A mother of one has been jailed for having sex with an eight-year-old boy more than 50 times.
"16 year old had sex with 8 year old" would be truthful. But, at least Metro.co.uk is actually calling it sex, not rape. They probably would call it " rape" had it been a female "victim" and a male perpetrator, instead of a lucky boy with a cute teen perpetrator.
Loren Morris, 21, slept with the boy for about two years starting when she was 16, a court heard.
So she was a under 17 year old "*child"
She was charged after the boy, now 14, was overheard bragging to classmates he had slept with her.
The traumatized statutory rape victim bragged? Could it be that he did not think he was a traumatized victim?
We wrote an entire series about the child sex trauma myth. That all unbiased findings point to consensual child sex being non-traumatic. Even more so if the "rapist" is a hot 16 year old and not a 45 year old hag.
- 25 hottest sex offenders any boy wishes to become a rape victim of
- Bruce Rind Study: Scientific Publications Condemned and Repressed by US Congress and Senate
But there are clear indication that the legal proceedings must be traumatizing for the boy. Just the guilt of knowing that his bragging got his lover into prison is traumatic for a decent person.
- Victim: Courts did more harm than Polanski
- Child sex is not traumatic when it happens. Only much later (Child Sex Trauma Myth #2)
- Child Sex Trauma Theory Traumatizes Children (#6)
- Tea Abuse: How a traumatic event impacts children depends on how the adults cope with it. (MRA Angry Harry)
And if everyone tells the poor boy that he was a victim that will be scarred for life. He might believe it. Of course, A Voice for Men thinks that 2 years in prison with one year suspended is not enough punishment for making a boy so happy that he feels like bragging.
AVoiceForMen is complicit in causing trauma to the poor boy. They have this to say: Paedophile jailed for a [only] a year for repeated sex with eight-year-old
Antoine Mullers, defending, said Morris, of Lyde, Herefordshire, stopped having sex with him when she realised it was ‘wrong’.
And the child sex trauma myth clearly found that the "child" gets traumatized once he or she finds that the sexual experience was WRONG. Or worse, that they the child " victim" was so perverted that s/he enjoyed the vile act.
Judge Robert Juckes QC added: ‘I have come to the conclusion that due to the concern and embarrassment caused to both you and your family that you will not be offending again, let alone committing sexual offences.’
Of course, a voice for men is right. A male offender would not be treated so lightly. We agree, both male and female offenders should equally be treated more lightly for non-violent consensual sex with minors. We will not discuss the merit of total legalization of such acts, but we stress that mostly harmless sex acts (see Rind Study) should not be punished by heavy sanctions. Even more so because the perpetrator
She was seen smiling and smoking at Worcester crown court yesterday where she was jailed for two years after being convicted of three counts of sexual intercourse with a child under 16.
Morris was also banned from contact with a child under 16 without the permission of a parent and put on the sex offenders’ register for ten years.
- Help! My 18 year old girl friend has raped me 298 times
- Dangerous pedophile hunters threaten harmless pedophile (Jack McClellan)
A man would have gotten 20+ years to life! Double standards!!!
http://mensrightsmelbourne.com/2014/03/20/female-paedophile-jailed-for-only-two-years-for-repeated-sex-with-eight-year-old/
@Mens Rights Melbourne: I totally agree with your outrage. Just I don’t want equal injustice for all. I want equal
humane treatment for all. Victimless crimes, or crimes where the victims willingly participate and do not even complain, these should not be punished with enormous prison sentences.
On the other hand, I believe that violent criminals get away too easily. Whoever violently assaults, robs, rapes, kills people in ways that they can not escape, these people deserve to be punished severely. Also violent rioters, hooligans, etc.
I invite you to study the evidence, like our child sex trauma myth series and 100 posts about teenage sexuality.
What the fuck is wrong with you shitstains? You people are almost as fucked in the head as the cunt in question! An eight year old cannot consent, you braindead sacks of of human garbage! Jesus H. Christ almotherfuckingmighty, the human stupidity referred to in the site’s name must be that of its userbase.
“Please read the above links that prove that most child and adolescent sex trauma is not caused by consensual sex, but by societal shock and reaction. So you want to harm young boys for political benefits to later reduce harm to adult men.
There is another flaw in your argument. I see the moralistic outrage of MRA at the female abuser.
I do NOT see the MRA’s saying: let us imprison the bitch, so that we will get feminist support to have the unjust draconian sex laws lifted for both sexes.
These MRA are working to get MORE people into prison, for consensual sex. I don’t see any of these to work at reducing the prison populations.
Are you saying that the AVM crowd secretly wishes to abolish legal sanctions for consensual sex with adolescents (or children)? But they hide this wish in order to be more effective at getting feminists into their boat?”
Some very good points there.
The MHRM crowd are using children as political ends – just as feminists do. They are using the double standards in statutory rape cases simply to make a wider political point that will further their political cause i.e. fairer treatment for fathers in custody cases (or even more cynically, more cheques written out to Paul Elam). They appear to have zero interest in the welfare of boys, and less than zero interest in the welfare of the male ‘predators’ who will be repeatedly anally raped in prison for bringing consenting teenage girls to orgasm (and who may have seduced them).
One very small point –
“That all unbiased findings point to consensual child sex being non-traumatic. Even more so if the “rapist” is a hot 16 year old and not a 45 year old hag.”
