Famous Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman makes a point against criminalization of drugs in this video interview
Continue reading “Milton Friedman – Why Drugs Should Be Legalized”
Former Army Major Daniel Woolverton Sentenced For Raping Baby. What kind of rape?
|
A former Army Major from our area was sentenced to 27 years in federal prison for a horrific crime: raping a baby. Federal authorities found 30,000 images and 100 videos of child pornography on the computer of 35 year-old Daniel Woolverton. Daniel Woolverton was a 1997 West Point graduate, with a career as an Army trial lawyer that appeared to be on the fast track. Now, hes behind bars after raping a boy as young as three months old, an act he videotaped. "Well, its repulsive," said an Arlington neighbor. "Raping an infant? Oh boy. Thats terrible," said another. wusa9.com/news/ |
Video from wusa9.com/news/ |
Raping a 3 month old infant! We found this terrible, too. So terrible that we consulted a medical doctor to inquire about the consequences of forcible penetrative rape of an infant. He confirmed our suspicion: The absolute mismatch in size would cause extreme, grave, life threatening injuries in an immature infant. So, how come, there is no mention of such grave injury?
We remembered Definition of "Rape": When a "Rape" is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word "Rape": indecent touching of a minor is "rape". It is absolutely impossible for us to know what kind of activities Daniel Wolverton engaged in Our language lost its precision and its power. The new "rape" definition serves purely to mislead the public as to the nature of the crime. To incite the mob.
Isn’t the truth enough? Most likely he did indecent touching and fumbling with an infant. Yes fumbling in places and ways he should not fumble. But it seems he did not engage in activities that would permanently hurt, mutilate and hospitalize the child.
Compare: Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years.)
Aren’t we insensitive? Defending a infant rapist? No, we don’t say what he did was right and defensible. We just say we should not mislead the public as to what he did. One thing is for sure. Thanks to the new definition of "rape", we can not know what he did.
Continue reading “Former Army Major Daniel Woolverton Sentenced For Raping Baby. What kind of rape?”
Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (40 years)
- Greenburgh nanny sentenced for shaking baby […] two years in state prison and three years of post release supervision on her July 2008 guilty plea to reckless assault on a child in the first degree. […] As a result of the violent shaking, the baby suffered a subdural hematoma and diffuse rental hemorrhages, injuries that can lead to numerous, potential lifelong developmental challenges.
Nanny sentenced to five years for shaking toddler to death- Nanny Gets Four Years For Shaking Baby: severity of the injuries included multiple skull fractures and massive brain hemorrhages.
- New Study Finds That Many People Guilty of Child Abuse Get “Off the Hook” in Court | Shaken Baby Syndrome Attorney
- A woman knowingly drinks lots of alcohol when pregnant, and thus culpably giving birth to a permanently disfigured and mentally retarded child. Verdict: No crime, no jail
Compare this to
- Independence, MO —Two local men are going to federal prison on child pornography convictions. Both were sentenced Tuesday. Martin A. Cordry, 48, of Sugar Creek was sentenced to 40 years in prison without parole.
- A trucker arrested in Flagstaff for possession and transportation of child pornography has been sentenced to more than 11 years in federal prison. Prosecutors say 61-year-old Richard Self was convicted last November on three counts of transportation of child pornography and three counts of possession of child pornography. The Arizona Daily Sun says Self was sentenced Monday to a 135-month term
- Travis Matthew, 26, pleaded guilty last September to receiving child pornography and was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison.
- The former music minister at St. Eugene Catholic Church in Asheville was sentenced to 28 years in prison, followed by a lifetime of supervised release in connection with a child pornography charge. […] guilty plea to a single criminal count of production of child pornography,
- More examples: child porn witch hunt
Is there gender bias? Obsessive punishment for sexual deviations?
Bruna Surfistinha: A famous happy hooker middle class girl in Brazil
ex
Below the Real Bruna in a famous TV show
Bruna Surfer Girl: The real Bruna in a famous TV show in Brazil
Online call girl exposes sex myths of Brazil | The Sunday Times
SHE was known to her clients as Bruna the Surfer Girl, a chic São Paolo prostitute who fled her middle-class home at the age of 17 to sell herself to up to five men a day. Then Bruna took to the internet, and her racy accounts of life as a high-class Brazilian call girl have earned her international fame.
Six months after she gave up prostitution to turn her blog into a bestselling book, Bruna — whose real name is Raquel Pacheco — has become an improbable sex symbol in Brazil and a potential goldmine for publishers and film-makers around the world.
