Any six year old knows perfectly well if s/he is coerced while overpowered and threatened, or acts consensually out of free will.
Try to explain her/nim that the stupid adults have defined all sexual activity even of late 17 year or 15 year old adolescents as non-consensual. So it is the same "non-consensual rape" if a 17 year old takes the initiative to work hard to seduce an adult to have sex, or if the same adult rapes him/her at knifepoint.
The first example is "statutory rape" and the second is "forcible rape", the reader might retort. That differentiation has long been lost outside theoretical academic discussion.
The press happily reports about trials and conviction of "rapists" that raped the victim 300 times. No, she did not lock up the "victim" in a dungeon for years, like Mr. Fritzl. The victim came always came back for more, but did not consent (by our weird definition of legal consent). Human-Stupidity even documented a case where the rapist, unbeknownst to him, was duped by the victim into raping her.
Children of 6,8, or 15 years risk serious legal consequences, even jail, if they don’t know these confusing definitions and regulations. Therefore this ought to be be mandatory elementary school subject.
Human-Stupidity has repeatedly, assailed the tendency in modern law, incited by feminism, to "rape" and manipulate language, to use inaccurate and deliberately inflammatory, emotive language to try to foster a hidden agenda.
Due to feminist zeal to vilify consensual lovers of adolescent women, we belittle the true suffering of victims of forcible rape victims.
Human-Stupidity thinks it it truly offensive to the underage victims of real forcible violent rape to equate their suffering to the the "suffering" of willing participants in sex, to equate their resistance and unequivocal non-consent to the voluntary though legally invalid consent, or to the suddenly withdrawn consent in a "six second rape".
Minors under 18 (or 16) years of age can not consent to sex. When spoken by a minor under the age of consent, then by this definition, the following absurd equality holds.
|
"I love you, please make love to me" |
= |
"NOOO, don’t touch me, leave me alone" |
 |
= |
 |
Both statements above are non-consent of rape-victims, in case the birds are under the age of consent.
Continue reading “Consent, rape & minors. What is consent to sex?”