Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to falsely imprisoned Horst Arnold

Teacher Horst Arnold served his 5 year prison term for rape to the very last day. Soon thereafter a high court declared him obviously innocent and the accusations blatantly false. Still, he was not reinstated to the job he had lost. His false accuser, still anonymous, escapes financial damages by infinite appeals, using government paid lawyers. The real victim of her false accusations has to pay legal fees and thus threw the towel. The false accuser still receives government pension but applied legal trickery to make sure the victim of her accusation can never get at that money.


The teacher Heidi K. falsely accused her now deceased colleague Horst Arnold of rape. Arnold had five years in prison, was acquitted recently. Shortly thereafter, he died. Now it is official: Heidi K. will not have to pay damages to his daughter.

  • Even now, the false accuser’s last name is secret. "Heidi K". She is photographed with her face covered.  And the falsely convicted victim’s name is public.  It is disgusting.
  • The case of the teacher Horst Arnold,  accused wrongly of rape,  was one of the most spectacular miscarriages of justice in recent history. His colleague, Heidi K. had brought him to court, he was jailed, was later acquitted, but died shortly afterwards.

    The formerly in shape sports teacher died a broken man, having lost his house, money, job, reputation and health after an unjust 5 year prison term

    Horst Arnold’s daughter Heidi K. sued for damages. Now it is official: Heidi K. will not have to pay. Heidi K. gave up, due to excessive legal costs and small chance to actually receive the financial compensation.

    False accuser gets 5 1/2 years in prison for 5 year imprisonment of an innocent man

    Here is the good news: Heidi K got a 5 1/2 years prison term as a notorious and patholgical liar, pending appeal. (German). She  still remains anonymous and shamelessly uses government-paid lawyers to avoid paying her victim’s heirs. She was sentenced for false imprisonment. She could not be prosecuted for false accusations due to statute of limitations.


    Perverted Justice system imprisons innocent men with no due process 

    This begs the question: how has feminist rape hysteria managed to totally pervert due process in  our justice system , that any psychologically deranged woman can get a decent law abiding man into prison with the most absurd and incoherent rape accusations.

    In the original rape trial "the prosecution could not present any conclusive evidence, but the court believed Heidi K., amd followed their presentation in full. […] She had Charisma and could convince people. In her tears, evidence seemed to crystalize" [4] Impeccably groomed Heidi K. had taught class, minutes after the alleged rape in a much frequented room, after an alleged escape over a fire ladder and vomiting. Her anal fissure was found in her second medical exam, non-existent in the first exam. She alleged to have been threatened by the accused, a week after the fake rape. But the accuse had a good alibi he was in prison. In spite of such glaring inconsistencies, Horst Arnold was convicted. Felow teachers became suspicious only after several more years of Heidi K. telling fabulous stories that would make Baron von Münchhausen blush. The erroneous expert witnesses, and shoddy justice officials suffered no punishment at all. [4 5]

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to falsely imprisoned Horst Arnold” »
    Convicted false rape accuser Heidi K. will not pay damages to fals…
    » continues here »

    Prominent Victim of False Rape Accusations and Biased Court System Becomes Activist, Writes Book (Jörg Kachelmann in Germany)

    A famous and highly popular TV weather anchor man languished in jail for months, suffered over year in court, spent a fortune in legal cost, lost his TV job and reputation. Because of a rape accusation that was unfounded. And now Jörg Kachelmann becomes an activist to fight unjust convictions due to false accusations.

    Slander is a popular weapon, these days

    "Verleumdungen sind heute eine beliebte Waffe"

    – Joerg Kachelmann and Miriam are getting even – with "ill-trained" police officers, prosecutors, judges and expert witnesses, and a "habitual men sentencing justice". At the same time, they expect to establish "an informal network". Their goal: "That in the future is less innocent people are convicted because of false accusations." This they announce  in an interview with SPIEGEL.

    "In the area of ​​abuse and rape false accusations have become a mass phenomenon," said Kachelmann ("tile man") who was acquitted about a year ago after a spectacular marathon process  charged with raping a former girlfriend.

