Child Porn on Australian WTV television (and in video stores and academy award winning movies "The Tin Drum")?

The 1978 film Felicity was promoted by its makers as a movie that "follows the exploits of a sheltered teen as she sheds her inhibitions and surrenders her blossoming body to a world of bold sexual adventure".

The 90-minute film avoided an X rating on its release and was rated R 18+ because censors believed it contained "scenes of intercourse, implied fellatio, lesbian activity and dialogue" discreet enough for restricted viewing.

Sound like a movie that was slightly pornographic then, and now certainly fulfills the criteria for child porn as laid out in the Copine scale and Dost test.

WTV [television] board member John Rapsey said the approval for release in 1978 was evidence the film did not contain material considered child pornography. TV station in ‘child porn’ row

This, of course, is a big mistake. Movies, newspaper, magazines that were main stream in the 70’s nowadays are child porn. In Germany, video stores routinely got raided for having ldft over soft core or hard core videos that formerly were legal. Most people are unaware that the child porn hysteria is relatively new.

In 1978, Britain’s newspapers had nude girls on page 3, Holland  legally distributed hard core porn with 16 and even 15 year old girls, Germany’s reputable "Der Spiegel" put a 14 year old nude on their cover, and all over Germany, nudist magazines showed nude boys and girls of any age frolicking at beaches.  The only reason that Video store owners don’t get arrested DVD’s of "The blue Lagoon" and "Taxi driver" is that this would cause a scandal and would expose the ridiculousness of the CP (child pornography) witch hunt. These mainstream movie films have underage actors depicting underage characters engaging in sexual activites. Pure child porography.

So I am pretty sure that the complainant was right:

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Child Porn on Australian WTV television (and in video stores and academy award winning movies "The Tin Drum")?” »
Child Porn on Australian WTV television (and in video stores and a…
» continues here »

Sexting children Margarite, Isaiah in Lacey, Washington avoid jail

A district attorney ignored child porn laws and punished sexting children sensibly for gross misdemeanor of telephone harassment instead of following the law and seeking felony convictions for child porn with life long sex offender registration.  It would be better if sexting laws were changed for good, as suggested by legal scholars.

LACEY, Wash. — One day last winter Margarite posed naked before her bathroom mirror, held up her cellphone and took a picture. Then she sent the full-length frontal photo to Isaiah, her new boyfriend.
A Girl’s Nude Photo, and Altered Lives | New York Times

She produced and distributed child pornography. This is what the law says.

They broke up soon after. A few weeks later, Isaiah forwarded the photo to another eighth-grade girl, once a friend of Margarite’s. Around 11 o’clock at night, that girl slapped a text message on it.

“Ho Alert!” she typed. “If you think this girl is a whore, then text this to all your friends.” Then she clicked open the long list of contacts on her phone and pressed “send.”

Rude, inconsiderate, bad character, worthy of punishment. But grounding a few days for rude and inconsiderate behavior. What is the punishment for adults for re-distributing nude photos without a model release?  Not jailing a few years for distributing child pornography! But, remember, it’s the law!

In a world without child porn laws, by regular laws about adult photos, these guys should get a serious slap on the wrist, and Margarite should go unpunished. But, according to our laws, she is a felon. Compare: In the brave new world of ‘sexting,’ females are ‘victims’ of the very crime they commit

But when that sexually explicit image includes a participant — subject, photographer, distributor or recipient — who is under 18, child pornography laws may apply.

“I didn’t know it was against the law,” Isaiah said.

That is because culturally, such a fine distinction eludes most teenagers. Their world is steeped in highly sexualized messages. Extreme pornography is easily available on the Internet. Hit songs and music videos promote stripping and sexting. A Girl’s Nude Photo, and Altered Lives | New York Times

Human-Stupidity keeps pointing out: the consequences of such dumb laws are that we adults have the obligation to teach children the law.

After all, the poor children get punished for infractions they don’t even know about!? And they can not know, they are not normal natural infractions like lying, stealing, hurting people. That means that we have to tell 8 year olds that they go to jail or face other serious legal consequences if they do sexual touching when they are 10 or 12. And we need to explain exactly what type of photos are illegal. And we have to face the children’s questions: "why do I go to jail for photographing myself?" "Oh, I go to jail so I don’t abuse myself? I go to jail for my own protection?" Of course, it does not make sense. (Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12.)

Of course, this way we inoculate sexual thoughts into the 99% of the children who would never have thought any sexual thoughts.

Note that adult sexting is legal! Holding our children up to higher standards then ourselves. Ridiculous!

The most troubling behavior in this story is that by the non-parental authority figures. Charging 12- and 13-year-olds with dissemination of child pornography? Authorizing principals to search cellphones at will to root out sexts? Someone please explain to me how society was served and justice done by hauling at eighth grader to jail in this instance? What a great way to teach young people to become citizens – show them that the 4th Amendment doesn’t count if the Principal says so.reader’s comment

Very true. This happens all the time. Violating profound constitutional principles to prosecute alleged sex crimes. No due process in rape prosecutions, criminalizing thought crimes in child pornography prosecutions. Draconian punishment under the guise of protecting victims. In this case there was a real victim, but she was partially to blame for her innocent stupid trust.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Sexting children Margarite, Isaiah in Lacey, Washington avoid jail” »
Sexting children Margarite, Isaiah in Lacey, Washington avoid jail
» continues here »

What is a Pedophile? Hebephile, Ephebophile, Teleiophile, Infantophile

15 year old Brooke Shields - no pedophilia, rather Ephebophilia, or Teleiophilia.

