No matter how actively a minor desires a sexual relationship, s/he is always a victim of *statutory *rape". This feminist language abuse must never be challenged, or else.
A legal professional who uses any common sense faces serious problems. We are surprised that these cases have even happened and are worried about the backlash.
Barrister criticized for calling child abuse victim ‘predatory’
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has criticized a barrister acting on its behalf for describing a 13-year-old sex abuse victim in court as "predatory".
Robert Colover also called the girl "sexually experienced". The CPS said his language had been "inappropriate".
Speaking about Mr Colover’s remarks, a CPS spokesman said: "The language used by prosecution counsel was inappropriate.
"The transgressor in this case was the defendant and he bears responsibility for his criminal acts."
Alan Wardle, from the NSPCC, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: "The age of consent in this country is 16, before that a child cannot consent. As a society we have drawn a line in the sand on that.
"In this case, the child was 13 and the man was 41 – it’s pretty clear who the predator was."
Of course. A sexually mature post-pubertal minor who shows sexual interest is always a victim. The older person is always a predator. A consequence of this grotesque logic
Yes means No! Forcibly raping a 17 year old is the same rape as consensual love making
"Yes" means "No" You have a girl friend under the local age of consent, and you (unwisely) want to have sex with her. Don’t bother to ask for her consent to sex. Just ravish her violently, no matter how much she resists. It makes no difference if she consents or not. Her "yes" means "no", her consent is invalid.…
The Blame Game: Lawyers say 14-year-old consented to rape; shares blame
Continue reading “Teenagers who aggressively seek sex are always rape victims”