In defense of Pedophilia

Pedophilia, *consensual* underage sex is not traumatic when it happens, rather only later, when the “victim” is told how terrible a victim she is.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading »
In defense of Pedophilia » continues here »

In defense of Pedophilia” attacks the age of consent taboo topic, regarding sex with 17 year old “children”  in typical judgmental judgybitch fashion (Disclaimer).

So I ended up in this completely retarded conversation on Facebook in reference to this case in Sweden, in which a 27 year old had sex with a very physically mature  13 year old whom he thought was much older. Sweden, believe it or not, is relatively sane about this sort thing, and refused to prosecute the man for “child rape”.  In defense of Pedophilia

In the USA “statutory rape” 17 year old children is a *strict liability crime. You had sex with a minor, it is “rape”.

There is absolutely no excuse. If she is 17 years and 364 days old, and she forced herself onto you while you were passed out drunk, if s/he showed you a valid ID emitted by a US government entity proving s/he is over 18, all that does not change the fact that s/he was “raped”.

Age of consent laws

It is perfectly legitimate to think

  1. “Sex at a young age is unwise”
  2. “I don’t want my young daughter to have sex”

This is very different from Age of consent laws that imply that

  • under all circumstances, with no exception, a sex act with a person under the age of consent is considered terrible enough to warrant heavy handed government intervention.

Thanks to the Antifeminist (author of the sexual trade union theory) for having called my attention  to JudgyBitch – ‘In “defence” of pedophilia’.  It is also worth reading the very open minded comments in in defense of Pedophilia.

Science does not support Age of consent laws

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “In defense of Pedophilia” »
In defense of Pedophilia » continues here »

Share

Cliff Richard’s celebrity persecution for 1980’ies sex crimes

More hysterical nonsense about Cliff Richard and Jimmy Savile. Britain’s witch hunt continues. Famous entertainers get prosecuted for "crimes" they allegedly committed 40 years ago, during the sexually liberated 1960’ies and 70ies. They get charged with alleged "child sex" with 15 year old more than willing "children", or, more absurdly, *rape charges by women who somehow were not able to clearly say "no".  These men were so famous, they needed security guards to keep the screeching teenage girls away.

The source accused the police of organising a “fishing expedition”, claiming that the raid had been carried out in an attempt to generate the maximum amount of publicity. Telegraph

The prosecution is based mainly on "mutual corroboration": if 4 women, independently, allege the same type of crime, it must be true. In the case of a common violent criminal this is likely to be true. In the case of a celebrity known by 30 million women, it is quite likely that a few psychologically imbalanced women join the fray.  After all, they can earn fame and money.  Prosecution is also based on "recovered memories", long debunked by Elisabeth Loftus. And on rape accusations that are most likely false. Cliff Richard, like Rolf Harris and Jimmy Savile, is famous enough that his case was quoted in German "Der Spiegel". Thanks to the antifeminist and his commentators for furnishing further details on the British celebrity sex  hysteria.  

The friend said: “The whole thing is appalling because what they are doing, they are just going in there making as much noise about it as they can and seeing if anyone comes out of the woodwork to back it up. And if they don’t, they will still have wrecked someone’s life.” Telegraph

It is amazing that the sex hysteria persecution goes against fairly decent men, and not against the 70’ies rock bands that were famous for sexual debauchery with adolescent groupies. Maybe the purpose  of these sex witch hunts is to instill fear in the common decent man?

In the sexual liberation of the 60’ies, 70’ies, age of consent was considered repression of the past. A faction of the German Green PartyGerman Green Party  openly favored abolition of age of consent laws, the maligned Rind Study showed that no damage can be shown to arise from *consensual_ underage sex.  


    When will anyone learn that if you carry out a police-media trawl of any and every celebrity, then inevitably a line of variously motivated complainants comes forward? This is just as would be expected no matter how clearly innocent is the target. And they don’t come much more obviously innocent than Cliff Richard.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Cliff Richard’s celebrity persecution for 1980’ies sex crimes” »
Cliff Richard’s celebrity persecution for 1980’ies sex… » continues here »

Share

50 Shades of Grey: Domesticating the Alpha Male

A man takes his girl friend to view the film. "For you to learn how to be submissive and obedient", he suggests. At the end, the couple concludes: "50 Shades of Grey" is a lesson on how NOT to be a submissive woman, how NOT to be a dominant man. Feminist Hollywood and political correctness makes sure that Anastasia Steele is always in control, never really dominated.  [0]

See: 50 Shades of Grey: Politically Correct Boredom. Privileged females make fuzz about obedience and some pain, unaware that (mostly) male soldiers in boot camp and war must blindly obey, have walk with blistered feet, kill and get killed without safe words nor right to back out.  [2]

grey-against-feminism Christian Grey is the man of every girl’s wet dreams: handsome, intelligent, cultured, filthy rich and successful, and, always in control (before he met Anastasia).  Thousands of female fans would give everything to be his girlfriend or fling and get flown around in the Billionaire’s helicopter.

Many women would not be as resistant as our heroine, Anastasia. Rather, some would certainly yield and sign the slavery contract. If a woman does not agree, a empowered alpha male could simply move on to the next woman candidate.   He could sweeten the deal, offering reward for thrashings. But with his Rock star popularity, he would not need to offer money.

Grey could afford to hire 10 girls at SeekingArrangement.com  [Cosmo] [10] [11] [12], offer a US$ 10,000 to US$ 20,000  monthly stipend to each and every girl that signs his contract.  Or he could make a few "indecent proposals" for a Million for a one month fling.

Instead of being manly, alpha male Christian Grey loses his dominance to a constantly resisting Anastasia. Instead of dumping her for not signing his contract, he constantly negotiates.  He spanks her only after she consents. This culminated in in "Don’t touch me" and "Don’t ever do this again".  

Before, Christian could not touch Anastasia Steele when she was drunk. He asked for consent at every moment, gave her two safe words and repeatedly reminded her that she could stop at any moment.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “50 Shades of Grey: Domesticating the Alpha Male” »
50 Shades of Grey: Domesticating the Alpha Male » continues here »

Share

50 Shades of Grey: Politically Correct Boredom

 

Politically correct film makers sanitized "50 shades of Grey": the heroine never submits, never surrenders. Movie heroine Anastasia Steele never enjoys the book’s spanking orgasm with Ben Wa Balls. She endures the climactic final heavy "six of the best" strokes out of morbid curiosity and stubbornness, not not out of submission. Anastasia Steele then immediately assumes the empowered feminist role, blames pervert Christian Grey and commands him to back off and not touch her.

50 shades of Grey vanilla is a politically correct bore

50 shades of Grey is the deconstruction of dominance and submission. Rather "the heroine is tasked with transforming him from a tortured control freak and into a regular boyfriend ", says Slate. A feminist empowered Anastasia that does not submit to Christian Grey’s dominance.

Fifty Shades of Grey Star Eloise Mumford: I Would Never Make a Film That Didn’t Empower Women says Time

All this feminist anti-submission PC results in a bore, described by USAToday:  "Sitting through the turgid and tedious S&M melodrama that is Fifty Shades of Grey may feel like its own form of torture." A movie flop that earns a paltry 3.4/10 on IMDb.

Even the pinnacle of political correctness, Huff Post cannot but state a huge list of differences Movie vs. book. [20] [21]

"Fifty Shades," which was greenlighted by a woman (Universal Studios chief Donna Langley), directed by a woman (British filmmaker and photographer Sam Taylor-Johnson), based on a book by a woman (James), from a script by a woman (Kelly Marcel), seeks to revive a genre that has gone limp. LA Times

 

BDSM dominant men must keep hiding in the closet

Submission and rape are frequent fantasies of women [30] [31]. 

A handsome young heart throb filthy rich billionaire CEO with excellent people skills, a man that is most women’s wet dream, he  can not find a willing submissive woman?  Rather he has to put up with Anastasia’s resistance and her attempts to change him!?

Gays became a protected class, and thus can come out of the closet. Radical feminist like Valerie Solanas can promote violence against men.  But dominant men with a sadistic streak must keep in hiding. Lest feminist boycott would ruin his business. Remember Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

Soldiers in boot camp, war, must submit to obedience, pain and humiliation

Soldiers routinely have to walk for days and nights, with bleeding blistered feet, sit in ice cold lakes. Boot camp pushes a recruit to his or her physical and mental limits. Without questioning and hesitation soldiers must obey, shoot, kill, and obediently run into a hail of deadly bullets. Often soldiers sign away their rights voluntarily (with no "yellow" or "red" safe word, with no right to back out!).  For millennia most men had no choice; draft was mandatory.  In the US men still must report to selective service to be ready for any potential future draft. 