Bruna Surfistinha (2011)
Raquel is a girl, adopted by an upper middle class family, who rebelled at 17 and left her family and studies at a traditional college in São Paulo to become a call girl. Shortly after starting work, she decided to write a blog about her experiences. Since some clients thought she looked like a surfer she adopted the name "Surfistinha" which means little surfer girl. This blog became a sensation, and quickly became one of the most popular blogs in Brazil. Becoming famous, her life changed significantly. She went on to be interviewed on Brazilian talk shows similar to Oprah and David Letterman, all the while continuing her blog about her racy exploits. She wrote a book about these experiences "O Doce Veneno Do Escorpião".
The Scorpion’s Sweet Venom: The Diary of a Brazilian Call Girl]
Another example of a happy hooker. Does she look like a victim?
Gladly, she is not a citizen of the USA, where certainly she would be victimized by the US legal system
Compare
- "Belle de Jour": Cancer Scientist financed Doctorate with Prostitution
- Feminist arguments against prostitution debunked
Continue reading “Bruna Surfistinha: A famous happy hooker middle class girl in Brazil”
Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse!
"Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children." (Adapted freely from protectchildren.ca/app/en/mandatory
| This is a terrible flaw in our child porn laws: unborn life is not protected. There is must be mandatory 10 year jail sentence for pedophiles that watch unborn nudity. We must protect our unborn fetuses from the perversity of pedophiles (embryophiles and fetophiles). Watching such unborn child porn kills: Often, ultrasound pictures lead to abortions, to killing of unborn life. | Tell the House: Protect the unborn child against abuse. Criminalize production, possession, and possession of Unborn Child Porn.
|
.
 Perverts take ultrasound photos of unborn babies and distribute them on the internet. source But does it harm nobody? Weinstein’s critics argue that merely “viewing” unborn child porn does real harm to unborn kids by perpetuating a $3 billion annual market. The Justice Department estimates that in creating their product, unborn child pornographers have abused 1 million unborn kids in the United States. And some studies suggest that between 30 and 50 percent of viewers of unborn child porn also molest a child. (freely adapted from theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/jack-weinstein/8273/) |
Fetuses engaging in indecent touching. Perverts owning such photos deserve to be raped in jail forever. This picture would be rated 7 on the 10 point Copine child pornography scale:
The fetuses also should be arrested at birth: handcuffed, jailed, and be registered as sex offenders for life. |
|
It is important to realize that these images are crime scene photos – they are a permanent record of the abuse of an unborn child. The lives of the unborn children featured in these illegal images and videos are forever altered. Once these images are on the Internet, they are irretrievable and can continue to circulate forever. The unborn child is revictimized as the images are viewed again and again. (adapted freely from missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?PageId=1504)
“He didn’t intend to hurt anyone. However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” |
 Technology has made it possible to have unborn porn. Source: uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Child_porn I thank Uncycolpedia for their child porn persiflage which gave me inspiration for this article |
Children of 17 years, 12 years, 5 years, 1 year, 1 month of age are all protected strict laws from being abused by viewers of sexual erotic photos and videos. Owning such photos of children and looking at such photos and videos is child abuse.
But why this 0-18 year age limit? The 18 year cutoff rate already is getting softened. Europe and Australia already punish the possession of depictions of "aparently underage" for 22 year old women in pony tails that look as if they were 17 years old. Thus the law now protects young looking 22 year old women from child abuse. (see 17 year old "children"?)
Now we need to work on the other end of the age range. Who says that the lower age limit for child pornography prosecutions has to be zero year old new borns? Embryos and fetuses need protection against abuse and rape, too. Right from conception, when human life is created.
Unborn-child-porn leads to 100 000’s child killings
Often such ultrasound photos are the first step in the monstrous killing of unborn babies. Most abortionists demand ultrasound photos of the unborn child before killing it. Or even with mothers who did not plan to kill the unborn child, ultrasound pictures discover a problem with the child and thus cause her to decide to kill the innocent unborn child.
And these child killings feed the market for mutilated dead-fetus-porn (dead-unborn-child-porn)
Mutilated dead unborn-child-porn (mutilated fetus porn)
Warning: fairly gruesome photos follow. Dead-unborn-child-porn, mainly from "pro-life" organizations.
