Racial profiling 1 2 3 is illegal, in spite of clear proof that certain races commit multiple times more violent crime. But gender profiling is written into law (Violence against women act) in spite of proof that women resort to domestic violence just as much as men.
Stereotyping Certain Races as Having a Greater Propensity to Commit Crimes Is Absolutely Prohibited. Some have argued that overall discrepancies in crime rates among racial groups could justify using race as a factor in general traffic enforcement activities and would produce a greater number of arrests for non-traffic offenses (e.g., narcotics trafficking). We emphatically reject this view. It is patently unacceptable and thus prohibited under this guidance for federal law enforcement officers to engage in racial profiling. 4
Of course, ignoring common sense and inconvertible crime statistics are an impediment to police work. It violates the human rights of law abiding citizens by exposing them to more crime. And violates the human rights of old white ladies that needlessly get searched so police don’t look racially biased when searching young Arab or black men.
On the bright side, a German court recently acknowledged the right of police to search suspects by skin color, when on trains usually used by illegal immigrants.
Statistically, the black man with skittles and hoodie below has a 10-100 time greater chance of being a violent criminal then our two protesters above and aside. 6
That suspicion, of course, would not warrant shooting a black man for his skin color. But it might be justified to be more careful and to check him out. Even the politically correct protesters and even honest law abiding blacks would change to the other side of the street, were they to encounter a group of such black people.
Generations of blacks have now been told they are victims, whites are evil and blacks are entitled to free money, housing and everything else when very few blacks alive today have ever faced systematic discrimination. If they have faced discrimination it is because responsible blacks are grouped with the great many blacks in America that cause such tremendous crime and problems.
If Whites are held responsible for actions committed by members of my race centuries ago [slavery], shouldn’t it be fair for law abiding Blacks to be held responsible for the black thugs and criminals? It’s simple logic but not so easy under the laws of political correctness.
50 years of welfare, social programs and excuses has had a tremendously negative effect on the black race in America. Blacks under perform nearly across the board when compared with other races. Why? Political correctness, liberal politics, ignorance and hate. It is easier for blacks, as a whole, to blame their station in society on white people for slavery than it is to blame themselves for making bad life decisions. Most people who are not black are taught actions have consequences. Young blacks are taught they can do or say whatever and they will be excused. This is why we are seeing a growing number of brazen attacks by groups of young blacks on whites these days. These young black thugs believe there will be no consequences. But there are consequences, even in the ridiculous world of political correctness. That is why such a large percentage of prisoners are black. Political correctness tells us it’s because of racist judges, police and laws…but the realistic know it is simply because so many blacks commit crimes. 8
Whites, and men, are not protected classes
Here are some more shocking statistics: More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year. Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks. […]On a per-capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crimes than Whites. 6
Whites don’t have race consciousness as blacks do. Whites don’t show up in thousands to defend other whites. Not as victims, much less if they are actual criminals like Rodney King. Similarly men would never defend male criminals as women feminists defend female criminals like Lorena Bobbitt, Mary Winkler, Rita Graveline and Susan Falls.
Now would you racially profile here? Just because certain dog races are more prone to violence and inflicting serious bodily harm, that does not allow one to discriminate.
Sometimes cute white poodles might bite, and a big vicious guard dog can be friendly and might not bite. Furthermore, the dog suffers from trauma and discrimination because it spent a lot of his life chained and did not get pampered by a luxury owner like little poodle.
Similarly, it is very unfair to discriminate against sausage dogs in the races. After all,
Trayvon Martin vs. George Zimmermann: premature rush to conclusions
The rush to judgment among some prominent voices on the left assumes George Zimmerman is responsible for a terrible hate crime, and that isn’t fair to Mr. Zimmerman. He hasn’t even been charged, much less been afforded the due process to which all Americans are entitled. This is not a defense of Mr. Zimmerman; it is a defense of a sacrosanct Constitutional process being short-circuited by assumptions and rage.
On the other hand, some prominent conservative voices want to label it all a tragedy exploited by race-baiting pimps and leave it at that. They are unwilling to entertain the possibility that the black community’s rage in this case might be fueled by an otherwise valid perception that, in general, innocent black men too often are presumed guilty by a racially biased criminal justice system.
Responsible voices should insist that the black community’s rage is, at best, premature in this particular case. 9
Trayvon Martin vs. George Zimmermann Link List
Trayvon Martin, black rage and political correctness– Race and IQ Human-Stupidity.com