An ephebe kisses a man. Tondo from an Attic kylix, 5th c. BCE by the Briseis painter. At the Louvre.

Ancient Greek Pedophile art: An ephebe kisses a man. 5th c.. At the Louvre. Proof of age not available.

Isn’t it strange? For traditional feminists who want female equality, freedom and self determination, it looks amazing

  • feminists don’t oppose the burka and are quiet about Muslim repression of females (because Muslims successfully keep women away from the eyes of the feminist’s spouses)
  • feminists successfully restrict women’s right to choose sexual services (prostitution) as a profession. that often pays lots more money then other work. Of course, men who can pay $100 to an attractive prostitute are less likely to marry an average looking fat aging woman who later will take away half their property and demand half their income.
  • I got convinced that the antifeminists hypothesis is the most parsimonious explanation for these apparent contradictions.

Feminists conspire to increase their sexual value by eliminating female sexual of competition

What feminists strive for Explanation
(increasing their own sexual market value by reducing competition)
Feminists even repress women,
to foster their reproductive goal of reducing sexual options for their own men
feminists don’t oppose the burka and are quiet about Muslim repression of females because Muslim’s repression of women successfully keep women away from the eyes and hands of the feminist’s spouses
feminists don’t promote women’s right to free choice, rather they successfully restrict women’s right to choose sexual services (prostitution) as a profession Of course, men who can pay $100 to an attractive prostitute are less likely to marry an average looking women who later will take away half their property and demand half their income for life.
Prostitutes are non-Union picket line violators, they give away their work cheaply
decrease age of consent to eliminate competition by very young attractive women (age of consent used to be 12, is now 18 everywhere and there seem to be plans to increase it to 21 worldwide)
prohibit erotic art, photography, pornography Under the guise of protecting porn models (who did not ask to be protected and do not want to go back to menial jobs) feminists want to avoid men seeing attractive women naked, getting distracted, spending time and money.
prohibit sex dolls, sex robots, but not vibrators

Pedophile witch hunters & feminists are NOT concerned about children’s well being

If draconian child porn laws were to protect children, why then videos of real child killings are legal?
Nude adolescent photos: a Crime. Videos of lynching, killing, beating adolescents are legal Prime Time TV.

Congratulations to the antifeminist blog, they are the only ones that give a sensible explanation for this: feminists want to cut of competition to their sexual monopoly so men will continue paying high prices for sex (marriage with life long support and half of all property on divorce).

I quote the antifeminist blog, I could not say this any better.

Why do I think you are obsessed with criminilizing everything and only those things that harm your particular, selfish reproductive and sexual needs? Because that is all you seem to be interested in. What about teenage girls bullying and beating each other up on video and then having them uploaded to websites that make money from advertisements? Naahh, no sexual threat, therefore nothing to say. What about teenage girls and even 10 year old girls appearing on reality tv shows to be exploited for commercial gain by adults and clearly suffering psychological distress as a result? Nope, no specific sexual threat to your reproductive interests so you have probably never given it two seconds thought. A 17 year old who likes to screw older men? You don’t want your man running off with or even looking at a hot 17 year old, so therefore 17 year old girls can’t give meaingful consent and older men should be criminilized.[…]

Can 17 year old girls make meaningful decisions about whether or not their unborn babies should be killed? Is having sex really more complex than deciding which political party is best able to govern? Surely if an 18 year old can vote, a 17 year old can fuck? And how come she can consent to sex with another 17 year old and not a 25 year old??
http://www.theantifeminist.com/the-chilling-banality-of-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-2452

12 year old street children sleep on sidewalk while police hunts sex tourists who befriend 17 year old girls

I myself and many friends have, in a fairly rich third world country, witnessed 12 year old girls roaming and begging in the streets and sleeping on the sidewalk. Pretty soon they will be pregnant, impregnated by a street kid, and give birth to a street baby. All this in a very rich city neighborhood, and very visible to police and law enforcement.

Disclaimer: posting as “Devil’s advocate” I post suggestions that outrageously fly in the face of conventional opinion! Prepare to get shocked!

Would these girls not be better off if taken care of by a loving mature responsible pedophile like Jack McClellan, who would clothe them, send them to school, and give them birth control?
Instead of tetting education from street criminals, being at the mercy of street kid gangs (also sexually), lacking health services

Yes, I know, readers will be furious and quote this out of context to discredit this entire blog.