Hebephile, a newly proposed diagnostic classification in which people display a sexual preference for children at the cusp of puberty, between the ages of, roughly, 11 to 14 years of age. Pedophiles, in contrast, show a sexual preference for clearly prepubescent children. There are also ephebophiles (from ephebos, meaning “one arrived at puberty” in Greek), who are mostly attracted to 15- to 16-year-olds; teleiophiles (from teleios, meaning, “full grown” in Greek), who prefer those 17 years of age or older); and even the very rare gerontophile (from gerontos, meaning “old man” in Greek), someone whose sexual preference is for the elderly. So although child sex offenders are often lumped into the single classification of pedophilia, biologically speaking it’s a rather complicated affair. Some have even proposed an additional subcategory of pedophilia, “infantophilia,” to distinguish those individuals most intensely attracted to children below six years of age.
Based on this classification scheme of erotic age orientations, even the world’s best-known fictitious “pedophile,” Humbert Humbert from Nabokov’s masterpiece, Lolita, would more properly be considered a hebephile. (Likewise the protagonist from Thomas Mann’s Death in Venice, a work that I’ve always viewed as something of the “gay Lolita”).  
Why most "pedophiles" aren’t really pedophiles, technically speaking | Scientific American

Photo of 10 year old Brooke Shields might be just artistic photography. But those who feel sexually attracted are pedophiles.The meaning of the word "Pedophile" was manipulatively changed and distorted. Pedophile is a clearly defined scientific term meaning an adult that has attraction to pre-pubertal children.

We are discussing grammar, semantics, and politics of language manipulation here.
We are not defending or condoning pedophile activities.

Brooke Shields (2008). Is she getting victimized each time one watches her movies or adolescent nude/bikini photos? 1000's times per day?Correct Terminology

Hebephiles, Ephebophiles, Teleiophile were grouped into the "pedophile" group. So a "worse label’ can be attached to a sexual offender. An "adolescent lover" who had a 17 year old girlfriend is called "child lover" (or rather, in a second step of vilification, child rapist). Sure helps to secure longer jail terms and to get the population angry.  This is exactly identical to the manipulation that extended the word "child" from under 12 or under 14, to under 18, admittedly for the purpose of enforcing child protection laws for adolescents.

Additionally, child mutilators and murderers are usually called "pedophiles" in the press. Killing children has nothing to do with "child lovers" or sexual attraction for children.

Brooke Shields re-victimized constantly?

Thus someone gets arrested for possession of Brooke Shields 15 year photos , falsely called a pedophile, and the average Joe thinks he is a baby murderer. Note that the bikini photo of a 15 year-old  becomes child pornography in case one collects the photo for sexual arousal (Copine level 4).

According to child porn persecution theory, "children" (under 18) get re-victimized whenever someone looks at their depictions.. We prevented the re-victimization of Brooke Shields through the first 10 year old photo by putting black bars at all private parts.  Add to this the famous Brooke Shields movies (Blue Lagoon, …) , one can see that Brooke Shields constantly gets re-victimized thousands of times per day by people who watch these movies with an impure mind.

Ruinous persecution of mother and father for innocent baby bath photos. It is preposterous to assume that parents or a large number of men are "infantophiles". We want to stress that attraction to infants is a serious sexual aberration and certainly must not be acted upon.

Infantophiles

Of course, Infant abusers can be labelled with a stronger label then "pedophile". Those attracted to 17 year olds are more ostracised by the incorrect application of the name "pedophile" or child lover, then by "teleiophile", late adolescent lover. To reach the maximum vilification, the word "infantophile" is now, correctly, created. It is undesirable that perverts that mess with infants can hide behind the word "pedophile", which could mean attraction to 9 year olds.

We are discussing grammar, semantics, and politics of language manipulation here. We are not defending or condoning pedophile activities.

There are also law abiding pedophiles who declaredly do not act upon their attraction. These, in spite of being accused merely of thought crimes, are in danger of being hurt by angy pedophile vigilantes.

Other Language manipulation ("rape", "consent")

Human-Stupidity has assailed the manipulative distortion of language is very common in the service of criminalizing adolescent sexuality.  The meaning of "rape" and "consent" have been manipulatively changed, just like "pedophile" and "child".

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “What is a Pedophile? Hebephile, Ephebophile, Teleiophile, Infantophile” »
What is a Pedophile? Hebephile, Ephebophile, Teleiophile, Infantop…
» continues here »

Copine/ Sap Scales, Dost Test: Severity of child porn

The COPINE scale was originally developed for therapeutic psychological purposes. More specifically, it is used to distinguish between child erotica and child pornography. […]

In the late 1990s, the COPINE project ("Combating Paedophile Information Networks in Europe") at the University of Cork, in cooperation with the Paedophile Unit of the London Metropolitan Police, developed a typology to categorize child abuse images for use in both research and law enforcement.[4] The ten-level typology was based on analysis of images available on websites and internet newsgroups. Other researchers have adopted similar ten-level scales. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COPINE_scale

http://www.pbfcomics.com/archive_b/PBF215-Kitty_Photographer.jpg

Is the child victimized by the photographer? or is the photographer victimized by the child porn law?