I’m not sure we should be promoting the idea that age or even looks of the older partner should be a determinant of how traumatic consensual sex with a minor will be. If its consensual, the evidence is that it won’t be traumatic.
Scarecrow:
But I’ll bet if the father had a 16 y/o SON who was sending nude pictures to another man, the CHIPS would have taken him and charged with a ‘homophobic hate crime’. It seems that the US authorities are only concerned about such things when the OPPOSITE sexes are involved!
Sorry, but YIKES! That woman is fugly!!!
Anyhoo, glad to hear that a boy got to tap some booty – too bad she wasn’t hotter.
In central CA – I was there near the end of last year – and I had to get some property transferred into my name. Outside the courthouse, a man was yelling at another man – because his 16 year old daughter was sending the man naked photos of herself. He was saying things like “you’re f**ked you pedophile mother f**ker”.
I kept thinking to myself – why do some people get so wound up over – not even sex – but just nudity?
Anyway, a cop had to stand outside and break up the fight that was about to ensue…
HS & Anon71:
The best way is to decriminalize sex. When women get a light sentence for this kind of behavior, the MRM should demand that men get treated with the same leniency. Let’s start a slide in the OTHER direction: get the feminists competing for lighter sentences or no sentences at all.
@Anonymous, it might be worth discussing your argument
It is quite possible you are right. Feminists regularly make special exceptions for women, like Battered Women Syndrome, or domestic violence pussy passes.
So the status quo can be perpetuated: men get imprisoned for underage sex, women don’t. Just as men get imprisoned for alcohol induced sex, women don’t.
Note that it ought to be the opposite: boys mature more slowly then girls, and historically marriage ages have been LOWER for girls then for boys, world wide. So if anything, women ought to be prosecuted MORE for having sex with less mature boys.
@Anonymous age 71: Catching perverted women perpetrators as a way to change laws that hurt men. A noble goal, even though the both the adult women and the adolescent boy will suffer serious consequences.
Please read the above links that prove that most child and adolescent sex trauma is not caused by consensual sex, but by societal shock and reaction. So you want to harm young boys for political benefits to later reduce harm to adult men.
There is another flaw in your argument. I see the moralistic outrage of MRA at the female abuser.
I do NOT see the MRA’s saying: let us imprison the bitch, so that we will get feminist support to have the unjust draconian sex laws lifted for both sexes.
These MRA are working to get MORE people into prison, for consensual sex. I don’t see any of these to work at reducing the prison populations.
Are you saying that the AVM crowd secretly wishes to abolish legal sanctions for consensual sex with adolescents (or children)? But they hide this wish in order to be more effective at getting feminists into their boat?
Before AVM blasts me again: I do NOT believe this. Do you, @Anonymous age 71?
@Eric: feminists have a history of “changing awareness” of women who did not know they were raped. To make them aware they were rape victims. Or to include them in the rape statistics even if they continue thinking they were not raped.
Now MRA are going down the same path. Telling happy lucky boys that they were scarred for life, causing lasting trauma in innocent boys. Making sure that other boys, and their potential lovers, will be so in fear that they will not have sex.
Sounds like it fits the anti-feminist’s Sexual Trade Union Theory, and Robert Kurzban’s Hypocrisy theories, preventing others from having sex.
The only way to correct mistreatment of men is to get women caught up in the same laws.
As an example, some years ago, Congress changed the retirement rules so a man’s wife gets part of his retirement money, for which she did nothing and for which he worked many years,UNLESS she signed off on it. But, the IRS said this meant a man could not retire without his wife’s permission.
And, there were old men where I worked whose wife essentially condemned them to work until they dropped dead. Most common reason was she didn’t want him around under her feet all the time. Second most common reason was she didn’t want a reduced pension income. Let him keep running on the treadmill until he drops.
The rules were changed. Because the IRS realized men shouldn’t have that sort of treatment? No, because several women were caught up in the same mis-treatment and were unable to retire. And, the feminists hollered until the rule was changed. Now, a person can retire without spousal permission. They just have to take survivor’s benefits which reduces their own pension, UNLESS she signs off on it voluntarily.
And, when women don’t have their own pension, the solution to maximize pension pay-out for the man is for him to buy an annuity payable upon his death to her until her death and take full retirement.
Anyway, this is a mere example of using equal treatment for women to reduce the mistreatment of men.
In your case, it is very good to say both men and women should not be punished severely under these laws. What power do you have to effect this? None at all.
The only way to get the laws changed to reduce penalties for consensual sex with young boys and girls is to put the shaft to as many women as possible, and the laws will be changed. Guaranteed.
Your belief that women should not be charged, to work for reducing penalties for both men and women, by letting only women off the hook really doesn’t make sense. The only result is to exempt women from those laws while nailing men to the wall, which is exactly what the femis want.
That’s something characteristic of most of these stories: the ‘victims’ never do the complaining. Yet Dizzy Dean Esmay at AVfManginas said recently that idea of ‘a boy getting lucky should go the way of the dodo.’ I guess Esmay and other male feminists feel they should decide who is a victim and who is not.
“We agree, both male and female offenders should equally be treated MORE LIGHTLY for non-violent consensual sex with minors.”
—————–
Thank you so much for having the balls to say the way it should be and not pandering to the jealousies of vicious old hags and wallflowers.