Archive for the ‘Manipulative Language’ Category

Which one is not a Vegetable?A healthy school meal has to include 1-2 servings of vegetables.  So the  US congress decided that Pizza is a vegetable, to appease special food industry interests.

How many vegetables are in this picture? Yes, 3. Strangely Coca Cola is not yet defined a vegetable, but it seems that french fries already were defined vegetables.

In case you were wondering where all of the healthy vegetables were on your child’s lunch menu at school, they’re in the pizza they’ve been eating everyday. Congress recently declared that Pizza constitutes a vegetable requirement even though it only contains an average of two tablespoons of tomato sauce. inquisitr

Who needs leafy greens and carrots when pizza and french fries will do?  In an effort many 9-year-olds will cheer, Congress wants pizza and french fries to stay on school lunch lines and is fighting the Obama administration’s efforts to take unhealthy foods out of schools. KSPR

pizza-french-fries-vegetables

"While it’s unfortunate that some members of Congress continue to put special interests ahead of the health of America’s children, USDA remains committed to practical, science-based standards for school meals," says a USDA spokesperson. Newser

Like many of you, when I heard this I thought it had to be a headline from The Onion. But sadly I’ve realized that there are too many agri-businesses and politicians who are willing to allow our childhood obesity epidemic to continue. They don’t care that our military is telling us that young people are too fat to fight, with only one in four meeting the fitness requirements for military service. They don’t care that one in three children under the age of 18 will develop Type II Diabetes within their lifetime. They don’t care that the rate of childhood obesity has doubled since 1980.   TheStateColumn

Hamburgers are vegetables too? They contain alettuce leaf and tomato sliceHuman-Stupidity analysis

  1. Children are endangered, made obese, sick, diabetic for life. Not only is this tolerated, active advertising for child food porn is legal.
  2. This dangerous deadly child abuse (yes people die earlier because of obesity) is a world wide epidemic and almost nothing is done against it.
  3. This human stupidity is "normal". The entire world is getting obese due to wrong nutrition and lack of exercise. And it starts with children, their parent’s mistakes, and child food porn propaganda
  4. *Language abuse helps to deceive the common person into accepting rules that otherwise would create more resistance. A law saying that a healthy meal has to contain milk, meat, and pizza would cause more resistance.
  5. It is all about influential special interest groups! Healthy food brings economic benefits to small farmers, small enterprises, and of course to the entire (healthier) population.
  6. Hundreds of millions of children get sick because of false nutrition they were unable to give informed consent to. On the other hand, the "best interest of the child" is used as pretext to condemn men to ruinous child (wife) support payments, debtor’s prison. Alleged concern about children’s welfare is used as excuse for the child porn witch hunt and legal morass created around teenage sexuality. All this is hypocrisy
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Pizza is a healthy vegetable in school lunches – US congress fattens children’ » »
Pizza is a healthy vegetable in school lunches – US congress… » continues here »

Share

Beauty contests "reduce women to their parts" and are an "appalling offense against women’s equality".

Another female privilege: Which men have the opportunity to get free travel and a million dollar prize, just for their looks?

Miss-world-2011bMen don’t have such chances. Mr. Universe steroid freak show, and prize boxing both require talent, hard work and entail serious health risks.

Getting beat to pulp in a boxing match (while women watch and cheer the winner) is not an appalling offense against men’s equality and does not reduce men to their parts?

knockout

We at Human-Stupidity never cease to wonder why such idiotic perverted logic by feminists and the politically correctness movement will be copied by serious newspapers and taught in women’s studies courses at serious colleges. Our friend the antifeminist would probably explain that the Miss Universe contest is an appalling offense against old ugly feminist’s equality.

miss-world-feminisit-protest

 

 

 

 

Woman who studied in a nunnery is crowned Miss World 2011|Daily Mail

Miss Venezuela, 21, crowned Miss World in London

LONDON A human resources graduate from Venezuela, whose ambition is to work with children, was crowned Miss World 2011 at a glittering beauty pageant in London on Sunday.
Ivian Sarcos, 21, took the ultimate beauty accolade at Earls Court in London, the city where the first Miss World was staged in 1951.
Outside the venue, a small feminist demonstration took place, protesting at what they said was an "appalling offence against women’s equality."
The beauty contest was broadcast live to more than 150 countries and was watched by a billion viewers, organisers said.
The competition has drawn criticism in recent years for being outdated and little more than a chance to look good in swimwear.
But of the 122 contestants whom Sarcos beat, a quarter are graduates and more than half speak three or more languages.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Miss World 2011, appalling offense against women’s equality, reduces women to their parts.’ » »
Miss World 2011, appalling offense against women’s equality,… » continues here »

Share


“Yes” means “No”

You have a girl friend under the local age of consent, and you (unwisely) want to have sex with her. Don’t bother to ask for her consent to sex.  Just ravish her violently, no matter how much she resists. It makes no difference if she consents or not. Her “yes” means “no”, her consent is invalid. Either way, if she consents or not, you are raping her. And all rapes are the same.

