Category: Stupidity-Dogmas

Stupidity, dogmas, taboos, prejudices, unconsciousness

Rapists-proven-innocent are majority (57%) of prisoners released by Innocence Project

153 of the 268  exonerations in the Innocence Project were for rape. This is 57.1 % rape convictions, we found in a search of the innocence project for "Rape".  A large number was due to eyewitness misidentification. People freed by DNA testing are freed because the innocence has been proven.

This confirms the false rape society suspicion,  that people can easily be locked up for rape accusations, and that due process is violated especially in rape cases. 

 There have been 268 post-conviction DNA exonerations in United States history. These stories are becoming more familiar as more innocent people gain their freedom through postconviction testing. They are not proof, however, that our system is righting itself. # Seventeen people had been sentenced to death before DNA proved their innocence and led to their release.

  • Seventeen people had been sentenced to death before DNA proved their innocence and led to their release.
  • The average sentence served by DNA exonerees has been 13 years.
  • About 70 percent of those exonerated by DNA testing are members of minority groups.
  • In almost 40 percent of DNA exoneration cases, the actual perpetrator has been identified by DNA testing.
  • Exonerations have been won in 34 states and Washington, D.C.

    Source: innocenceproject.org/know/

    • The innocence Project is a national litigation and public policy organization dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted individuals trough DNA testing and reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice. innocenceproject.org/

    Kenny Waters, an innocence case that was not due to rape but murder and robbery conviction

    The listing of men convicted of rape and freed due to innocent project.

     

    Last First State Conviction Year Exoneration Date Real Perpetrator Found Compensation
    Abbitt Joseph NC 1995 2009 Not Yet Not Yet
    Abdal Habib Wahir NY 1983 1999 Not Yet Yes
    Adams Kenneth IL 1979 1996 Yes Yes
    Alexander Richard IN 1998 2001 Yes Not Yet
    Anderson Marvin VA 1982 2002 Yes Yes
    Atkins Herman CA 1988 2000 Not Yet Yes
    Barnes Steven NY 1989 2009 Not Yet Not Yet
    Bauer Chester MT 1983 1997 Not Yet Not Yet
    Bibbins Gene LA 1987 2003 Yes Yes
    Bivens Phillip MS 1980 2010 Yes Not Yet
    Bloodsworth Kirk MD 1985 1993 Yes Yes
    Booker Donte OH 1987 2005 Yes Yes
    Bradford Ted WA 1996 2010 Not Yet Not Yet
    Bravo Mark Diaz CA 1990 1994 Not Yet Yes
    Briscoe Johnny MO 1983 2006 Yes Not Yet
    Brison Dale PA 1990 1994 Not Yet Not Yet
    Brown Dennis LA 1985 2005 Not Yet Not Yet
    Brown Keith NC 1993 1997 Yes Yes
    Bryson David Johns OK 1983 2003 Not Yet Not Yet
    Buntin Harold IN 1986 2005 Not Yet Not Yet
    Burnette Victor VA 1979 2009 Not Yet Not Yet
    Butler A.B. TX 1983 2000 Not Yet Yes
    Byrd Kevin TX 1985 1997 Not Yet Yes

    These were the last names starting with letters A and B. Click on "more" to see the rest of the alphabet.

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Rapists-proven-innocent are majority (57%) of prisoners released by Innocence Project” »
    Rapists-proven-innocent are majority (57%) of prisoners released b…
    » continues here »

    "Objectifying gaze" makes helpless women lose math ability. Feminist researchers want to persecute men, not empower women

    "Objectifying gaze" (ogling women’s breasts) causes women to helplessly lose their math abilities and get significantly lower math test results. Women who suffer through an objectifying gaze perform worse on math tasks right afterwards. But, interestingly, they are also more willing to accept an invitation by the "perpetrator" of the gaze.

    Such findings yielded Feminist research psychologist Professor Dr. Sarah J. Gervais from the University of Nebraska a coveted feminist prize: the Georgia Babladelis Best Paper Award, Psychology of Women (division 35 of the American Psychological   Association), 2010-2011. 

    Women Can’t Think When You’re Looking At Our Tits

    A blogger’s refreshingly short summary of Dr. Gervais’ research.

    Maybe women’s psyche needs to be empowered, so their intelligence does not get derailed by a simple short ogling stare. Empowering women, of course, is not the goal of feminist study. Rather, new laws are needed to further punish and curtail male behavior. Harassment laws already severely restrict free speech at the work place (Freedom of Speech and Appellate Review in Workplace Harassment Cases)

    Video showing Objectifying Gaze Research and an interview

    Compare  a very insightful Sexual Harassment spoof on YouTube.

