Politically Incorrect Google Search (PIG). Must try!

Google searches can be frustrating. You get all the boring main stream media lies, and you have to dig deep to get interesting alternative politically incorrect site links.

 

Your frustration is over.

 

Try pig: Politically incorrect Google Search 

at fluechtling.net/pig

(German version:
Politisch inkorrekte Google Suche (pigs) at fluechtling.net/pigs )

 

You must try searches yourself to believe it. You will want to use this search instead of the normal Google Search.

Please help to improve the searches by posting blog rolls and link lists with politically incorrect sites, in English and in German. There is a lot more to add, especially in German.

If you search for "Blacks Lives Matter" you get this nice result

 

black-lives-matter-pig

 

If you were to look at the normal boring Google Search, you would get this

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Politically Incorrect Google Search (PIG). Must try!” »
Politically Incorrect Google Search (PIG). Must try! » continues here »

Share

Women’s Rights: Hillary Clinton’s Double Standard on Sexual Assault

 

1) “Believe all accusers of sexual assault”, says Hillary Clinton

Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and

supported.https://t.co/mkD69RHeBL

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) November 23, 2015

twittered Hillary Clinton, reports Breitbart 

Except, don’t believe or support the survivors of her husband’s sexual assaults, of course. 

 

  • Hillary Clinton accused Donald Trump as a sexist enemy of women (4). 
  • Donald Trump reminded Hillary of her sexist past. Of pressuring and disbelieving survivors of husband Bill Clinton’s of sexual assaults (2) and that
  • Hillary Clinton had not believed nor supported the  survivors of sexual assault by husband Bill Clinton (3)

Conclusions:

  • Accusing Donald Trump can backfire badly.
  • Politically correct people with double standards should not accuse Donald Trump.

Note:

  • this is not about Bill Clinton’s past,
  • this is not about the veracity of the accusation against Bill. 
  • This is about Hillary Clinton imposing her feminist standards (“accusers are to be believed”) upon all men except her own husband.

 

2) Hillary Clinton pressured Bill Clinton’s accusers

Hillary stood by Bill through all of this, and reportedly pressured many of these women to back off of their accusations. Willey and Broaddrick, particularly, have voiced accusations against Hillary the mainstream media has been reluctant to report. Here’s Broaddrick’s recollection: […]

None of that even touches Hillary’s representation of a child rapist; she joked about it in 1975, on tape, stating that she knew he was guilty: “I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.” Hillary pushed the story that the 12-year-old victim “sought out older men” and was “emotionally unstable.”

But Hillary is the great banner-carrier for sexual assault victims.

That’s rich.[Breitbart]


Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported. https://t.co/mkD69RHeBL

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) November 23, 2015

[…] On the very day upon which Breitbart News reported that former Bill Clinton sexual assault accuser Juanita Broaddrick had spoken out about Hillary’s candidacy, Hillary decided to pretend that she’s an advocate for the little people who get raped. Broaddrick alleged on national television that Clinton had raped her in 1978: […]

In the aftermath of the rape, Hillary approached her and essentially threatened her in order to keep her silent, Broaddrick has said.

She told Breitbart News’ Aaron Klein yesterday, “Shame on you, Hillary, that’s disgusting. Shame on you, Hillary. It’s time to be truthful.”

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Women’s Rights: Hillary Clinton’s Double Standard on Sexual Assault” »
Women’s Rights: Hillary Clinton’s Double Standard on S… » continues here »

Share

Cuckold father, genetic father, and son share million dollar court verdict

Paternity-fraud families win damages – France

Two men, and a  French boy who was raised by the wrong father have been awarded nearly €2m (£1.5m) in damages. 

The clinic who –for "ethical reasons"- did not inform the husband that he was not be the father, was ordered to compensate the boy – now a man – and the cuckolded husband. The biological father, and the boy’s real siblings were also compensated for having been deprived of a family member.

The fraud was only discovered when the boy felt he did not look like his father


Gender Inversion

STOP. This can not be true.  I admit, I inverted the genders.

In my gender-inverted story no woman was harmed. Due do female privilege, family court verdicts usually hand down verdicts favoring females.  Rarely do family courts care about male suffering caused by females. In our feminist gynocracy’s women are not even held accountable if they spend child support on their own fashion shoes.

Intentional paternity fraud (cuckolding) is not a crime in Western democracies. On the contrary, some countries outlaw genetic testing by the father. Frequently courts force proven non-fathers to continue paying child support for another man’s children. Women routinely ignore court orders and keep children away from their fathers with impunity. No efforts are made to locate the real biological father. 

High schools have stopped to even mention blood group testing, in order to avoid embarrassing discoveries of cuckolding 11 12  13. And I have never heard of a man getting a financial court verdict because a woman hid his paternity from him.

Follows the true story. Here the verdict benefits mainly daughters and mothers.

