Trayvon Martin, racial profiling, political correctness

Racial profiling 1  2 3 is illegal, in spite of clear proof that certain races commit multiple times more violent crime. But gender profiling is written into law (Violence against women act) in spite of proof that women resort to domestic violence just as much as men.

Stereotyping Certain Races as Having a Greater Propensity to Commit Crimes Is Absolutely Prohibited. Some have argued that overall discrepancies in crime rates among racial groups could justify using race as a factor in general traffic enforcement activities and would produce a greater number of arrests for non-traffic offenses (e.g., narcotics trafficking). We emphatically reject this view. It is patently unacceptable and thus prohibited under this guidance for federal law enforcement officers to engage in racial profiling.  4


travonmartin8_thumbOf course, ignoring common sense and inconvertible crime statistics are an impediment to police work. It violates the human rights of law abiding citizens by exposing them to more crime. And violates the human rights of old white ladies that needlessly get searched so police don’t look racially biased when searching young Arab or black men.

On the bright side, a German court recently acknowledged the right of police to search suspects by skin color, when on trains usually used by illegal immigrants.

Statistically, the black man with skittles and hoodie below has a 10-100 time greater chance of being a violent criminal then our two protesters above and aside. 6 

That suspicion, of course, would not warrant shooting a black man for his  skin color. But it might be justified to be more careful and to check him out. Even the politically correct protesters and even honest law abiding blacks would change to the other side of the street, were they to encounter a group of such black people. trayvonmartin11_thumb

Generations of blacks have now been told they are victims, whites are evil and blacks are entitled to free money, housing and everything else when very few blacks alive today have ever faced systematic discrimination. If they have faced discrimination it is because responsible blacks are grouped with the great many blacks in America that cause such tremendous crime and problems.

 If Whites are held responsible for actions committed by members of my race centuries ago [slavery], shouldn’t it be fair for law abiding Blacks to be held responsible for the black thugs and criminals? It’s simple logic but not so easy under the laws of political correctness.

50 years of welfare, social programs and excuses has had a tremendously negative effect on the black race in America. Blacks under perform nearly across the board when compared with other races. Why? Political correctness, liberal politics, ignorance and hate. It is easier for blacks, as a whole, to blame their station in society on white people for slavery than it is to blame themselves for making bad life decisions. Most people who are not black are taught actions have consequences. Young blacks are taught they can do or say whatever and they will be excused. This is why we are seeing a growing number of brazen attacks by groups of young blacks on whites these days. These young black thugs believe there will be no consequences. But there are consequences, even in the ridiculous world of political correctness. That is why such a large percentage of prisoners are black. Political correctness tells us it’s because of racist judges, police and laws…but the realistic know it is simply because so many blacks commit crimes. 8

Whites, and men, are not protected classes

Black on white crime gets whitewashed and ignored 1 2 3 4 5.

Here are some more shocking statistics: More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year. Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks. […]On a per-capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crimes than Whites.   6

Whites don’t have race consciousness as blacks do. Whites don’t show up in thousands to defend other whites. Not as victims, much less if they are actual criminals like Rodney King. Similarly men would never defend male criminals as women feminists defend female criminals like Lorena Bobbitt, Mary Winkler, Rita Graveline and Susan Falls.

heels,animal,cute,black,dog,kawaii_thumbNow would you racially profile here? Just because certain dog races are more prone to violence and inflicting serious bodily harm, that does not allow one to discriminate.

Nice Little Dog_thumb









Sometimes cute white poodles might bite, and a big vicious guard dog can be friendly and might not bite. Furthermore, the dog suffers from trauma and discrimination because it spent a lot of his life chained and did not get pampered by a luxury owner like little poodle.

Similarly, it is very unfair to discriminate against sausage dogs in the races. After all,












Trayvon Martin vs. George Zimmermann: premature rush to conclusions

The rush to judgment among some prominent voices on the left assumes George Zimmerman is responsible for a terrible hate crime, and that isn’t fair to Mr. Zimmerman. He hasn’t even been charged, much less been afforded the due process to which all Americans are entitled. This is not a defense of Mr. Zimmerman; it is a defense of a sacrosanct Constitutional process being short-circuited by assumptions and rage.

