"Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children."                   (Adapted freely from protectchildren.ca/app/en/mandatory

This is a terrible flaw in our child porn laws: unborn life is not protected. There is must be mandatory 10 year jail sentence for pedophiles that watch unborn nudity. We must protect our unborn fetuses from the perversity of pedophiles (embryophiles and fetophiles). Watching such unborn child porn kills: Often, ultrasound pictures lead to abortions, to killing of unborn life. Tell the House: Protect the unborn child against abuse. Criminalize production, possession, and possession of Unborn Child Porn.
SIGN PETITION

.

20100923153031!Baby_in_ultrasound
Perverts take ultrasound photos of unborn babies and  distribute them on the internet. source 

But does it harm nobody? Weinstein’s critics argue that merely “viewing” unborn child porn does real harm to unborn kids by perpetuating a $3 billion annual market. The Justice Department estimates that in creating their product, unborn child pornographers have abused 1 million unborn kids in the United States. And some studies suggest that between 30 and 50 percent of viewers of unborn child porn also molest a child.     (freely adapted from theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/jack-weinstein/8273/)

twin kiss Source:  prenatalvision.blogspot.com/2010/07/4d-ultrasound-captures-twins.html

Fetuses engaging in indecent touching. Perverts owning such photos deserve to be raped in jail forever. This picture would be rated 7 on the 10 point Copine child pornography scale:

Pictures that depict touching, mutual and self-masturbation, oral sex and intercourse by a child, not involving an adult.

The fetuses also should be arrested at birth:  handcuffed, jailed, and be registered as sex offenders for life. 

It is important to realize that these images are crime scene photos – they are a permanent record of the abuse of an unborn child. The lives of the unborn children featured in these illegal images and videos are forever altered.

Once these images are on the Internet, they are irretrievable and can continue to circulate forever. The unborn child is revictimized as the images are viewed again and again.

        (adapted freely from missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?PageId=1504)

 

 

“He didn’t intend to hurt anyone. However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” 

thechronicleherald.ca/Front/9019133.html

unbornchildporn_thumb2 
Technology has made it possible to have unborn porn.

Source: uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Child_porn

I thank Uncycolpedia for their child porn persiflage which gave me inspiration for this article

 

Children of 17 years, 12 years, 5 years, 1 year, 1 month of age are all protected strict laws from being abused  by viewers of sexual erotic photos and videos. Owning such photos of children and looking at such photos and videos is child abuse.

But why this 0-18 year age limit? The 18 year cutoff rate already is getting softened. Europe and Australia already punish the possession of depictions of "aparently underage" for 22 year old women in pony tails that look as if they were 17 years old. Thus  the law now protects young looking 22 year old women from child abuse. (see 17 year old "children"?)

Now we need to work on the other end of the age range. Who says that the lower age limit  for child pornography prosecutions has to be zero year old new borns? Embryos and fetuses need protection against abuse and rape, too. Right from conception, when human life is created.

 

Unborn-child-porn leads to 100 000′s child killings

Often such ultrasound photos are the first step in the monstrous killing of unborn babies. Most abortionists demand ultrasound photos of the unborn child before killing it.  Or even with mothers who did not plan to kill the unborn child, ultrasound pictures discover a problem with the child and thus cause her to decide to kill the innocent unborn child.

And these child killings feed the market for mutilated dead-fetus-porn (dead-unborn-child-porn)

Mutilated dead unborn-child-porn (mutilated fetus porn)

 

Warning: fairly gruesome photos follow. Dead-unborn-child-porn, mainly from "pro-life" organizations.

Warning: very graphic pictures. These fotos are so gruesome, we will not endeavour to publish them. Many are clearly unborn-child=porn, as the genitals are obscenely exposed. We only publish censored blacked-out pixelated versions. Click to see the uncensored mutilated dead unborn-child-porn. 

 

Dead fetuses in indecent poses with genitals exposed

Click to see uncensored perverse photo of Unborn child with obscenely opened legs and clearly visible genitals There are people who produce, collect, distribute depictions of dead and mutilated unborn children. Pedophiles know no bounds.

Click to see uncensored photoObviously people getting their kicks from watching these photos. Embryos in indecent position with genitals clearly visible. There is an entire web site dedicated to such cruelty. Remember: each time a mutilated embryo is being looked at, it is suffering mutilation again!

Rumors are these unborn child pedophiles (also perversely called pro-life) rummage in garbage bins to find life-less victims to photograph.

Some 300, 000 children a year are taken from their wombs because of neglect and abuse. The most horrific crime that can done to an unborn child is sexual abuse. The ridiculous idea is that you can stop abuse by allowing digital unborn child porn. I was a real unborn child exposed to unborn child pornography and it almost killed me.

