‘I Didn’t Want To Appear Racist’ and thus did not pursue child abuse and rapes perpetrated by Pakistanis, say British police.
Up to 1,400 children were sexually exploited in Rotherham. Children as young as 11 were trafficked, beaten, and raped by large numbers of men between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, a review into child protection has revealed.
How could this have happened? A clue is given by the report’s authors, who state that ‘several staff their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist’.
So "minorities" have free reign to pursue rape, child abuse, and statutory rape, whole sale and over decades!
Feminist women are only interested in exotic types of *consensual rape, date rape, rape culture of drunk college girls repenting what they did the evening before. Race is no boundary, black athletes routinely get persecuted, prosecuted, and convicted. But if rape is exclusively perpetrated by a "protected class", then feminists shut up.
Real, violent rape is of no interest to feminists. Very interesting.
Feminists’ Failure on Rotherham
In Rotherham there is a real-life “rape culture.” But you will not learn anything new about it from Salon, the Daily Beast, Jezebel, or Slate. It has gone unmentioned at Feministing, Bitch Media, or the Feminist Majority Foundation. There have been no outraged op-eds from Jenny Kutner, Jessica Valenti, or Samantha Leigh Allen.
Feminists’ Deafening Silence on Rotherham
After news came out that some 1,400 English girls, including some as young as 11, were lured and coerced into sex slavery by Pakistani gangs in North England, there’s been a media blackout in feminist circles about the crimes. All it takes is one false rape allegation leveled against white college boys by a stripper (now a convicted murderer) to send feminists like Amanda Marcotte into a frenzy of bloodlust, but when well over a thousand underage girls are victims of a huge, Muslim-run sex trafficking organization in England, silence. […]
What feminists really care about is power, whether it comes at men’s or women’s expense. They will not break ranks with their allies in this struggle for political dominance, even if their allies are raping women left and right. They don’t care.
1400 rapes. Statutory, forcible?
We wish there were an analysis into the nature of the offenses, if it was *consensual or forcible rape. It seems there were plenty of real forcible rapes. If the perpetrator were white, nobody would forgive statutory rape:
- Why Jeremy Forrest was right to fall in love with an 15 year old underage girl but hunted down internationally and savagely punished
Muslims have more leeway
The ‘identity politics’ obscenities in the Rotherham Pakistani gang-rape culture scandal
- There are almost no white on black rapes:
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0702.pdf Page 30 table 42.
- Geert Wilders in court for offending Muslims (who threaten his life and already killed Theo van Gogh)
- UN demands Germany repress free Speech. Political Correctness rules the world
- UK: Police stop and search innocent white people to balance race figures, terror watchdog says
Unarmed Black gentle giant beats White man to death, unprovoked. Where are the riots?
Had the white man at least racially profiled the Black perpetrator or even used the N-word, one could se e
11 thoughts on “"Police did not want to appear racist", thus let 1400 children be abused over 15 years”
“In light of what you’ve written on this blog about paedohysteria, including the ridiculous definitions of “rape” and “childhood” running rampant in the media, why did you plunge head first into agreement with the confounded official narrative?”
I can only think it’s because his hatred of brown people is even greater than his wish to avoid becoming the victim of a sexual holocaust.
In light of what you’ve written on this blog about paedohysteria, including the ridiculous definitions of “rape” and “childhood” running rampant in the media, why did you plunge head first into agreement with the confounded official narrative?
Political correctness gone mad.
Next time you see a fuzzy sweater wearing liberal arts professor at a college campus- be sure to thank them!
The same happened in Australia. Child abuse, sexual assault and rape in aboriginal communities was ignored because of an unwillingness to criticise these people who were living “in harmony with the land”
Well I attempted to look at some of the absurdities of the Rotherham report here: https://holocaust21.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/rotherham-abuse-inquiry-liars-liars-pants-on-fire/
The report is very anecdotal and throws in one or two violent rapes in a sea of ‘consensual’ rapes. And it is written by a radical feminist IMO… So I’m not sure I agree with the analysis that ‘feminists are ignoring real abuse’… The Rotherham report is very much a radical feminist report.
@holocaust21, very interesting.
I suspected that this is mainly “consensual” rape, where Pakistani simply pick girls that are not rooted in stable social family networks.
So they are convicted on feminist rape definitions. Still, feminists are surprisingly non-vocal on this. They tiptoe around racial issues. This is very complex, various taboos and PC issues involved so press reports are far from truth.
Believe me, if this were half a dozen white nerds, that never touched a minor, but exchanged nude photos of 17 year olds, they would be all over this, feminists, religious right, everyone.
Please keep commenting, you might want to pick these categories:
teenage sexuality and child porn witch hunt
other categories might be either of no interest to you, or, possibly even offensive to you.