"Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children." (Adapted freely from protectchildren.ca/app/en/mandatory
| This is a terrible flaw in our child porn laws: unborn life is not protected. There is must be mandatory 10 year jail sentence for pedophiles that watch unborn nudity. We must protect our unborn fetuses from the perversity of pedophiles (embryophiles and fetophiles). Watching such unborn child porn kills: Often, ultrasound pictures lead to abortions, to killing of unborn life. |
Tell the House: Protect the unborn child against abuse. Criminalize production, possession, and possession of Unborn Child Porn.
|
.
Perverts take ultrasound photos of unborn babies and distribute them on the internet. source
But does it harm nobody? Weinstein’s critics argue that merely “viewing” unborn child porn does real harm to unborn kids by perpetuating a $3 billion annual market. The Justice Department estimates that in creating their product, unborn child pornographers have abused 1 million unborn kids in the United States. And some studies suggest that between 30 and 50 percent of viewers of unborn child porn also molest a child. (freely adapted from theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/jack-weinstein/8273/) |
Fetuses engaging in indecent touching. Perverts owning such photos deserve to be raped in jail forever. This picture would be rated 7 on the 10 point Copine child pornography scale:
Pictures that depict touching, mutual and self-masturbation, oral sex and intercourse by a child, not involving an adult.
The fetuses also should be arrested at birth: handcuffed, jailed, and be registered as sex offenders for life.
|
|
It is important to realize that these images are crime scene photos – they are a permanent record of the abuse of an unborn child. The lives of the unborn children featured in these illegal images and videos are forever altered.
Once these images are on the Internet, they are irretrievable and can continue to circulate forever. The unborn child is revictimized as the images are viewed again and again.
(adapted freely from missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?PageId=1504)
“He didn’t intend to hurt anyone. However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.”
thechronicleherald.ca/Front/9019133.html
|
Technology has made it possible to have unborn porn.
Source: uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Child_porn
I thank Uncycolpedia for their child porn persiflage which gave me inspiration for this article
|
Children of 17 years, 12 years, 5 years, 1 year, 1 month of age are all protected strict laws from being abused by viewers of sexual erotic photos and videos. Owning such photos of children and looking at such photos and videos is child abuse.
But why this 0-18 year age limit? The 18 year cutoff rate already is getting softened. Europe and Australia already punish the possession of depictions of "aparently underage" for 22 year old women in pony tails that look as if they were 17 years old. Thus the law now protects young looking 22 year old women from child abuse. (see 17 year old "children"?)
Now we need to work on the other end of the age range. Who says that the lower age limit for child pornography prosecutions has to be zero year old new borns? Embryos and fetuses need protection against abuse and rape, too. Right from conception, when human life is created.
Unborn-child-porn leads to 100 000’s child killings
Often such ultrasound photos are the first step in the monstrous killing of unborn babies. Most abortionists demand ultrasound photos of the unborn child before killing it. Or even with mothers who did not plan to kill the unborn child, ultrasound pictures discover a problem with the child and thus cause her to decide to kill the innocent unborn child.
And these child killings feed the market for mutilated dead-fetus-porn (dead-unborn-child-porn)
Mutilated dead unborn-child-porn (mutilated fetus porn)
Warning: fairly gruesome photos follow. Dead-unborn-child-porn, mainly from "pro-life" organizations.
Warning: very graphic pictures. These fotos are so gruesome, we will not endeavour to publish them. Many are clearly unborn-child=porn, as the genitals are obscenely exposed. We only publish censored blacked-out pixelated versions. Click to see the uncensored mutilated dead unborn-child-porn.
Dead fetuses in indecent poses with genitals exposed
Continue reading “Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse!”
