Arrest Arnold Schwarzenegger for rape, harassment, with no bail!

Sex with a dependent employee is rape

Schwarzenegger, the powerful strong governor having sex with a dependent employee, his maid Mildred Patricia Baena. By feminist terminology, this is more then sexual harassment, this is rape. Due to the power differential, she is unable to consent.

Arnold Schwarzenegger fathered a child more than 10 years ago outside of his marriage to Maria Shriver, a source close to the former California governor confirmed to CNN on Tuesday. […]

Schwarzenegger fathered the child with a household staffer, the Times article said. He has provided support for the child since birth, the source told CNN.
Schwarzenegger acknowledges having child with staffer

If the maid accused him of rape, Schwarzenegger would be instantly jailed with no bail

Can you imagine if the the maid Mildred came forward, now, with charges that he raped her? Just exaggerate things a little, how she was powerless and afraid of losing her job. But, as the burden of proof is inverted, it would be more prudent to allege real forcible rape, with some lurid details how she kept saying no but she was no match for his superior Mister Universe strength. She could allege that this was a repeated pattern, over years. She could even sprinkle in some allegations of sexual abuse of his child. He would have to prove his innocence.

Women don’t lie about rape and are instantly believed. Furthermore, our legal system and constitutional rights to due process are not valid in rape and child abuse cases. Men accused of rape are guilty until proven innocent.

Of course, after a decade there would be no way for him to prove his innocence. The child would be the proof of sex having happened. Add a few lurid stories about groping other women and orgies while pumping iron on steroids. Schwarzenegger would be arrested instantly. (like IMF Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn) No bail, because he might be a flight risk. Probably he could re-gain his Austrian nationality in case he made it to Europe.

The female power to cry "rape"

Our man-made cultural progress made us safe. We are not in constant danger of being attacked by lions, snakes, even marauding neighboring tribes. The Magna Carta and our modern constitutions gave us legal rights against unjust unproven accusations, undue imprisonment. Unfortunately, as Human-Stupidity documents, we created new dangers looming over every man (much less over women). Child abuse accusations, possession of so called child porn, and rape accusations can be leveled at any time against every man and lead to instant arrest, jail, and conviction without due process of law.

That power to allege rape, of course, give a woman infinite power. A man would have to cave in to her every demand and blackmail. It is amazing why Arnold Schwarzenegger dare to fire his maid. But she was a nice person with character, she only told the truth and did not use her legal privilege to accuse him of rape. It does not matter that maybe Mildred was the one that pursued Arnold.

Arnold can shirk paternity: legally the maid’s husband is the father

If Arnold did not recognize paternity, then he can not be forced any more. No matter how much proof, the maid Mildred Patricia Baena’s husband is the legal father and will be obliged to support the child. No way out. It does not matter that the child looks exactly like Arnold (see the photo)

Birth Certificate of Mildred Patricia Baena’s son Arnold’s Secret Son: Here’s the Birth Certificate

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Arrest Arnold Schwarzenegger for rape, harassment, with no bail!” »
Arrest Arnold Schwarzenegger for rape, harassment, with no bail!
» continues here »

False Rape charges by trespassing maid against IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn?

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, IMF Managing Director and French presidential candidate accused of rape. As the feminist dominated press is scared to even think that the rape accusations are false, Human-Stupidity has to speak up. The story is very strange, and dominated by clear mistakes committed by accuser. A five star hotel maid trespasses into a naked client’s room? Unforgivable. 5 Star hotel ecurity lets a rapist check out? The maid is not trained to instantly report crimes to security staff?

Maid violates professional ethics and walks into a prominent naked guest’s room

The New York Police Department claims that at about 1 p.m. on Saturday, a hotel maid entered a $3,000-a-night suite at the Sofitel near Times Square, believing that it was empty.

No possibility of false rape charges set up against Dominique Strauss Kahn. Gulty verdict has already been decided by the press. No presumption of innocence. That is a bad start. She made a mistake. This should not happen in a top class hotel. Were the sex roles inverted, were a male employee walk in on a prominent naked female guest, like Mrs. Hillary Clinton, the male employee would be fired and arrested for sexual harassment. Usually, hotels have a policy to avoid such embarrassment: cleaners should knock on the door, ring the bell, yell "room service" when walking into rooms.

