Oregon Senate approved bill (to require computer technicians to report child pornography) will cause unnecessary suffering

Do report teenage self shots, bath photos of nude toddlers, 17-year-old-girl-in-leotards-movies

It is time now technicians learn what child pornography is. Do you know? You think child pornography is photos of 7 year olds in explicit sexual activities? You really have no clue about the law!

17 year olds have become "children", department store children’s swim suit catalogue photos become child porn when collected by a person who seems to have prurient reasons to collect such photos. Knox vs. USA determined that photos of 15 year olds in Leotards can constitute child pornography

Can you imagine all the cell phone repair-men now are required by law to turn in adolescents for taking their own photograph or having a photograph the girl friend sent?  Sexting teens in Oregon will prefer to destroy defective cell phones to getting free warranty repairs that might land them in jail.

We wonder why the law does not include teachers and parents in their duty to report and criminalize adolescents. With some effort, 20-30% of adolescents could be criminally persecuted just for sexting. Remember, receiving the photos is a heinous crime, too.

Oregon’s Senate approved a bill that requires computer technicians to report images of child pornography

The measure passed the state Senate on a 24-1 vote Friday and now heads to the governor for signature or veto.

Technicians who believe they may have spotted images of child porn must notify the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the state Department of Human Services or law enforcement. Failure to do so could result in a misdemeanor charge.

Only a misdemeanor? We think technicians should get mandatory felony charges </sarcasm>

We are surprised, that in this day and age where toddlers play with cell phones, no 7 year olds have yet been arrested for photographing themselves nude or their doctor plays. It will happen!

And don’t forget all the family photos of babies taking bath, changing diapers. They all need to be analyzed painstakingly by police and and highly paid defense lawyers to see if baby poses in a way that the perverted mind of a public prosecutor considers sexually enticing or provocative.

Privacy laws? Technicians snooping our income tax return?

So the technician now is encouraged to snoop cell phones and computers to find child pornography? What if he finds the income tax return? Insider information about the stock market? Or stories about adult love affairs? Is he not violating the privacy of his customer?

Everyone now risks 10 years in jail and  has to be wary when

Reporting laws create suffering for adults and children

A lot more suffering will be created. Not only for innocent children accused of sexting, of adults inadvertently getting child porn  photos,

Lots of so called child porn certainly does not cause any damage to the minor when produced, for example taking one’s own nude photos, or boyfriend and girlfriend engaging in legally allowed sex (age of consent of 16 or 14)

Well, and sometimes our zeal goes a bit overboard

Child pornography reporting laws don’t make children safer

Only the perverted logic of feminists and religious zealots can invent the lore that (even inadvertently) downloading or looking at some pictures somehow hurts a person thousands of miles away that is not even aware of the guy’s action.

So 95% of so called child porn never endangered any child, because it really is adolescent erotica, involves legal acts, …. There is small percentage of true child pornography that serves as the excuse for the witch hunt. It did hurt a child at some time, but its viewing will not hurt it again as some mystics claim.

Equally as viewing photos of stoning, whipping, clubbing to death or beheading of minors will not re-victimize the victim of violence.

Do NOT report movies of children whipped by Taliban, stoned to death, beheaded by terrorists or of self mutilating jackass wannabees

Our sex obsessed society feels comfortable about violence, vigilantism, killing and mayhem.

Do report academy award winning movie "The Tin Drum" when in Oklahoma

By conventional logic, Brooke Shields must be a total wreck. Her movies and photos have been seen by millions and still are all over the net. And her movies "Taxi Driver" and "Blue Lagoon" clearly are child porn by today’s standards. She still gets re-victimized tens of thousands of times per day.

Many minors were on the cover of Playboy magazine or on page 3 of British tabloids in the 1970s. Now this needs to be reported as child porn.

Child  porn prohibition likely to cause increased child abuse

World renowned academic researcher is getting ostracized for his scientific research that showed that

He suggested to use artificially created child porn so no children would be harmed. We suggest to add so called child porn depicting that was clearly created without hurting children, and to grandfather child porn that has been around for decades, where no new damage is being done.

