Month: December 2019

From holocaust denial to race/gender equality denial

Lawyers and historians who testified in court in defense of holocaust deniers, are threatened with prosecution[note] for themselves being in violation of holocaust denial laws: Switzerland: Prison Term for ‘Holocaust Denial’, more cases of lawyer and expert witness intimidation can be found and cited[/note]. Such a blanket prohibition of speech, where truth is no valid defense[note]

[/note], can lead down the slippery slope to hate speech laws and repression of #TrueSpeech.  Denying that the Nazi holocaust killed 6 million Jews is a felony[note]Prosecutions and convictions[/note] in many countries. “Scholars have pointed out that countries that specifically ban Holocaust denial generally have legal systems that limit speech in other ways, such as banning “hate speech“.”[Laws against Holocaust denial|Wikipedia]

  • Disclaimer: I do NOT deny the Holocaust, I am not a historian.
  • But we point out that, regarding minority crime today,  #TrueSpeech is Forbidden, True Facts are Taboo.
  • Note: European internet companies such as Swiss protonmail [note]ProtonMail will only disclose the limited information on our users that we have if served with a valid Swiss court order. Please see the Data Disclosure section of our Privacy Policy: https://protonmail.com/privacy-policy “ We will only disclose the limited user data we possess if we are instructed to do so by a fully binding request coming from the competent Swiss authorities (legal obligation). While we may comply with electronically delivered notices (see exceptions below), the disclosed data can only be used in court after we have received an original copy of the court order by registered post or in person, and provide a formal response.”[/note] can be forced to turn over your information to authorities when accused of holocaust denial, and probably for hate speech. Their privacy guarantees are misleading.
  • 91-Year-Old Swede Convicted for Anti-Islam Hate Speech
  • The EU’s relentless attack on free speech – spiked
  • Free Speech Found Guilty by Europe

Reposted from Sincerity.net

more links[note]

[/note]

Switzerland: Prison Term for ‘Holocaust Denial’

On April 10, 2000, a Swiss court sentenced 79-year-old publicist and retired teacher Gaston-Armand Amaudruz to one year in prison for “denying” the existence of homicidal gas chambers in World War II German concentration camps. […]

Continue reading “From holocaust denial to race/gender equality denial”

Social media “community standards” don’t allow “content” that encourages hatred against protected groups.

  1. As in hate speech laws[note]Hate speech is speech that violates PesseKodex12.1’s restrictions. Hate speech laws enforce #TrueSpeech restrictions upon everyone, under penalty of the law.[/note] *[note] This is why “Kill the [South African White] Boer” or “kill all white men”[22,23,24,25] is not hate speech, while “My daughter was raped by a Pakistani Muslim” is hate speech. In dishonest PC fashion, “Hate Speech” has nothing to do with what the normal person understands as hate.[/note], it is not allowed to say anything negative about a “protected group” aka “minority”[note]some of the confusion about “majority minority”, about minorities that are in numerical majority, can be avoided by this term “protected group”. [/note]
  2. It is irrelevant if the disallowed “content” is factually true (#TrueSpeech).
  3. It is ok to encourage hate against an unprotected group[note] “White Kills Black” is Fit to Print. [/note]

Reprinted with permission from Sincerity.net

“Community standards”[note]It would be interesting to compare community standards, and their interpretations, from 8 years ago, when social networks still subscribed to free speech and #TrueSpeech[/note] are just  another version of the #PCGagOrder re-formulated[note]Racism taboo ⇔ PC gag order [⇔ PresseKodex12.1 ⇔ Stylebook ethics] (are all equivalent) The root cause of our societal lies, dishonesties, subsequent misunderstandings, and deadly policy mistakes * *, is any one of these: the racism taboo or …[/note]. Community standards are another WRITTEN PROOF of repression of #TrueSpeech with PesseKodex12.1’s restrictions

“Encouraging hatred” is interpreted very widely[12].  with typical PC dishonesty.   Negative facts might encourage “hatred” against “protected groups” aka “minorities”. The #PCGagOrder is officially enforced by YouTube and FaceBook. Forbidden to say anything negative about minorities, to avoid stirring up prejudices.   This #PCGagOrder is enforced by Hate speech laws, and social media.

“We also don’t allow any content that encourages hatred of another person or group of people based on their membership in a protected group”

That interview was one of fourteen videos that YouTube banned from the E. Michael Jones channel on YouTube in June. As with other thirteen, the only explanation YouTube gave was that the video violated its rules concerning hate speech, I.e., “We also don’t allow any content that encourages hatred of another person or group of people based on their membership in a protected group.” YouTube’s notice did not identify the offending hate speech or the “protected group.” Source

Continue reading “Social media “community standards” don’t allow “content” that encourages hatred against protected groups.”