[...] Unborn child pornography is one of the most overlooked forms of unborn child abuse that exists. This is due in part to the misconception that these victims are willing participants.

[...] The effects of pornography on unborn children specifically and society as a whole are quite obvious. Almost all agree, even the researchers from this study, that in the case of unborn child pornography, where a real unborn child is videotaped or photographed there is always a victim.

Most would also agree the effects are similar for the victims whose pictures have been altered and their face is superimposed on an adult body.        (Freely adapted after MICHAEL REAGAN: Child Porn Is Child Abuse. I Know Because It Happened to Me)

 

Dead fetus porn (dead-unborn-child-pornography)

Dead fetuses are seen all over the internet! Just because they did not die a violent death by the hand of man does not mean they are not victims.

741px-Human_Embryo
A six week embryonic age or eight week gestational age intact Embryo, found ia Ruptured Ectopic pregnancy case. source
800px-Human_Embryo_-_Approximately_8_weeks_estimated_gestational_age 
Victim of a spontaneous abortion, in indecent position with legs wide open. Each time this photo gets looked at, the fetus gets abused again.
A complete spontaneous abortion at about 6 weeks from conception, i.e. 8 weeks    source

 

Twin unborn child pornography

Twin fetuses, of same sex of of opposite sex, confined into a small space.  

media-medical-hw-n5551262
Two fetuses together. Why would anyone want to look at such photos?
Twins-in-the-womb 
Two clearly underage fetuses together in close contact. A pedophile’s fantasy

 

.

Outlaw possession of fetal & embryonic pictures

World wide, lawmakers decided to put people in the slammer for 15 years, if, among their 15 000 legal porn photos, 5 child porn photos or movies can be found. No matter if the girl depicted is 17y or 4 years, or zero years, no matter if she is just nude, or dressed in leotards but gyrating provocatively, or if she engages in hard core sex.

We need to close the loop hole that allows pictures of unborn fetuses to be shown with impunity.

Tell the House: Protect the unborn child against abuse. Criminalize production, possession, and possession of Unborn Child Porn.

SIGN PETITION

 

Human-Stupidity.com Analysis

 

  • Child porn laws are dangerous in many ways: Cruel child porn laws kill, "destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
  • so human-stupidity.com just extends that allegation that most men are prone to attraction  and sexual activity with pre-pubescent children to the equally preposterous allegation that lots of men would get sexually excited by nudity of unborn fetuses
  • WatchchildpornGetanalrapedtodeath_thWe understand that some people find it perverse, that we make jokes about "child pornography"
    • Some misunderstanding stems from the perverse fact that due to absurd alteration of our vocabulary,  "Children" can be 17 years old (17 year old "children"? )and "pornography" can be nude photos or even videos of dressed girls in Leotard dancing provocatively. (Knox vs. United States). So Child pornography spans the gamut of 15 year old girls in Leotards dancing provocatively, to 17 year olds photographing themselves in the nude,  to 3 year olds getting violently penetrated and mistreated
    • we think John Wayne Bobbitt dick cutting jokes are tasteless ** “I remember waking up in a pool of blood, with my penis missing, and my first thought was, ‘Y’know, this would make a really amusing stand-up comedy routine.’”…”They told me they were going to re-attach my penis using Micro-Surgery. I was humiliated. I wanted Jumbo-Surgery”… “My medical and attorney bills are over $750,000. Not to brag, but that’s $95,000 per inch”…
    • We think that most literature and legislation child porn sound like bad jokes ( Voodoo science of child pornography laws). Most of the texts from this article were directly adapted from real texts for child pornography persecution apologists.
    • We are outraged that thousands of upstanding normal men are in jail for decades, for possession of so called "child porn", most of which is neither porn nor involves what normal people would call children.
    • But it is not clear to us, why even mere possession of real porn involving real children should be such a terrible crime deserving higher prison terms then the actual act of child abuse.
    • This is shown by the following macabre child-porn-joke. Though somewhat tasteless, we believe it has a deeper meaning:

After being found guilty of the abduction, torture, sexual abuse and then murder of one child, I would have thought now being caught wanking over child porn was demonstrating an improvement in behaviour.  sickipedia.org/getjokes/similar/489667

In case you don’t get the deep meaning of the joke

Enhanced by Zemanta
Subscribe to Human-Stupidity Blog

Receive an email notification whenever Human-Stupidity.com has a new post.

5 Comments

  1. Child Porn is Bad says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Child Porn is bad and needs to be exterminated. This is not funny! You will go to hell!