Strauss-Kahn then emerged naked from the bathroom, and grabbed her, pulled her into the bedroom and threw her on to the bed, before trying to lock the suite’s main door, according to New York Police Dept. Deputy Commissioner Paul Browne, who outlined the charges to reporters. "She fights him off, and then he drags her down the hallway to the bathroom, where he sexually assaults her a second time," he told Reuters.

What a coincidence: she makes a serious professional mistake. A hitherto well behaved, civilized man, suddenly goes crazy? Just because he was naked he wanted to take advantage of her and rape her?

A man on the covers of all magazines, admired by millions of women, who could get women at a snap of his fingers. A man from a country with legalized prostitution who could afford 2 luxury prostitutes per day, in case he is a sex addict. And this guy, exactly the moment the woman walks in, illegally, incorrectly, grabs her and rapes her?

The maid, 32, finally managed to push Strauss-Kahn away and escape, according to Browne, and her colleagues called 911. Strauss-Kahn had checked out by the time police arrived at the hotel, leaving behind his cell phone.

Very strange. No rapist makes it out of a 5 star hotel, full of security agents, trained to catch thieves, impostors, troublemakers. Especially people who cause trouble and then want to slip away without getting caught. Top hotels have a very professional security staff. I am sure maids are trained to instantly report crimes to security. So any delay in reporting would be her second professional failure of the day.

New York Police usually does not take longer then 5 minutes to arrive. And he made it all the way into the plane? Check out of hotel, check into the airport, pass security?

Strauss-Kahn was arrested on charges of attempted rape, conducting a criminal sexual act, and unlawful imprisonment of the woman.
Arrest of IMF Chief on Attempted Rape Charges Throws French Presidential Race Into Chaos | Time Magazine

A really important man:

In fact DSK, as the French call one of the country’s leading political figures, happens to be on the cover of virtually every French magazine this week as the country’s possible next President, […]

Across Europe, too, Strauss-Kahn’s arrest will have a major impact. It could impact critical negotiations over the E.U.’s deep debt crisis, in which Strauss-Kahn has been a key — if not the key — player. He was due to be at emergency debt meetings in Brussels this week, and perhaps mindful that he could soon be one of the E.U.’s most powerful leaders

False rape charges to cover up own wrong, or for political reasons?

What are the alternative explanations? Don’t forget, she committed a serious professional lapse, almost a crime. So it is quite likely that she did that for a reason, with intent.

Many political and economic enemies would pay millions to get him out of the way. maybe they bribed a lowly hotel maid?

But there is a much easier and parsimonious explanation:

The room maid, in serious violation of her professional duties, walked into a client’s room and surprised him naked. Even if that was a honest mistake, it could have serious consequences for her.

Maybe he reacted with strong irritation, wanted to complain and get her fired (for good reasons). That scared her. There is no talk about her getting fired now.
Maybe she walked in with the intent to steal and was caught
Maybe she walked in with the intent to seduce a famous man
Maybe she planned to seduce him and was rejected. "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned"
Maybe she walked in with the intent to seduce a famous man and then blackmail him by threatening to cry rape.
Maybe he made an indecent proposal, even tried to indecently touch her. In revenge, she cried rape.

As we learn in the false rape society, many women have a knee jerk reaction to cry "rape" in order to distract from their own problems. Did you notice? Nobody talks of firing her for her transgression.

Let us see if there is any hard corroborating evidence, except an accusation by a guilty woman that committed a serious, unforgivable professional mistake.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “False Rape charges by trespassing maid against IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn?” »
False Rape charges by trespassing maid against IMF Managing Direct…
» continues here »

Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence

The Jörg Kachelmann rape trial is the sensational trial of the year in Germany. A famous TV anchor whose program once went viral on YouTube, sex, multiple girl friends delight the rainbow press. Serious press organs like "Der Spiegel" and "Die Zeit" arrived at the sensible conclusion that there is absolutely no evidence to support the accusation (or rather, it appears to be a painstakingly planned false accusation). In spite of mounting evidence to the contrary, feminists, led by feminist Icon Alice Schwarzer continue convinced that Kachelmann is guilty and accuse these press organs of partiality.