Warning: very graphic pictures. These fotos are so gruesome, we will not endeavour to publish them. Many are clearly unborn-child=porn, as the genitals are obscenely exposed. We only publish censored blacked-out pixelated versions. Click to see the uncensored mutilated dead unborn-child-porn.
Dead fetuses in indecent poses with genitals exposed
Continue reading “Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse!”
Consent, rape & minors. What is consent to sex?
Any six year old knows perfectly well if s/he is coerced while overpowered and threatened, or acts consensually out of free will.
Try to explain her/nim that the stupid adults have defined all sexual activity even of late 17 year or 15 year old adolescents as non-consensual. So it is the same "non-consensual rape" if a 17 year old takes the initiative to work hard to seduce an adult to have sex, or if the same adult rapes him/her at knifepoint.
The first example is "statutory rape" and the second is "forcible rape", the reader might retort. That differentiation has long been lost outside theoretical academic discussion.
The press happily reports about trials and conviction of "rapists" that raped the victim 300 times. No, she did not lock up the "victim" in a dungeon for years, like Mr. Fritzl. The victim came always came back for more, but did not consent (by our weird definition of legal consent). Human-Stupidity even documented a case where the rapist, unbeknownst to him, was duped by the victim into raping her.
Children of 6,8, or 15 years risk serious legal consequences, even jail, if they don’t know these confusing definitions and regulations. Therefore this ought to be be mandatory elementary school subject.
Human-Stupidity has repeatedly, assailed the tendency in modern law, incited by feminism, to "rape" and manipulate language, to use inaccurate and deliberately inflammatory, emotive language to try to foster a hidden agenda.
Due to feminist zeal to vilify consensual lovers of adolescent women, we belittle the true suffering of victims of forcible rape victims.
Human-Stupidity thinks it it truly offensive to the underage victims of real forcible violent rape to equate their suffering to the the "suffering" of willing participants in sex, to equate their resistance and unequivocal non-consent to the voluntary though legally invalid consent, or to the suddenly withdrawn consent in a "six second rape".
Minors under 18 (or 16) years of age can not consent to sex. When spoken by a minor under the age of consent, then by this definition, the following absurd equality holds.
|
"I love you, please make love to me" |
= |
"NOOO, don’t touch me, leave me alone" |
 |
= |
 |
Both statements above are non-consent of rape-victims, in case the birds are under the age of consent.
Continue reading “Consent, rape & minors. What is consent to sex?”
Walter E. Williams: How much can discrimination explain?
- Does the American basketball league discriminate against whites? 70% of the players in the US basketball league are black!
- How come, Jews, a discriminated group, earn 30% of US Nobel Prizes even though they are only 3% of the population?
- If you see a tiger approaching you, do you stereotype the tiger and run? Or do you first try to find out about the individual tiger before you make a discriminatory decision?
A black professor can ask such questions. I wonder what would happen if a white professor asks such politically incorrect questions, Highly recommended, though long 53 minute speech.
NOTE for those interested in feminism and men’s rights:
similar arguments apply to feminist claims re. sex discrimination against females.
Walter E. Williams, (born 1936 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) is an American economist, commentator, and academic. He is the John M Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University, as well as a syndicated columnist and author known for his libertarian views.
Continue reading “Walter E. Williams: How much can discrimination explain?”
Repressive sex laws in the "Land of the Free". Polygyny in birds & human meddling in other people’s sexuality
Why do we, in the land of the free, have a prohibition of polygyny, a victimless crime? Why does the law restrict people’s freedom needlessly? Why do consenting adults have many legal restrictions to their sexual liberty? Teenage sexuality is full of legal problems (Consult a lawyer before playing doctor. Perverse sex laws traumatize children).
Why do we feel a compulsion to meddle in other peoples freedom to form whatever form of marriage or sexual relationship they might want to engage in?
Many women would rather be the second (or fifth) wife of an attractive, rich, powerful man like Tiger Woods or Brad Pitt, then the first and only wife of boring, fat, jobless, broke alcoholic Joe Bloke in a Detroit ghetto. Even just being Tiger’s mistress is much more exciting then Joe Bloke. Why does our law restrict the liberty of these women, and of Tiger Woods?
Repression of other people’s sexuality is in the reproductive interest of older married women, of unattractive men. Even vor the successful alpha male it is advantagous to repress sexuality in others, while hypocritically pursuing his own promiscuous sexuality (remember Eliot Spitzer?).
In this post we show that evolutionary theory suggests evolution has created mental modules in our brains to repress sexuality in others, The gut feelings caused by these modules get rationalized into theories that give rise to repressive legislation.
