6-year-old charged with sexual assault for consensual doctor play

Grant County authorities have accused a 6-year-old boy of first-degree sexual assault of a child for allegedly playing “doctor” with a 5-year-old girl in September.

The case, which is plowing new legal ground in Wisconsin, calls into question when a child’s act can be considered criminal — particularly when it involves behavior some experts say is normal for children that age —

Normal behavior is criminalized (Overcriminalization)

Of course, normal behavior is criminalized at all ages. Playing doctor for kids, adolescent sexuality later, sexting and photographing legal sex acts (child pornography). Or attraction of grown men to adolescent women. All is illegal.

According to the petition for protection or services filed Nov. 12, the girl’s mother found her daughter in the boy’s yard “with her skirt and underpants around her ankles” and the boy sitting underneath her, penetrating her with his finger. The petition alleges the boy “did have sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 12.”

State law defines sexual intercourse, in part, as “intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person’s body.”

Toddlers need legal counsel and classes in stupid adult sex laws

The boy failed to read Human-Stupidity.com’s advice about playing doctor

Typical problems:

  • Only one witness, the mother. If she has a grudge with the boy, his family, or if she is mentally instable suffering from phantasies, her accusation is accepted.
    • The daughter, after being exposed to mother’s hysteria, is not a reliable witness.
    • The boy’s confession to the mother is hearsay. He needs to be read his Miranda rights and be advised to plead the 5th (not to say anything because he could incriminate himself).
    • Furthermore the boy is not fit to stand trial
    • I know, this is ridiculous.
  • language abuse: slightest penetration with the finger is called "sexual intercourse". Why does modern feminist inspired law have to pervert our language?
  • Discrimination against males: why can’t the girl be guilty for statutory rape?
  • No Romeo and Juliet clause for being of similar age

The girl told her mother they were playing “butt doctor” and told authorities the boy only touched her on the outside of her body, court documents state. A third child, a 5-year-old boy, also was with them, but he did not touch her inappropriately, the girl said.

All hinges on mother’s statement. Maybe she is hysterical?

Judge Leineweber refused to dismiss the petitions, saying the relevant part of the sexual assault allegation is the mother’s observations.  Case asks: Can a 6-year-old commit sexual assault?

Next problem:

  • confounding consensual* acts with sexual assault. Did he hold down the girl against her will? Yes, I know, the girl is unable to consent. So is the boy.

The boy needed only to have penetrated the girl and known she was under a certain age, he wrote, adding, “Even the most immature 6-year-old could appreciate these two concepts.”

Why should a 6-year-old know that playing doctor is a felony? Did we teach him?

Why should a boy understand that playing doctor is a heinous crime?  That is about as asinine as criminalizing taking one’s own photos.

has he been taught that in school? Is teaching stupid adult laws a mandatory kindergarten subject? Is Human-Stupidity’s playing doctor advice. Our blog must be mandatory reading in kindergarten.

Why should 6-year-old boys know that consensual doctor play constitutes sexual assault?

He  probably does not know what sex is. But he knows what consent is and the girl certainly consented.

The most immature 6-year-old understands the concept of consent. Adults and judges don’t understand the difference between consensual*  activities and sexual assault/rape.

Playing doctor is normal for 6-year-olds

The boy’s lawyer, Stephen Eisenberg of Madison, called the allegations “crazy” and said he has never heard of a 6-year-old being accused of first-degree sexual assault. The boy is now 7.

Right. A sensible comment.

Sexual exploration normal in young

Dr. Lucy Berliner, director of Harborview Center for Sexual Assault and Traumatic Stress in Seattle, Wash., said it is “completely outside” accepted medical practice to characterize a 6-year-old’s actions as sexual assault.

Another sensible comment

Read the entire case: Case asks: Can a 6-year-old commit sexual assault?

Author: Human-Stupidy (Admin)

Honest Research, Truth, Sincerity is our maxim. We hate politally correct falsification, falsification, repression of the truth, academic dishonesty and censorship.

15 thoughts on “6-year-old charged with sexual assault for consensual doctor play”

  1. Every one who made a comment sounds disturbs in ur own personal life. These are children that needs to learn appropriate games and touching. What 6 yr. Old knows or plays ob/gyn. This is something that should have been reported. what if the boy wanted to play doctor with your daughter or you. As an adult you would not allow it. And correct the boy behavior and tell his parents. Hopefully everything works out well for the children.

  2. @Jesse.
    Are you THICK or what?
    It doesn’t matter whether the 6 yr old boy knows or not – that is the whole point of this post. Of course he doesn’t know anything, but the ‘responsible adults’ that think it’s appropriate to charge him and consequently ruin his whole future know; they know plenty…
    Sorry Jesse, as usual your comments are either stupid or inappropriate and you don’t seem to have suffucient intellectual power to comprehend what is being discussed on this blog.

    Just read but don’t comment – you’re making a fool of yourself and your feminist colleagues whenever you do.