    Human-Stupidity covered the scandalous Jörg Kachelmann rape case . It was the German court case of 2011. The prominent TV weatherman, had been accused by his ex girl friend to have raped her, exactly on the day they split up because of her discovering his infidelity. A famous man, not only TV weather anchor but owner of the company that produced the weather reports. Attractive, well off, with several lovers and millions of women swooning after him.

    Video: Lupine the cat comes into the weather forecast


    Kachelmann would "really want every rapist behind bars". But for women, slander has become a popular and effective weapon." Kachelmann’s wife Miriam added: with abuse allegations women today can "very easily take revenge on bosses and life partners" and "easily obtain custody of children." There  a "victim industry, which in this sick form must definitely go," said the 26-year-old psychology student.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Prominent Victim of False Rape Accusations and Biased Court System Becomes Activist, Writes Book (Jörg Kachelmann in Germany)” »
    Prominent Victim of False Rape Accusations and Biased Court System…
    » continues here »

    Not guilty verdict in Jörg Kachelmann (false?) rape accusation trial

    The Mannheim District Court acquitted Jörg Kachelmann from the rape charge due to lack of evidence – but there is no peace in sight: Kachelmann’s defending lawyer, Schwenn, harshly criticized the court, women’s rights activists also criticize the trial and Alice Schwarzer demands respect for the moderator’s ex-girlfriend.

    The verdict is not yet final, the criminal investigation department will decide whether to appeal the verdict within the week (Der Spiegel)

    Die Zeit speaks of a second-class acquittal, saying the 5th criminal division of Mannheim’s District Court […]

    ‘spared no efforts in trying to support the accusation of rape made by the (moderator’s) ex-girlfriend. However, it failed to do so, on the contrary, the further into the case hearing, the suspicious facts dissipated. And finally, after hearing all witnesses and questioning all experts, the judge only had one option: an acquittal.’

    The verdict is "Not guilty" for Jörg Kachelmann

    If in doubt, decide for the accused. Jörg Kachelmann was acquitted of the charges of having raped his ex-girl friend. According to the Mannheim court, there was not enough evidence to convict. It was not proven that the 52 year old Kachelmann had threatened the woman with a knife and raped her, in February 2010, after a relationship argument.

    Presiding judge Michael Seidling said, the judgment is not based on the court being convinced of Kachelmann’s innocence, nor convinced of a false rape accusation by the accuser. A man could not be convicted by mere suspicion. That suspicion was diminished during the trial, but not totally disproved.

    Kachelmann will be indemnified for his time in jail, and the court cost will be paid by the government.

    Finally, the international press starts reporting. But no major details

    The German press report in great detail. Even rainbow press has valuable information

    Kachelmann ACQUITTED of rape charge

    Kachelmann pensive, his lawyer smiling
    Court: in dubio pro reo – star lawyer criticized

    The Mannheim District Court has acquitted Jörg Kachelmann of the rape charges placed against him by his ex-girlfriend. It was, however an acquittal due to want of evidence, and this was clearly reflected in the verdict summary: “Today’s acquittal is not based on the fact that the court is convinced of Mr Kachelmann’s innocence and, conversely, of the joint plaintiff having made a false accusation. However, after recording the evidence there is reasonable doubt about Mr Kachelmann’s guilt. He is hence to be acquitted in accordance with the ‘in dubio pro reo’ principle.“ […]

    The court also said that the suspicious facts had lost in strength, but not disappeared” during the trial. […]

    Kachelmann is to be indemnified for the time he was held in remand. The legal cost will be borne by the state. The 52-eyar old seemed petrified before the verdict was announced. […]

    The victims‘ support organisation Weißer Ring now fear that victims will chose not to report a rape, said its spokesman.

    Depite the acquittal, Kachelmann will not return to the ARD. “As long as the case has not been closed and verdict is not final, we see no reason to decide on this” an ARD spokesperson said.