 

SAP scale

In 2002, the sentencing advisory panel (SAP) of England and Wales devised the SAP scale, condensing the different levels of child porn from 10 to 5 It dropped the Copine levels 1 to 3 completely.  The SAP levels indicate increased seriousness of the crime, and are also considered indications of the dangerousness of the offender (which is problematic).  See Sexual deviance: theory, assessment, and treatment.

Dost Test

In order to better determine whether a visual depiction of a minor constitutes a "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area" under 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(A), the court developed six criteria. […]

1) Whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child’s genitalia or pubic area.

Harmless photos might become child pornography, when cropped in a way that they emphasize clothed genital areas. Cropping a photo (with emphasis on the genital areas) turns it from a legal mainstream newspaper child swimsuit photo into a heinous child porn photo. It is hard to understand how the child in the photo can be victimized by cropping the photo.

Concerning the lascivious display of clothed genitalia, the Department of Justice described use of the Dost test in child pornography and 2257 documentation regulations in a 2008 rule, writing that the precedent United States v. Knox, 32 F.3d 733 (3d Cir. 1994) did not prohibit ordinary swim team or underwear model photographs, but "although the genitals were clothed in that case, they were covered by thin, opaque clothing with an obvious purpose to draw attention to them, were displayed by models who spread or extended their legs to make the pubic and genital region entirely visible to the viewer, and were displayed by models who danced or gyrated in a way indicative of adult sexual relations." […]

The test was criticized by NYU Law professor Amy Adler as forcing members of the public to look at pictures of children as a pedophile would in order to determine whether they are considered inappropriate. "As everything becomes child pornography in the eyes of the law—clothed children, coy children, children in settings where children are found—perhaps children themselves become pornographic en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dost_test

Everything becomes child pornography. 

You will see in the Copine scale analysis below, that any department store adolescent lingerie catalog can become child pornography, when collected by a man that might get excited by the photos.

Human-Stupidity Analysis

The Copine scale (and the derived Sap scale) is a good attempt to rate child pornography on one dimension, by its "seriousness".

It totally fails to consider 2 other important dimensions

  1. age:  penetrative sex with a toddler or with a 17 year old have the same rating (Copine 9 out of 10). The first causes serious injuries and is surely unnatural. The second is perfectly legal in Europe where the age of consent is 16, a natural legal act between adolescent lovers, still it is one of the most serious levels of child porn. An adolescent couple can legally have sex, but they cannot photograph themselves doing it. Otherwise they get victimized by themselves (?). Human-Stupidity believes they get victimized by the insane laws.
  2. consent vs. non-consent: consensual S/M spanking play of adolescent minors or kidnapping torture are the same (Copine 10, the highest rating)

The Copine scale

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Copine/ Sap Scales, Dost Test: Severity of child porn” »
Copine/ Sap Scales, Dost Test: Severity of child porn
» continues here »

Julie Carr performed oral sex with baby daughter: 17 years jail; filmed it: 20 years. Too harsh compared to 4 years for baby killer?

 

Is our sex obsessed society punishing sexual child abuse too severely,
compared to serious bodily harm to children?

Julie Carr Performed oral sex with baby daughter: 17 years jail; filmed it: 20 years.
Compare: killing baby: 4 years; causing permanent brain damage: 2 years.

We will be attacked now with untrue accusations of "promoting child abuse". Which, of course, we are not doing. We don’t say Julie Carr should go unpunished.

Warning: not safe for children. Do not continue reading if you are easily offended.

We try to avoid explicit language, but even CNN uses some semi-explicit language

 

We are wondering what is less damaging to the infant:

  1. a mother licking baby in the wrong places. (17 years in jail) plus 10 years supervision plus life long sex offender registration
  2. physical abuse: violent shaking of an infant causing permanent life long brain damage (2 years jail). Or killing infant (4-5 years in jail). No registration in murderous-nanny-registry to prevent future work as nanny.

No, we are not condoning either behavior. We don’t think it is normal, healthy behavior. Sorry for questioning conventional wisdom and asking taboo questions.

If we suggested killing Julie Carr vigilante style, to mete out a death sentence, or 4 life sentences without parole, that would be acceptable.

But suggesting to even think about lower sentencing for certain kinds of child sexual abuse, is a no-no. We have been warned that this would be dangerous. We hope we will not attract vigilante threats.

But, our sense of justice, our sense of scientific curiosity compels us to ask these questions: Are some licks in inappropriate places really warrant much longer jail terms then violent brain and spinal cord trauma? What kind and how much damage is being caused in the infant by mom licking in inappropriate places? No, we don’t promote or condone such behavior.

And how many other so called "child rapists’ did not do more then Julie Carr? (Did we mention that we don’t condone this behavior, but are opposed to misleadingly call fondling and licking "rape").

Woman sentenced after streaming sex abuse of daughter over webcam|CNN

[Julie] Carr used a webcam to deliver four live videos of herself performing oral sex on her youngest daughter, according to the documents. The videos were sent to Nicholas Wilde, then 19, in West Midlands, England, whom Carr had met on an internet dating site, the documents said.
Woman sentenced after streaming sex abuse of daughter over webcam|CNN

We were surprised that the crime was labeled correctly:
"oral sex on an infant"  and and not the usual "rape of infant".