This is not my fault. I am not making this up. This is our modern law and modern logic.

“No” means “No”, too.

Minors under 18 (or 16) years of age can not consent to sex.  If s/he says “Yes”, it means “No”. If she says “No”, it means “No”, too.

A underage girl’s consent it totally irrelevant

  1. On the way home 3 young men drag 15 year old Maria into an abandoned lot, 2 men hold her down and one rapes her violently, against her protests and screams.
  2. 15 year old Maria begs her boyfriend to make love to her and they have a great love-making session.
What is the difference between (1) and (2)?

Both (1) and (2) are exactly the same: non-consensual rape!. If she consented or fought back makes no difference!

I am really sorry, forgive me.

I am not insensitive to rape victims.

Maria, if you think that forcible rape and love making are not the same, you are mistaken! You are too young to understand the wisdom of the elders, that know that these are the same.

I am sorry,it is not my fault. I did not make this up. I swear.  On the contrary, I dare to challenge conventional wisdom and write against this insanity.

There are cases where a 15 or 17 year old girl begs a judge not to jail her boyfriend and common law husband, father, financial supporter and caretaker of her baby. But, the laws are there to protect her (?from what??), and thus she is left a penniless single mother with a jailed boyfriend in prison.

We fail to see how this serves the well being of the child, which is of extreme importance to the law.

All rapes are the same

We just learned, from Vice President Biden “Rape is rape is rape” : all types of rape are the same.  British Kenneth Clarke said  that “some “rapes” are less serious then others” but was forced to recant.  Clarke explicitly stated that a 17 year old boy making love with his 15 year old girl friend is not the same as dragging someone into the bushes. A media outcry corrected him and recanted. So it is the consensus, that both are the same.

Feminist manipulative language made sure that almost every sex act is a potential rape. And now it is clarified that all rapes are the same.

“I love you, please make love to me” = “NOOO, don’t touch me, leave me alone”
lovey-dovey-feeling =

(is equal to)

rape-ducks

Offensive to forcible rape victims


"Yes" means "No"

You have a girl friend under the local age of consent, and you (unwisely) want to have sex with her. Don’t bother to ask for her consent to sex.  Just ravish her violently, no matter how much she resists. It makes no difference if she consents or not. Her "yes" means "no", her consent is invalid. Either way, if she consents or not, you are raping her. And all rapes are the same.

This is not my fault. I am not making this up. This is our modern law and modern logic. 

"No" means "No", too.

Minors under 18 (or 16) years of age can not consent to sex.  If s/he says "Yes", it means "No". If she says "No", it means "No", too.

A underage girl’s consent it totally irrelevant

  1. On the way home 3 young men drag 15 year old Maria into an abandoned lot, 2 men hold her down and one rapes her violently, against her protests and screams.
  2. 15 year old Maria begs her boyfriend to make love to her and they have a great love-making session.
What is the difference between (1) and (2)?

Both (1) and (2) are exactly the same: non-consensual rape!. If she consented or fought back makes no difference!

I am really sorry, forgive me.

I am not insensitive to rape victims.

Maria, if you think that forcible rape and love making are not the same, you are mistaken! You are too young to understand the wisdom of the elders, that know that these are the same.

I am sorry,it is not my fault. I did not make this up. I swear.  On the contrary, I dare to challenge conventional wisdom and write against this insanity.

There are cases where a 15 or 17 year old girl begs a judge not to jail her boyfriend and common law husband, father, financial supporter and caretaker of her baby. But, the laws are there to protect her (?from what??), and thus she is left a penniless single mother with a jailed boyfriend in prison. 

We fail to see how this serves the well being of the child, which is of extreme importance to the law.