    The joint plaintiff is considering appealing against the verdict. […]

    Chief Judge Michael Seidling said: “We are convinced of having made the correct decision from a judicial point of view. But we are not satisfied by it. We are releasing the accused and the joint plaintiff with a potentially permanent suspicion; him of being a potential rapist, and her of being a potentially vengeful liar. (…)” […]

    [Feminist} Alice Schwarzer: One must continue respecting the potential victim. Maybe she said the truth, maybe she did not. One can not know.

    Justice  has NOT been done yet

    Justice has not been done yet.  A strange accusation ruined the life of a successful prominent man. In typical fashion, as it exists only in rape accusations, he was jailed for 4 months, on the mere accusation of a single woman, with not a shred of proof.  His girl friend of over 10 years was allegedly raped exactly on the day she allegedly found out he was unfaithful and they split, after an argument. 

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Not guilty verdict in Jörg Kachelmann (false?) rape accusation trial” »
    Not guilty verdict in Jörg Kachelmann (false?) rape accusatio…
    » continues here »

    Kachelmann trial: Jörg Kachelmann’s court verdict May 31. Not guilty?

    The verdict in the Jörg Kachelmann rape trial in Germany will be out on May 31. Human Stupidity plans to report as soon as possible.

    132 days in jail, 43 days in court, starting September 6, 10 expert witnesses, several ex-girlfriends as witnesses. Only vague circumstantial evidence. No proof. Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence but with clear prosecutor misconduct, victim’s lies.  Unfortumately, the public was excluded from major parts of the trial, thus nobody really knows all the relevant details of the case.

    The world press reported the beginning of the trial and then just shut up and ignored it. Certainly they will report on the verdict.The German press reports in detail about Kachelmann.

    The prosecution demands 4 years and 3 months, the defense wants an acquittal.

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    All this messy court case, career destruction, jail time, ruinous cost for defense and expert witnesses is due only to

    1. removal of due process from our court system in rape and child abuse accusations.
    2. the lie that "all men are rapists". If it were not for the feminine myth that all men are rapists, the burden of proof would be really high to think that such a man would, out of a sudden, violently rape a woman at knife point:  A famous, well known, civilized and non-violent man that has a dozen girl friends and millions of female fans he could pick sex partners from.

    German press reports about the Kachelmann rape case.

    1. Joerg Kachelmann | Die Zeit

    2. Topic Kachelmann | Der Spiegel

    3., about Kachelmann: the rainbow press paper hired arch-feminist Alice Schwarzer and tends to be anti-Kachelmann.

    Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence

    The Jörg Kachelmann rape trial is the sensational trial of the year in Germany. A famous TV anchor whose program once went viral on YouTube, sex, multiple girl friends delight the rainbow press.  Serious press organs like "Der Spiegel" and "Die Zeit" arrived at the sensible conclusion that there is absolutely no evidence to support the accusation (or rather,  it appears to be a painstakingly planned false accusation).  In spite of mounting evidence to the contrary, feminists, led by feminist Icon Alice Schwarzer continue convinced that Kachelmann is guilty and accuse these press organs of partiality.

    Rape trial without evidence

    The so-called objective evidence in the rape case against Jörg Kachelmann, allegedly held by Mannheim Public Prosecutor’s Office, doesn’t exist. Several expert witnesses have so far testified in the rape trial. None found any supporting evidence that Jörg Kachelmann raped Simone D. On the contrary, the evidence contradicts the alleged victim’s story.  Additionally, the alleged victim, who had accused her ex-boyfriend of raping her at knife point, had to admit to having lied and fabricated some of the evidence herself.

    On the other hand, the court painstakingly interviewed various ex-girlfriends of Kachelmann, who had absolutely no knowledge about the  alleged incident, but could only smear Joerg Kachelmann’s reputation. Some girl friends earned major amounts for interviews in the rainbow press, but at the same time insisted on privacy during their court hearings.