In case you don’t know, any sexual activity, like kissing or fondling with a minor is defined as "rape". Probably it would sound too weird and incredible to write "Mother raped infant daughter". If it were perpetrated by a man, certainly the headline would read "Man raped his infant daughter".   And everyone would imagine the guy having committed more atrocious acts then licking a baby’s privates.  (No, we don’t approve of this!)

Compare this headline:  Former Army Major Daniel Woolverton Sentenced For Raping Baby. Whereupon Human-Stupidity provokingly asked "What kind of rape"?  (No, we don’t condone Woolverton’s behavior).

We did not want to be sexually explicit, so we refrained from the graphic terminology CNN used in this case here. But we suspect Woolverton probably engaged in similar activities as mother Julie Carr, like oral sex and manual indecent touching.  In Woolverton’s case, we can not know, due to modern misleading language definitions of rape.

We will be crucified for this. People will falsely accuse us of condoning sexual abuse of children. We do not condone Woolverton’s or Julie Carr’s behavior..

Rather our message is 2 fold

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Julie Carr performed oral sex with baby daughter: 17 years jail; filmed it: 20 years. Too harsh compared to 4 years for baby killer?” »
Julie Carr performed oral sex with baby daughter: 17 years jail; f…
» continues here »

Cute child photo scares Reddit’s men’s rights into child porn frenzy

Child Porn or Cutsie child photo? with-this-i-am-going-to-control-your-life

Reddit men’s rights is one of the most powerful sites countering feminist indoctrination and propaganda on the web. Even mens rights proponents are scared out of their wits about the greatest taboo on earth, the child porn witch hunt.

The founder and moderator of reddit’s r/mensrights reported this photo to authorities. If men’s rights movement joins the witch hunt that jails mainly men for decades for mere possession of photos often almost as harmless as the one in question here, who will defend men’s rights to liberty? Note that the photo has a deeper meaning, about how men’s “pussy obsession” allows women’s to have power in men’s life.

He is worried about this:

“r/mensrights, a forum for over 21,000 disgruntled misogynists, claims that they seek to rescind laws that protect rape victims, molested children, and battered women in order to ‘restore equality to men.’ Given the shocking content that is being called ‘pornographic’ that was posted and endorsed by its fan base, it seems only fitting that their motives be called into question. the image is reported to contain two very young children exploring each other’s sexual organs. Does this community really wish to do justice for ‘oppressed’ men? Or do they just want carte-blanche to victimize children and rape their wives?”

Femimedia would eat that kind of shit up.

The reddit r/mensrights moderator might be right. It is worse saying anything in defense of “child porn” then saying “the earth revolves around the sun, the bible got that wrong” during the middle age inquisition. It is a sure way to get ostracized and to detract from any fact and topic one might want to focus on.

I am begging users, if you see sexual images involving children, report it immediately to ASACP. No one should want that shit in here. submitted by kloo2yoo

A post was up for 12 hours or so, while I was away. No one had sent a message to the modqueue, and no one had reported it. that user has been banned, and the post reported to law enforcement, and to the Reddit admins.

http://www.asacp.org/

I’m fucking disgusted and I’m fucking pissed, and I almost closed and locked the forum, but I don’t want to take it out on all 21,546 other users. don’t do that shit.

Now reporting this to child porn persecution authorities, that really is going overboard. But, asacp probably think kloo2you is pulling their leg and will not report this to police, afraid of making themselves a laughing stock. So maybe not much damage is being done.

Imagine if this same image was posted on a feminist forum, would the asacp need to be involved? LOL! of course not!

Only men are pedophiles!

Thanks for keeping up the stereotype get a kloo2yoo.

There is a major rift in the “Men’s rights movement”. Most men’s righters are conservative fathers who are worried about the false domestic violence accusation industry, about debtor’s prison for fathers unable to pay the alimony that reduces them to work slaves. They could care less about the thousands men being locked up in prison for 20 years for often inadvertent possession of photos, often of mere nude adolescent erotica  (read more here) or for having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl that was in a over-21-bar thanks to a fake ID.

20 years ago I overheard leading academic authorities in sexology “Child Porn is the new witch hunt”.  So is adolescent sexuality.

So if mainstream men’s rights thinks they need to join the unjust persecution of men for possession of harmless photos, they should re-name themselves “father’s rights”. And a “free men’s sexuality” movement is urgently needed.  Human-Stupidity is one of the few sites daring to stare down the sex offender persecution monster.

Please read more in human stupidity’s child porn witch hunt section.

Child Porn or Cutsie child photo? with-this-i-am-going-to-control-your-life

Reddit men’s rights is one of the most powerful sites countering feminist indoctrination and propaganda on the web. Even mens rights proponents are scared out of their wits about the greatest taboo on earth, the child porn witch hunt.

The founder and moderator of reddit’s r/mensrights reported this photo to authorities. If men’s rights movement joins the witch hunt that jails mainly men for decades for mere possession of photos often almost as harmless as the one in question here, who will defend men’s rights to liberty? Note that the photo has a deeper meaning, about how men’s "pussy obsession" allows women’s to have power in men’s life.

