fallacies and PC. The typical argument that interbred half breeds prove that pure bred dog or human races does not exist. And being funded by the Pioneer fund makes results biased. But being at a politically correct anthropology department would not bias results?”

    The arguments are far off, but so are the arguments of valued researchers like Graves. You may skip this video, it is not very intelligent, but typical of the fanatic majority.

    Reply

Leave a Reply. We appreciate a discussion: if you disagree, your comment still is welcome.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.