    The prominent Swiss weather anchor Jörg Kachelmann, working for German television, was held in remand for several months before the rape trial held its first hearing, despite his claims of innocence, and despite the absence of any flight risk. Adding to this the non-existent danger of collusion, this jailing of a suspect, based on nothing but unproven allegations, amounts to breach of due process.

    Surprisingly, the English speaking press has absolutely no coverage about the Kachelmann rape trial. Therefore, Human-Stupidity undertook the trouble of improving on Google translations to publish the translated text of an excellent article Two bruises but no other findings by  German News Magazine "Die Zeit

    Two bruises but no other findings in alleged rape case

    Did Jörg Kachelmann rape his lover Simone D? The experts’ interpretation of the evidence differs from that of the prosecution.

    The Mannheim District Court has been hearing Jörg Kachelmann’s case for six months now. That’s how long the 5th criminal division has been searching for evidence to prove that the accused weatherman of the first German television channel raped his occasional mistress, Claudia Simone D. The search has so far been futile. In fact, as the case progresses, incriminating evidence steadily dissipates.

    On 9 February 2010, the 37-year old Simone D. made a police statement according to which, after a row in her flat, Jörg Kachelmann raped her at knife point and threatened to kill her. The Mannheim Public Prosecutor’s Office had always made a public pretence of having objective evidence indicating the defendant’s culpability. This assertion, however, has been seriously challenged over recent months.

    German courts deal with rape cases on a daily basis. That the Kachelmann proceedings have turned into a mammoth case without an ending in sight is not unrelated to the fact that investigators spent weeks interrogating the victim/witness without questioning her statements. The Kachelmann case proves beyond doubt that, in this day and age, no potential victim of a sexually related crime need fear the authorities. Rape victims humiliated and bullied by the police and judiciary were merely a post war phenomenon, now long gone, though still preferentially exemplified by women’s rights activists. Today, a woman who reports a rape in Germany can expect a maximum of discretion, understanding, solidarity and attention. The extent of this is demonstrated fully on Simone D.

    The criminal investigation department accepted the rape story of Kachelmann’s girlfriend without any verification of her statement. In a remark made immediately after the report on 10 February 2010, the female interrogating officer from Schwetzingen wrote: “We feel the woman is making a credible impression”. When questioned by the court six months later on the basis of this evaluation, the police officer was unable to respond.

    Credulity and naivety – unexpected qualities in a judge – were also displayed later, in the witness statement before the Mannheim District Court by the custodial judge, who ordered Kachelmann –pleading innocence – to be held in remand on 10 March 2010. The judge stated, as reason for the arrest warrant, that Kachelmann’s version, according to which he first had consensual sexual intercourse with Simone D. but then left after a jealous outburst from her, simply did “not appear plausible” to him. In addition, he held it on assumption that “someone who accuses another of committing a criminal offence would be telling the truth”.

    Accusers are always believed. Especially rape accusers. In spite of evidence that false rape accusations have been a weapon of choice since biblical times and nowadays are endemic. Credible experts from police and academia estimate that 20% – 60% of rape accusations are false.  Of course, feminist writers vehemently disagree. (Additionally, most rape accusations are not about forcible rape in the traditional meaning of the word.

    The Mannheim Public Prosecutor’s Office has also been supportive of the victim/witness from the beginning, although the woman, whose hopes had been dashed by Kachelmann, would have very understandable motives for a false accusation. The Public Prosecutors continued to support Simone D. even when, in the course of the investigation, she admitted to not only having lied in parts of her statement, but also to fabricating some of the incriminating evidence herself (see ZEIT file “Schuldig auf Verdacht” from 24 June 2010).

    When her manipulations were discovered, at the end of April 2010, Kachelmann had already spent a month in custody. In spite of this the Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed Simone D’s attempt to mislead the court as a “minor issue”. 
    Source: Two bruises but no other findings | Die Zeit

    The Hofstra rape case is an example where 4 men were jailed and on the verge of getting 20 year verdicts based on the contradictory accusation of one lone girls. Only video evidence cleared the falsely accused.