He is worried about this:

"r/mensrights, a forum for over 21,000 disgruntled misogynists, claims that they seek to rescind laws that protect rape victims, molested children, and battered women in order to ‘restore equality to men.’ Given the shocking content that is being called ‘pornographic’ that was posted and endorsed by its fan base, it seems only fitting that their motives be called into question. the image is reported to contain two very young children exploring each other’s sexual organs. Does this community really wish to do justice for ‘oppressed’ men? Or do they just want carte-blanche to victimize children and rape their wives?"

Femimedia would eat that kind of shit up.

The reddit r/mensrights moderator might be right. It is worse saying anything in defense of "child porn" then saying "the earth revolves around the sun, the bible got that wrong" during the middle age inquisition. It is a sure way to get ostracized and to detract from any fact and topic one might want to focus on.

I am begging users, if you see sexual images involving children, report it immediately to ASACP. No one should want that shit in here. submitted by kloo2yoo

A post was up for 12 hours or so, while I was away. No one had sent a message to the modqueue, and no one had reported it. that user has been banned, and the post reported to law enforcement, and to the Reddit admins.

http://www.asacp.org/

I’m fucking disgusted and I’m fucking pissed, and I almost closed and locked the forum, but I don’t want to take it out on all 21,546 other users. don’t do that shit.

Now reporting this to child porn persecution authorities, that really is going overboard. But, asacp probably think kloo2you is pulling their leg and will not report this to police, afraid of making themselves a laughing stock. So maybe not much damage is being done.

Imagine if this same image was posted on a feminist forum, would the asacp need to be involved? LOL! of course not!

Only men are pedophiles!

Thanks for keeping up the stereotype get a kloo2yoo.

There is a major rift in the "Men’s rights movement". Most men’s righters are conservative fathers who are worried about the false domestic violence accusation industry, about debtor’s prison for fathers unable to pay the alimony that reduces them to work slaves. They could care less about the thousands men being locked up in prison for 20 years for often inadvertent possession of photos, often of mere nude adolescent erotica  (read more here) or for having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl that was in a over-21-bar thanks to a fake ID.

20 years ago I overheard leading academic authorities in sexology "Child Porn is the new witch hunt".  So is adolescent sexuality.

So if mainstream men’s rights thinks they need to join the unjust persecution of men for possession of harmless photos, they should re-name themselves "father’s rights". And a "free men’s sexuality" movement is urgently needed.  Human-Stupidity is one of the few sites daring to stare down the sex offender persecution monster.

Please read more in human stupidity’s child porn witch hunt section.

  • Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (11 years) by: admin (1)

    March 17, 2011, 15:47

      Greenburgh nanny sentenced for shaking baby two years in state prison and three years of post release supervision on her July 2008 guilty plea to reckless assault on a child in the first degree. As a result of the violent shaking, the baby suffered a subdural hematoma and diffuse rental hemorrhages,…

  • Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse! by: Agent Provocateur (2)

    March 15, 2011, 13:39

    "Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children."             …

  • "Operation Protect Our Children" mistakenly shuts down 84,000 Sites with no child porn by: admin (2)

    February 18, 2011, 06:25

    What if you woke up one morning and your blog’s URL pointed to a Department of Homeland Security page that said, "Website seized for trafficking in child pornography"? That’s what happened to 84,000 innocent site owners this week, and there’s no guarantee it won’t happen again. Over the past few…

  • 17 year old "children"? United Nations confesses political manipulation of "child" definition by: Devils Advocate (5)

    February 1, 2011, 03:55

    The United Nations manipulated the definition of "child" on purpose! So child protection laws could be extended to adolescent youth without need to be voted again. Human-Stupidity.com found the smoking gun. Proof is on the United Nations web site. Q – What does the UN mean by "youth," and…

  • Couple stoned to death by Taliban Video. 17 year old girl stoned to death, too. by: Devils Advocate (4)

    January 30, 2011, 07:54

    The two people have been publicly stoned to death in Afghanistan’s once peaceful north over an alleged love affair.  Warning: Don’t worry: only legal depictions of killing and gore,, no offensive illegal nudity, eroticism or sex.! © ABC News Television The alleged lovers,…

  • Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail. by: admin (5)

    January 20, 2011, 10:16

    A young man got arrested for possession of child porn, depicting a 12 year boy old masturbating. It is his own video: he recorded himself when he was 12 years old. Mandatory minimum jail sentence: 2 years. Think hard: maybe you took some indecent photos of yourself. Or your family album contains nunde photos mom…

  • Eek! A Male! Pedophile hysteria hurts and kills children by: Devils Advocate

    January 14, 2011, 05:15

    Imagine, putting ointment on a 3 month old’s vagina.  Every man is a suspect for pedophilia. Soon no father will dare to change his daughter’s diapers. Avid consumers of child abuse books on Amazon have a dirty mind. 30 years ago, before the pedophilia hysteria, the idea of abusing a 1 year old would not even have…

  • "Watching child porn victimizes the child". The Voodoo science of child pornography laws by: Devils Advocate (20)

    December 26, 2010, 05:00

       "However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” Senior gets jail time, probation for having single image of child pornography  We at Human-Stupidity…

  • Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii) by: admin (4)

    December 11, 2010, 08:53

    Legalizing child pornography is linked to lower rates of child sex abuse Study carried out in Czech Republic confirms similar results in Japan and Denmark Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA),…