Rape trial without evidence

The so-called objective evidence in the rape case against Jörg Kachelmann, allegedly held by Mannheim Public Prosecutor’s Office, doesn’t exist. Several expert witnesses have so far testified in the rape trial. None found any supporting evidence that Jörg Kachelmann raped Simone D. On the contrary, the evidence contradicts the alleged victim’s story. Additionally, the alleged victim, who had accused her ex-boyfriend of raping her at knife point, had to admit to having lied and fabricated some of the evidence herself.

On the other hand, the court painstakingly interviewed various ex-girlfriends of Kachelmann, who had absolutely no knowledge about the alleged incident, but could only smear Joerg Kachelmann’s reputation. Some girl friends earned major amounts for interviews in the rainbow press, but at the same time insisted on privacy during their court hearings.

The prominent Swiss weather anchor Jörg Kachelmann, working for German television, was held in remand for several months before the rape trial held its first hearing, despite his claims of innocence, and despite the absence of any flight risk. Adding to this the non-existent danger of collusion, this jailing of a suspect, based on nothing but unproven allegations, amounts to breach of due process.

Surprisingly, the English speaking press has absolutely no coverage about the Kachelmann rape trial. Therefore, Human-Stupidity undertook the trouble of improving on Google translations to publish the translated text of an excellent article Two bruises but no other findings by German News Magazine "Die Zeit

Two bruises but no other findings in alleged rape case

Did Jörg Kachelmann rape his lover Simone D? The experts’ interpretation of the evidence differs from that of the prosecution.

The Mannheim District Court has been hearing Jörg Kachelmann’s case for six months now. That’s how long the 5th criminal division has been searching for evidence to prove that the accused weatherman of the first German television channel raped his occasional mistress, Claudia Simone D. The search has so far been futile. In fact, as the case progresses, incriminating evidence steadily dissipates.

On 9 February 2010, the 37-year old Simone D. made a police statement according to which, after a row in her flat, Jörg Kachelmann raped her at knife point and threatened to kill her. The Mannheim Public Prosecutor’s Office had always made a public pretence of having objective evidence indicating the defendant’s culpability. This assertion, however, has been seriously challenged over recent months.

German courts deal with rape cases on a daily basis. That the Kachelmann proceedings have turned into a mammoth case without an ending in sight is not unrelated to the fact that investigators spent weeks interrogating the victim/witness without questioning her statements. The Kachelmann case proves beyond doubt that, in this day and age, no potential victim of a sexually related crime need fear the authorities. Rape victims humiliated and bullied by the police and judiciary were merely a post war phenomenon, now long gone, though still preferentially exemplified by women’s rights activists. Today, a woman who reports a rape in Germany can expect a maximum of discretion, understanding, solidarity and attention. The extent of this is demonstrated fully on Simone D.

The criminal investigation department accepted the rape story of Kachelmann’s girlfriend without any verification of her statement. In a remark made immediately after the report on 10 February 2010, the female interrogating officer from Schwetzingen wrote: “We feel the woman is making a credible impression”. When questioned by the court six months later on the basis of this evaluation, the police officer was unable to respond.

Credulity and naivety – unexpected qualities in a judge – were also displayed later, in the witness statement before the Mannheim District Court by the custodial judge, who ordered Kachelmann –pleading innocence – to be held in remand on 10 March 2010. The judge stated, as reason for the arrest warrant, that Kachelmann’s version, according to which he first had consensual sexual intercourse with Simone D. but then left after a jealous outburst from her, simply did “not appear plausible” to him. In addition, he held it on assumption that “someone who accuses another of committing a criminal offence would be telling the truth”.

Accusers are always believed. Especially rape accusers. In spite of evidence that false rape accusations have been a weapon of choice since biblical times and nowadays are endemic. Credible experts from police and academia estimate that 20% – 60% of rape accusations are false. Of course, feminist writers vehemently disagree. (Additionally, most rape accusations are not about forcible rape in the traditional meaning of the word.

