How all due process got dismantled in rape accusations. Feminst power at its best.
Feminism overrides the constitution! Amazing! Rules of due process, presumption of innocence, “innocent until proven guilty”, are fundamental or constitutional law in most countries. Feminists managed to override constitutional guarantees, as they managed to change thousand year old definitions of legal terms like “rape” and “child” (see: Female evolutionary Superiority in social manipulation causes feminist Language Distortions’ universal acceptance ).
Highly recommended reading:
Domestic violence fairytales threaten constitutional protections
SPECIAL REPORT
Are Domestic Violence Policies Respecting
Our Fundamental Freedoms?
All the following content was shamelessly copied from falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/07/if-presumptively-innocent-are-given.html I could not say it any better, and shortening it is a pity.
- Prior to the great wave of rape reforms starting in the 1970s, rape advocates reported, with seemingly infinite invention, that women were too scared, too embarrassed, too certain of its futility to report their own rapes. The sexual grievance industry insisted that rape was underreported, and that reforms were needed to do justice to countless women who suffered in silence the brutal indignity of rape. So we kowtowed to the sexual grievance industry to solve “the problem.”
- First, we adopted laws that eliminated the requirement of corroboration, which de facto served to flip the old law on its head: now, women don’t need any corroboration of their claims, but men and boys are arrested based solely on even the far-fetched say-so of any woman or girl if they can’t produce corroborating evidence of their innocence.
That wasn’t enough, they said. So we adopted rape shield laws that forbade almost any evidence of the accuser’s prior sexual history with persons other than the accused, a rule that resulted in innumerable innocent men and boys being sent to prison for alleged rapes that never occurred. - That wasn’t enough, they said. So we adopted laws that eliminated the requirement of force, and innocent men and boys who misunderstood the acquiescence of a woman were sent to prison.
- That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted laws that eliminated the mens rea requirement for rape. Historically, in a rape prosecution, the guilty defendant must have had the intention to have intercourse with a woman without her consent. Too stringent, said the sexual grievance industry, and the requirement was lightened or dropped altogether.
- That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted laws (in the UK and a handful of US states) that legally forbade naming rape accusers. In the US, the news agencies and outlets have, by common consensus, agreed not to name rape accusers. The mere allegation of rape by the anonymous female, without any other evidence and no matter how far-fetched, invites a man’s name to be splashed all over the newspaper, TV, radio and Internet for the world to titillate at the details of his humiliation.
- That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted laws that lengthened and even eliminated statutes of limitations for rape, and now, men are sometimes accused of and charged with alleged rapes that occurred 20, 30, 40 or more years after they supposedly occurred, effectively foreclosing the accused from mounting a meaningful defense because the evidence of their innocence has long disappeared.
- That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted VAWA which, among many other things, pays the legal bills of alleged victims of sexual assault. VAWA pays none of the legal bills of men accused of rape, the presumed innocent — even those who were falsely accused. In the UK, it’s worse. They compensate alleged rape victims, even the ones not subjected to any physical force, no matter how slight their injuries; the UK does not compensate men falsely accused of rape, no matter how egregious their harm. Sometimes false rape accusers are compensated.
- That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted laws that exempted rape accusers from taking polygraph tests as a condition to proceeding with the rape investigation. In contrast, using polygraphs on men accused of rape is routine, and often if men don’t submit to them, even flimsy charges won’t be dropped. (Moreover, polygraphs are routinely used to insure that sex offenders (predominantly male) are adhering to the terms of their probation, and a refusal to take the polygraph will land the person refusing in jail.)
- That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted Fed.R.Evid. 413 and many states adopted similar laws. Unlike any other criminal charge, including murder, assault, even planning the World Trade Center attacks, a rape trial in federal court and in various states allows evidence of the defendant’s commission of prior offenses (specifically, his prior offenses of sexual assault) to show that he has a propensity for committing the crime at issue. This rule, which is unique in all of American jurisprudence and widely condemned by legal scholars, allows the jury to hear about the defendant’s prior acts whether or not the defendant takes the stand. Even accusations of prior sexual offenses that occurred years before — and even crimes for which the defendant was acquitted — are admissible if the alleged act is proven by just a preponderance of the evidence (far lower than beyond a reasonable doubt). This is sometimes all a jury needs to convict the man or boy of the crime at issue.
- That wasn’t enough, they said. So we enacted rules on college campuses making it easier and easier to expel males accused of sexual wrongdoing, with kangaroo courts and inquisitorial hearing processes. Many college campuses adopted rules that say rape accusers can’t be charged with underage drinking in connection with their accusation, thus providing yet one more motive to lie about rape for any young woman looking to evade an underage drinking charge.