  • Cruel child porn laws kill, "destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by: Devils Advocate (7)

    November 1, 2010, 20:22

    Airline safety is compromised because "nude airport scanner" violates child porn laws. 32 men committed suicide in one CP case alone. Toddlers die because men are afraid to help them. Jack B. Weinstein: A reasonable judge opposing cruel mandatory child porn jail terms for mere possession

  • Hollywood movies glorify criminal heroes: how romantic! by: admin (1)

    September 28, 2010, 05:18

    Romantic Hollywood movies are full of illegal (criminal) actions, perpetrated by movie heroes, our role models!  Interestingly, most of these illegalities are considered highly romantic (when perpetrated by a heartthrob movie star) "When done in real life, many of the tricks used by onscreen singletons to successfull…

  • Brooke Shields nude: exploited pedophile magnet? by: admin

    September 26, 2010, 17:33

    Brooke Shields, now 44, posed for a nude photo when she was 10 years old. Now Richard Prince’s photograph of the picture, called "Spiritual America," has been yanked from a major exhibition at the Tate Modern. If pedophiles didn’t already know about "Spiritual America," the Richard Prince photo taken of a nude,…

  • Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime.. by: admin (5)

    August 31, 2010, 06:04

    The beating last month of a 15-year-old girl in the transit tunnel at Westlake Center as security personnel watched without intervening is prompting a review of King County Metro’s policies for its unarmed guards. The incident — which was partially captured on surveillance video — happened about 7:15 p.m.…

  • Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photosKinderpornografie: by: Devils Advocate (6)

    August 1, 2010, 02:18

    More child porn insanity! Children nowadays need legal counsel to know if and how they can photograph themselves or have relations with other teenagers, or else they can spend years in jail and remain the rest of their lives on sex offender lists. US court on ‘sexting’: Child porn or child’s play? 01/15/2010…

  • "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy by: Devils Advocate (7)

    July 3, 2010, 06:21

    Junk food makes our children fat, obese and unhealthy which leads to disease and premature death. It does not kill instantly, only in the long run. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy. A 17 year-old cannot consent to sex  (hence consensual sex with a minor is rape). A…

  • EU Requests To Retain User Data From Search Engines to protect children from pedophiles by: admin (1)

    June 29, 2010, 23:11

    • Child Porn or Cutsie child photo? with-this-i-am-going-to-control-your-life

    Reddit men’s rights is one of the most powerful sites countering feminist indoctrination and propaganda on the web. Even mens rights proponents are scared out of their wits about the greatest taboo on earth, the child porn witch hunt.

    The founder and moderator of reddit’s r/mensrights reported this photo to authorities. If men’s rights movement joins the witch hunt that jails mainly men for decades for mere possession of photos often almost as harmless as the one in question here, who will defend men’s rights to liberty? Note that the photo has a deeper meaning, about how men’s "pussy obsession" allows women’s to have power in men’s life.

    He is worried about this:

    "r/mensrights, a forum for over 21,000 disgruntled misogynists, claims that they seek to rescind laws that protect rape victims, molested children, and battered women in order to ‘restore equality to men.’ Given the shocking content that is being called ‘pornographic’ that was posted and endorsed by its fan base, it seems only fitting that their motives be called into question. the image is reported to contain two very young children exploring each other’s sexual organs. Does this community really wish to do justice for ‘oppressed’ men? Or do they just want carte-blanche to victimize children and rape their wives?"

    Femimedia would eat that kind of shit up.

    The reddit r/mensrights moderator might be right. It is worse saying anything in defense of "child porn" then saying "the earth revolves around the sun, the bible got that wrong" during the middle age inquisition. It is a sure way to get ostracized and to detract from any fact and topic one might want to focus on.

    I am begging users, if you see sexual images involving children, report it immediately to ASACP. No one should want that shit in here. submitted by kloo2yoo

    A post was up for 12 hours or so, while I was away. No one had sent a message to the modqueue, and no one had reported it. that user has been banned, and the post reported to law enforcement, and to the Reddit admins.

    http://www.asacp.org/

    I’m fucking disgusted and I’m fucking pissed, and I almost closed and locked the forum, but I don’t want to take it out on all 21,546 other users. don’t do that shit.

    Now reporting this to child porn persecution authorities, that really is going overboard. But, asacp probably think kloo2you is pulling their leg and will not report this to police, afraid of making themselves a laughing stock. So maybe not much damage is being done.

    Imagine if this same image was posted on a feminist forum, would the asacp need to be involved? LOL! of course not!

    Only men are pedophiles!

    Thanks for keeping up the stereotype get a kloo2yoo.

    There is a major rift in the "Men’s rights movement". Most men’s righters are conservative fathers who are worried about the false domestic violence accusation industry, about debtor’s prison for fathers unable to pay the alimony that reduces them to work slaves. They could care less about the thousands men being locked up in prison for 20 years for often inadvertent possession of photos, often of mere nude adolescent erotica  (read more here) or for having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl that was in a over-21-bar thanks to a fake ID.

    20 years ago I overheard leading academic authorities in sexology "Child Porn is the new witch hunt".  So is adolescent sexuality.