Yes, I know there are other possible solutions. But where are they? Where is Interpol,hunting down this girl so she could be sent to a decent school and quality foster parents? Interpol hunting the truant girl with the same might they would hunt down people for owning one single nude photo of the same girl! Where are the United Nations boycotting that country for neglecting to take care of kids. Where are feminists complaining about the orphan and child care facilities that are so bad that kids prefer the streets? They are too busy worrying about preventing distribution of 30 year old photographs.

At the same time, government and police are engaged in a hunt for tourists (and the occasional local) who have relationships with 17 year olds.

Distortion of terminology in the service of manipulation

It is quite amazing how language gets distorted, in order to dupe people to think this witch hunt is justified. Adolescent nude erotic photos become “child pornography”. In Europe, they defined now photos of very young looking 23 year olds with pony tails as “child pornography”

Terminology original meaning manipulatively extended to:
Child children maximum 13 or 11 years
  • 17 year old adolescents
  • young looking 25 year olds with pony tails

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child defines a child as “a human being below the age of 18 years unless under the law  applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier.”

Amazing! The feminists got their definition even into the United Nations. I doubt that 50 years ago anyone would have called a 17 year old a child. The above definition of “child” is the precise definition of a “minor” or underage person. Why re-define and abuse an existing well defined word “child” for a term that already exists (“minor”)? There must be a hidden agenda!

Note also that according to the above definition, the US drafts 17 year old children into the army.

Child pornography depictions of sexually explicit activities involving children under 12 or 13 years
  • any nudity, provocative non-nude posing of adolescents under 18 years of age.
  • depiction of sexually explicit activities of adolescents
  • drawings and art meant to depict adolescents and children
  • erotic photos of 27 year olds with pony tails and teddy bears, looking like they could be under 18 (under the European law of “apparently underage”  (“Scheinminderjährigkeit” in German)
Child rapist Criminal forcing a child 13 or under to endure violent sexual penetration
  • consensual sex with a 17 year old
  • indecent fondling a clothed child
pedophilia sexual attraction to prepubescent children
.
Hebephilia refers to the sexual preference for pubescent individuals;
ephebophilia, refers to the sexual preference for individuals in later adolescence,
pedophilia, refers to the sexual preference for prepubescent children
sexual attraction to

  • anyone under 18, or
  • who looks under 18.

How to change these laws and witch hunts?

Ancient Greek Art: Child Porn depicting criminal Child Abuse (by today's standards)

Ancient Greek Art: Child Porn depicting criminal Child Abuse (by today's standards)

Turn back the laws by 60 years

It is interesting, surprising even to myself. If asked how laws should be changed, my answer is:

  • just go back to the sexual laws30-50 -120 years ago

Men were intelligent enough to sanction REAL abuse of REAL children. All other stuff was invented later. (read up on my web site, I just wrote a lot about the child porn witch hunt issue (child-porn-witch-hunt and Teenage Sexuality witch hunt )

Expose excesses & manipulative deception of the masses & academia

Honest language would be required. Language get raped (excuse the metaphor) to deceive the masses. Not only the masses! Academia (women’s studies, sociology), law, United Nations all buy into this manipulation. Everyone! Amazing!

Using words that for thousands of years had a clear meaning (rape) to mean something totally different (consensual sex, or mere fondling, of minors). This purposeful deception does not lend itself to truth-finding.

Maybe people get tired of ridiculous excesses like

Promote real research

Repression and prohibition of of academic research also helps perpetuating the witch hunt. (“Child Abuse” Dogmatists Repress Scientific Research). Like the persecution of Galileo Galilei. If the truth is suppressed to serve special interests (the Bible, or the feminist agenda), witch hunts get promoted.

Females winning evolutionary Male Femal Power Games

I am starting to get inspired to analyze, from an evolutionary point of view, how we got to where we are now. It seems to me:  men and women always had conflicts of interest. In the EEA (50 000 years ago in the savanna):

  • Men had physical power, economical power (meat from killed prey, territory, …).
  • Women had social and group manipulation skills and cunningness as their only counter-weapon to counter overpowering male physical power. Women even manage to enlist men to promote their issues …….

For stone age women, the only power they had to keep brute men at check would be

  • acting as a cohesive group of solidary females
  • shaming men for sexual digressions
  • shaming men preventively BEFORE they could do sexual digressions

Men developed no defense against this because

  • men still had the brute strength argument
  • men still had the power to withhold food and protection
  • women were usually right. They did not do excesses like punishing men with 20 years in jail for making cave drawings or stick figures of minors

Now men gave up both economic power and brute strength. Women kept all their power of cunningness. So women are winning on all fronts.

Comments? I am very interested in further research about the above hypotheses.  How can this be proven?

