He was a good husband. Out of the blue, his wife filed for divorce. She probably cheated on him before. So he snapped. He drugged her and tied her to the bed, while unconscious. Then he waited, to make sure she was awake and would feel the mutilation. He cut off her breasts and ground them up in the garbage disposal. Isn’t that funny? She sure will never die of breast cancer! Then he cut off her clitoris, and glued her vagina shut with ample quantities of super-glue. Teaches the slut a lesson!
Then, in a TV talk show, a group of men makes fun of the story. Isn’t it hilarious? The spectators have hearty laughs and giggles. Of course, it is not the same as cutting off a man’s penis, because a penis is softer then a woman’s breast. One moderate man actually says she did not deserve it, but he can think of a woman’s crime where he would do just the same.
If a woman divorced him, got 50% of his salary (before taxes) and gots him jailed for non-payment. Then he would discover he was cuckolded, the child was not his kid, and the courts still held him responsible for payment because he had acted as a good father and he was too trusting to do a DNA test early enough. Then the rage is understandable and she really deserves it. She still will recover and can take care of the bastard child.
Participants and audience laugh and giggle. They all agree, full of understanding.
He realized every man’s secret dream. All men secretly dream of sexually mutilating a woman, to teach her a lesson.
I just inverted the sexes, for demonstration purposes.
Men are not that vile. Never ever would a male talk show host, audience, guests condone such barbarity against women, or make fun of it. Only women are that mean, violent and vengeful to joke and make fun of male mutilation! It is the secret fantasy of many women to cut off a man’s penis. (People say this statement is misogynistic. I did not make this up, watch the video to believe that those woman have a good time joking about this abuse of a man)
Lorena Bobbitt cut off her husband’s penis and later demanded and got an excuse. Of course, she got no jail sentence for that. She was justified because he was a philanderer and cheated. She had real fan clubs. Go ahead and google "Lorena Bobbitt jokes". John Waine Bobbitt never went as far as many women to, he never got a baby from a mistress, much less made his wife pay and care for a baby that was not hers. He just, allegedly, cheated. Amazingly his penis was found and re-attached.
Catherine Kieu mutilates husband | YouTube
Catherine Kieu, 48 learned from Lorena’s mistake. Her husband would not get his penis back. She planned meticulously. She drugged him first, tied him up. Made sure he was awake to see and feel the punishment he deserved. After cutting off the penis, she ground it up with the sink’s electric garbage disposal. So she could be sure he never will use it again. A wonder she did not grind it while it was still attached. Or put it through a meat grinder, so he could look at it afterwards? She left him tied up. It is amazing that he did not bleed to death. She was very nice to call police, so after a long delay he finally got medical attention and would stay alive, so he could live the rest of his life without a penis and ponder what he did wrong. He must have done something to hurt her, make her angry, to deserve it.
The tax payer is paying her lawyer. I am sure he will plead battered woman syndrome, not guilty for reasons of insanity. After all, Lorena Bobbitt got away without punishment.
It is not clear if she destroyed his testicles, too. In that case, our hero would also have to extract the woman’s ovaries, to make the above example equal to Caterine’s crime.
On Monday night, police say Kieu spiked a meal and served it to the victim.
The 60-year-old man started to feel sick and went to lie down, then awoke tied to the bed as Kieu attacked him with a 10-inch kitchen knife, police said.
She then put the penis down a garbage disposal, police said.
"It’s hard to believe what would motivate a person to do this sort of thing," the district attorney’s chief of staff, Susan Kang Schroeder, said outside court. "It’s one of the worst things you could do to a person short of killing him."
Newly appointed defense attorney Lee Gabriel made no public statement after the hearing.
Police did not release the victim’s name. He underwent surgery and was listed in good condition at University of California at Irvine Medical Center, hospital spokesman John Murray said.
Murray declined to say whether the penis was reattached or provide any additional details about the victim’s condition, citing patient privacy laws.