Close the loophole: outlaw unborn child porn

A tasteless article poking fun at the child pornography prosecution craze:

Start reporting REAL avoidable damage caused to children

Pregnant women drink alcohol,cause brain damage in offspring with no legal consequences or social ostracism. Nothing is done about families and food industry conspire to create a generation of obese diabetics who will die 15 years prematurely

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share

Author: Human-Stupidy (Admin)

Honest Research, Truth, Sincerity is our maxim. We hate politally correct falsification, falsification, repression of the truth, academic dishonesty and censorship.

7 thoughts on “Oregon Senate approved bill (to require computer technicians to report child pornography) will cause unnecessary suffering”

  1. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Tip for ANYONE who is not a fucking souless robot like every other on the planet; learn to do all your own PC repairs. Shops rip you off anyway. I recently bought a new PC, and I’m wishing I hadn’t. front USB ports keep fucking about, and the other night my case fan went kaput. Wish I’d have built the fucker myself.

  2. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I like looking a preteen models. I have not ONCE seen an image of a little girl in any kind of distress. It’s obvious that they love the attention and enjoy posing for the camera. I WOULD NOT find pictures of children being tortured and raped a turn on. It is possible, to find a preteen girl attractive WITHOUT wanting to abduct, rape and murder her. The sick fucks who do this do not like children; they simply enjoy inflicting pain on living things. This stupid fucking society we live in simply cannot see how differnt the two things are. I would NEVER hurt a child and would rather fucking die than do so.

  3. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I live in Oregon and I’ve read over the laws on Child Porn and they def do not include looking at 15 y/o girls in leotards. As far as I can tell, nudity doesn’t automatically make it illegal, either. It’s what she’s doing in the pics and what body parts are being shown. This article seems more than a little misleading.

    Eraser is a good high-tech program that’s supposed to get rid of stuff on your HD real well.

    The main concern in this state has been a bill under consideration to obliterate the SoL on child molestation charges. The False Rape Society talked about that one at length and I was in contact with our local ACLU about it. Haven’t heard if it ever got out of committee. There were impassioned pleas on both sides of the fence, and fortunately some women were among those testifying against it!

    1. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      The tapes contained numerous vignettes of teenage and preteen females, between the ages of ten and seventeen, striking provocative poses for the camera. The children were obviously being directed by someone off-camera. All of the children wore bikini bathing suits, leotards, underwear, or other abbreviated attire while they were being filmed. The government conceded that no child in the films was nude, and that the genitalia and pubic areas of the young girls were always concealed by an abbreviated article of clothing. The photographer would zoom in on the children’s pubic and genital area and display a close-up view for an extended period of time. Most of the videotapes were set to music. In some sequences, the child subjects were dancing or gyrating in a fashion not natural for their age. The films themselves and the promotional brochures distributed by Nather demonstrate that the videotapes clearly were designed to pander to pedophiles. http://www.mit.edu/activities/safe/safe/cases/knox/94a0734p.htm

    2. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      Good men have to live like terrorists, encrypt and wipe their hard disks. Thus terrorists can hide better. And you have to do this routinely before your computer breaks and you send it to repair. Sad.

      Sequel said:

      Eraser is a good high-tech program that’s supposed to get rid of stuff on your HD real well.

  4. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I follow both your blog and theantifeminist blog. It’s sad the-spearhead doesn’t cover these taboo topics because they don’t want to look bad. Insane sex legislation is the greatest threat to men’s civil rights at the moment and very few blogs like yours actually cover these topics without fear. Is there a reason some of your articles are posted at inmalafide but they are not posted to the-spearhead ?

    1. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      If the spearhead invites me, I gladly post. If you want to help me to get the connection, great. I can also post observing certain restrictions. Not all my posts are totally inflammatory.

      But we have to see what the spearhead accepts and tolerates. I have been flamed there a few times already, just for my comments.

Leave a Reply. We appreciate a discussion: if you disagree, your comment still is welcome.