Pedophilia apology 33 years ago: withdrawal of candidacy to German Parliament.

Pedophilia apology, 33 years ago, prompts Dagmar Döring to withdraw her candidacy to the German parliament for the Liberal FDP party.

 

The texts were discovered by researcher Franz Walter, hired by the German Green Party to research their own party’s involvement in efforts to decriminalize child sexuality.

40 years ago, the child sex trauma myth and Voodoo theory had not yet become the religious dogma (Disclaimer). The Rind study had not yet been unanimously condemned by the US Congress and Senate. A decent percentage of Germans practiced nudism at most beaches, rivers. So nudes of all ages could be readily seen during summer. Legal Dutch hardcore porn employed 15 and 16 year old actresses engaging in sex acts. British newspapers had topless 15 and 16 year old page 3 girls.

Dagmar Döhring went beyond Daniel Cohn Bendit. He described how he behaved passively when anti-authoritarian children opened his fly and played with him.

Dagmar Döring stated how she could be only satisfied by a long relation with a girl. Her boy friend had a relation with  13 year old boy that was cruelly ended after it was discovered. Dagmar Döring wrote how she would fight all these unjust cruel laws that criminalized such behavior.

If she were in Britain or the US, she probably would go to prison, once the victims come forward to sue for millions. No real victims are needed. Anyone claiming to have been abused will be automatically believed as there is no due process for those accused of sex crimes.

Human-Stupidity will not take a position towards liberating child sex (disclaimer) But we want to stress the following facts:

 

 

More in "Der Spiegel"

Share

Author: Human-Stupidy (Admin)

Honest Research, Truth, Sincerity is our maxim. We hate politally correct falsification, falsification, repression of the truth, academic dishonesty and censorship.

3 thoughts on “Pedophilia apology 33 years ago: withdrawal of candidacy to German Parliament.”

  1. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Children engaging in consensual sex or being raped should be treated no differently to other forms of speech deemed unpalatable to many (such as beheadings and death row executions). Freedom of Speech means nothing if undesired speech is censored due to dogmatic beliefs.
    There will always be those that dislike certain forms of speech – but that’s the whole point to having Freedom of Speech laws: to make democracy one where the mob is unable to silence the minorities.
    I am trying to get help with a site (still inits infancy) dealing with this matter – anyone willing to help me would be much appreciate -> http://www.endchildexploitation.comlu.com

  2. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Unfortunately, you can’t use logic to debate articles of faith. For example, G. Murray probably didn’t even read most of the links you provided. It’s not as simple as “child pornography is bad.” Destroying the lives of children, because of ridiculous laws, is far worse.

Leave a Reply. We appreciate a discussion: if you disagree, your comment still is welcome.