    This clear bias in favor of accusers can be found world wide. The Obama administration ordered US colleges to convict rape suspects in internal administrative proceedings by preponderance of evidence, a far cry from "beyond reasonable doubt".  Add to this panel members totally biased in favor of the accuser, and a conviction is virtually assured, no matter how flimsy or patently wrong the accusation.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence” »
    Jörg Kachelmann rape trial without evidence
    » continues here »

    Jörg Kachelmann rape trial of the year (Germany): prosecutor misconduct, victim’s lies

    kachelmann-bild.deThe Kachelmann case is in Germany almost like OJ Simpson case: a very famous person is accused of a heinous crime, and the population is split on their guilty-or-not verdict.  In the Kachelmann ("Tile man") case, of course, it is not even assured that a crime has happened. Feminists think he is guilty, of course.  "The criminal case of the year" in Germany is almost unknown in the English speaking Press. Only Human-Stupidity has reported com regularity on the Jörg Kachelmann rape case.

    Jörg Kachelmann, handsome, attractive and famous weather anchor man of a main German TV channel, had a dozen girl friends he juggled skillfully so each one thought she was the only one. Even if he did not rape, such immorality makes him almost a criminal. Tens of Millions see him every day on TV. A famous, well known person.

    In our world of feminist inspired laws, any man can be arrested at any time. Just one woman making an unproven accusation of rape is all that is needed. The Magna Carta, modern constitution and due process are not valid for males, Jörg Kachelmann spent several months in jail, upon the mere word of one woman, with no corroborating proof. End of career as weather man. No way to broadcast weather reports out of jail. Career destroyed.

    It turns out that there was grave misconduct of the prosecutors, from the beginning. Inquired by prosecutors, the alleged victim consistently insisted on a lie. Prosecutors warned her she must not lie, and she insisted. "Der Spiegel" recently reported that the prosecution failed to video or audio-tape the audition of the alleged victim, even when they were trying to dig deeper into her lies. They even failed to completely transcribe the conversation with the victim, with a gap at a crucial point where prosecutors allegedly only drank water or coffee with the accuser, for 20 minutes. After that coffee break she changed her story.

    Furthermore, prosecutors stated that the clearly repeated lies, proven wrong by evidence on the accuser’s computer, did not cause any doubt in them regarding the veracity of the accusations, nor made them even consider releasing the accused from prison. (Geliebte belog die Staatsanwälte // Lover lied to the prosecutors)

    Cat Lupine managed to get into the transmission room in the midst of Kachelmann’s weather report. The video went viral in YouTube.

    What happened? Rape accusations, lies, inconsistencies.

    Reader comments at the intellectual News Magazine "Der Spiegel" are fairly outspoken about the fact that this trial should have never happened, and that it is time to try the accuser for perjury and false accusations. Human-Stupidity is not alone thinking this case is a clear farce and an example of "Hell hath no fury as a woman scorned" revenge.

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Jörg Kachelmann rape trial of the year (Germany): prosecutor misconduct, victim’s lies” »
    Jörg Kachelmann rape trial of the year (Germany): prosecutor …
    » continues here »

    Jörg Kachelmann rape case in Germany: useless court excursion to Switzerland

    The entire Jörg Kachelmann rape case court went on an excursion to Zurich, Switzerland.  The prosecutor wanted to hear testimony of Swiss photographer Linda T. who had met the weather TV Anchor (Kachelmann) for a photo shoot in 2010. She was often called Kachelmann’s "Lover #10", and rumors were that she was so traumatized from sexual harrassment by Kachelmann that she took a sick leave from work. Linda T’s testimony proved all these allegations wrong.

    Linda T. had refused to come to Germany to testify. So two judges, two prosecutors, and the lawyers travelled to Switzerland. They presented their questions to a Swiss prosecutor who questioned the woman in the presence of the German legal team."