Polygyny in birds
When good males are scarce, a female bird may prefer to become the second mate of a higher quality male with a bigger territory.
 Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind by Robert Kurzban $27.95 0691146748 (all quotes are from Kurzban’s book. This book is a must-read to really understand this topic here) |
|
Morality for the birds?
To better understand how evolution could have formed modules for anti-polygyny morality, Kurzban analyzes a hypothetical bird population where moral rules prohibit polygyny. He asks
Which birds stand to gain reproductive advantage when polygyny is prohibited?
- "Clearly, female birds already paired with the best male mates will do better. Their mates won’t be able to acquire secondary females whose offspring would compete for the man’s resources." (Kurzban, p 209). Women married with good males have reasons to be feminists. Hillary Clinton only loses if hubby Bill gets entangled with interns. In contrast, Monica Lewinsky probably would have fared very well as Bill Clinton’s second or even fifth wife.
- "There’s a natural alliance between monogamously mated females and low quality males because they both gain by enforced monogamy". "low-quality males benefit, since they now might get mates who would otherwise wind up as secondary mates of high-quality males" (Kurzban, p.) In a polygynous animal, primate, or human societies, many low-quality get no wives and no offspring at all. "Low quality males would have a deep, abiding, even crucial interest in rules that force everyone into monogamy" (Kurzban, p 213). Remember, evolution selected for mental modules that gave us reproductive advantage in the EEA, in small groups of hunter-gatherers. It seems that for low quality males, monogamy is the only chance to get a wife, rear offspring and thus have reproductive success! Low quality males that successfully prevent the high quality males from monopolizing multiple females would have considerably more offspring then tolerant open minded men who would remain empty handed while the high quality males would get all the females.
- Almost all males "benefit from all other males being monogamous, even if they themselves are not [monogamous]? […] "it’s best to constrain others’ sexual behavior. We’re all in favor of moral rule that prevent others from doing things that harm our own interests, but it is to our advantage to not obey our own rule.
- High quality alpha males can profit from imposing monogamy on other males. Powerful males have a better chance to remain unpunished if they violate these rules (at least in birds with no feminist dominated court system)
- The losers of polygyny prohibition are un-paired females who have to settle for a lower quality male (‘a loser’) because they are deprived of the freedom to choose to be wife #2 of a high quality male (with better genes, bigger territory, and more resources).
- The other losers of enforced monogamy are the "cads" the sexy good looking promiscuous players. They are attractive to women for having good genes, but they can’t win the battle over who brings the most worms. "Without promiscuity, sexy males can’t make the most of what they’ve got." (Kurzban, p. 211).
- "Dads, however, win if the sexy males can’t be promiscuous. (They also benefit from keeping their females at home, rather than searching for the good-gene cads)" (p 211) "Dads" are mated male birds that invest in their family and bring home worms for their kids.
We have an "interfere in other people’s private sex life" mental module.
"Humans are extremely social, and our survival and reproduction are determined in large part by how well we navigate the social world. Given this, it’s reasonable to expect that our minds are designed to compete fiercely-if not subtly- for the benefits in the social world: the best mates, the best friends, membership in the best groups, and so on. The outcomes of these competitions would have had massive effects on reproductive success over the course of human evolution."
So birds, mammals, and humans that increase their reproductive success by restricting other people’s sexual access will out-compete the democratic, personal-liberty-respecting tolerant liberal individuals.
We will post more about Kurzban’s theory of the modular mind, and the evolutionary advantages of internal inconsistency, self-deception, hypocrisy to explain this further. But to get a deep understanding one probably needs to read evolutionary literature
- Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind by Robert Kurzban $27.95 0691146748 |Amazon paperback or kindle version
Humans have "moralistic modules designed to favor rules that promote their fitness interests".
"The hypothetical birds would vote for policies that prevent others from engaging in sex outside mateships and anything else that goes along with promiscuity. "they probably would not know why they were opposed to these practices. Their decision would be based on the output of certain modules designed to limit other people’s promiscuity. They would be insensitive to arguments about freedom and individual choice, and unaware of being inconsistent. They would probably rationalize this as being ‘pro-family", pro-life. Their resistance against abortion might be based in the desire to punish the females for having sex, and not in the desire to save embryos or in theories about the beginning of life." (Kurzban)
"They might be opposed to abortion -the availability of which by reducing the costs of sex, might well be linked to promiscuity" (Kurzban)