All rapes are the same

We just learned, from Vice President Biden "Rape is rape is rape" : all types of rape are the same.  British Kenneth Clarke said  that "some "rapes" are less serious then others" but was forced to recant.  Clarke explicitly stated that a 17 year old boy making love with his 15 year old girl friend is not the same as dragging someone into the bushes. A media outcry corrected him and recanted. So it is the consensus, that both are the same.

Feminist manipulative language made sure that almost every sex act is a potential rape. And now it is clarified that all rapes are the same.

"I love you, please make love to me"

=

"NOOO, don’t touch me, leave me alone"
lovey-dovey-feeling

=

(is equal to)

rape-ducks

Offensive to forcible rape victims


"Yes" means "No"

You have a girl friend under the local age of consent, and you (unwisely) want to have sex with her. Don’t bother to ask for her consent to sex.  Just ravish her violently, no matter how much she resists. It makes no difference if she consents or not. Her "yes" means "no", her consent is invalid. Either way, if she consents or not, you are raping her. And all rapes are the same.

This is not my fault. I am not making this up. This is our modern law and modern logic. 

"No" means "No", too.

Minors under 18 (or 16) years of age can not consent to sex.  If s/he says "Yes", it means "No". If she says "No", it means "No", too.

A underage girl’s consent it totally irrelevant

  1. On the way home 3 young men drag 15 year old Maria into an abandoned lot, 2 men hold her down and one rapes her violently, against her protests and screams.
  2. 15 year old Maria begs her boyfriend to make love to her and they have a great love-making session.
What is the difference between (1) and (2)?

Both (1) and (2) are exactly the same: non-consensual rape!. If she consented or fought back makes no difference!

I am really sorry, forgive me.

I am not insensitive to rape victims.

Maria, if you think that forcible rape and love making are not the same, you are mistaken! You are too young to understand the wisdom of the elders, that know that these are the same.

I am sorry,it is not my fault. I did not make this up. I swear.  On the contrary, I dare to challenge conventional wisdom and write against this insanity.

There are cases where a 15 or 17 year old girl begs a judge not to jail her boyfriend and common law husband, father, financial supporter and caretaker of her baby. But, the laws are there to protect her (?from what??), and thus she is left a penniless single mother with a jailed boyfriend in prison. 

We fail to see how this serves the well being of the child, which is of extreme importance to the law.

All rapes are the same

We just learned, from Vice President Biden "Rape is rape is rape" : all types of rape are the same.  British Kenneth Clarke said  that "some "rapes" are less serious then others" but was forced to recant.  Clarke explicitly stated that a 17 year old boy making love with his 15 year old girl friend is not the same as dragging someone into the bushes. A media outcry corrected him and recanted. So it is the consensus, that both are the same.

Feminist manipulative language made sure that almost every sex act is a potential rape. And now it is clarified that all rapes are the same.

"I love you, please make love to me"

=

"NOOO, don’t touch me, leave me alone"
lovey-dovey-feeling

=

(is equal to)

rape-ducks

Offensive to forcible rape victims


Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Yes means No! Forcibly raping a 17 year old is the same rape as consensual love making.’ » »
Yes means No! Forcibly raping a 17 year old is the same rape as co… » continues here »

Share

"Rape" means a dozen different things. They are not the same! What perfidy:

  1. "Rape" had a clear, well defined meaning for thousands of years, until re-defined by feminists. The re-defined "rape" includes half a dozen acts that formerly had their own names and were not rape.
  2. Then vice president Biden comes hammering that all these dozen types of rape are the same. This is deceptive, because most of his listeners imagine he is talking about true-forcible-rape, not about Swedish-broken-condom-rape, 5-second-rape, consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girlfriend-future-wife-rape, duped-by-victim-into-raping-her-rape or didn’t-get-consent-in-writing-rape.
  3. This purposeful politically motivated rape ambiguity leads to equivocation and misunderstandings.  This must be intentional and can only be politically motivated, because everywhere else we take pride in defining terms clearly, succinctly, concisely and unambiguously.  (other exceptions are the closely related definitions of consent, child,

 

Joe Biden: "Rape is rape is rape" | YouTube

Vice president Joe Biden, praising the University of New Hampshire’s sexual assault policy, Biden said: "rape is rape is rape".

Vice president Joe Biden said more stupid and patently wrong things on that day, but that is beyond the scope of our article. See:
Are One in Five College Women Sexually Assaulted? (The vice president buys into the campus-rape lie.) He fell prey, or rather is part of the relentless feminist lie and deception campaign to bedevil men as rapists.