    Original Research paper

    Gervais, S. J. Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (in press).  When what you see is what you get:  The consequences of the objectifying gaze for men and women.  Psychology of Women Quarterly. (abstract, entire pdf)

    Winner: Georgia Babladelis Best Paper Award, Psychology of Women (division 35 of the American Psychological   Association), 2010-2011.

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    Professor Sarah Gervais’ Subtle Prejudice Lab analyzes subtle prejudice against women while engaging in serious prejudice against men (who need control and punishment) and women (who need protective laws instead of empowerment)

    Download objectifying gaze research video with Dr. Gervais

    Why women who are ogled at work do not perform as well in the office

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “"Objectifying gaze" makes helpless women lose math ability. Feminist researchers want to persecute men, not empower women” »
    "Objectifying gaze" makes helpless women lose math abili…
    » continues here »

    Judge John Reilly forced to apologize for differentiating nerd’s groping from sexual assault

    OTTAWA – John Reilly, a retired judge and Liberal candidate for the Alberta riding of Wild Rose, was forced to apologize Thursday for suggesting in a radio interview that not all sexual offenders should be incarcerated.

    Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff called an Alberta candidate’s comments on sexual offenders "disgraceful,” but said he has accepted Reilly’s apology and he’ll continue to serve as the party’s candidate for the riding.
    Alberta Liberal candidate John Reilly apologizes for remarks on sexual assault 

    John Reilly, former Judge and Liberal Party Candidate in Alberta, CanadaThe "sexual assault":

    she goes, gets into bed naked, he goes up, he’s thinking he’s going to be able to, that she’ll probably agree to have sex with him, he fondles her privates, and she wakes up and tells him to go away, and he goes away. They report it, he’s charged with sexual offence, he has digitally penetrated her,  
    Judge John Reilly interview

    Most likely the defendant did not stick the entire finger in there but just passed the limit with one phalanx.  Also he was ill advised and probably admitted the penetration before getting a lawyer’s advice. Of course, the women would always be believed anyway

    Now this does not look like a habitual predator, the judge is totally right.

    But, this is an example how powerful the feminist language distortion is. Call some behavior "rape" or "sexual assault", and the perpetrator is to be crucified. If you told it by the real name, "fondling the privates of a naked girl while sleeping at a party", that would not cause the feeding punishing frenzy in the interviewer and the populace. You can notice this in the strong reactions of the interviewer in the written and his aggravated tone in the audio transcript.

    Former judge John Reilly’s interview with The Rutherford Show Transcript

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Judge John Reilly forced to apologize for differentiating nerd’s groping from sexual assault” »
    Judge John Reilly forced to apologize for differentiating nerd&#82…
    » continues here »

    Let Portugal default on debt! Will USA default too?

    The European Union, in violation of its non-bailout clause, guarantees debt for its defaulting members.

    • This just postpones the problem of the huge debt which will come due at a later time.
    • It also does not solve the structural problem, that countries with very different attitudes and politics are ties to one currency.
      • Did you know that in the rich productive countries of Europe, like Germany, salaries are lower, the retirement age is higher, Now try to tell a Greek or Portuguese worker to reduce his salary and retire 5 years later. This is why we have riots all over Europe.
      • So either break up the monetary Union to separate countries with different monetary situation
      • Or let the markets decide. Once a country defaults, the lenders will get the message that they should check how credit worthy a country is, before lending their money.
    • Almost all countries in the world increase their debt every year. No payback schedule in sight. Only ever growing debt.  Critics think the debt of almost all countries in the world is unsustainable.

    Weinberg said there is nothing on the table that can stop the euro zone falling into crisis.

    “Not only is there no solution in hand, but there is no inkling that any idea on the table at this summit could plausibly avert a default on substantial portions of euro land’s sovereign debt,” he wrote.

    “Lending money to already over-borrowed nations does not help or fix them. Also, no plan exists for strategies to cope with the fallout of a sovereign default should one occur,” Weinberg added.
    Is Europe Slipping Towards Default?

    Marc Faber: If The U.S. Was A Corporation, Its Credit Rating Would Be Junk (Video)

    The entire world economy is driven by blindness and greed. Greed of corporate executives, of politicians, and yes, greed of the citizens who want their perks, high pay, and little work. Keep borrowing till the world financial system collapses. Keep bailing out to buy a bit more time, the delayed collapse will be even worse.

