Trayvon Martin, black rage and political correctness


Trayvon Martin was killed by neighborhood watch activist George Zimmermann. Police accepted Zimmermann’s claim of self defense. Now the political correctness crowd and the Black Rights movement latched on to the case and demand George Zimmermann’s arrest and conviction.  Unopposed and unpunished, the New Black Panther organisation has offered a bounty to hunt down Zimmermann for unnamed purposes. And there is an unspoken assumption that Trayvon would be justified to physically attack Zimmermann had he used any racial slur.

Was it Self Defense or not?

If Trayvon Martin seriously attacked George Zimmermann, then it was self defense. If Zimmermann approached and attacked Trayvon Martin, then it was not self defense.

We can not give the final answer to this question. In a few weeks we hopefully have forensic analysis of the 911 calls, of the Trayvon Martin’s body (to see if he has signs of having hit Zimmermann) and of Zimmermann’s injuries (if this proof has not been lost due to lack of initial police investigation), and of witness statements.

Initially we were quite convinced by Trayvon Martin FAQ that Trayvon did seriously attack Zimmermann. Also note Zimmermann made 40 police reports already, without ever shooting anyone.

But now a police video shows Zimmermann with no blood or visible injury.  Well, we hope (for Zimmermann’s sake) that there is a good explanation, that he got his wounds expertly treated before the video. We could say that if Zimmermann embellished the beating story, that still does not mean that he was not viciously attacked. Like fanatic feminists: "Yes Nafissatou Diallo told dozens of lies about the alleged rape, other rapes, immigration. This does not mean that she wasn’t raped by Dominque Strauss-Kahn"). But it would seriously undermine George Zimmermann’s credibility. If he is an over-zealous racist vigilante,  who shoots an innocent boy, let him get punished.

A few Pro-Trayvon press reports:

Maybe they both were no good? But, once more, we have no investment in either position. We want the TRUTH to be found.

Manipulative press reports due to political correctness?

We see elements of manipulation: seemingly 17 year old Trayvon Martin has only 3 year old photos where he looks like an inoffensive boy, while Zimmermann seems only to have a criminally looking mug shot. And why does no-one clarify Trayvon’s school suspensions (I have never been suspended in school. Have you?).

Justifying black violence

If Zimmermann followed Trayvon, if he, God beware even used the N word, then most people would take it for granted that Trayvon Martin had the right to whoop Zimmermann.

Using the N word is valid reason for serious beating (Video)

It is interesting, the black (?) commentators write that the white guy attacked with a broken bottle. I clearly see him as defensive in the video, trying to keep the black aggressors away from him and only breaking the bottle after being attacked by multiple attackers.

Typically, black violence is seen as justified against the historic white oppressor. (See the Rodney King case). Similarly, women that kill  2 3 4 or mutilate sleeping husbands are excused as acting in self defense, as victims of alleged violence. 

This rage is fed by political correctness ideology. Blacks are told that the reason for all black hardship lies in discrimination by the evil white man. This feeds the rage against the oppressor. If Black poverty and other disadvantages were attributed to their own behavior, their own lower iq and lower impulse control, they would not feel justified to lash back. The same hate is created in women when they believe the pay gap is due to patriarchal oppression and not to female choice, lower work hours, less risk.

Bounty to capture Zimmermann!? To lynch him?

The New Black Panther Party has offered a $10,000 reward for the ‘capture’ of George Zimmerman.

The group’s leader Mikhail Muhammad said the bounty was ‘an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth’.

At a rally for slain teenager Trayvon Martin, the Black Panthers called for 10,000 black men to hunt down Zimmerman, Martin’s shooter who has not been charged over the killing.

Mr. Muhammad said at the gathering in Sanford that his group was planning to apprehend the killer itself.

‘If the government won’t do the job, we’ll do it,’ he said.   2

The police does not want him, he is not in hiding from police.  He probably is hiding form the New Black Panthers and other racist extremists. 

What would they capture him for?  They can not hand him to police. Probably they would kill him. In justified revenge rage against the with oppressor.

So far, no Rico charges. Since the Ku Klux Klan has been disbanded, there are no moderate whites who would call for a "one million whites" march, to protest the organized hate crime group. This is a proven call for violence by an organized group. Very different from the million hoodie walks about an uncertain case.

Whites allow and whitewash black violence, just as males allow and forgive female violence.

Author: Human-Stupidy (Admin)

Honest Research, Truth, Sincerity is our maxim. We hate politally correct falsification, falsification, repression of the truth, academic dishonesty and censorship.

9 thoughts on “Trayvon Martin, black rage and political correctness”


  2. I have no idea what the facts are here but Zimmermann appears to me as someone who liked to play cop and may have done something, like following the boy, to inite some sort of confrontation. It’s up to the court and jury to decide if he’s ever charged. But these Black Panthers should definately be charged with a crime as well as Spike Lee who gave out the address of the wrong people. Remember, he intended to give out the address and he knew it might lead to violence and it did lead to harassment of this couple in their 70’s where they had to flee to a hotel. Lee did apologise and pay them some money but he was probably afraid they he could be charged with some criminal offence as well as sued for damages.

  3. Who was the initial aggressor? Difficult to argue self-defense it you are following the guy and ends up killing him, you had no right to follow him much less confront him, and to boot, you kill him after the confrontation. Zimmerman is DOA

    1. I think you have a right to follow. At a distance, discretely, only watching. Not walking up to 2 feet distance.

      Clearly showing no aggressive intention. And trying to identify as neighborhood watch when possible or when challenged.

      It seems to be common neighborhood watch protocol. So unless Zimmermann violated these rules and walked into Trayvon Martin’s personal space, this would not give Trayvon the right to attack.

      I think you can also peacefully politely “confront”: asking what an unknown guy is doing in the neighborhood. But here it would be very appropriate to first identify yourself first. And if police is on the way, yes, such confrontation is probably inappropriate. But again, it would not give Trayvon Martin the right to whoop George Zimmermann’s Latin ass.

      And in my next article I am asking why Trayvon could not out-run Zimmermann, and why he did not go straight home. Was the community that big he could not quickly get to the safety of his (father’s girlfriend’s) home?

  4. fucking NIGGERS!!! they shout that nigger word in every line, butget puissed when a white man says it.They should die , nigers!!!! is that a reason to beat someone up? goddamn NIGGERSSSS!!!!! Would you niggers rather still be in dark africa? thank the white man for what you have these days!!

Leave a Reply. We appreciate a discussion: if you disagree, your comment still is welcome.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.