 

Rape is not rape is not rape is not rape

Rape is ill defined, is ill defined, is ill defined. Dozens of types-of-rape

"A rape is a rape is a rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! What perfidy! Manipulative ambiguity is perfidy.  Who thinks that all these are the same? It is an offense to victims of true-forcible-rape to conflate their true violent victimization with other kind of consensual rape.

 

1) True-forcible-rape (rape-rape)

A women gets threatened by 3 thugs with knives, dragged into the woods, held down, raped and beaten, while screaming. Dragging-into-the-bushes-at-knife-point-rape is the classical meaning of rape and is what most people imagine when they hear the word "rape".

This is the perfidy of the language abuse regarding the meaning of the word "rape". It is difficult to justify a long prison term and sex offender registration for kissing-underage-girlfriend-rape. See Equivocation | Wikipedia

rapist_Julian_Assange2) Swedish-broken-condom-rape 

In the Julian Assange case, the women decided to press charges after they found out that Assange had sex with both of them (revenge-for-for-being-cheated-rape). They used a Swedish law that sex without condom is rape. This gained so much power because the United States (where broken-condoms-sex is not rape) wants to punish Julian Assange for unusual and unprecedented publishing-confidential-documents-rape  (see cartoon)

3) Consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girl-friend-rape

"Rape" means a dozen different things. They are not the same! What perfidy:

  1. "Rape" had a clear, well defined meaning for thousands of years, until re-defined by feminists. The re-defined "rape" includes half a dozen acts that formerly had their own names and were not rape.
  2. Then vice president Biden comes hammering that all these dozen types of rape are the same. This is deceptive, because most of his listeners imagine he is talking about true-forcible-rape, not about Swedish-broken-condom-rape, 5-second-rape, consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girlfriend-future-wife-rape, duped-by-victim-into-raping-her-rape or didn’t-get-consent-in-writing-rape.
  3. This purposeful politically motivated rape ambiguity leads to equivocation and misunderstandings.  This must be intentional and can only be politically motivated, because everywhere else we take pride in defining terms clearly, succinctly, concisely and unambiguously.  (other exceptions are the closely related definitions of consent, child,

 

Joe Biden: "Rape is rape is rape"|YouTube

Vice president Joe Biden, praising the University of New Hampshire’s sexual assault policy, Biden said: "rape is rape is rape".

Vice president Joe Biden said more stupid and patently wrong things on that day, but that is beyond the scope of our article. See:
Are One in Five College Women Sexually Assaulted? (The vice president buys into the campus-rape lie.) He fell prey, or rather is part of the relentless feminist lie and deception campaign to bedevil men as rapists.

 

Rape is not rape is not rape is not rape

Rape is ill defined, is ill defined, is ill defined. Dozens of types-of-rape

"A rape is a rape is a rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! What perfidy! Manipulative ambiguity is perfidy.  Who thinks that all these are the same? It is an offense to victims of true-forcible-rape to conflate their true violent victimization with other kind of consensual rape.

 

1) True-forcible-rape (rape-rape)

A women gets threatened by 3 thugs with knives, dragged into the woods, held down, raped and beaten, while screaming. Dragging-into-the-bushes-at-knife-point-rape is the classical meaning of rape and is what most people imagine when they hear the word "rape".

This is the perfidy of the language abuse regarding the meaning of the word "rape". It is difficult to justify a long prison term and sex offender registration for kissing-underage-girlfriend-rape. See Equivocation | Wikipedia

rapist_Julian_Assange2) Swedish-broken-condom-rape 

In the Julian Assange case, the women decided to press charges after they found out that Assange had sex with both of them (revenge-for-for-being-cheated-rape). They used a Swedish law that sex without condom is rape. This gained so much power because the United States (where broken-condoms-sex is not rape) wants to punish Julian Assange for unusual and unprecedented publishing-confidential-documents-rape  (see cartoon)

3) Consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girl-friend-rape

"Rape" means a dozen different things. They are not the same! What perfidy:

  1. "Rape" had a clear, well defined meaning for thousands of years, until re-defined by feminists. The re-defined "rape" includes half a dozen acts that formerly had their own names and were not rape.
  2. Then vice president Biden comes hammering that all these dozen types of rape are the same. This is deceptive, because most of his listeners imagine he is talking about true-forcible-rape, not about Swedish-broken-condom-rape, 5-second-rape, consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girlfriend-future-wife-rape, duped-by-victim-into-raping-her-rape or didn’t-get-consent-in-writing-rape.
  3. This purposeful politically motivated rape ambiguity leads to equivocation and misunderstandings.  This must be intentional and can only be politically motivated, because everywhere else we take pride in defining terms clearly, succinctly, concisely and unambiguously.  (other exceptions are the closely related definitions of consent, child,

 

Joe Biden: "Rape is rape is rape"|YouTube

Vice president Joe Biden, praising the University of New Hampshire’s sexual assault policy, Biden said: "rape is rape is rape".