    Related articles
    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Sexual harassment is in the eye of the beholder. No fright, no distress.

    "Harassment" perceived as non-threatening isn’t distressing

     For women, sexual harassment was distressing when they saw it as frightening, but not when they saw it as bothersome. "We were surprised by this finding," Settles said. "We thought women would be negatively impacted if they saw their harassment as frightening or bothersome."[…]
    Study Finds Surprising Gender Differences Related to Sexual Harassment |Science Daily

    The same come-on perceived as non-threatening and thus non-threatening and non-traumaticSurprise. Open-minded researcher Isis H. Settles from Michigan State University and colleagues get unexpected results that don’t fit the feminist mold.

    All depends on how the victim perceives the harassment. The enclosed two cartoons depicts how the same harassing behavior can elicit either shock and terror, or, in the second  picture, below, mild amusement.

    This of course makes us wonder if the feminist hysteria is not self-fulfilling. Women in "macho" cultures, who were never indoctrinated in feminist hysteria and never knew that cat calls or invitation to sex were something frightening, don’t get distressed by such action.  So the solution to the harassment problem would be to empower women, not to get frightened easily.

    Of course, undue influence using violence or strong coercion is something different.  Feminists tend to confound clearly violent illegal criminal rape and harassment with normal or slightly disturbing but non-violent and non-abusive behavior.

    Definition of Harassment

    Sexual harassment is defined as unwanted gender-based comments or behaviors (Fitzgerald, 1996) with three subtypes. Gender harassment refers to behaviors that disparage an individual on the basis of her or his gender (e.g., comments that insult women s intelligence; comments regarding behaviors a real man would do). Unwanted sexual attention refers to unwanted touching or attempts to establish a sexual relationship (e.g., repeated requests for dates). Finally, sexual coercion refers to attempts to coerce a sexual relationship in exchange for job-related threats or benefits (e.g., promising a promotion if the target engages in sexual activities). Frightened or Bothered: Two Types of Sexual Harassment Appraisals

    Maybe we are ill informed. It seems that mere looks (See Gervais’ "objectifying gaze"), compliments, innuendo, bantering is enough to qualify as sexual harassment.

    Great unexpected results! Teasing and "harassing" in non-threatening environment is not frightening. Probably because Dr. Isis Settles’ subjects were not distraught feminist-indoctrinated damsels in college freshmen experiments but empowered women in the armed forces.

    In other words: a creepy guy in a deserted forest coming on strong, that is frightening. Or your boss threatening to immediately fire you if you don’t yield to his/her advances. Workplace bantering mostly is not frightening but just bothersome. Like so many things in life. If a person gets frightened by workplace innuendo, then Human-Stupidity suggests to that  the problem is in the mind of the perceiver who feels frightened by harmless non-dangerous situations. 

    Our feminist laws repress men and protect women like defenseless victims

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Sexual harassment is in the eye of the beholder. No fright, no distress.” »
    Sexual harassment is in the eye of the beholder. No fright, no dis…
    » continues here »

    Countersue women’s rights groups for falsifying data that led to enactment of the very laws used to sue Silvio Berlusconi

    Valeria Ajovalasit’s Arquidonna women’s rights group sues Italian president Silvio Berlusconi. For violating laws enacted due to pressure by the same feminist groups, based on false manipulated data, warped logic and under abuse of male chivalry and concern about women’s well being. [Similar issues are at the US supreme court in the Wal-Mart class action suit).

    Valeria Ajovalasit, president of Arquidonna women’s rights group, feels degraded by Italy’s president Silvio Berlusconi’s allegedly paying a beautiful 17 year old for sex. For wrongly paying money to a girl that wanted money, Valeria Ajovalasit and Arquidonna now want Berlusconi to pay all women of Italy, without receiving sex in return.
    Ruby ‘the heart stealer’ cashes in: The woman at the centre of sex allegations surrounding Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has cashed in on her fame by appearing in an Italian commercial.

    An Italian women’s rights group has asked the court overseeing Silvio Berlusconi’s sex trial for the right to seek compensation from the prime minister, claiming that he has offended the dignity of all Italian women.
    Italian women seek compensation from Silvio Berlusconi| The Telegraph

     

    Valeria Ajovalasit, head of Arquidonna women's rights group Amazing how easy it is to offend the dignity of all Italian women. Now feminist laws that were enacted in the last 50 years gravely offend the dignity of men by criminalizing more and more behavior that formerly was normal and legitimate.