The Mannheim Public Prosecutor’s Office has also been supportive of the victim/witness from the beginning, although the woman, whose hopes had been dashed by Kachelmann, would have very understandable motives for a false accusation. The Public Prosecutors continued to support Simone D. even when, in the course of the investigation, she admitted to not only having lied in parts of her statement, but also to fabricating some of the incriminating evidence herself (see ZEIT file “Schuldig auf Verdacht” from 24 June 2010).

When her manipulations were discovered, at the end of April 2010, Kachelmann had already spent a month in custody. In spite of this the Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed Simone D’s attempt to mislead the court as a “minor issue”.
Source: Two bruises but no other findings | Die Zeit

The Hofstra rape case is an example where 4 men were jailed and on the verge of getting 20 year verdicts based on the contradictory accusation of one lone girls. Only video evidence cleared the falsely accused.

This clear bias in favor of accusers can be found world wide. The Obama administration ordered US colleges to convict rape suspects in internal administrative proceedings by preponderance of evidence, a far cry from "beyond reasonable doubt". Add to this panel members totally biased in favor of the accuser, and a conviction is virtually assured, no matter how flimsy or patently wrong the accusation.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence” »
Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence
» continues here »

Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to go home", says California Supreme Court.

"I-need-to-go-home" means "stop". ?And failing to stop in the midst of consensual sex is "rape". A boy who failed to read the girl’s mind and make the appropriate interpretion of her cryptic comments was sent to jail for "I-need-to-to-home"-rape or "can’t-understand-women’s-subtle-hints-rape".

It is none of the 20 types of rape, and different from the "5-second-rape" where the "Stop" was explicit and clear. So we are up to 21 types of rape and counting.

During consensual sex girl says "I need to go home" and "I should be going now". "No" means "No", and "I should be going now" means "Stop". Women like men to read their mind and understand their indirect speech. But failure to understand a woman’s veiled hint now is punishable with long jail terms for"rape".

In our modern language aberration, everything is the same: there is no difference between "forcible rape at knife point", taking 5 seconds to stop consensual sex when the girl says "stop" ("5-second-rape"), or taking 90 seconds to understand the deeper meaning of "I should be going now", all is the same: "rape". Our language is becoming more and more impoverished and is losing its precision and subltety, thanks to feminist manipulative language that sees only black and white with no nuances.

The 2000 case involved two 17-year-olds who had sex in a bedroom during a party. The boy testified that the sex was consensual and that he stopped when the girl demanded. She testified the boy kept having sex with her for about a "minute and a half" after she called it off.

The boy was convicted of rape and served about six months in a juvenile facility. The high court affirmed that conviction Monday.

Justice Janice Rogers Brown, while agreeing with the majority on what constitutes rape, dissented on whether the boy was guilty. She wrote that the girl never clearly said stop, instead saying "I should be going now" and "I need to go home."

Brown also wondered how much time a man has to stop once a woman says stop.

"Ten seconds? Thirty?" she wrote. foxnews.com

Freerepublic reports on the "I-should-be-going-rape". The comments of the Free Republic readers are enlightening.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to go home", says California Supreme Court.” »
Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to …
» continues here »

"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different types of rape!

"Rape" means a dozen different things. They are not the same! What perfidy:

"Rape" had a clear, well defined meaning for thousands of years, until re-defined by feminists. The re-defined "rape" includes half a dozen acts that formerly had their own names and were not rape.
Then vice president Biden comes hammering that all these dozen types of rape are the same. This is deceptive, because most of his listeners imagine he is talking about true-forcible-rape, not about Swedish-broken-condom-rape, 5-second-rape, consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girlfriend-future-wife-rape, duped-by-victim-into-raping-her-rape or didn’t-get-consent-in-writing-rape.
This purposeful politically motivated rape ambiguity leads to equivocation and misunderstandings. This must be intentional and can only be politically motivated, because everywhere else we take pride in defining terms clearly, succinctly, concisely and unambiguously. (other exceptions are the closely related definitions of consent, child,

Joe Biden: "Rape is rape is rape" | YouTube

Vice president Joe Biden, praising the University of New Hampshire’s sexual assault policy, Biden said: "rape is rape is rape".