Well, I have shown, on this blog, that the underage sex, child porn, prostitution discussion is rife with deceitful language. That people make a big difference between issues of violent crimes (low penalties), depictions of violence (absolutely no penalty for crime and gore movies), and sexual thoughts and depictions (insane penalties).

Males gave away their power, females kept and increased their power

To be very provocative, a Devil’s Advocate, maybe men erred by giving women voting rights and all kind of other special rights and protections. They took these rights and used their superior social group skills to overpower men. Probably can not be undone. So how can men earn back their rights? No sane politician will legalize prostitution, decrease the age of consent, undo child porn laws. Unless, yes, maybe men band together like feminists ….

Or just give up and pay half of your income for your divorced ex-wive’s support and pay your child support without having the right to interfere and no right decide for which school your hard earned money is being spent. Too busy earning money to support your ex, no time for thinking and writing replies to blogs.

And too scared to go out, you might be leering at a 17 year old and arrested for your indecent thoughts.

Expose feminism, as in the antifeminist blog

I repeat again the very compelling theory, that

feminism is a trade Union to foster the self interest of middle aged unattractive women.

Middle aged unattractive feminists conspire to eliminate female sexual of competition

  • increase age of consent to eliminate competition by very young attractive women (age of consent used to be 12, is now 18 everywhere and there seem to be plans to increase it to 21 worldwide).
  • prohibit prostitution, to eliminate cheap easy sex
  • try to eliminate pornography, which gives men sexual relief without needing live women
  • try to eliminate sex dolls (while not restricting vibrators)

By eliminating other sexual outlets, men have no other sexual outlet and are thus forced to stay with unattractive women and pay dearly for it: it might cost them half their income and half their property. This is why this brand of feminists do not oppose the burka (eliminates competitors), do not favor self determination in prostitutes (picket violators, giving merchandise away cheaply)

Promote real equal rights feminism

There are a small number of different feminists who actually are concerned with equal rights and female freedom. But these are outnumbered and pretty quiet.

Consider Gender Activism for Males

Females seem extremely skilled at defending their interests verbally, getting social and group support, garnering sympathy of the masses, of law makers, even getting academic recognition for their private agenda. Men are lone hunters who just are getting overpowered by the social might of the feminists.

Or maybe men need protective laws, like feminists? So they don’t get into jail for following their normal instincts while they are not harming anyone! Like jail for looking at photos.

Share

10 Comments

  1. Stephani says:

    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 4

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  2. admin says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

    Human-Stupidity.com is actually about human unconsciousness, blindness, taboos, about finding truth. See
    http://human-stupidity.com/irrational-brainwashed-dogmatism-in-intelligent-people

    It was not meant as a site about child porn and teen sex. It just so happens, that this is one of the strongest witch hunts where pure hate and cunning tricky deceitful language reign. Just see a defense of child porn or teen sex, and all rationality is gone.

    Stephany, I wish you would really study the issues, instead of such blind knee jerk reactions.

  3. Rob Taylor says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

    Yes, yes, you’re aren’t really interested in molesting children at all. So why not use your real name? On a registry?

  4. Female evolutionary Superiority in social manipulation causes feminist Language Distortions’ universal acceptance | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    […] Pedophile witch hunt & underage sex law excesses: why the witch hunt and how to change it? […]

  5. The Highwayman says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    QUOTE (from Stephani): “screw little kids”

    How do 15 to 17 year olds qualify as “little kids”? This is the problem with pedohysteria people either: 1) appeal to emotionally charged phrissy phrases and refuse to engage in rational debate or 2) use arguments that certainly make sense if you are talking about adults having sex with 10 year olds (and nobody is advocating that) and then apply them to YOUNG WOMEN aged 15+.

    For those of you who think that adolescents are “children” read THE CASE AGAINST ADOLESCENCE by Robert Epstein. Not only are teenagers youong adults but overprotective attitudes towards them are actually harmful.

  6. John says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    I just want to say to the author of this website, it is so nice to see another person with their eyes open. I just found your website tonight and I agree with everything you said and I have been saying the same thing as you for years on death ears. It is so hard to live in a world of the blind and it is a pleasure to know that there are other people like me that see the truth like you. Finding your website is like living in the night of the living dead movie thinking I am the only human remaining and then finding a real thinking person. Wow. It is a great feeling.

    I just want to thankyou for all your wrote and I hope that for the sake of our society, that you will shine your truth bright on a mountain top for all to see.