But surely these massive reforms must have cut into underreporting of rape? Surely after decades of one reform after the next to encourage women to come forward, the women must be lining up, right? - Well, no, we are told. Nothing has ever worked to curb alleged underreporting, and underreporting is supposedly still rampant. As but one example, on college campuses, the supposed hotbed for modern rape, more than ninety five percent of students who are sexually assaulted supposedly remain silent, we are told. All the rape reforms, all the bending over backwards to get victims to “come forward” have been a waste of time. [ . . . ]
- In one of the most despicable assertions ever uttered in the rape context, Chair of Women Against Rape Ruth Hall said the following: “There will be lots more rape victims” if the presumptively innocent accused of rape are afforded anonymity until they are charged.” Now alleged underreporting is being wielded in a last ditch effort to stop the plan for anonymity for the presumptively innocent. This plan, you must know, will not grant anonymity until conviction but only until a man is charged. It is, thus, the most modest reform imaginable to protect innocent men, scarcely a reform at all, if truth be told. But to the sexual grievance industry, any support for the presumptively innocent is too much support.
Content shamelessly copied from falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/07/if-presumptively-innocent-are-given.html
This fits very nicely with other blog articles here
I showed in prior posts that many real problems, serious problems could be solved if they were attacked with the same vigor that feminists applied especially to “crimes” against females. These problems could be solved if attacked with the same vigor: bullyism, mafia intimidation, and the global health threat number one, child obesity. Feminsts are so concerned with the well being of our kids and are not concerned about millions of children condemned to an unhealty life of obesity, diabetes and premature death. See some of my suggestions how attitudes similar to the above measures could solve the deadly world health crisis of obesity from childhood into adulthood.
- “Child Food-Porn” (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy
- Food Porn arouses Lust for Food with No Nutritional Value
- Childhood Obesity Promotion: Cartoon characters attract kids to junk food
Blogroll update « Michael Eriksson's Blog says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] leave a comment » During my searches for the last entry, I found one very interesting post titled Rape Laws: dismantling of due process explained step by stepe. [...]
December 12, 2010, 1:56 am"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different types of rape! | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] decades in jail because only now the DNA test could prove their innocence. Normal constitutional due process rules are invalidated for legal court proceedings in rape accusations: "Guilty until proven [...]
April 21, 2011, 8:35 pm"Protection from Abuse" (restraining) order is Abuse | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] from abuse order is ruinous abuse. No due process* Nor presumption of innocence. If the request is granted (as it probably will be), the man (98% of [...]
May 1, 2011, 5:40 pmArrest Arnold Schwarzenegger for rape, harassment, with no bail! | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] about rape and are instantly believed. Furthermore, our legal system and constitutional rights to due process are not valid in rape and child abuse cases. Men accused of rape are guilty until proven [...]
May 19, 2011, 5:15 amArrest Arnold Schwarzenegger for Rape and Harassment, Without Bail! says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] about rape and are instantly believed. Furthermore, our legal system and constitutional rights to due process are not valid in rape and child abuse cases. Men accused of rape are guilty until proven [...]
May 25, 2011, 4:00 pmTeenage sexuality: The immense complexity of local laws, state lines and international travel | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] are even worse for adolescents then for adults. Like in Marco’s case in Turkey, there always is the aggravating circumstance that potentially false accusations of abuse, sex, and rape (especially against males) are always believed. The accused is arrested, tried and convicted, under complete disregard of constitutional human rights of due legal process. [...]
May 28, 2011, 6:25 amKachelmann trial: Jörg Kachelmann’s court verdict May 31. Not guilty? | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] of due process from our court system in rape and child abuse [...]
May 30, 2011, 3:52 pmNot guilty verdict in Jörg Kachelmann rape accusation trial | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] of due process from our court system in rape and child abuse [...]
May 31, 2011, 6:05 amGerman Weatherman Jörg Kachelmann Found Not Guilty of Rape for Lack of Evidence says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] of due process from our court system in rape and child abuse [...]
May 31, 2011, 10:44 amSome “Rapes” ARE Less Serious Than Others, So Mr. Kenneth Clarke is Right! says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] dogmatic belief that “women don’t lie about rape,” the perverted suspension of due process, and the “presumption of guilt of the accused in rape cases”, it is very easy to be [...]
June 1, 2011, 4:01 amRadical masculism: a necessity to fight back against radical feminists on level playing field. | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] repression, police power to ruthlessly roll back constitutional rights, the Magna Carta, due process. Feminism has changed the world into a medieval nightmare of laws stacked against men. A level [...]
