#1 Google and #2 Apple, the world’s most valuable, profitable, successful companies have rapidly grown while deprived of the benefits of racial and gender diversity.
Imagine how much more profitable these companies could have been if white men had not made irrelevant products and bad decisions. Diversity is strength!
Having a diversity of perspectives leads to better decision-making, more relevant products, Google diversity report
- Had Google and Apple embraced diversity, hired lots of women and Blacks, had they been led by minorities, Google and Apple would be much more valuable then they already are. They would not merely be the two most valuable companies in the world.
- White men created the two most successful enterprises in the world. White men are especially capable and successful.
Please chose (1) or (2)
Economic success is racist! Economic success favors White men!
(2) must not be true because it is racist and sexist. Occam’s razor is racist. The obvious easy explanation must not be true.
the data — which in Silicon Valley usually reigns supreme — shows that diversity on groups benefits research, development, innovation and profit. [New York Times]
The two companies with the best profit, innovation, development and research are led by white men and lack diversity. This proves that diversity benefits company success.
Racist white male patriarchy’s logic needs to be abolished in favor of political correctness own logic
Asians are around 30% in these companies, according to Google diversity report. Numbers about Jews are glaringly absent.
Whites are actually underrepresented at Google. Non-Jewish Gentile whites are totally underrepresented. Jews, are totally overrepresented: Larry Page and Sergey Brin, CEOs of Google, CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg. But in Google’s diversity report, Jews are glaringly absent.
Note: Jewish IQ of around 112, Asian IQ of around 105, White IQ of 100, and African American IQ of 85 [Wikipedia] perfectly explain the racial composition of High Tech companies that hire by merit.Human-Stupidity favors merit and hiring the Best for the job. This is what made these companies great.
"Non-Hispanic whites are 61 percent of the Google work force, slightly below the national average." […]
Google’s disclosures come amid an escalating debate over the lack of diversity in the tech industry. Although tech is a key driver of the economy and makes products that many Americans use everyday, it does not come close to reflecting the demographics of the country–in terms of sex, age or race.
– Google can only accomplish that by firing well over three-quarters of its Asian employees, and replacing them with blacks and Hispanics (and a few whites, to bring white numbers up from 61 percent to 67 percent).
“White” has stopped meaning Caucasian, imprecise as this term has always been, and has started to mean “those racial groups that have made it.” “Minority” has started to mean “those racial groups that have not yet made it.”
To be more precise and politically incorrect: those racial groups that have never made it and will never make it because they have low low IQ and high impulsivity and crime. These traits are unfortunately is heritable. The Minnesota study of twins reared apart "yielded a heritability of 0.70 for IQ". Don’t blame Human-Stupidity for reporting unpopular science results.
Google’s disclosures come amid an escalating debate over the lack of diversity in the tech industry. Although tech is a key driver of the economy and makes products that many Americans use every day, it does not come close to reflecting the demographics of the country — in terms of sex, age or race. The lopsided numbers persist among engineers, founders and boards of directors. [New York Times]
Similarly, the Olympic 100 m dashes would become much faster, if there were more diversity:
- Racial Quotas for Whites /Asians needed to offset black privilege in 100 m Olympic finals
- 71 fastest runners on earth: 1 white Christophe Lemaitre & 70 blacks. Are races equal?
The world’s most valuable company recently added language to a board committee charter vowing to diversify its board. The move follows objections from shareholders Trillium Asset Management LLC and the Sustainability Group, who said they’re disappointed that the iPhone maker has only one woman on its eight-member board, and one incoming female member of the executive team that reports to Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook.