Hacked nude celebrity photos may be child pornography

 

Child Porn claims to scare sites into taking down photos

Olympic gymnast McKayla Maroney claimed her nude photos are child porn, to scare web sites into removing her photos. 

Maroney’s lawyers confirmed that the leaked nude images of the U.S. gymnast were taken at the time when she was not yet 18. This means that the people who are involved in the leak and those who are storing copies of the images on their PCs could face a lawsuit on child abuse  Tech Times

But: Children photographing themselves are child porn producers

Little was McKayla Maroney aware she was incriminating herself of a heinous crime: "McKayla Maroney may be a victim of the leaked photo scandal, but she could be facing felony charges for child pornography." [2].  Any 17 or under "child" that takes photo of herself in any indecent pose, is a producer of child pornography (sexting). And mere possession of child pornography is punishable up to life in prison [3] [4

Child pornography can be fully dressed photos of 17 year olds

Deliberately posed pictures of children [up to 17 years of age] fully clothed, partially clothed or naked can be child pornography. If the dirty mind of a district attorney or policeman officer considers baby’s pose indecent, then Family pictures of nude baby bath can cause ruinous child porn prosecution.

Use a Polaroid, not the "cloud"

"Stars who want to take nude photos without getting hacked: Use a Polaroid: To keep private pictures private, never upload them online."[Fox News].

 

Will anyone question the stupidity of child pornography laws?

Only Human-Stupidity dares to ridicule voodoo theory, to  denounce child porn hysteria in 70 posts, to cite Milton Diamond‘s peer reviewed research and infamous Rind Study 

  

Share

Virginia DA obtains warrant to forcibly erect child’s penis to photograph for sexting prosecution

A 17 year old "child" boy consensually exchanged intimate photos with his 15 year old girl friend. To bolster their case, the prosecution requested and obtained the right to photograph the boys genitalia in erect state, and to forcibly use medical means to obtain the erection.

Of course only the young man is prosecuted, even though the girl equally engaged in production, possession, and distribution of child pornography.

Teen sexting prosecution prompts outrage | BBC

On Wednesday the Washington Post reported on the case of a 17-year-old from Manassas, Virginia, who is facing felony charges for manufacturing and possessing child pornography after he allegedly texted nude images of himself to his 15-year-old girlfriend.

According to the boy’s defence attorney, Jessica Harbeson Foster, prosecutors in the Washington-area Prince William County want to bolster their case by taking photos of the suspect’s aroused penis and comparing it to the texted image using "special software".

She says the prosecutors have plans if the teen does not willingly comply.

"We just take him down to the hospital, give him a shot and then take the pictures that we need," Ms Foster says she was told.

She added that the police had already taken a photo of her client’s flaccid penis, obtained despite his objections.

So the prosecution already produced child pornography, forced a child to pose for indecent photos (Copine scale level 4: deliberately posed, not erotic)

Child porn laws purport to protect the child, even when 17 years old, from the repeated trauma of having his or her photo viewed (Voodoo theory).

    "Ugh, you fucking pervert. Sending pictures of your privates to a 15 year old innocent girl, you make me fucking sick. Now, I’m gonna pull down your pants by force, stick a needle in your dick, take a bunch of pictures of it, and then spend hours comparing them to the other pictures of teenage boy dicks I have."  7/09/14 11:36am  | View all 451 replies
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Virginia DA obtains warrant to forcibly erect child’s penis to photograph for sexting prosecution” »
Virginia DA obtains warrant to forcibly erect child’s penis … » continues here »

Share

Internet Porn harmless for adolescents, sex researchers find

    "Sex Researchers suggest not to worry about the flood of nude movies on the internet"

    In its cover story, German magazine "Der Spiegel" shows how Germans are more relaxed about sexuality: in spite the world wide porn hysteria, science was unable to show that the availability of internet porn is damaging to adolescents or children. 

  • derspiegel-coverFeminist Alice Schwarzer advises women to drop boy friends  that insist on porn consumption. If all women followed such feminist advice, there would be no relationships left in this nation.
  • Canadian sex researcher Simon Lajeunesse failed to find 20 young men that were not yet polluted by the ever present porn flood. "We could not find a single one", he said.
  • In every school yard, every computer, cell phone, game console is a potential porn player.
  • Even more so, every owner of a cell phone is a potential porn producer or porn star. Women take a leading role sending their own photos and movies to their partners or their crushes. This is called "sexting".
  • At the end of relationships, some disgruntled men posts such porn on the internet. This genre is called "revenge porn".
  • 18th century archeologists found huge amounts of smut images under the ashes of Pompeii: man with man, women with woman, gods with goats, anal, oral, vaginal. These shocking images were shamefully hidden in secret museums and could be watched only by men who could prove legitimate research interest.
  • Research is unambiguous: 12, 13 year olds are not endangered, not damaged by porn. They don’t start sex earlier, don’t have more partners, have no more pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, abortions then earlier generations without the internet sex. Sex information even has a potential positive effect as sex education.
  • The English "children’s commissioners" report concluded, in 2013, that a causal relationship between porn and risky behaviors can not be shown.
  • Meta researcher Eric Owens reports in the New York Times that no conclusions can be drawn. A few studies find negative effects, such as violent porn may influence children from already problematic families, or Porn creating negative body images. Others find the opposite.
  • Human-Stupidity Analysis

    1. The negative effects are probably false, a confirmation bias. After all, the powerful feminist and religious dogmatics are eager to prove that porn is terribly damaging.  Porn must be really harmless to children and adults, if a large part of research results dodges feminist and religious dogma and finds no harm, even in adolescents.
    2. As Human-Stupidity would expect, "Der Spiegel" reports that moral panic and sex laws in themselves are detrimental:  giving minors access to porn is a felony. Thus educators and teachers can not teach responsible use of porn, nor clarify doubts, by watching porn with the minors.

    More details from "Der Spiegel"

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Internet Porn harmless for adolescents, sex researchers find” »
    Internet Porn harmless for adolescents, sex researchers find » continues here »

    Share

    Millions of children watch child porn daily

    Millions of children watch child porn daily when they look into their bath room mirror. If they do so while posing sexy, or masturbating, it is even higher on the copine scale of child porn, for "children" as old as 17.

    Practically every single person under 18 sees LIVE child porn on a daily basis. What they see in the mirror would qualify as child pornography, if photographed or filmed.

    This is not the only example where live pictures are legal, but pictures of legal behavior are not

    And no, publication and distribution of the illegal pictures are not necessary for it to be a crime


    If a teen makes a sexy pose in front of the mirror, what s/he sees is a live version of level 4 child pornography, according to the copine scale "Deliberately posed pictures of children fully clothed, partially clothed or naked (where the amount,context and organisation suggests sexual interest)."

    If they look  straight at their genitals, they see  a live version of copine level 6 CP: "Pictures emphasizing genital areas, where the child is either naked, partially clothed or fully clothed."

    They see level 7 , If they touch themselves, with their eyes open,: "Pictures that depict touching, mutual and self-masturbation, oral sex and intercourse by a child, not involving an adult."


     

    This is why it is so hard to explain children why sexting is such a huge crime. But possessing one’s own photo in the privacy of one’s own cell phone is production and possession of child pornography. According to the voodoo theory of CP, it victimizes the child who took its own photo.

    We ought to outlaw bathroom mirrors. Because what these children see in the bathroom mirror is a live version of what would be child porn, if photographed or filmed.

     

     


    1. Watching depictions of a child being beheaded by Muslim terrorists, or stoned to death for extramarital sex,  a child being clubbed to death by US inner city gang bangers is totally legal. Distribution of such movies by for-profit web sites or TV networks is legal too.  Now if there is nudity, if in the movie the kid is not clubbed to death but makes love, or masturbates, then a child is being victimized.  We fail to understand this logic.

    2. Committing actual physical violence against children carries lower penalties then possession of photos: Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (40 years)

    3. Why would children or adolescents get victimized by mere watching? “Watching child porn victimizes the child”. The Voodoo science of child pornography laws

    4. Should some kind of child pornography (that does not victimize children) be encouraged, for reducing real crimes against children? Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii)


    See also

    Share

    MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?

    George Zimmerman is an assassin. MSN Brazil spreads this slanderous news in their Brazilian version. George Zimmerman was acquitted and thus must not be called a murderer or assassin. 

    Not satisfied with the normal lies and deceit in the George Zimmerman case, MSN resort to illegal slander. Good for George, to get multi million dollar lawsuit against msn. Before, CBS had doctored the 911 tapes and is being sued by George Zimmerman

    Americanos saem às ruas para pedir justiça contra assassino de Trayvon Martin

    IMG_21072013_081229

    George Zimmerman has been the victim of a concerted defamation campaign ever since black civil rights leaders got wind of the case.

     

    They lied to you, hid evidence.
    Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

     

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture
    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?” »
    MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow? » continues here »

    Share

    They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture

     

     

     

    (1) The trial could only start due to criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey

    .There never was a case that an honest prosecutor could have brought to court, and that an unbiased judge would have allowed to proceed.

     

    In reference to the George Zimmerman trial’s whistleblower who lost his job at the State Attorney’s Office, Dershowitz says Angela Corey should face “disciplinary action” for “deliberately withholding and suppressing” evidence submitted to George Zimmerman’s defense and the judge. He claims Corey “withheld other evidence in the course of the pretrial and trial proceedings.”  7

    You would arrive at the conclusion that Zimmermann is innocent beyond reasonable doubt, and that Trayvon Martin is a murderous aggressor, beyond reasonable doubt.

     

    (2) Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at the place where he had been 240 seconds earlier.

    Path and time line

    The final fight and the killing happened about 60 yards from Zimmerman’s car and 60 yards from Trayvon Martin’s destination. Trayvon Martin, without any doubt, returned to where he was a few minutes before. This is inevitable logic, because the fight happened where Zimmermann was originally.

    Two maps trying to explain George’s and Trayvon’s path

    trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-map-with-911-call-timing-v-3-1

     

     

    If the prosecution and the press were right, out of shape Zimmermann  chased after football athlete Trayvon.

    Trayvon could have simply entered his house, but chose not to do so. Trayvon could have simply outrun Zimmerman but chose not to do so.

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors” »
    They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman&#8… » continues here »

    Share

    Child Pornography, Gun Dealings, on Trayvon Martin’s Cell Phone

    Underage nude females constitute child porn. (Copine scale). Child pornography was found on Trayvon Martin’s cell phone, revealed whistle blower Ben Kruidbos, subsequently fired by special prosecutor Angela Currey.

    Kruidbos testified last month that he found embarrassing photos found on Trayvon’s cellphone, including pictures of a clump of jewelry on a bed, underage nude females, marijuana plants and a hand holding a semiautomatic pistol. Defense attorneys allege that data wasn’t turned over to them as part of the evidence exchange process, known as discovery. Orlando Sentinel

    Possession of child pornography is a strict liability crimepunishable with severe multi-year mandatory prison sentences for each single picture and life long registration as a sex offender.

    According to legal doctrine the depicted minor suffers severe victimization whenever these photos are viewed.

    Nelson declined on Thursday to rule, before trial anyway, on a defense request to sanction prosecutors for allegedly failing to disclose key text messages and photos found in Trayvon’s cell phone.

    The new data included photos of naked “underage” girls, Trayvon smoking, a photo of a gun and texts describing what appeared to show the teen arranging the purchase of a firearm. The information was later released to the media by the defense but won’t be shown initially to jurors.
    Miami Herald (see also Fox News)

    This is all part of Government and media’s lies, deceit about George Zimmermann trial.

    Trayvon Martin, a thuggish criminal with multiple 10 day school suspension for crimes that were never reported to police (possession of lumps of jewelry, burglary tools, drugs, multi round after school MMA fighting and aggression) and now, child pornography and semi-automatic weapon photos.

    Kruidbos, who testified in a pretrial hearing in the Zimmerman case in June, said that he had reason to believe that additional information found in Trayvon Martin’s cell phone had not been turned over to the defense. Kruidbos said more than 2,000 photos from the phone were not shown to defense attorneys, including pictures of underage naked girls, images showing piles of jewelry on Martin’s bed and photos of Martin blowing smoke. HLNtv

    One might dismiss naked underage girls as irrelevant. Human-Stupidity has amply documented, how prosecutors think naked underage girls are extremely relevant due to child pornography  laws.

     

    But piles of jewelry raise suspicion that Trayvon really is a burglar, maybe was checking out houses and was correctly profiled by George Zimmerman.

    Piles of jewelry (likely the proceeds of burglary) had been found in Trayvon Martin’s school backpack, confiscated, and were never part of a police inquiry, due to government orders to avoid disciplining black students.

    After school MMA fighting, gun procurement activities etc. would complete the picture of an aggressor that would not just go home when angered by a suspicious neighborhood watch man, but would go back to exact revenge and blood.

     

    Some of the earliest text messages date back to early November 2011, in which Trayvon, a junior at Dr. Michael M. Krop Senior High School in North Miami-Dade, indicates he was suspended from school for being in a fistfight.

    Later in the month, on the 21st, he exchanged messages with at least one friend about an after-school fight.

    One of Trayvon’s cellphone pictures shows two teens about to square off against one another as a third stands in the middle like a referee. Trayvon said he fought a rival who "snitched on me." I
    n Trayvon Martin’s text messages, talk of marijuana, fights and guns

    Little sweet Trayvon, a habitual street fighter, drug user, interested in guns. Inadmissible evidence?

    Share

    Child porn laws victimize children and adults.

    Irrational absurd child pornography laws

    • victimize children by making them sex criminals for taking, passing on or possessing harmless photos of themselves
    • put a large percentage of children at risk (those who possess so called child porn but are lucky not to be prosecuted)
    • victimize children by increasing actual sex crimes against children (Professor Milton Diamond). Some dangerous pedophiles end up abusing real children because they have no legal outlet perusing pictures.
    • victimize adults that inadvertently possess child pornography. Almost any computer has one potential child porn photo somewhere in a computer cache, recycle bin or spam email. Or in legally downloaded over-18 porn where the actress turned out to be a minor with a true valid government ID that “proved” she was over 18
    • victimize adults that, by sexual orientation, seek child pornography. The prohibition takes away the chance to use a harmless outlet, in the privacy of their home, that does not harm real live children. In the US, possession of photos carries higher penalties then actual forcible child abuse.

    The discussion is further complicated by manipulative language that intentionally confounds children and adolescents, confounds  erotica and explicit pornography.  We will elaborate further below.


    30 percent of 17-year-olds with cell phones report receiving sexually-explicit texts

    In other words, 30% of our adolescents are committing felonies and are at risk of getting victimized by law enforcement and court prosecutors. They are at risk to become registered sex offenders.

    A 13-year-old girl and a 12-year-old boy from Valparaiso have been charged with possession of child pornography and child exploitation after it was discovered they were using their cell phones to exchange nude pictures of themselves with each other.

    sexting2222So the children are exploiting themselves. And photographing oneself is a heinous felony.

    Maybe children should go to prison for looking at themselves in the mirror when nude. Obviously, what they see in the mirror is child pornography.

    Actually, nude children themselves are child pornography. Children see children nude all the time, but they cannot photograph them. It is probably hard for them to fathom that a photo of what they see all the time is a terrible thing,  punishable with higher prison sentences then actual child beating , mutilation and child killing. The reason for this distorted logic is hard to understand. [1] [2]

    Adult laws are crazy and insane, and thus hard to explain to reasonable children.

    The “sexting” case is being dealt with in Indiana’s juvenile court system. In adult court, they could have faced 11 years in prison and been forced to register as sex offenders.

    11 years in prison for photographing oneself. Pure insanity. If they inadvertently keep the photos it still can happen when they grow up [2]

    Porter County Deputy Prosecutor Cheryl Polark told the Northwest Indiana Times that young people don’t understand the ramifications of texting nude pictures or posting certain material on social networking sites like Facebook. She said a nude picture could end up being shared with half the school and could get in the hands of people who seek out child pornography.

    embarrassing nose-picking photo. Might haunt the kid once he becomes president or senatorIt is somewhat embarrassing if the photos get distributed all over school. But there are so many other embarrassing things in life that might end up on the internet. Photos of picking one’s nose, for example.

    But what if they end up in the hands of people who seek out child pornography? Great! So these people could get child pornography that was produced without harming children!  And if they live far away, then even the anonymity of the children is preserved.

    Child pornography reduces sex crimes

    Don’t forget, as Dr. Milton Diamond proved very clearly, that free access to child porn reduces sex crimes against children. The explanation for this is that a pedophile can masturbate to the child porn and thus diminishes his sexual urge and the need to seek live children.

    Of course, “watching child porn victimizes the child”, according to the Voodoo science of child pornography laws”. Again, we can not understand how a child gets victimized if someone secretly looks at their photos, 1000s of miles away, in the privacy of his home. Child pornography laws are simply irrational witch hunt.

    We fail to protect children from serious life threatening damage, be it fetal alcohol syndrome or child food porn that kills millions prematurely.

    Make war, not love

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Child porn laws victimize children and adults.” »
    Child porn laws victimize children and adults. » continues here »

    Share