  7. Keith Richard Radford Jr says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Have you watched cops lately, the 1st thing they do is offer to help the domestic volition cases person too find a way to break up the family. Do they get some kick back for selling kids into adoption? What kind of policy tells police to start forcing planned parenthood on the people? Are they just the guy/woman that the cop is talking too, maybe having a relationship on the side with? How corrupt and destructive do policy’s have to get before we revisit a law that was passed in the dead of nite and a point of order was called and ignored by the speaker at the time. Far to much money is siphoned off citizens by these laws. Far to many kids that don’t know who there fathers or mothers are and far to much theft is being justified by genocidal warriors using lies to steel calling it moral? Take your idea of morality, shove it where the sun don’t shine and set fire too it. The rich have scandals and the poor get charged and the prisons get the money before they even step in. Bogus laws and worthless policy is the order of the trash making these laws. Did you know that when these laws were passed in the dead of night the speaker ignored the point of order and the laws is as bogus as the one California passed just afterwards.

  8. Smith says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I completely agree with above poster; it’s great to see that there is at least one guy who is not afraid to expose the failed logic in feminist issues.
    Even though I’m scared just to visit your site, I couldn’t keep myself from posting my thanks.

  9. Keith Richard Radford Jr says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    background checks make idiots rich with worthless info because people change from day to day

    I remember living behind a church were Brian Lamb, and a bunch of these Cspan guys used too have a wood shop. At that place of residence my mom thought I needed an exorcist, after playing in the mud the way very young children will sometimes with my uncle who mixed a glass of this red clay in water and told me it was chocolate milk.

    After drinking it as he would force me to do thing all the time like the time he made me cut off the limb I was sitting on and the device came out of my shoulder being more powerful and in control I broke out with ring worm all over my body and my mom told me it was writing that could not be understood so she had priests come in from the church.

    I guess my Dad did not know that one of the people at the church was in line for being my new dad but that was not in the cards because I guess he felt I was in need of discipline after an accident in the wood shop. I had been check out on the band saw by my grandfather who was a millwright in Arkansas and to do some jobs the blade shield had to be removed. Some kids came in and wanted to use the saw, then got mad that I wanted to warn them to put the guard on and they told me they owned it all and I was not to tell them anything, and after this head strong kid cut his thumb off the other kids said they would tell their fathers it was all my fault, but it was not.

    I had a fever of well over a hundred and I was a bloody mess with the infection. The priests came in with outer guys and one had a camera. The priests would throw me across the room well the other snapped a picture. I would fall on furniture and the floor and they would tell me get on the bed, don’t get off the bed very loud and when I would crawl back on the bed they would pick me up and throw me over and over again well the other priest would snap another picture and this went on till one guy said we have enough picture and they left me in the blood, mud, and bedding, then my aunt came in with some save that was for ring worm.

    She spread the save and kidded me about dying when the rings got to my heart. After getting well I went back to the wood shop and the guys had made me a special shield and gave me my sword which were both made of wood and I had to fight one of the guys in my shorts because I did not want to remove them and the other guy was naked (he know who he is). I was still not up too speed and lost the battle. They then called me the bad guy and this group was supposed to be my gate keeper or something like that appointed by the priests. My Dad did not like them much also but that did not matter much because someone at the church was going to be my new dad till he said no, my mom cried allot, my dad was gone, I healed up, but I still have a case.

    Please know that there is nothing any of you can do to make what you and the rest of the ones involved can do to make this my fault. See at the time I was about seven years old. Since then the church has made an effort to kill me, to the extent of trying to pass laws to kill sex offenders.

    Come on, keep it up, keep pushing laws that you as a group of very said individuals know have no value. Take me too court so I can own a network. I have met with your staff members in private since along with military personal and others.

    Now lets note when this happened I was only a small child being thrown around a room like a rag doll by people that started all this clear back in the late fifty’s and the steering by very bad people that think abusing kids to make laws to stop abuse, Ha! these laws are bogus and the fact that they can not kill gays anymore does not justify the use of laws too kill someone set up by them to create some worthless set of laws by a fusion of church and state is wrong and realty designed by them to harm us all.

    My case was pragmatic but more than that I know what was done and who was involved making vendetta laws that really have no bases in truth, and are based in lies.

    Keith Richard Radford Jr

    PSS don’t be cowards, let me know you received this e-mail through a response.

    It’s time to communicate

  10. joão paulo says:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    I’m from Brazil and I think everything’s said here is true, but there is an especific true thats need to be understood: WE NEED UNION, WE NEED ACTIVISM, URGENTLY, OR WE ALL GONNA BE SLAAAVESSSS!!!!

Leave a Reply