Vice president Joe Biden said more stupid and patently wrong things on that day, but that is beyond the scope of our article. See:
Are One in Five College Women Sexually Assaulted? (The vice president buys into the campus-rape lie.) He fell prey, or rather is part of the relentless feminist lie and deception campaign to bedevil men as rapists.

 

Rape is not rape is not rape is not rape

Rape is ill defined, is ill defined, is ill defined. Dozens of types-of-rape

"A rape is a rape is a rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! What perfidy! Manipulative ambiguity is perfidy.  Who thinks that all these are the same? It is an offense to victims of true-forcible-rape to conflate their true violent victimization with other kind of consensual rape.

 

1) True-forcible-rape (rape-rape)

A women gets threatened by 3 thugs with knives, dragged into the woods, held down, raped and beaten, while screaming. Dragging-into-the-bushes-at-knife-point-rape is the classical meaning of rape and is what most people imagine when they hear the word "rape".

This is the perfidy of the language abuse regarding the meaning of the word "rape". It is difficult to justify a long prison term and sex offender registration for kissing-underage-girlfriend-rape. See Equivocation | Wikipedia

rapist_Julian_Assange2) Swedish-broken-condom-rape 

In the Julian Assange case, the women decided to press charges after they found out that Assange had sex with both of them (revenge-for-for-being-cheated-rape). They used a Swedish law that sex without condom is rape. This gained so much power because the United States (where broken-condoms-sex is not rape) wants to punish Julian Assange for unusual and unprecedented publishing-confidential-documents-rape  (see cartoon)

3) Consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girl-friend-rape


Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different types of rape!’ » »
"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different… » continues here »

Share

15 year old Brooke Shields - no pedophilia, rather Ephebophilia, or Teleiophilia.

Hebephile, a newly proposed diagnostic classification in which people display a sexual preference for children at the cusp of puberty, between the ages of, roughly, 11 to 14 years of age. Pedophiles, in contrast, show a sexual preference for clearly prepubescent children. There are also ephebophiles (from ephebos, meaning “one arrived at puberty” in Greek), who are mostly attracted to 15- to 16-year-olds; teleiophiles (from teleios, meaning, “full grown” in Greek), who prefer those 17 years of age or older); and even the very rare gerontophile (from gerontos, meaning “old man” in Greek), someone whose sexual preference is for the elderly. So although child sex offenders are often lumped into the single classification of pedophilia, biologically speaking it’s a rather complicated affair. Some have even proposed an additional subcategory of pedophilia, “infantophilia,” to distinguish those individuals most intensely attracted to children below six years of age.
Based on this classification scheme of erotic age orientations, even the world’s best-known fictitious “pedophile,” Humbert Humbert from Nabokov’s masterpiece, Lolita, would more properly be considered a hebephile. (Likewise the protagonist from Thomas Mann’s Death in Venice, a work that I’ve always viewed as something of the “gay Lolita”).  
Why most "pedophiles" aren’t really pedophiles, technically speaking | Scientific American

Photo of 10 year old Brooke Shields might be just artistic photography. But those who feel sexually attracted are pedophiles.The meaning of the word "Pedophile" was manipulatively changed and distorted. Pedophile is a clearly defined scientific term meaning an adult that has attraction to pre-pubertal children.

We are discussing grammar, semantics, and politics of language manipulation here.
We are not defending or condoning pedophile activities.

Brooke Shields (2008). Is she getting victimized each time one watches her movies or adolescent nude/bikini photos? 1000's times per day?Correct Terminology

Hebephiles, Ephebophiles, Teleiophile were grouped into the "pedophile" group. So a "worse label’ can be attached to a sexual offender. An "adolescent lover" who had a 17 year old girlfriend is called "child lover" (or rather, in a second step of vilification, child rapist). Sure helps to secure longer jail terms and to get the population angry.  This is exactly identical to the manipulation that extended the word "child" from under 12 or under 14, to under 18, admittedly for the purpose of enforcing child protection laws for adolescents.