Kieu was charged with one felony count of torture, one felony count of aggravated mayhem and sentencing enhancements for great bodily injury and personal use of a knife. If convicted of all counts, she could face life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Garden Grove Police Lt. Jeff Nightengale said Kieu called police Monday night to report a medical emergency and told arriving officers "he deserved it" before pointing to the room where the victim was found bleeding profusely. She was taken into custody without incident and refused to talk to officers further. Daily News
Men are abused and repressed from cradle to grave
We live in a world where men can be killed and mutilated with impunity. Where man lost their human rights and go to debtor’s prison for not paying child support, even for a cuckold child. Where women get quota in politics and CEO ranks, but not in jail or on death row. Where women got equal rights in votes but not in the draft. Where boys are discriminated from cradle to grave. Female genital mutilation is a crime, but many boys get circumcised with no medical reason and with no anesthesia. Young male children get arrested for sexual harassment, school is run by women and so adapted to girls that now 57% of bachelors degrees go to women. Finally, women work less and retire earlier then men. So women receive many more years of retirement benefits. Men pay for woman’s retirement benefits. Read Angry Harry. Become active. Embrace radical masculism to oppose oppressive radical feminism.
Ata and others demonstrate above that they missed the point. And their mistaken notion of sentencing for gendered crimes further reflects their lack of understanding.
First, sexual violence is wrong- period. There is no justification for harm. The point the author made, with explicit explanation included, is that how society handles violence directed at males reflects a double standard, both in the court of public opinion and in the courtroom itself.
The anatomical analogies are incorrect. First, a penis is not the equivalent of a clitoris. The clitoris is homologous to the penis in that it derives from the same tissue that develops into a penis in a male embryo, and locationally, it is positioned similarly, above the tissue that differentiates into either vulva or scrotum. But the visible clitoris is the glans and hood, whereas 2/3 to 3/4 of the penis is visible. The glans penis, foreskin, and shaft are external, whereas the clitoral shaft is mostly internal, and eventually splits into two crura or “legs” behind the vaginal walls. This means that a clitorectomy, removal of the clitoris, is restricted to the glans, not the entire clitoris. Penis removal takes away the glans, foreskin (if still attached), and the shaft. The distribution of nerves is different in the clitoris and penis, but considering that the shaft is external, there is sufficient pain that often shock or blacking out occurs after severing the penis. And, as the admin underscored, size difference is relevant because the amount of blood contained in a 1 cm organ vs. a multi inch organ. Amputating the clitoral glans is not likely to cause death from blood loss, but amputating the penis, glans or entirety from glans to base of shaft, can and has caused death from blood loss. Regardless, anatomical accuracy reveals that far more tissue (not just in volume or length, but in regard to diverse structures) is destroyed in penis removal.
This is relevant for the next point: women who have undergone clitoral glans removal can still orgasm, and do at around the rate of a woman with an intact clitoris. This does not justify FGM by any means, but it is a reality that has been studied. Researchers investigating FGM in Sudan have asked Sudanese women about their sexual experiences. Without prompting, many Sudanese women detailed what they considered orgasms, describing orgasm with the same glow and language as women elsewhere with the clitoris. This may be because they still have diverse erogenous zones intact, including the G spot, clitoral crura, and perhaps other internal remnants of clitoris that are pleasantly stimulated through insertion and intercourse. In contrast, for men, losing the glans penis is sufficiently to make orgasm take much longer and be much less satisfying, but losing the penile shaft makes orgasm next to impossible. There is erectile tissue near the perineum, but it cannot be stimulated adequately for orgasm by simple touch or even prostate stimulation.
So, in response to what was written above, can a woman still “feel” vaginal penetration after clitoral glans removal? Quite often yes. Vaginal sensation itself tends to be limited to the first 2 inches of the vagina, but the stretch receptors that require penile girth can also be stimulated and provide pleasure through stimulating the clitoral crura. This would more than likely be functional and responsive in the awful event of involuntary clitorectomy upon a child or adult. The woman would have far more erogenous tissue remaining to experience some sexual stimulation than a man lacking his external penile shaft using a strap-on. Again, this is not simply hypothetical- this point has already been documented in real case studies.