    So if mainstream men’s rights thinks they need to join the unjust persecution of men for possession of harmless photos, they should re-name themselves "father’s rights". And a "free men’s sexuality" movement is urgently needed.  Human-Stupidity is one of the few sites daring to stare down the sex offender persecution monster.

    Please read more in human stupidity’s child porn witch hunt section.

  • Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (11 years) by: admin (1)

    March 17, 2011, 15:47

      Greenburgh nanny sentenced for shaking baby two years in state prison and three years of post release supervision on her July 2008 guilty plea to reckless assault on a child in the first degree. As a result of the violent shaking, the baby suffered a subdural hematoma and diffuse rental hemorrhages,…

  • Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse! by: Agent Provocateur (2)

    March 15, 2011, 13:39

    "Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children."             …

  • "Operation Protect Our Children" mistakenly shuts down 84,000 Sites with no child porn by: admin (2)

    February 18, 2011, 06:25

    What if you woke up one morning and your blog’s URL pointed to a Department of Homeland Security page that said, "Website seized for trafficking in child pornography"? That’s what happened to 84,000 innocent site owners this week, and there’s no guarantee it won’t happen again. Over the past few…

  • 17 year old "children"? United Nations confesses political manipulation of "child" definition by: Devils Advocate (5)

    February 1, 2011, 03:55

    The United Nations manipulated the definition of "child" on purpose! So child protection laws could be extended to adolescent youth without need to be voted again. Human-Stupidity.com found the smoking gun. Proof is on the United Nations web site. Q – What does the UN mean by "youth," and…

  • Couple stoned to death by Taliban Video. 17 year old girl stoned to death, too. by: Devils Advocate (4)

    January 30, 2011, 07:54

    The two people have been publicly stoned to death in Afghanistan’s once peaceful north over an alleged love affair.  Warning: Don’t worry: only legal depictions of killing and gore,, no offensive illegal nudity, eroticism or sex.! © ABC News Television The alleged lovers,…

  • Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail. by: admin (5)

    January 20, 2011, 10:16

    A young man got arrested for possession of child porn, depicting a 12 year boy old masturbating. It is his own video: he recorded himself when he was 12 years old. Mandatory minimum jail sentence: 2 years. Think hard: maybe you took some indecent photos of yourself. Or your family album contains nunde photos mom…

  • Eek! A Male! Pedophile hysteria hurts and kills children by: Devils Advocate

    January 14, 2011, 05:15

    Imagine, putting ointment on a 3 month old’s vagina.  Every man is a suspect for pedophilia. Soon no father will dare to change his daughter’s diapers. Avid consumers of child abuse books on Amazon have a dirty mind. 30 years ago, before the pedophilia hysteria, the idea of abusing a 1 year old would not even have…

  • "Watching child porn victimizes the child". The Voodoo science of child pornography laws by: Devils Advocate (20)

    December 26, 2010, 05:00

       "However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” Senior gets jail time, probation for having single image of child pornography  We at Human-Stupidity…

  • Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii) by: admin (4)

    December 11, 2010, 08:53

    Legalizing child pornography is linked to lower rates of child sex abuse Study carried out in Czech Republic confirms similar results in Japan and Denmark Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA),…

  • Cruel child porn laws kill, "destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by: Devils Advocate (7)

    November 1, 2010, 20:22

    Airline safety is compromised because "nude airport scanner" violates child porn laws. 32 men committed suicide in one CP case alone. Toddlers die because men are afraid to help them. Jack B. Weinstein: A reasonable judge opposing cruel mandatory child porn jail terms for mere possession

  • Hollywood movies glorify criminal heroes: how romantic! by: admin (1)

    September 28, 2010, 05:18

    Romantic Hollywood movies are full of illegal (criminal) actions, perpetrated by movie heroes, our role models!  Interestingly, most of these illegalities are considered highly romantic (when perpetrated by a heartthrob movie star) "When done in real life, many of the tricks used by onscreen singletons to successfull…

  • Brooke Shields nude: exploited pedophile magnet? by: admin

    September 26, 2010, 17:33

    Brooke Shields, now 44, posed for a nude photo when she was 10 years old. Now Richard Prince’s photograph of the picture, called "Spiritual America," has been yanked from a major exhibition at the Tate Modern. If pedophiles didn’t already know about "Spiritual America," the Richard Prince photo taken of a nude,…

  • Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime.. by: admin (5)

    August 31, 2010, 06:04

    The beating last month of a 15-year-old girl in the transit tunnel at Westlake Center as security personnel watched without intervening is prompting a review of King County Metro’s policies for its unarmed guards. The incident — which was partially captured on surveillance video — happened about 7:15 p.m.…

  • Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photosKinderpornografie: by: Devils Advocate (6)

    August 1, 2010, 02:18

    More child porn insanity! Children nowadays need legal counsel to know if and how they can photograph themselves or have relations with other teenagers, or else they can spend years in jail and remain the rest of their lives on sex offender lists. US court on ‘sexting’: Child porn or child’s play? 01/15/2010…

  • "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy by: Devils Advocate (7)

    July 3, 2010, 06:21

    Junk food makes our children fat, obese and unhealthy which leads to disease and premature death. It does not kill instantly, only in the long run. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy. A 17 year-old cannot consent to sex  (hence consensual sex with a minor is rape). A…

  • EU Requests To Retain User Data From Search Engines to protect children from pedophiles by: admin (1)

    June 29, 2010, 23:11

    • Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Cute child photo scares Reddit’s men’s rights into child porn frenzy” »
    Cute child photo scares Reddit’s men’s rights into chi…
    » continues here »

    Alexandra Wallace: "Asians in the Library". Political correctness hysteria

    A private rant complaining about "hordes of Asians" chatting on cell phones in the University Library yielded a huge outcry by the political correctness police in press and University politics. The Alexandra Wallace was threatened with disciplinary action, and received death threats. The political correctness hordes are dangerous! Everyone has to step on eggshells and think carefully before uttering a sentence. Free speech be damned.

