Millions of children watch child porn daily when they look into their bath room mirror. If they do so while posing sexy, or masturbating, it is even higher on the copine scale of child porn, for "children" as old as 17.
Practically every single person under 18 sees LIVE child porn on a daily basis. What they see in the mirror would qualify as child pornography, if photographed or filmed.
This is not the only example where live pictures are legal, but pictures of legal behavior are not
And no, publication and distribution of the illegal pictures are not necessary for it to be a crime
If a teen makes a sexy pose in front of the mirror, what s/he sees is a live version of level 4 child pornography, according to the copine scale "Deliberately posed pictures of children fully clothed, partially clothed or naked (where the amount,context and organisation suggests sexual interest)."
If they look straight at their genitals, they see a live version of copine level 6 CP: "Pictures emphasizing genital areas, where the child is either naked, partially clothed or fully clothed."
They see level 7 , If they touch themselves, with their eyes open,: "Pictures that depict touching, mutual and self-masturbation, oral sex and intercourse by a child, not involving an adult."
This is why it is so hard to explain children why sexting is such a huge crime. But possessing one’s own photo in the privacy of one’s own cell phone is production and possession of child pornography. According to the voodoo theory of CP, it victimizes the child who took its own photo.
We ought to outlaw bathroom mirrors. Because what these children see in the bathroom mirror is a live version of what would be child porn, if photographed or filmed.
-
Watching depictions of a child being beheaded by Muslim terrorists, or stoned to death for extramarital sex, a child being clubbed to death by US inner city gang bangers is totally legal. Distribution of such movies by for-profit web sites or TV networks is legal too. Now if there is nudity, if in the movie the kid is not clubbed to death but makes love, or masturbates, then a child is being victimized. We fail to understand this logic.
-
Committing actual physical violence against children carries lower penalties then possession of photos: Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (40 years)
-
Why would children or adolescents get victimized by mere watching? “Watching child porn victimizes the child”. The Voodoo science of child pornography laws
-
Should some kind of child pornography (that does not victimize children) be encouraged, for reducing real crimes against children? Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii)
See also
- Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail
- Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse!
- Leading sex research experts against child porn laws: "Adolescents and young adults are no children"
- Adolescent girl-fights with injuries: cheer on! Nudity, love and sex: crime and victimization
- child food porn
- Mandatory 15 years jail for photos of legal girl friend: You Can Have Sex With Them; Just Don’t Photograph Them
- Child porn laws victimize children and adults
- child sex trauma myth
-
"Hot for Teacher", Paedogeddon: "Pedophilia" Comedy Videos
-
Youtube Spoof of “Catch a Predator”: Absurdity of Underage Sex Entrapment