  3. I was checking e-mail on Yahoo! earlier and came across this article about the discovery of a missing 7 yr old girl’s body in a trash container in Georgia:

    http://news.yahoo.com/gbi-body-found-search-missing-ga-girl-192436957.html

    This is a very tragic story, but what is most noteworthy about it is the HATRED expressed by ALL of the commenters.
    The cause of the childs death has not even been established yet, although admittedly does appear very convincingly to be the work of a child molester.
    I wonder how many children are killled even per week in the USA by being run down by out of control motor vehicles with drunk drivers behind the wheel?
    Such deaths would these days not even get mentioned in the local newspaper, let alone make it to the homepage of Yahoo.com.
    Even if such stories of accidental deaths of children did get reported in mainstream news media, there would be very little if any at all HATE expressed towards the drunk drivers responsible. WHY?
    Because the western world have been brainwashed by the ingenious social engineering of the feminazi party (which now practically control the world) to HATE paedophiles…
    And of course ‘paedophiles’ meaning all men or should that be ‘male-persons’ according to their approved politically correct language?
    I agree that the death of this little girl was horrible and the circumstances sure appear to be henous to put things mildly, however there are thousands of other causes of children’s death, but nobody seems to think they are important.
    What is important it seems, is following the feminazi dogma like sheep and believe that all paedophiles are murdering scum and persecute them all; even if they’ve done nothing to anyone.
    I would imagine by now all the local ‘paedos’ in Georgia will be bracing themselves for the inevitable arrival of visiting lynch-mobs, that believe they should all be killed, that will throw rocks through their windows etc., even when the cause of death of the little girl is unknown…
    And now to mention it: why aren’t drunk drivers who have killed people as a result of their drunken anti-social behaviour registered on a publicly accessible offender list?
    The feminists should be very proud of themselves, their social engineering and propaganda skills would make someone like Adolf Hitler hide in embarrassment, making him and his once Nazi party’s hate campaign against Jews and other non-Ariyan races comparable with the local church’s annual pantomime.
    However, as this site is dubbed ‘Human-Stupidity’, none of the behaviour demonstrated by the masses over this and numerous similar cases should be at all surprising – all of those commenters on the Yahoo article behaving like brainless sheep being lead to the slaughter house; hence this post…

  4. not to worry, this world is corrupt, it wont be around forever, so the boy should just grow up and live a ok life, cause this evil world wont be around forever. He is only six, if they treat him badly he could actually turn into a sexual offender, actually when he is 18(if this worlds still around that is) Putting him on that list might actually make him into one, cause this is going to follow him through out his life.

    1. This world is what people make of it and it’s going no where anytime soon. Not everyone grows up to be a sex offender just because of encounters like this or by being treated badly. I like your positive thinking on this issue but he is only 6 and doesn’t know better. The legal system is one sided and flawed. Look on the bright side. At least he’s not an adult that has had his life ripped apart due to a criminal charge due to one vicious individual.

  5. I have never heard of your web site until today. I found this article at In Male Fide but wanted to comment here where I hope the author can see it. This was excellent analysis. My son is almost 5 years old, and I am now thinking twice about letting him play with anyone outside of my sight or my wife’s sight. It’s a shame, but given the reality of incidents like this one, it’s clear there are some profoundly evil people in this world who can and will destroy your life if they can. Keep up the good work.

    1. Your son is in danger of being considered a predator for doing what kids do. As someone mentioned, the laws are stacked against men, because if the girl was fumbling him he probably would be charged with indecent exposure.

      Later on, in college, any girl can accuse your son of rape, even if he did nothing. The new “preponderance of evidence” law will make sure he will be kicked out of college, if not jailed. Or he can be convicted of 5 second rape, if she says stop in the middle of a consensual sexual encounter.

      You are in danger of being accused of being a predator towards your own son or his friends. You are in danger of being accused of rape by your own wife. And if your wife leaves you, you will go to jail if you ever are unable to pay the high child and spousal support you will be required to pay.

      The law has made the world is a dangerous place for men, and that starts at toddler age.

  6. authorities have accused a 6-year-old boy of first-degree sexual assault of a child for allegedly playing “doctor” with a 5-year-old girl in September.

    Regardless of what happened, I assure you it will always be the male who is arrested. If she played doctor with him and was “examining his genitals, he would have been arrested for indecent exposure.

    We already have laws where if a man stops to look at a naked woman standing in the window, he is arrested as a peeping tom, if she looks at a man who is naked walking by a window, he is arrested for indecent exposure.

    We have several states that have laws against a man having an erection in public but I bet no woman no matter how little she is dressed will ever be arrested for aiding and betting a crime.

  7. State law defines sexual intercourse, in part, as “intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person’s body.”

    This means if someone is chocking and I reach in to pull something out that they are choking on, I have had sexual intercourse with them?

  8. An interesting fact left out of the article is that the girl’s father is the city adiministrator of the town in which the “crime” allegedly happened. What role, if any, did he play in persuading the DA to go forward with this unprecedented legal action? A comprehensive legal search of the entire US found no six year old has ever been convicted of first degree sexual assault, yet the DA in this rural town has decided to pioneer new legal ground? Sound suspicious to me. Additionally, the DA has received documentation from at least three medical experts who have personally examined the boy and found that not only is he not a sexual predator, but that the continued legal action on the part of Grant County is definitely damaging the boy. As this circus unfolds, this information will become part of the public record. Why would the DA, knowing this, proceed? That is what this story is REALLY about. Hell just got a little more crowded.

Leave a Reply. We appreciate a discussion: if you disagree, your comment still is welcome.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.