Additionally, child mutilators and murderers are usually called "pedophiles" in the press. Killing children has nothing to do with "child lovers" or sexual attraction for children.

Brooke Shields re-victimized constantly?

Thus someone gets arrested for possession of Brooke Shields 15 year photos , falsely called a pedophile, and the average Joe thinks he is a baby murderer. Note that the bikini photo of a 15 year-old  becomes child pornography in case one collects the photo for sexual arousal (Copine level 4).

According to child porn persecution theory, "children" (under 18) get re-victimized whenever someone looks at their depictions.. We prevented the re-victimization of Brooke Shields through the first 10 year old photo by putting black bars at all private parts.  Add to this the famous Brooke Shields movies (Blue Lagoon, …) , one can see that Brooke Shields constantly gets re-victimized thousands of times per day by people who watch these movies with an impure mind.

Ruinous persecution of mother and father for innocent  baby bath photos.  It is preposterous to assume that parents or a large number of men are "infantophiles".  We want to stress that attraction to infants is a serious sexual aberration and certainly must not be acted upon.

Infantophiles

Of course, Infant abusers can be labelled with a stronger label then "pedophile". Those attracted to 17 year olds are more ostracised by the incorrect application of the name "pedophile" or child lover, then by "teleiophile", late adolescent lover. To reach the maximum vilification, the word "infantophile" is now, correctly, created. It is undesirable that perverts that mess with infants can hide behind the word "pedophile", which could mean attraction to 9 year olds.

We are discussing grammar, semantics, and politics of language manipulation here. We are not defending or condoning pedophile activities.

There are also law abiding pedophiles who declaredly do not act upon their attraction. These, in spite of being accused merely of thought crimes, are in danger of being hurt by angy pedophile vigilantes.

Other Language manipulation ("rape", "consent")

Human-Stupidity has assailed the manipulative distortion of language is very common in the service of criminalizing adolescent sexuality.  The meaning of "rape" and "consent" have been manipulatively changed, just like "pedophile" and "child".

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘What is a Pedophile? Hebephile, Ephebophile, Teleiophile, Infantophile’ » »
What is a Pedophile? Hebephile, Ephebophile, Teleiophile, Infantop… » continues here »

Share

A former Army Major from our area was sentenced to 27 years in federal prison for a horrific crime: raping a baby.

Federal authorities found 30,000 images and 100 videos of child pornography on the computer of 35 year-old Daniel Woolverton.

Daniel Woolverton was a 1997 West Point graduate, with a career as an Army trial lawyer that appeared to be on the fast track. Now, hes behind bars after raping a boy as young as three months old, an act he videotaped.

"Well, its repulsive," said an Arlington neighbor.

"Raping an infant? Oh boy. Thats terrible," said another. wusa9.com/news/


Video from wusa9.com/news/

Raping a 3 month old infant! We found this terrible, too. So terrible that we consulted a medical doctor to inquire about the consequences of forcible penetrative rape of an infant. He confirmed our suspicion: The absolute mismatch in size would cause extreme, grave, life threatening injuries in an immature infant. So, how come, there is no mention of such grave injury?

We remembered Definition of "Rape": When a "Rape" is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word "Rape": indecent touching of a minor is "rape". It is absolutely impossible for us to know what kind of activities Daniel Wolverton engaged in Our language lost its precision and its power. The new "rape" definition serves purely to mislead the public as to the nature of the crime. To incite the mob. 

Isn’t the truth enough? Most likely he did indecent touching and fumbling with an infant. Yes fumbling in places and ways he should not fumble. But it seems he did not engage in activities that would permanently hurt, mutilate and hospitalize the child.

Compare: Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years.)

Aren’t we insensitive? Defending a infant rapist? No, we don’t say what he did was right and defensible. We just say we should not mislead the public as to what he did. One thing is for sure. Thanks to the new definition of "rape", we can not know what he did.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Former Army Major Daniel Woolverton Sentenced For Raping Baby. What kind of rape?’ » »
Former Army Major Daniel Woolverton Sentenced For Raping Baby. Wha… » continues here »

Share

Any six year old knows perfectly well if s/he is coerced while overpowered and threatened, or acts consensually out of free will.