    One lone blog defends the right to think and speak (UCLA Vilifies White Student For Thought Crime | Vdare)

    • In the politically correct outrage, nobody cares about what she said.
      • Do Asians have a tendency to talk in the college library? Why do library officials not interfere? After all, she is not complaining about breach of a formality (like wearing a turban) but rather about noise that objectively disturbs the ability to study. Is the library at fault not to take up disciplinary action for distubance of peace in library? Any sociologist or political scientist up to watching behavior at the library and doing an unbiased test of her contention? And even her observations are wrong, so what?
      • Do Asians tend to have the entire large family visit them on the weekends to cook and wash their laundry? This is an interesting observation. Again, even if she is wrong, why disciplinary threats and threats of violence against her.
    • Hate laws are problemetic restrictions to constitutionally guaranteed free speech. Initially they served a fairly noble cause, they were meant to prevent incitement of violence, lynching mob incitation and Adolf Hitler style rhetoric to beat up and kill Jews.  But being extended to any harmless uttering of a blonde student. failing to carefully select politically correct wording is troubling.
    • She was actually pretty careful to hedge what she said. But still not enough.
    • If she were an official of government, police or the University, maybe there would be a justification for using carefully selected wording. But an average citizen being vilified for some personal opinion which most likely is factually correct?
    • Human Stupidity has examples where political correctness has serious consequences. From not scanning people at airports (body scans are "child porn") to searching old white ladies in equal frequency as young muslim men, to restriction of academic research about child sexuality and racial differences.

    U.C.L.A. Student’s Video Rant Against Asians Fuels Firestorm

     

    […] In the video, Ms. Wallace complains about Asian students in the school library using their cellphones to call family members after the tsunami in Japan. At one point, she mimics people speaking an Asian language.

    “The problem is these hordes of Asian people that U.C.L.A. accepts into our school every single year, which is fine,” Ms. Wallace said in the video. “But if you’re going to come to U.C.L.A., then use American manners.” (NY Times)

    Alexandra Wallace: Asians in the Library | Youtube movie

    On Monday, U.C.L.A.’s chancellor, Gene Block, released a statement that deemed the video “thoughtless and hurtful” and called for a more civil discourse. Officials said the university was looking into possible disciplinary action against Ms. Wallace.
    (NY Times)

     

    Ms. Alexandra Wallace withdraws from University after being ostracised and threatened

     

    Alexandra Wallace apologizes, announces she will no longer attend UCLA | Daily Bruin

    The letter comes the day UCLA announced that it will not take action against Wallace for the video.

    Below is Wallace’s full letter:

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Alexandra Wallace: "Asians in the Library". Political correctness hysteria” »
    Alexandra Wallace: "Asians in the Library". Political co…
    » continues here »

    Tiger Woods, hypocrisy, moral condemnation of promiscuity

    an evolutionary perspective […] helps us understand why sexual transgressions by successful males, as well as the seemingly irrational levels of moral outrage at those transgressions, are both "natural," regardless of whether you personally feel that either is intrinsically good or bad.

    Finally an intelligent comment about the moral condemnation hysteria of Tiger Woods.  Evolutionary Theory by Kurzban and deScioli

    Men fantasize about novel women. Rich powerful man can actually get them

    Tiger is a man with immense wealth and social status. Throughout history, men with wealth and status have tended to trade it for access to multiple mates. Evolutionary historian Laura Betzig has documented this pattern in modern societies and throughout history, as in the abundant cases of Roman emperors, Indian maharajahs, Arabian sheiks, and Chinese mandarins. Bhupinder Singh, the wealthy and powerful Seventh Maharajah of the state of Patiala, for example, had 350 wives, and he by no means held the record. European and North American states tend to be officially monogamous, but of course they are unofficially polygamous as well. Rock stars, famous athletes, politicians and even television evangelists are reliable sources of public outrage, which fires up every time we learn about their frequently overactive private lives.[…]

    Kinsey found that the typical male masturbated with some frequency, during such activities men often fantasize about novel women. What if the man was sufficiently attractive that those fantasy women were actually ready, willing, and eager to turn desire into reality? The average heterosexual man would, under those circumstances, perhaps act like the average homosexual man (who is unconstrained by a more selective target audience), or like the average rock superstar: he would take hundreds of partners.

    Psychology Today. December, 2009. Kenrick, D. T. “In "Defense" of Tiger Woods, AND of his critics." [link]

     

    Moral outrage keeps others in check. So powerful men don’t monopolize too many women

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Tiger Woods, hypocrisy, moral condemnation of promiscuity” »
    Tiger Woods, hypocrisy, moral condemnation of promiscuity
    » continues here »