Rape is wrong and can be significantly damaging both physically and psychologically; unfortunately, people do not feel the same way about penis removal, which can also be significantly damaging physically and psychologically. A woman who has been raped may not desire sex, have libido issues, lose sensation, suffer vaginismus, vulvodynia, and may have other problems, including depression, anxiety, loss of trust, PTSD, etc. However, her clitoral glans, shaft, and crura are usually still intact. She can still orgasm from masturbation if sex is out of the question. Usually, her fertility is not affected. A man who has his penis removed may share the same or similar psychological issues, plus other factors as the penis is an expected visible feature, whereas a clitoris, though it is usually present during hetero sex, is not a visible feature that lovers look for. (It is obviously great when it is there and ought to be there, but society does not shame a woman who lacks a clitoris the way it shames a man without a penis or with a small penis). There is also a loss of function and disabilitiy, from difficulty urinating (especially if the injury does not receive treatment immediately, as the Hijra in India who undergo penis removal often spend 30 + min straining just to urinate), to loss of protection against UTIs (men seldom have UTIs but the incidence increases several times when a man has lost his penis), to loss of sensitivity and loss of orgasmic capacity. Yes, the vagina is more than “just a hole” and vaginal injuries may make penetration itself unbearable or non penetrative sex related activities themselves unthinkable as they may be too triggering of trauma to be pleasurable. But, female fertility is generally not compromised from clitoral injuries or things like rape (other vaginal injuries may present a bigger issue depending on their extent). Male fertility is compromised by penis removal such that even if a man can still somehow orgasm and ejaculate, the likelihood of sperm reaching ova is significantly reduced, without technological intervention. Thus, in many countries where medicine is not highly advanced and/or in vitro fertilization is lacking, a man without a penis has a very low possibility of ever fathering offspring bearing his own genes. It has been documented that penile injuries like subincision significantly reduce incidence of conception as the ejaculate does not run the full length of the penis and has less projectile force. Finally, the abundance of testosterone in men induces more frequent erections, both voluntary and involuntary. This process occurs whether someone experienced mutilation or has a fully intact penis. Thus, the phantom pains from nerves trying to induce an erection would be far worse for males than for females.
Further, the sentencing issue is not given in terms of apples and apples. Ms. Kieu is received 7 years to life based on aggravating factors, namely mayhem. Penis removal is enough to kill someone from hypovolemic shock/blood loss, but she went further. She tossed the severed penis in the garbage disposal and turned it on so her ex husband’s penis could never be reattached. And she had planned the whole ordeal. She used Ambien to drug her husband’s soup, tied him up, awoke him so that he could watch and be awake as she cut off his penis, screaming “You deserve it!”, then put it in the garbage disposal just as she handed the phone to her ex husband to call 911. The circumstances of Catherine Kieu’s crime exceed the cruelty of most incidents of men sexually assaulting women. The individual sentences also reflect differences in state laws. If male sexual mutilation occurred in the same state as female sexual mutilation, the sentence would be far more severe for a male perpetrating the same sexual crime against a woman.
Then there is the sentencing reality, where female genital mutilation is always deemed a crime, but male routine infant circumcision is not, despite both male and female infants lacking the ability to give consent. Foisting potentially life altering, unnecessary surgery upon an individual without his or her consent is the prime offense, regardless of damage done. Yet only those who violate female consent are punished.
The same double standard, devaluing the genitals of one sex while valuing the genitals of another, allows male consent to be violated in another way: popular perception that male genitalia is a privilege which can be taken away, but female genitalia is always sacred and a right. Testicular/groin injuries are frequent comedic material in movies, tv shows, commercials, show for children, etc.; there is no corresponding frequency of breast, clitoral, or vaginal injury being portrayed comedically. The mindset justifying this imbalance must be that male genitalia has little to no importance as the special property of another human being; rather, it is only “important” insofar as it functions for other peoples amusement and pleasure. This same mindset was captured live on “The Talk” in 2011, with Sharon Osbourne first saying she would cut off Arnold Schwarzenegger’s penis and put it in the garbage disposal if she had been married to him and had found out about his infidelity. This was broadcast within a week or 2 of Catherine Kieu’s crime. Ms. Kieu’s crime followed Sharon Osbourne’s recommended pattern. The day after the crime was reported, Ms. Osbourne again spoke excitedly of sexually mutilating men, saying what Ms. Kieu did “was quite fabulous”. It is quite likely that mainstream media was a motivating factor in Ms. Kieu’s crime, just as it was in Thailand when Thai media popularized penis mutilation and incidences of women attacking their partners increased.