France baby-swap families win damages | BBC

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Cuckold father, genetic father, and son share million dollar court verdict” »
Cuckold father, genetic father, and son share million dollar court… » continues here »

Share

Worldwide campaign against Julien Blanc, Pickup Artist

Brazilian TV confirmed in prime time news, that the ministry of the exterior will not give a visa nor permit entry to Julien Blanc for allegedly promoting violence against women. women letting their anger out with machine guns, that is good PC business

 "Pick-Up Artist" pushing Japanese women’s heads down to his crotch

 

In the US and Europe, attempts to expel convicted felon illegal foreigners rarely succeed.  Felons, ISIS terrorists, mercenaries rarely get denied visas and rarely get kicked out of countries. Hooligans, street brawlers, convicted robbers rarely get kicked out of Australia or blocked entry into Brazil.   So the Julien Blanc case is a demonstration of the awesome power of feminist activism! Feminist power, like the license to kill husbands and impunity for Lorena Bobbitt‘s penis slicing.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Worldwide campaign against Julien Blanc, Pickup Artist” »
Worldwide campaign against Julien Blanc, Pickup Artist » continues here »

Share

Pick up artist Julien Blanc, expelled from Australia, barred from Brazil and more countries

 

Is This The Most Hated Man in the World? | Time

Pick up artist Julien Blanc [1] [2] has been forced to leave Australia. Britain and Canada are also considering a ban

Is Julien Blanc the most hated man in the world? A series of online petitions against him suggest he might be.

Australia revoked his visa and expelled Julien Blanc

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Pick up artist Julien Blanc, expelled from Australia, barred from Brazil and more countries” »
Pick up artist Julien Blanc, expelled from Australia, barred from … » continues here »

Share

Racism disclaimer! Are we racist for citing statistics and research?

We wish prosperity, success for Africans and Blacks world wide

We actually would be extremely happy if Africa could follow in the footsteps of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea and become rich, highly productive and low crime citizens and states. We would love to see Blacks world wide to become leaders in scientific research, earn Nobel Prizes in natural sciences.

But we do not want ………

  1. Black success based on unjust quota, Black Privilege  job admissions, hiring and promotion of fire fighters, in affirmative action college admission, affirmative action in substandard college graduation.
  2. censorship, taboo, repression of free speech and severe punishment for speaking the truth (James Watson),
  3. repression of scientific research , free information (Rushton). 
We do propose equal opportunities. Not equal outcome.

Like Martin Luther King, we favor color blindness, not special perks, advantages, quotas determined by skin color.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Racism disclaimer! Are we racist for citing statistics and research?” »
Racism disclaimer! Are we racist for citing statistics and researc… » continues here »

Share

I renounce my Female Legal Privileges

I renounce all my female legal and societal privilege, in in an irrevocable, legally binding notarized declaration.  As a strong, empowered woman, I am deeply offended by unequal treatment on the basis of gender on issues, like lifetime alimony, child support, DNA testing and paternity fraud, "domestic violence only against women act", rape shield and harassment laws. I can not change feminist anti-male laws. But I can renounce my female privilege [12] [13] [14] and I suggest every honest egalitarian woman to do the same. 


I hereby irrevocably renounce any privileges I enjoy by virtue of my female gender [6]
and I refuse to engage in discrimination against men [7].  Especially
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “I renounce my Female Legal Privileges” »
I renounce my Female Legal Privileges » continues here »

Share

Un-Scientific American lends credibility to Gender Junk Science about Hubble Telescope

Unscientific American: Diversity is strength: We did not make this up, all these titles really exist in the Junk Diversity IssueHubble telescope time preferentially goes to men.

Female-led proposals to use the in-demand Hubble telescope are less likely to be selected.Scientific American claims this in the midst of a huge section of Junk Diversity Science which has been utterly debunked elsewhere.

An internal Hubble study1 found that in each of the past 11 observation proposal cycles, applications led by male principal investigators had a higher success rate than those led by women.  Women submit roughly 25% of proposals for Hubble telescope observing time. [SciAm]


Un-Scientific American lends credibility to junk diversity and gender science nonsense, by interspersing junk diversity propaganda among true natural science articles.
Un-Scientific American misleads their readers who think their gender baiting is on par with real science.

This confounding of junk gender science with true natural science is very serious. This is why after years of study even we need serious deprogramming from the politically correct cultural Marxist lies that impressible children, adolescents and adults are constantly told by school books and biased un-scientific journals like Scientific American!

Scientific American’s mixing of real natural science with politically motivated unscientific falsified junk science like gender, domestic violence, race and iq issues aspires to permanently poison the minds of young and old with feminist and politically correct hate ideology.

All the titles on our "Unscientific American" cover are true Junk Diversity Science articles,
we could not have made this up.

The head of a science department of a major research University confirmed to us, in private, that female scientists generally less innovative and talented then their male counterparts [7]. Implicit quotas demand hiring and promoting women who don’t meet the requirements men would be measured up to. Quotas guarantee that the rare woman with sufficient talent will be snatched away for an even more prestigious job, always rising to her level of incompetence. Aware of Larry Summer’s dismissal [8], our department head refuses to be identified.

"Scientific American used to be a great magazine but like any publishing venture headquartered in New York, it has gradually drifted into liberal never-never-land." [UnScientific American]


Men and women are equal by dogmatic fiat

Did Megan Urry control her statistics for yearly working hours, life time interest in science, years experience, work invested in the proposal, IQ, math talent of the applying scientists?

We wager a bet that the average male physics proposal writer, more so a Ivy League department chair, did not flunk their first physics exams in college, like Megan Urry herself and was interested in physics since tender age of 6, unlike Megan Urry [4] and other female applicants. Megan Urry (of course) ignores even the possibility that male and female applicants might be intrinsically different in some way.  Larry Summers was a victim of telling such truth that there is a dearth of women in the top talent for science and math.

In spite of IQ tests having been manipulated to elevate female IQ to the same level as males [Wikipedia],   there are twice as many men with IQ over 150: Men: either very clever or really stupid [Wikipedia] because of greater male variance on IQ and most other traits.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Un-Scientific American lends credibility to Gender Junk Science about Hubble Telescope” »
Un-Scientific American lends credibility to Gender Junk Science ab… » continues here »

Share