    Source: News Magazine "Der Spiegel" about Kachelmann

    Human-Stupidity is the lone English speaking publication reporting about the Jörg Kachelmann rape case, the court case of the year in Germany. Jörg Kachelmann was a famous TV anchor or the main German TV channel. A woman he had a 15 year love affair with accused him of rape. Exactly on the day when they broke up, after she found out he had another women lover (Details here:


    Related Human-Stupidity topics: Men’s Rights & Feminism teenage sexuality child porn witch hunt.

    "Rape on breakup day"

    "Hell has no fury like a woman scorned" revenge false rape accusation?

    A famous, very good looking single man, seen daily by millions of German women on TV,  after a 15 year long affair with a woman (whose sexual attractiveness wanes faster then a man’s) will rape her exactly when they decide to break up the relationship. Or the woman was hurt and wanted to get even. Which one is more likely?

    With no corroborating proof whatsoever, according to the legal principle "Men accused by women or children are guilty until proven innocent" he was arrested for 4 months, obviously lost his job as a TV weather man, and must have spent hundreds of thousands of legal cost.


    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Jörg Kachelmann rape case in Germany: useless court excursion to Switzerland” »
    Jörg Kachelmann rape case in Germany: useless court excursion…
    » continues here »

    Meteorologist TV weather anchors prone to false rape charges? Heidi Jones and Joerg Kachelmann

    WABC’s Heidi Jones, who anchors the station’s weekend evening weather coverage and fills in on “Good Morning America,” was charged Monday with filing a false report, a Class A misdemeanor. If convicted, she could face up to a year in jail or a $1,000 fine.  Meteorologist Heidi Jones Charged With Filing False Rape Report

    TV weather anchors and meteorologist. What a coincidence. Unpredictable and falsely predicted thunderstorms and typhoons. And false rape accusations. Heidi Jones and Joerg Kachelmann are both weather anchors, but are on opposite sides. Heidi Jones is a false rape accuser. Joerg Kachelmann is accused of rape, and we believe the accusations are false, out of revenge.

    What is it about meteorologist  weather anchor women or weather anchor men to get involved in false rape charges?  We already reported on a famous german TV weather anchor man that is a victim of rape charges that are most likely false

    Why we think TV weather anchor meteorologist Joerg Kachelmann’s rape charges are false?

    A good looking, famous, TV anchorman (not of a small network but the main German TV station), playboy with 10 girl friends. His official girl friend finds out he has others and they split, after many many years.

    What is more likely:

    • The successful playboy with many girl friends rapes her exactly when they part?
    • The woman is angry and revenge-bent because the guy cheated and now split

    Add to this a few contradictions in the woman’s testimony, a computer with old photos of self inflicted blue ematomes seem to have been a training for the later rape hematomes.

    Unproven Rape charges: Famous German TV Weather Anchorman Joerg Kachelmann released after 4 months instant jail (

    Meteorologist false rape accuser Heidi Jones denies prior accusations

    Now “poor” rape accuser is back-pedalling. The police understood her wrong, she did not file rape charges!!

    Dumb dumb police. Or lying lying meterologist? You form your own opinion.

    The following video is just a regular weather report by Heidi Jones. Just to see what a false rape accuser looks like. Unlike Joerg Kachelmann, whose  face was over German speaking TV, after his accusation, I cannot find many images of her AFTER her accusation and recanting.

    NY meteorologist says she never claimed rape

    NEW YORK — A meteorologist on ABC’s local New York station accused of false reporting says she

    never told police she was the victim of a rape or an attempted rape.

    Heidi Jones was given a desk appearance ticket for false reporting after police said she made up claims she was sexually assaulted in Central Park and later harassed by the same man. Police say she admitted fabricating the claims after they investigated the incident.

    A lawyer for Jones said Friday the meteorologist never said she was the victim of an attempted rape, as was reported in the media. The attorney did not clarify what Jones says she told police.

    The lawyer says the characterization of the case as a ‘false rape claim’ is an attempted character assassination. Jones has been suspended from the station pending an internal investigation.

    UPDATED: New York TV meteorologist arrested for false rape claim (The false rape society)