Penis removal in mainstream media is depicted as a an acceptable way to stop rape, an appropriate punishment for molestation or rape, and may be excused if the alleged victim claims rape (regardless of any evidence or reality of a crime having actually occurred). It is unclear how penis removal can be self-defense as hands, fingers, the throat, eyes, and internal organs are just as accessible and vulnerable, potential sites for injury to stop an assault. It is more likely that vengeance and sadism motivates penis removal, not self defense. Many media outlets go further, with comments recommending penis removal or castration for non sexually motivated or nonsexual crimes like murder, though comments seldom if ever recommend breast removal, hysterectomy, clitorectomy, or oophorectomy for females who commit murder or sexual violence. Now that media are reporting more about female child molesters, they are still less vilified and comments on their crimes still find fewer cries, if any, for female molesters to undergo sexual mutilation as a consequence. And when adult female commit extremely violent sexual crimes against male children (Katherine Nadal who cut off her son’s penis and testes before he was a year old, Jennifer Marie Vargas, who angrily grabbed her 6 year old son’s scrotum and tore it open with her nails, then superglued it shut and forced him to bed as he was screaming and crying), there is minimal to no public outcry. People are starting to wake up as some commenters are doing a good job of pointing out that violence is a reality and is not 1 gender vs. another, but people hurting someone’s son, daughter, brother, sister, husband, or wife.
I addressed the comments, which can be unpredictable, because in a narrow way, they reflect popular ideas held by the public and correspond somewhat to the trends of the time. In 2011, when the initial reporting about Catherine Kieu’s crime against her husband came out, the majority of comments on most media outlets were that “the husband [Mr. Becker] must have done something to deserve what happened to him” and that “Ms. Kieu is the victim; Mr. Becker deserves no sympathy”. There were a handful of sober comments reminding readers that the details of the crime had not yet emerged and it is sexist to assume Mr. Becker did anything to deserve his injury; it was possible that Ms. Kieu was simply mentally unstable. 2 years later, when the trial concluded and it was publicized that Mr. Becker had not in fact done anything to merit his injury and Ms. Kieu, was, in fact, mentally unstable for reasons unrelated to her ex husband, 2013 comments finally showed more balance and humanity in responding to the news. Those posting from FaceBook and other sites, mainly women celebrating Ms. Kieu’s crime as if it was heroic and that the same should be done “more often”, have made it possible to view their opinions frozen in time, such that others can observe documentation of what people were saying.
This is Horrible. It is an injustice for men. Women cut off men’s penises more than I realized. I came across a video of a man in an operating room. So much pain. His penis was never reattached. His wife got rid of it. This topic should be more published. Definitely punishment needs to be more severe.
Men and women both need to call the companys that sell products with television commercials that do not treat men equally or portray them as ignorant or not treated with equal consideration. Men buy these products too. Media influences peoples popular opinions. This simple action has power and a movement will grow. This will reverse this current trend with women advertisers portraying men as ignorant or stupid and not deserving of equal rights. Women will never be emotionally equal to men until they take up this cause for men as well. For women to be equal to men the womans movement would have done well to take up mens causes too. Now men are way behind. To get thier brother’s total support it would have been best if there was a concern shown for men too and made it a ‘peoples movement’ not just a women’s movement.
Women are not held responsible for thier actions. Do the gender reversal on any situation you hear about and you will see it is not fair in the courts or in the media. Men and women will never be equal emotionally until mens sexual rights and private parts are treated with the same criminal prosecution and public outcry as are womens. When I was a child a kick in the testicals by my mother hospitalised me and traumatised me for the rest of my life. No one cares but yet this is portrayed as funny on multiple television shows like Americas Funniest videos nightly. If done by another person this needs to be treated as a sexual assault. When ever a woman does anything to a mans sexual organs that can damage them or hurt them or her actions were intended to or could have hurt him there should be a sexual assault charge and or worse an equal jail sentence like there is for a rape.