    You are a sick pervert. Making fun of child porn.

    Wikipedia about child porn

    Abuse of the child occurs during the sexual acts which are recorded in the production of child pornography,[6][7][9][10][11][12][13] and several professors of psychology state that memories of the abuse are maintained as long as visual records exist, are accessed, and are “exploited perversely.”[11][12]

    ^ a b c Wortley, Richard; Stephen Smallbone. “Child Pornography on the Internet”. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police No. 41: p17. “The children portrayed in child pornography are first victimized when their abuse is perpetrated and recorded. They are further victimized each time that record is accessed.”.
    ^ a b Sheldon, Kerry; Dennis Howitt (2007). Sex Offenders and the Internet. John Wiley and Sons. pp. p9. ISBN 0470028009. “…supplying the material to meet this demand results in the further abuse of children Pictures, films and videos function as a permanent record of the original sexual abuse. Consequently, memories of the trauma and abuse are maintained as long as the record exists. Victims filmed and photographed many years ago will nevertheless be aware throughout their lifetimes that their childhood victimization continues to be exploited perversely.”

    So it is proven scientifically that watching child porn re-victimizes the child.

  2. admin says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Did you really read my comments at the end of the above blog post in Human-Stupidity Analysis? Where I explain the child porn witch hunt issues in serious ways.

    So you think the unborn child also will be victimized by the photos showing it in indecent positions, often with genitals exposed. Or victimizing only starts right after birth? or at what age?

    In this article: Voodoo science of child pornography laws I discuss how possibly a victim can feel re-victimized and abused exactly the moment when somewhere in the world, in the privacy of his home, a pervert is looking at his or her childhood abuse photo. The victim might not even be aware exists that such a depiction exists. According to the laws of physics, biology, and psychology, there is no (paranormal) way how a victim can be influenced by someone else watching photos, far away, privately.

    Much more so if the so called “child porn” is no sexual abuse of a 4 year old, but rather no more then a movie of a 15 year old dancing sensually, fully dressed in Leotards (See Knox vs. USA), or a 14 year old sexting victim who took her own nude photo in front of a mirror. Or a couple of 15 year olds having legally allowed sex and filming themselves.

    Remember also that depiction of physical life endangering child abuse, even of child killing are perfectly legal. TV can show footage of a 15 year old clubbed to death by gangs.
    Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime. Also nanny cam movies of non-sexual life endangering toddler abuse are perfectly legal.

    Somehow, our sex-obsessed society makes a big fuzz about sexuality and doesn’t care too much about real physical damage. Compare also the lack of societal reaction to physical bullying and violence: My 12 year old daughter brutally attacked by refugee boys at school.

    Pregnant women are not punished for drinking alcohol and causing fetal alcohol syndrome, incurable brain damage. Nor are parents punished for making their children obese for life, with diabetes, through systematically wrong nutrition.

    After being found guilty of the abduction, torture, sexual abuse and then murder of one child, I would have thought now being caught wanking over child porn was demonstrating an improvement in behaviour.

    The joke looks cruel. But it has a deep meaning. In Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes, Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii) postulates that availability of child porn allows the afflicted pedophile to act out his perversion at home, to masturbate with pictures and thus to alleviate his pressure and his drive. So the pervert will not attack real people. The same researcher has, long ago, showed that regular adult porn reduces sex crime which seems to be pretty much accepted wisdom nowadays. Just the child porn findings go too much against the public hysteria and are hard to swallow.

    Are you aware that according to Dr. Diamond, the child porn prohibition actually victimizes children, because it increases child abuse crimes?

  3. Oregon Senate approved bill (to require computer technicians to report child pornography) will cause unnecessary suffering | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [...] Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse! [...]

  4. The Oregon Senate Bill Requiring Computer Technicians to Report Child Pornography Will Cause Unnecessary Suffering says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    [...] “Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw Fetal Abuse!“ [...]

  5. MRDA says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    LMFAO!

    I wonder if there’s actually anyone out there who jerks off to pregnancy scans; anything’s possible with our species!

    Glad to see I’m not the only one to pick up onthe Pavlovian reaction to “paedophilia”. Great post!

Leave a Reply

 Subscribe to Human-Stupidity Blog (no spam, unsubscribe at any time) 

Subscribe to Human-Stupidity Blog
Receive an email notification whenever Human-Stupidity.com has a new post.
Email: 
 
Mailing list powered by Google Feedburner. Every email contains an unsubscribe link. You can unsubscribe at any time. Human-Stupidity hates spam as much as you do.

 Subscribe in a reader      Follow us on twitter