Vice president Joe Biden said more stupid and patently wrong things on that day, but that is beyond the scope of our article. See:
Are One in Five College Women Sexually Assaulted? (The vice president buys into the campus-rape lie.) He fell prey, or rather is part of the relentless feminist lie and deception campaign to bedevil men as rapists.

Rape is not rape is not rape is not rape

Rape is ill defined, is ill defined, is ill defined. Dozens of types-of-rape

"A rape is a rape is a rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! What perfidy! Manipulative ambiguity is perfidy. Who thinks that all these are the same? It is an offense to victims of true-forcible-rape to conflate their true violent victimization with other kind of consensual rape.

1) True-forcible-rape (rape-rape)

A women gets threatened by 3 thugs with knives, dragged into the woods, held down, raped and beaten, while screaming. Dragging-into-the-bushes-at-knife-point-rape is the classical meaning of rape and is what most people imagine when they hear the word "rape".

This is the perfidy of the language abuse regarding the meaning of the word "rape". It is difficult to justify a long prison term and sex offender registration for kissing-underage-girlfriend-rape. See Equivocation | Wikipedia

2) Swedish-broken-condom-rape

In the Julian Assange case, the women decided to press charges after they found out that Assange had sex with both of them (revenge-for-for-being-cheated-rape). They used a Swedish law that sex without condom is rape. This gained so much power because the United States (where broken-condoms-sex is not rape) wants to punish Julian Assange for unusual and unprecedented publishing-confidential-documents-rape (see cartoon)

3) Consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girl-friend-rape

"Rape" means a dozen different things. They are not the same! What perfidy:

"Rape" had a clear, well defined meaning for thousands of years, until re-defined by feminists. The re-defined "rape" includes half a dozen acts that formerly had their own names and were not rape.
Then vice president Biden comes hammering that all these dozen types of rape are the same. This is deceptive, because most of his listeners imagine he is talking about true-forcible-rape, not about Swedish-broken-condom-rape, 5-second-rape, consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girlfriend-future-wife-rape, duped-by-victim-into-raping-her-rape or didn’t-get-consent-in-writing-rape.
This purposeful politically motivated rape ambiguity leads to equivocation and misunderstandings. This must be intentional and can only be politically motivated, because everywhere else we take pride in defining terms clearly, succinctly, concisely and unambiguously. (other exceptions are the closely related definitions of consent, child,

Joe Biden: "Rape is rape is rape"|YouTube

Vice president Joe Biden, praising the University of New Hampshire’s sexual assault policy, Biden said: "rape is rape is rape".

Rape is not rape is not rape is not rape

Rape is ill defined, is ill defined, is ill defined. Dozens of types-of-rape

1) True-forcible-rape (rape-rape)

2) Swedish-broken-condom-rape

3) Consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girl-friend-rape

"Rape" means a dozen different things. They are not the same! What perfidy:

"Rape" had a clear, well defined meaning for thousands of years, until re-defined by feminists. The re-defined "rape" includes half a dozen acts that formerly had their own names and were not rape.
Then vice president Biden comes hammering that all these dozen types of rape are the same. This is deceptive, because most of his listeners imagine he is talking about true-forcible-rape, not about Swedish-broken-condom-rape, 5-second-rape, consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girlfriend-future-wife-rape, duped-by-victim-into-raping-her-rape or didn’t-get-consent-in-writing-rape.
This purposeful politically motivated rape ambiguity leads to equivocation and misunderstandings. This must be intentional and can only be politically motivated, because everywhere else we take pride in defining terms clearly, succinctly, concisely and unambiguously. (other exceptions are the closely related definitions of consent, child,

Joe Biden: "Rape is rape is rape"|YouTube

Vice president Joe Biden, praising the University of New Hampshire’s sexual assault policy, Biden said: "rape is rape is rape".