Kicking in the groin is sexual assault. Never occurred to me. Very true. In additional to bodily injury. Sort of equivalent to sticking a crowbar into women’s sexual parts.
Nobody even called cutting off a Penis a sexual assault. You are totally right, this should be an additional charge, on top of grievous bodily harm. It also would help to balance out criminal statistics by gender.
It is very vulgar for some women especially the presenters to make fun of the agony of an innocent man. Frankly some men are not in a different situation who see or hear about chopping the breasts of women (millions) or cutting off the clitoris and labias (100s of millions) or ripping her hole.(popular in history as well in Europe during the dark ages-1000 years span). Initially man gets a sweet pleasure of revenge (Gender war), but as women, will forget it after a while. No matter what is the crime we call for severe punishments for all mutilations. God bless the sick.
lol you obviously deserve to get mutilated by this woman, you just contradict ur whole point you vile asshole, your probably just sexually inadequate.
@ emilytaylor: this comment is abusiveness and needs to be documented, photographed, then removed. She advocates violent mutilation against a man- though which man she refers to is unclear- and is crass. A perfect illustration of cognitive dissonance that allows for sexual double standards.
In regards to the comparisons of “cutting off a woman’s breasts.” There actually have been many cases where men have cut off a woman’s breasts. Unfortunately, in almost all the known cases in which a man has cut of a woman’s breasts, he has also murdered her, resulting in a life sentence, which makes for a difficult comparison to this case. However, men often get less time even in these cases. Thomas Jeffeory Humphries for instance mutilated AND murdered his pregnant girlfriend in WA and got 33 years….this was considered “double” the normal sentence.
Simply Google “sentencing genital mutilation” and you will see what I mean. Men that drug and cut off their daughters’ clitoris (similar to this case) and claim “religious reasons” in the U.S. get 6 to 10 years maximum (and often times less). But it’s not restricted to religious claims. Dr. Graeme Stephen Reeves got 1 year for cutting off a woman’s clitoris and (ready for this) an extra 2 months for cutting off part of another woman’s.
Now I’m sure you could find cases that go the other way around. But I don’t think there is a gender bias “against men” in this particular type of case. If anything there is some evidence to indicate it might be other way around.
I say this not to defend this woman (which I’m not: she’s nuts and should go to prison for life), but simply to promote the idea that men that cut off the clitoris of a woman should get the same life sentence and not 6-10 years (or 2 months) regardless of reasons.
Now to those saying that “it’s not the same,” because a woman who has suffered damage to her vagina or the removal of her clit “can still totally have sex:” This displays all the things wrong with what some men think about women’s bodies. For example, stating that a woman could have sex with her clit removed is like me saying “oh, this man could still have sex with a strap on.” — Yeah they both could…but neither could feel it: So what’s the point? (Not to mention the horrendous emotional trauma suffered by both of them). Secondly, women who have been raped viciously often suffer horrible problems (like vulvodynia among others) and cannot have sex without pain for the rest of their lives. It’s not as easy as “oh, it’s just a hole, so you can still use it” view that some men have. lol.
Finally, two more points: I don’t believe Lorena Bobbitt’s trial happened in the U.S., so it’s not a good comparison to U.S. law, which is how it has been used all the times it has been brought up so far. And secondly, I don’t understand the comments that “all women want to do this and think it’s funny.”…..this is the grossest, creepiest thing I have ever heard. If “all women wanted to do it,” then there would be many more cases of women doing it. Cases like this have made world wide news (like Bobbitt’s, which was big in the U.S., but I believe took place in Ecuador). However, cases where women have their clits cut off (especially for religious reasons) are almost never news worthy. Of course, there are many cases where men have suffered a similar fate of having their penis cut off in a crime. However, oddly enough, in most of these cases the offender has typically been another male. This type of case is actually very rare, so I don’t think it really warrants a “all women want to do this” or “too many men are abused by the system” drama to play out. Again, this isn’t to say that it’s not horrendous, and deserving of a harsh sentence.