June 10, 2011, 10:22 pmRadical Masculism: A Necessity to Fight Radical Feminists says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] repression, and police power to ruthlessly roll back constitutional rights, the Magna Carta, and due process. Feminism has changed the world into a medieval nightmare of laws stacked against men. A level [...]
June 14, 2011, 4:01 amWhat’s So Awful About Rape? Rape is Not as Bad as it Used to Be! says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] stem the ever growing number of non-violent and even consensual types of rape, and to reinstitute due process and constitutional rights for the accused. Rape has ceased to be a special crime (see (1)), so we [...]
June 16, 2011, 4:01 amMen ruined & destroyed by feminist legal system driven to self immolation & murder | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] language, whining complaints, male benevolent chivalry, and pure male manipulability removed due process, justice, constitutional rights and freedom. Men were no match for concerted manipulations [...]
June 20, 2011, 5:08 amMen Ruined & Destroyed By the Feminist Legal System Driven to Self-Immolation & Murder says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] the chivalrous instincts of men, and the gullibility of men ended with the abolition of due process, justice, constitutional rights and freedom. Men were no match for concerted manipulations [...]
June 21, 2011, 4:00 am15 y criminal runaway is 20 y on her valid state ID: strict liability puts men in prison for sex, possession of child porn | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] this not counter any understanding of human rights and due process of any sane American or European person? Is this not a pure witch hunt, totally unjust, unfair, [...]
July 26, 2011, 5:59 amIf Underage Porn Stars Use Fake IDs, Their Male Paramours Can STILL Be Arrested for Creating Child Porn! says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] this not counter to any understanding of human rights and due process of any sane American or European person? Is this not a pure witch hunt, totally unjust, unfair, and [...]
August 10, 2011, 12:01 pmWay Over Half of All Rape Accusations Are False, According to Bavarian Police Report says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] then rape. Even when reported, conviction rates are very low. So it is more then fair to remove due process rights for alleged false rape accusers to assure higher conviction rates, the same way [...]
August 15, 2011, 12:00 pmOne in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guilty, jailed, slandered without due process, escaped. Others are not so lucky! | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] are false. Like Strauss-Kahn, thousands of men are presumed guilty, jailed and smeared without due process. They can not afford to spend millions of dollars for bail, a dream team of lawyers, detectives, [...]
August 23, 2011, 4:05 pmOne in Two Rape Accusations Are False! Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Presumed Guilty, Jailed, Slandered and Denied Due Process, Got Lucky says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] are false. Like Strauss-Kahn, thousands of men are presumed guilty, jailed, slandered, and denied due process. They can not afford to spend millions of dollars for bail, a dream team of lawyers, detectives, [...]
August 24, 2011, 4:01 amOne woman among the top 100 chess players. But 40% quotas in management and parliament? | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] law has been used to systematically discriminate against men in sports and to subvert due process in sexual assault [...]
March 11, 2012, 7:40 pmSafety guide for men from being deemed a rapist | Centre for Men's Rights says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] is due process guaranteed by constitutions and the Magna Carta. In rape and sexual abuse cases, due process has been all but abolished, leading [...]
April 1, 2012, 5:46 amFrench presidential election was decided by Nafissatou Diallo. And by feminist rape and harassment laws | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[...] Socialist Hollande triumphs in French presidential poll, thanks to Nafissatou Diallo and feminist rape and harassment laws. Hollande had already declared he would run against Strauss-Kahn in the [...]
May 6, 2012, 4:51 pmPedophilia apology 33 years ago: withdrawal of candidacy to German Parliament. | oogenhand says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[…] needed. Anyone claiming to have been abused will be automatically believed as there is no due process for those accused of sex […]
August 11, 2013, 9:46 amJapan will need euthanasia | oogenhand says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[…] rape, family court, domestic violence laws, alimony, child support, debtor’s prison, lack of due process are all stacked against […]
February 4, 2014, 11:43 amRape Hysteria’s legal proceedings questioned by Spiked Online | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[…] rape hysteria re-defines and extends rape definitions with manipulative language, abolishes due process, and infantilizes women whose enthusiastic consent is frequently invalid. The goal is to convict as […]
May 19, 2014, 6:39 amAmerican Family Courts’s wholesale destruction of constitutional rights | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[…] Court" tramples due process, puts men into life long indentured slavery, confiscates property worth Millions and Billions, […]
June 15, 2014, 3:12 amI renounce my Female Legal Privileges | Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception says:
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[…] waive my rights derived from rape shield laws and I accept due process [19]. I am strong and empowered to respond to cross examination exactly as any male victim of […]
October 11, 2014, 8:26 pm