Try to explain her/nim that the stupid adults have defined all sexual activity even of late 17 year or 15 year old  adolescents as non-consensual. So it is the same "non-consensual rape" if a 17 year old takes the initiative to work hard to seduce an adult to have sex, or if the same adult rapes him/her at knifepoint. 

The first example is "statutory rape"  and the second is "forcible rape", the reader might retort. That differentiation has long been lost outside theoretical academic discussion.

The press happily reports about trials and conviction of "rapists" that raped the victim 300 times. No, she did not lock up the "victim" in a dungeon for years, like Mr. Fritzl. The victim came always came back for more, but did not consent (by our weird definition of legal consent). Human-Stupidity even documented a case where the rapist, unbeknownst to him,  was duped by the victim into raping her.

Children of 6,8, or 15 years risk serious legal consequences, even jail, if they don’t know these confusing definitions and regulations. Therefore this ought to be be mandatory elementary school subject.

Human-Stupidity has repeatedly, assailed the tendency in modern law, incited by feminism, to "rape" and manipulate language, to use inaccurate and deliberately inflammatory, emotive language to try to foster a hidden agenda. 

Due to feminist zeal to vilify consensual lovers of adolescent women, we belittle the true suffering of victims of forcible rape victims.

Human-Stupidity thinks it it truly offensive to the underage victims of real forcible violent rape to equate their suffering to the the "suffering" of willing participants in sex, to equate their resistance and unequivocal non-consent to the voluntary though legally invalid consent, or to the suddenly withdrawn consent in a "six second rape".

Minors under 18 (or 16) years of age can not consent to sex.  When spoken by a minor under the age of consent, then by this definition, the following absurd equality holds.

"I love you, please make love to me"

=
(is equal to)

"NOOO, don’t touch me, leave me alone"
lovey-dovey-feeling

=

rape-ducks

 

Both statements above are non-consent of rape-victims, in case the birds are under the age of consent.

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Consent, rape & minors. What is consent to sex?’ » »
Consent, rape & minors. What is consent to sex? » continues here »

Share

Redefining rape: all feminists are up in arms. Feminists re-defined rape 30 years ago, and now republicans want to re-re-redefine rape to the original definition. The definition "rape" had since the old Romans and Greek before Christ was born. 

This bill takes us back to a time when just saying ‘no’ wasn’t enough to qualify as rape," says Steph Sterling, a lawyer and senior adviser to the National Women’s Law Center.
(The House GOP’s Plan to Redefine Rape)

And when being too young for sex were not called "rape" either, kissing a minor was not called rape either. In the old times, when language still had its own precise terminology, like "indecent act with a minor". And when the age of consent was lower, so 17 year olds enjoying sex were not "rape victims". As ‘Whoppie Goldberg called it "it was not real rape-rape".

Human-Stupidity Analysis

We are language semantics freaks: we don’t like that one word defines 2 different things. Not every killing is murder, and not every problematic sex act is rape.

Readers might disagree, if a irresponsible teen who got herself pregnant should get free abortion. Or if it is better to get an, even undeserved, abortion then the prospect of an immature poor mother traumatizing a baby. Or one might wonder why the immature teen girl that got pregnant from an immature teen boy the same age was not statutorily raped and thus does not deserve a free abortion.   But if she had a relationship with a more sensible, responsible, mature man, then she was statutorily raped and deserves a free abortion.

 

The House GOP’s Plan to Redefine Rape

Rape is only really rape if it involves force. So says the new House Republican majority as it now moves to change abortion law. [...]

Republicans propose that the rape exemption be limited to "forcible rape." This would rule out federal assistance for abortions in many rape cases, including instances of statutory rape, many of which are non-forcible. For example: If a 13-year-old girl is impregnated by a 24-year-old adult, she would no longer qualify to have Medicaid pay for an abortion.[...]

"This bill takes us back to a time when just saying ‘no’ wasn’t enough to qualify as rape," says Steph Sterling, a lawyer and senior adviser to the National Women’s Law Center.[..]

Other types of rapes that would no longer be covered by the exemption include rapes in which the woman was drugged or given excessive amounts of alcohol, rapes of women with limited mental capacity, and many date rapes. "There are a lot of aspects of rape that are not included," Levenson says.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Republicans re-re-define rape: to the original definition rape had for 2000 years before re-definition 30 years ago’ » »
Republicans re-re-define rape: to the original definition rape had… » continues here »

Share