All these women who are ridiculing men are going to be in hell. Everyone who thinks they are a bag of chips making compliments a crime should repent of this evil before they spend an eternity in hell. Baruch Obama put an end to this sexual harassment law is insidiously dangerous as is “political” “correctness”. We are sorry for calling you names like, sexual harasser,pervert,jerk Etc.
This post is outrageous! Not all woman are like that! This is bad to either sex and yes there are cases of men doing it to women which have been on the use but the comments about voting, education and child maintenance is ridiculous! Women have a right to vote we ate equals and are just as important as men, some women are CEOs eat but there are still more men in business due to sexism because they dont want the problem of paying for maternity leave and it’send choice not to go into teaching not women suppressing them, 7% is also not a lot of difference in the degrees also merely the fact moreem choose to leave education before uni. These comments which have been made are beyond ridiculous saying men are supressed, read back what you have put, this is why women are still fighting for equal rights narrow minded people like ypu
Women wanting the same wage for less work hours and less years of work experience is one of the problems you cite. Young unmarried women without children tend to earn MORE then their male peers. But if women choose time off for children, then they earn less. Just like a man that takes time off for children, ………. or for fishing ………. It is not the boss’ concern what employees do in their spare time.
Anglobitch anger is the weather-vane of truth.
Sad but true. Some men mutilate wives for cheating on them as well as their manstresses.
3 women super-glue man’s penis to his stomach. A true story!
incredible!
No mention how they would get the thing off.
Stupid fucking nigger using the word cunt in the video. He is a cunt for even talking.
It’s good to recognize and fight against this discrimination but I don’t think defining your struggle as some sort of opposition to women is the right way of doing it. Men need to re-assess what we are in the modern world and how we might adapt our expectations of ourselves. Once enough of us recognize that times have changed and our role in society has changed we can start making legitimate attempts to change the “Man=guilty” law system, the educational system and the general belittling of males that has emerged in the last two decades.
http://metaot.com/blog/are-western-societies-guilty-trivialising-female-male-violence
V
BOYCOTT AMERICAN WOMEN
Why American men should boycott American women
http://boycottamericanwomen.blogspot.com
I am an American man, and I have decided to boycott American women. In a nutshell, American women are the most likely to cheat on you, to divorce you, to get fat, to steal half of your money in the divorce courts, don’t know how to cook or clean, don’t want to have children, etc. Therefore, what intelligent man would want to get involved with American women?
American women are generally immature, selfish, extremely arrogant and self-centered, mentally unstable, irresponsible, and highly unchaste. The behavior of most American women is utterly disgusting, to say the least.
This blog is my attempt to explain why I feel American women are inferior to foreign women (non-American women), and why American men should boycott American women, and date/marry only foreign (non-American) women.
BOYCOTT AMERICAN WOMEN!
Are you a man who is interested in marrying indian women? Please visit Indian-Wife.com, India’s 1st International Marriage Site:
http://www.indian-wife.com
This case calls for a revenge attack. I hope the husband pulls it off.
If it were me, my main purpose in life would be get revenge and I would make sure it was graphic and public.
I agree with you .We to have women like that here in New Zealand .Kill all sick, in the head bitches from all around the world ,I say !!!!
Debunking of a lot of creationist anti-evolution arguments. Very nice.
http://www.skeptic.com/downloads/top-10-evolution-myths.pdf
I have yet to see on a public and syndicated talk show a group of men and an audience of men laughing at things happening to women , your talking apples and oranges here, men dont find humour in disfigurement of women, seems when its men its fair game, and i thought women were the gentle sex.
You didn’t read or understand the article. The author said what you just said…
Author wrote:
“I just inverted the sexes, for demonstration purposes.
Men are not that vile. Never ever would a male talk show host, audience, guests condone such barbarity against women, or make fun of it. Only women are that mean, violent and vengeful to joke and make fun of male mutilation!”
He says what you just said…men are not that vile and would not make fun of things happening to woman. He states that woman are the opposite.
And men do not deserve to have their penis cut off, that is horrible. How would a woman like it if she had the entire section of her vagina ripped out from the inside? It would be horrible! It’s not funny for either sex. Only when the man does something horrible like rape should he have it cut off.