    Berlusconi could legally have sex with that woman, but if he gives her money, then it is illegal, thanks to laws enacted by the same women’s groups that now want to extort money from Mr. Berlusconi. Based on falsified numbers about sex trafficking (The Myth of Sex Trafficking)

    Legitimate mainstream magazines, movies and newspapers from the 1970’s now are child porn, and tens of thousands of men are in jail getting special rape attention from gangsters.

    The antifeminist had the glorious idea: men’s groups unite and countersue.

    If Italian women get offended by a man (maybe, allegedly) having sex with a woman over the age of consent, imagine men’s offense at risking jail for looking at photos, for going to jail for having sex with women who lied about their age and presented fake id (Victim dupes man into raping her. How can you rape without knowing you are raping?). This does not offend the dignity of all men?

     

    Countersue Valeria Ajovalasit’s Arquidonna and other women’s Rights Groups: their false statistics helped promote laws that unjustly jail thousands of men and now accuse Berlusconi

    If there existed such a men’s rights lobby group in Italy, it could make a counter-claim against the feminists who passed the original anti-prostitution laws that criminalized the sexual choices and restricted the opportunities of all Italian men.  Including the feminist advocacy lobby groups that lobbied for such laws (that no doubt include the group behind this absurd claim against Berlusconi).  As I and others have documented, such lobbying has clearly been based upon deliberate lies, falsehoods, and exaggerations.  The antifeminist

    Women have fought to restrict and jail men and to take over the world’s courts and justice systems. This has been on-going for over a century (The Fraud of Feminism – Ernest Belfort Bax (complete) year (1913!) ). It is time for men to wake up, unite, and fight back.

    Feminist organizations lying about data

     

     

    Rushton Graves discussion about Race & IQ

    In video 9, Rushton is extremely convincing and, sorry, Graves and others sound embarrassingly like fools. You could hear the spectators giggling about some of the contorted evasive answers. Race does not exist. Asked if they had 100 Chinese in a shower, 100 Kenyans in a shower, 100 Englishmen. Can they identify which is which? They still could somehow argue how they could not sort this out. EgalitarianJay, thank you very much for these videos. They are very informative. I will watch them all. From what I have seen so far, they make me much more certain in my conviction. If these arguments is all they can come up with, then there is no way to refute Rushton. I have a hard time how serious scientist can fudge and fumble like Rushton’s opponents and still be taken seriously.Asked about exactly our example Koreans or Africans adopted by white middle class parents, Graves had the balls to argue that they live in a different environment, because there is a societal expectation for blacks to underachieve. a) For someone who says "race does not exist" this is quite amazing. If they can not discern the different races, how can they discriminate? b) all these claims without scientific proof. Test your hypotheses scientifically, Dr. Graves. Is this just me who sees a University professor Rushton present clear research against a bunch of embarrassingly unscientific guys defending indefensible hypotheses?

    Here is a playlist of the entire Rushton-Graves discussion about Race and IQ. Interesting summary of facing off the ideological opponents to Rushton’s theory. See all the videos in one piece here.http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DC0F78B62A560851

    Accidentally, one video got in there from another discussion. I left it in, because it actually contributes to the discussion and is a refreshing variation. Rushton mentioned the temperament differences that make racial peace and acceptance difficult. I focussed too much on IQ. He explained that demands of cold winter required special planning, a new strategy that was not required before leaving Africa. The worst winters were in Africa

    Related articles
    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Evolution, Intelligence, Behavior, Race.

    This TV series about Race and Intelligence shows the facts pretty well. The authors are fairly open minded. In the end they trying to remain politically correct and find what they want to find: that there is no genetic basis, or that differences are only due to discrimination.

    1

    Race and Intelligence 1/7 por NzingahMorena

    2

    Race and Intelligence 2/7 por NzingahMorena
    It is easily forgotten: Human-Stupidity is not really about the scientific discussion and solution of racial theories. We are most interested in unconsciousness, blindness, dogmatism.

    We are watching how clear scientific statements by Jensen, Rushton are met with ire and pseudo-scientific rebuttals. Even Mr. James Watson, who is not a normal Nobel Prize winner, but considered one of the most prestigious of Nobel prize winners was destroyed when he dared to speak unpopular truths. Even he is so wrong, where are the scientific rebuttals instead of the ad hominem attacks?

    We wish that the truth would be accepted, so the discussion would be based on the truth, not on wishful thinking. Further discussions are here:

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Evolution, Intelligence, Behavior, Race.” »
    Evolution, Intelligence, Behavior, Race.
    » continues here »