Rape is not rape is not rape is not rape

Rape is ill defined, is ill defined, is ill defined. Dozens of types-of-rape

1) True-forcible-rape (rape-rape)

2) Swedish-broken-condom-rape

3) Consensual-sex-with-adolescent-girl-friend-rape

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different types of rape!” »
"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different…
» continues here »

Rapists-proven-innocent are majority (57%) of prisoners released by Innocence Project

153 of the 268 exonerations in the Innocence Project were for rape. This is 57.1 % rape convictions, we found in a search of the innocence project for "Rape". A large number was due to eyewitness misidentification. People freed by DNA testing are freed because the innocence has been proven.

This confirms the false rape society suspicion, that people can easily be locked up for rape accusations, and that due process is violated especially in rape cases.

There have been 268 post-conviction DNA exonerations in United States history. These stories are becoming more familiar as more innocent people gain their freedom through postconviction testing. They are not proof, however, that our system is righting itself. # Seventeen people had been sentenced to death before DNA proved their innocence and led to their release.

Seventeen people had been sentenced to death before DNA proved their innocence and led to their release.

The average sentence served by DNA exonerees has been 13 years.

About 70 percent of those exonerated by DNA testing are members of minority groups.

In almost 40 percent of DNA exoneration cases, the actual perpetrator has been identified by DNA testing.

Exonerations have been won in 34 states and Washington, D.C.
Source: innocenceproject.org/know/

The innocence Project is a national litigation and public policy organization dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted individuals trough DNA testing and reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice. innocenceproject.org/

Kenny Waters, an innocence case that was not due to rape but murder and robbery conviction

The listing of men convicted of rape and freed due to innocent project.

Last	First	State	Conviction Year	Exoneration Date	Real Perpetrator Found	Compensation
Abbitt	Joseph	NC	1995	2009	Not Yet	Not Yet
Abdal	Habib Wahir	NY	1983	1999	Not Yet	Yes
Adams	Kenneth	IL	1979	1996	Yes	Yes
Alexander	Richard	IN	1998	2001	Yes	Not Yet
Anderson	Marvin	VA	1982	2002	Yes	Yes
Atkins	Herman	CA	1988	2000	Not Yet	Yes
Barnes	Steven	NY	1989	2009	Not Yet	Not Yet
Bauer	Chester	MT	1983	1997	Not Yet	Not Yet
Bibbins	Gene	LA	1987	2003	Yes	Yes
Bivens	Phillip	MS	1980	2010	Yes	Not Yet
Bloodsworth	Kirk	MD	1985	1993	Yes	Yes
Booker	Donte	OH	1987	2005	Yes	Yes
Bradford	Ted	WA	1996	2010	Not Yet	Not Yet
Bravo	Mark Diaz	CA	1990	1994	Not Yet	Yes
Briscoe	Johnny	MO	1983	2006	Yes	Not Yet
Brison	Dale	PA	1990	1994	Not Yet	Not Yet
Brown	Dennis	LA	1985	2005	Not Yet	Not Yet
Brown	Keith	NC	1993	1997	Yes	Yes
Bryson	David Johns	OK	1983	2003	Not Yet	Not Yet
Buntin	Harold	IN	1986	2005	Not Yet	Not Yet
Burnette	Victor	VA	1979	2009	Not Yet	Not Yet
Butler	A.B.	TX	1983	2000	Not Yet	Yes
Byrd	Kevin	TX	1985	1997	Not Yet	Yes

These were the last names starting with letters A and B. Click on "more" to see the rest of the alphabet.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Rapists-proven-innocent are majority (57%) of prisoners released by Innocence Project” »
Rapists-proven-innocent are majority (57%) of prisoners released b…
» continues here »

Judge John Reilly forced to apologize for differentiating nerd’s groping from sexual assault

OTTAWA – John Reilly, a retired judge and Liberal candidate for the Alberta riding of Wild Rose, was forced to apologize Thursday for suggesting in a radio interview that not all sexual offenders should be incarcerated.

Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff called an Alberta candidate’s comments on sexual offenders "disgraceful,” but said he has accepted Reilly’s apology and he’ll continue to serve as the party’s candidate for the riding.
Alberta Liberal candidate John Reilly apologizes for remarks on sexual assault

John Reilly, former Judge and Liberal Party Candidate in Alberta, Canada The "sexual assault":

she goes, gets into bed naked, he goes up, he’s thinking he’s going to be able to, that she’ll probably agree to have sex with him, he fondles her privates, and she wakes up and tells him to go away, and he goes away. They report it, he’s charged with sexual offence, he has digitally penetrated her,
Judge John Reilly interview

Most likely the defendant did not stick the entire finger in there but just passed the limit with one phalanx. Also he was ill advised and probably admitted the penetration before getting a lawyer’s advice. Of course, the women would always be believed anyway

Now this does not look like a habitual predator, the judge is totally right.

But, this is an example how powerful the feminist language distortion is. Call some behavior "rape" or "sexual assault", and the perpetrator is to be crucified. If you told it by the real name, "fondling the privates of a naked girl while sleeping at a party", that would not cause the ~~feeding~~ punishing frenzy in the interviewer and the populace. You can notice this in the strong reactions of the interviewer in the written and his aggravated tone in the audio transcript.

Former judge John Reilly’s interview with The Rutherford Show Transcript

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Judge John Reilly forced to apologize for differentiating nerd’s groping from sexual assault” »
Judge John Reilly forced to apologize for differentiating nerd&#82…
» continues here »

Consent, rape & minors. What is consent to sex?

Any six year old knows perfectly well if s/he is coerced while overpowered and threatened, or acts consensually out of free will.

Try to explain her/nim that the stupid adults have defined all sexual activity even of late 17 year or 15 year old adolescents as non-consensual. So it is the same "non-consensual rape" if a 17 year old takes the initiative to work hard to seduce an adult to have sex, or if the same adult rapes him/her at knifepoint.

The first example is "statutory rape" and the second is "forcible rape", the reader might retort. That differentiation has long been lost outside theoretical academic discussion.

The press happily reports about trials and conviction of "rapists" that raped the victim 300 times. No, she did not lock up the "victim" in a dungeon for years, like Mr. Fritzl. The victim came always came back for more, but did not consent (by our weird definition of legal consent). Human-Stupidity even documented a case where the rapist, unbeknownst to him, was duped by the victim into raping her.

Children of 6,8, or 15 years risk serious legal consequences, even jail, if they don’t know these confusing definitions and regulations. Therefore this ought to be be mandatory elementary school subject.

Human-Stupidity has repeatedly, assailed the tendency in modern law, incited by feminism, to "rape" and manipulate language, to use inaccurate and deliberately inflammatory, emotive language to try to foster a hidden agenda.

Due to feminist zeal to vilify consensual lovers of adolescent women, we belittle the true suffering of victims of forcible rape victims.

Human-Stupidity thinks it it truly offensive to the underage victims of real forcible violent rape to equate their suffering to the the "suffering" of willing participants in sex, to equate their resistance and unequivocal non-consent to the voluntary though legally invalid consent, or to the suddenly withdrawn consent in a "six second rape".

Minors under 18 (or 16) years of age can not consent to sex. When spoken by a minor under the age of consent, then by this definition, the following absurd equality holds.

"I love you, please make love to me"	= (is equal to)	"NOOO, don’t touch me, leave me alone"
	=

Both statements above are non-consent of rape-victims, in case the birds are under the age of consent.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Consent, rape & minors. What is consent to sex?” »
Consent, rape & minors. What is consent to sex?
» continues here »

Anonymous: We cannot make things up. Reality is worse than our imagination. https://www.amren.com/news/...
get educated please: Oh, Karen, black people can’t be racist, you silly goose. To be racist, you have to have...
Demon Slayer: If you don’t think the age-of-consent laws are fair and you get called to jury duty for a...
Christopher: I thought this was supposed to be a sarcastically-written “The Onion” – type article....
Shakil: You are a misogynistic, transphobic jackass! Please kill yourself the world will be a much better place...