On the other hand, some prominent conservative voices want to label it all a tragedy exploited by race-baiting pimps and leave it at that. They are unwilling to entertain the possibility that the black community’s rage in this case might be fueled by an otherwise valid perception that, in general, innocent black men too often are presumed guilty by a racially biased criminal justice system.

Responsible voices should insist that the black community’s rage is, at best, premature in this particular case.  9

Trayvon Martin vs. George Zimmermann Link List

Author: Human-Stupidy (Admin)

Honest Research, Truth, Sincerity is our maxim. We hate politally correct falsification, falsification, repression of the truth, academic dishonesty and censorship.

11 thoughts on “Trayvon Martin, racial profiling, political correctness”

  1. Well, the good news is that one turd has left the planet- P. Rushton. Too bad it wasn’t sooner. He has been refuted several times and has been shown up for being sloppy in sampling to fraudulent.

    1. The only serious refutations came from Nisbett and Flynn. From what I read, Rushton seriously refuted Nisbett as bad work and cherry picking. Nisbett otherwise is a serious researcher. Rushton wrote papers to refute Flynn at least partially, but Flynn has some interesting research.

  2. I know it’s off topic, but I think some here would be interested in Baker’s book : “Race” (1974), ~625 pages. You can download the book here :

    It takes some time to download the book (a few hours) but it’s a must-read. Also, the download link will be removed if no one use it – within 30 days. Don’t hesitate to share the link.

    1. Just as with Zimmerman, until it can be explained why ALL the blood that belonged to OJ that was “found” had preservatives and where the missing vial of blood is, I will still believe OJ is innocent.
      It’s hard to believe an old arthritic man could violently kill a young athletic man so easily.
      The evidence just was not there. And no I am not Black and I watched the ENTIRE trial.

  3. At the very beginning of his 911 call, Zimmerman tells the operator that there have been a lot of break-ins recently.  In fact, there were eight burglaries in the previous fifteen months.  Where the intruders were identified, most were young black males, including two who invaded the home of a young mother and tried to break into the bedroom she had locked herself into with her infant son.  This must have been a terrifying experience, but it was not of interest to the MSM.  Zimmerman met with the woman afterward.

    Is Twin Lakes in Sanford an anomaly?

    Like the 911 calls, Justice Department statistics are a click or two away. 

    Between 1976 and 2005, African-Americans, 12.6% of the population in the last census, committed 52.2% of all homicides.

    That is, over the 30-year period, African-Americans committed murder at about 7.33 times the white rate.  (Whites here include Hispanics.)

    Of homicides committed by strangers, on average, 18.77% involved blacks killing whites, while in 5.08% of the cases, whites killed blacks.  African-Americans were therefore nearly 3.7 times more likely to kill a white than a white to kill a black

    Actually, it is worse. As there are about 4 times more Whites then Blacks, an individual Black is about 15 times as likely to kill a White then an individual White to kill a Black person.

    To provide some raw numbers, in 2005, the last year for which the DOJ statistics are available, 10,285 African-Americans committed murders.  As 8.8% of these were "black on white," there were, assuming only one death per murderer, 905 whites killed, almost 2.5 per day.  In the same year, again assuming one killing per perpetrator, 267 blacks were murdered by whites (3.2% of 8,350 killings).

    Crime is a young man’s métier.  The vast majority of the 52.2% of U.S. murders committed by African-Americans are the work of the roughly 2% of the population who are black males between the ages of 15 and 25.

    Would these figures, courtesy of Eric Holder, surprise most Americans?  

    Not if you scroll down to the comments in local papers below stories of murders, like this one on March 31.

    Not if you judge by demographic trends since the 1960s.

    But this is a subject that cannot be mentioned by the national media.  With rare exceptions, when blacks kill whites, it’s local news.

    One of the exceptions was Eve Carson, student body president of UNC, killed by two African-American men on March 5, 2008.  Another white student, Lauren Burk, a freshman at Auburn, was kidnapped and killed by a black man the day before, but because of Carson’s position, her record of public service and academic accomplishments, and, no doubt, her attractiveness, the story was picked up.

    Read more:

  4. The color of crime

    Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder,
    and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
    • When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely
    than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
    • Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and
    Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
    • The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of
    the population that is black and Hispanic.

Leave a Reply. We appreciate a discussion: if you disagree, your comment still is welcome.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.