Making such a big fuzz about voluntarily signing an obedience contract with medium, non life threatening pain, is a sign of coddled feminist entitlement and female privilege [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47.


Still not tame enough for feminists

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “50 Shades of Grey: Politically Correct Boredom” »
50 Shades of Grey: Politically Correct Boredom » continues here »

Share

Hacked nude celebrity photos may be child pornography

 

Child Porn claims to scare sites into taking down photos

Olympic gymnast McKayla Maroney claimed her nude photos are child porn, to scare web sites into removing her photos. 

Maroney’s lawyers confirmed that the leaked nude images of the U.S. gymnast were taken at the time when she was not yet 18. This means that the people who are involved in the leak and those who are storing copies of the images on their PCs could face a lawsuit on child abuse  Tech Times

But: Children photographing themselves are child porn producers

Little was McKayla Maroney aware she was incriminating herself of a heinous crime: "McKayla Maroney may be a victim of the leaked photo scandal, but she could be facing felony charges for child pornography." [2].  Any 17 or under "child" that takes photo of herself in any indecent pose, is a producer of child pornography (sexting). And mere possession of child pornography is punishable up to life in prison [3] [4

Child pornography can be fully dressed photos of 17 year olds

Deliberately posed pictures of children [up to 17 years of age] fully clothed, partially clothed or naked can be child pornography. If the dirty mind of a district attorney or policeman officer considers baby’s pose indecent, then Family pictures of nude baby bath can cause ruinous child porn prosecution.

Use a Polaroid, not the "cloud"

"Stars who want to take nude photos without getting hacked: Use a Polaroid: To keep private pictures private, never upload them online."[Fox News].

 

Will anyone question the stupidity of child pornography laws?

Only Human-Stupidity dares to ridicule voodoo theory, to  denounce child porn hysteria in 70 posts, to cite Milton Diamond‘s peer reviewed research and infamous Rind Study 

  

Share

Vogue Kids Brazil confiscated for Child Porn Content

Vogue-kids-brasilFamous Magazine Vogue has a Brazilian "kids" fashion edition once a year.  Fully dressed children’s photos can be child porn (See copine scale), which according to the Voodoo theory of child pornography scars children for life each time someone looks at the picture.

"Vogue Kids" Magazine Accused of Publishing Sexualized Images of Children

"Vogue Kids" magazine, distributed this month with "Vogue", was criticized on social networks and accused by an institute for publishing photos of underage girls in sexy poses, dressed in a bikini. In some images, they are lying down with their legs open.

Complaints about the "Shade and Fresh Water" photo shoot spread in social networks sites and found their way, on Thursday (11), to state and federal prosecutors as well as the Federal Police. The agencies will evaluate the case.

A court issued an injunction demanding the distribution of the magazine issue to be stopped and already sold issues to be collected. (links follow below, after trigger warning)

"These are girls in sexy poses and [there is] a clear premature sexualization of these children," says psychologist Lais Fontenelle, which is part of the entity.

To the psychologist, the girls are doing clothing ads, which is vetoed by Conanda (National Council for the Rights of Children and Adolescents), linked to the Secretariat of Human Rights of the Presidency.

This year’s agency resolution prohibits advertisement targeted to children. Folha de São Paulo

The photos in question could be Copine scale level 5: "Deliberately posed pictures of fully, partially clothed or naked children in sexualised or provocative poses."

Senators demand punishment: "They want to call the parents of the children that were photographed, and punishment of all involved. Aruda agrees with the colleague and says that the country urgently needs to fight child abuse.  Public prosecutors must hold responsible  the company’s executives for this crime.  The magazine abused children, notwithstanding parental consent. We can not allow our children to make sensual poses in magazines that seek only economic exploitation.

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Vogue Kids Brazil confiscated for Child Porn Content” »
Vogue Kids Brazil confiscated for Child Porn Content » continues here »

Share