I think it’s a bit ironic to say “men would never make light of these things happening to women”…..and yet there are men on this very forum making light of it happening to women by suggesting that it’s “not as big deal” when it happens to a woman, because (to quote one man here) “she still has a cunt to fuck.”
(To them I say that the implication that “as long as she still has something for HIM to enjoy sexually, then it’s not that big a deal and is fine, regardless of whether or not SHE has anything to enjoy sexually” is really wrong.)
Now if I took the examples of those two ignorant men who commented above and were to say “See, that proves that ALL men make light of it and think the way those two men do” (or were to even go so far as to say that they hence must want to do it themselves, because they made light of it) you would likely tell me not to judge the thoughts of all men simply because of those two….and you would be right.
I can guarantee you that most women do not think this is funny or a light issue like those ignorant women on the radio implied anymore than most men think that mutilating a woman’s genitals is “not that bad, because it’s just a hole, and it can still be used for someone’s sexual pleasure (just not hers)” as those ignorant men above implied.
No one should “white wash” one person’s comments (male or female) onto all people of that gender.
its to do with the content stench between their legs that fucks them up in the head, wouldn’t you be if you had one ?
I agree that there’s a horrible double standard in this situation but let’s not pretend there aren’t double standards thoughout society, based on sex, race, appearance, etc. This was a heinous crime and this woman should be punished accordingly. Men & women do amazingly awful things to each other when a marriage goes bad. And if you believe men aren’t just as vile, vengeful, etc. as women then you’re ridiculously naive. BTW, not sure why you included the woman’s breasts in your mock scenario. What comparable body part did this crazy lady remove?
Well, there is no comparable part to the male penis in a woman. If you compare cutting off a clit with cutting off a penis, I have to disappoint you. The size difference is enormous, there is no urethra in the clitoris, cutting off a clitoris does not lead to such profuse life threatening bleeding, and it does not prevent the woman from having sex in the future. Got the differences?
It is like comparing an ejaculation to 9 months of child bearing. Things are not always the same, sexes are not identical.
I was thinking of removing ovaries and uterus, but this still is not comparable. Even breasts are not comparable to a penis, but come close in size and importance.
And I made a point why men are not as vile and revengeful. There are plenty of examples, in the movies, and in the Bobbitt literature linked in the article, that women fantasize about cutting off penises. I believe that it could easily be shown, scientifically, that only a tiny minority of men would enjoy sexually mutilating women in similar ways.
The “size” isn’t the issue, it’s the effect it has on the person’s life and the emotional trauma. It’s like you’re saying that if a person were to cut off a smaller penis, then it’s not as “important” as cutting off a larger penis.
Saying that a woman who has suffered damage to her vagina or the removal of her clit “can still totally have sex” displays all the things wrong with what some men think about women’s bodies.
For example, stating that a woman could have sex with her clit removed is like me saying “oh, this man could still have sex with a strap on.” — Yeah they both could…but neither could feel it: So what’s the point?
Secondly, women who have been raped viciously often suffer horrible problems (like vulvodynia among others) and cannot have sex without pain for the rest of their lives. It’s not as easy as “oh, it’s just a hole, so you can still use it” view that some men have. lol.
cut her whole fucking cunt out ,and to any other women who cuts a mans penis off. Women are just so fucking vile in this kind of crime,its worst than rape.At lest she still has her cunt to fuck another day.
The “size” isn’t the issue, it’s the effect it has on the person’s life and the emotional trauma. It’s like you’re saying that if a person were to cut off a smaller penis, then it’s not as “important” as cutting off a larger penis.
Saying that a woman who has suffered damage to her vagina or the removal of her clit “can still totally have sex” displays all the things wrong with what some men think about women’s bodies.
For example, stating that a woman could have sex with her clit removed is like me saying “oh, this man could still have sex with a strap on.” — Yeah they both could…but neither could feel it: So what’s the point?
Secondly, women who have been raped viciously often suffer horrible problems (like vulvodynia among others) and cannot have sex without pain for the rest of their lives. It’s not as easy as “oh, it’s just a hole, so you can still use it” view that some men have. lol.