In defense of Pedophilia

Pedophilia, *consensual* underage sex is not traumatic when it happens, rather only later, when the “victim” is told how terrible a victim she is. Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading »
In defense of Pedophilia
» continues here »

In defense of Pedophilia” attacks the age of consent taboo topic, regarding sex with 17 year old “children”  in typical judgmental judgybitch fashion (Disclaimer).

So I ended up in this completely retarded conversation on Facebook in reference to this case in Sweden, in which a 27 year old had sex with a very physically mature  13 year old whom he thought was much older. Sweden, believe it or not, is relatively sane about this sort thing, and refused to prosecute the man for “child rape”.  In defense of Pedophilia

In the USA “statutory rape” 17 year old children is a *strict liability crime. You had sex with a minor, it is “rape”.

There is absolutely no excuse. If she is 17 years and 364 days old, and she forced herself onto you while you were passed out drunk, if s/he showed you a valid ID emitted by a US government entity proving s/he is over 18, all that does not change the fact that s/he was “raped”.

Age of consent laws

It is perfectly legitimate to think

  1. “Sex at a young age is unwise”
  2. “I don’t want my young daughter to have sex”

This is very different from Age of consent laws that imply that

  • under all circumstances, with no exception, a sex act with a person under the age of consent is considered terrible enough to warrant heavy handed government intervention.

Thanks to the Antifeminist (author of the sexual trade union theory) for having called my attention  to JudgyBitch – ‘In “defence” of pedophilia’.  It is also worth reading the very open minded comments in in defense of Pedophilia.

Science does not support Age of consent laws


The peer reviewed Rind Study appeared in one of the most prestigious journals of the American Psychological Society. Never before or after has a scientific meta analysis been condemned by the unanimous vote of both the US senate and Congress. Susan Clancy, unintentionally stumbled upon the same truth again, that *consensual* underage sex is not traumatic when it happens, rather only later, when the “victim” is told how terrible a victim she is. (Disclaimer)

1970’ies movements to legalize underage sex

In the sexual liberation age of the 1970’ies, there were movements to legalize

  1. illegal sodomy and homosexuality
  2. illegal underage sex

It is interesting that homosexuals became a protected group whose legitimacy must not even be doubted. And pedophiles became the pariah of the earth, (Disclaimer)

  1. Pedophilia apology 33 years ago: withdrawal of candidacy to German Parliament.
  2. Pedophilia everywhere, in 1970ies Europe. Green Party Daniel Cohn Bendit’s quagmire


Girl begging to be “raped” (Video).

No matter how much she insists on sex, the man would be a “rapist”, because she is drunk. If she was not drunk, but underage, the man would still be a rapist. Even if the man himself was drunk and the woman was not.

This led to insane child porn laws

Cruel child porn laws kill, “destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)

Read our 60 posts about child porn and 100 posts about teenage sexuality.

  1. 25 hottest sex offenders any boy wishes to become a rape victim of
  2. “Police did not want to appear racist”, thus let 1400 children be abused over 15 years
  3. Child rapist raped, stitched by medics, and re-raped by 20 prisoners
  4. What is a Pedophile? Hebephile, Ephebophile, Teleiophile, Infantophile
  5. Republicans re-re-define rape: to the original definition rape had for 2000 years before re-definition 30 years ago
  6. Accessible porn reduces rape and prostitution
  7. Copine/ Sap Scales, Dost Test: Severity of child porn
  8.  Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime
  9. Definition of “Rape”: When a “Rape” is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word “Rape” & the Perversion of Language
  10. Family pictures of nude baby bath: ruinous child porn prosecution

Author: Human-Stupidy (Admin)

Honest Research, Truth, Sincerity is our maxim. We hate politally correct falsification, falsification, repression of the truth, academic dishonesty and censorship.

6 thoughts on “In defense of Pedophilia”

  1. Being a pedophile has been found by Dr. James Cantor to be a natural part of humanity and he can prove it by demonstrating that it is genetically predisposed.
    Science has shown that when a child provides his/her personal consent to sex that it is rarely ever harmful.
    It is rabid feminists and religious fanatics who have distorted reality for their willful fantasy that sex=harm even if done willingly.
    To see synopsi of the objective scientific studies (including Dr. Cantor’s) goto

  2. 1. Pedophilia is an attraction not an act. Many definitions exist for the word. From Wikipedia:

    Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger.[1][2] As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[1] A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years of age, but adolescents must be at least five years older than the prepubescent child for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.[1][2]

    Hebephilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in pubescent individuals approximately 11–14 years old, and is one of several types of chronophilia (a sexual preference for a specific physiological appearance related to age).

    It differs from ephebophilia, which is the primary or exclusive sexual attraction to those in later adolescence, approximately 15–19 years old,[1][2] and differs from pedophilia,[2] which is the primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[3][4][5] While individuals with a sexual preference for adults may have some sexual interest in pubescent-aged individuals,[2][6] researchers and clinical diagnoses have proposed that hebephilia is characterized by a sexual preference for pubescent rather than adult partners.[2][7]

    2. The common theme is a primary or exclusive attraction and clinically it must be over many months (six if I remember correctly).

    3. Just because a woman has sex with another woman doesn’t make her a lesbian. Also two men having sex doesn’t necessarily mean either is homosexual. Think a man and a woman who have sex makes either heterosexual? Sorry it does not. Plenty of stories involving men and women in long term relationships with children exist, but one of the parents is either bisexual or homosexual. People forget that sexual activity does not equal sexual orientation and to be honest pedophilia,
    Hebephilia, and ephebophilia are orientations along the massive spectrum of human sexuality. Some individuals might be attracted to everyone be they alive or dead.

    4. Defend any attraction you want. Just don’t defend any action unless being up to the top of your head in shit is your idea of fun. Now I don’t recommend having sexual intercourse with a prepubescent person because it is totally fruitless and probably physically damaging no m

  3. “The 35 year old woman with the body of a 10 year old: pedophilia or just a fetish? In my opinion, it’s pedophilia, literally. Her clients are sexually attracted to the fact that she looks like a child. But she is, in fact, an adult, and may therefore do as she pleases.”

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen a 35 year old with a 10 year old body. At least I’ve never mistaken a 35 year old for a 10 year old. But regardless it’s not pedophilia anymore than a guy being attracted to a woman that looks like a dude is homosexuality. Have you ever seen V for Vendetta and it has the scene where the “pedophile” priest is seduce by Natalie Portman who is dressed like a little girl? Yeah, that shit’s not real. No real pedophile would actually fall for that. It would be like a hairy dude dressing up as a woman to seduce a straight guy. She looked nothing like an actual child, she just looked like a woman dressed as a child. There is a huge difference.

    It seems like JB is too eager to throw actual pedophiles under the bus to make her point, especially with ridiculous statements such as this: “When everyone stands around shrieking about sexually mature 15 year olds, pedophiles get access to six year olds and no one notices because they are too busy tweeting nonsense about how 48 days is the difference between pedophilia and acceptable desire.”

    Lulwut? That’s not real life. The police will break down your door and arrest you if you have sex with a six year old. I advise you not try it.

    And this: “The hysterics only come out when men are involved, and generally only when those men are heterosexual. Gay men seem to get a pass when it comes to “protecting children” from dangerous male sexuality.”

    Yes please tell that to Nambla, Johnathan King and all those catholic priest that were arrested in the great purge.

  4. This has nothing to do with paedophilia — She has to be pre-pubescent for it to match that orientation; From puberty, its normal male sexuality to find girls attractive – There is no special age.

Leave a Reply. We appreciate a discussion: if you disagree, your comment still is welcome.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.