Nelson Mandela – worse than Apartheid?

 

Nelson Mandela is universally revered.

So much that joking about him leads to arrest in Britain.

Arrested Because He Joked About Mandela: Police Hold Shopkeeper for Eight Hours, Take His DNA and Seize His Computer | Daily Mail

South Africa has one of the highest violent crime rates in the world.

Better off Under Apartheid
60% of South Africans: ‘Country Better run under Apartheid!’; ANC

Dec 12, 2009 – Most South Africans, both black and white, believe the country was better run of "apartheid nostalgia" as South Africa grapples with high crime rates, …. HRC statistics, 21,000 people died in political violence in South Africa

Video A media blackout, world wide, hides black on white murder in South Africa. The same happens in the USA:

Mandela’s radicalism often ignored by Western admirers Aljazeera America December 6, 2013

"If you talk to many American liberals, they think Mandela was Martin Luther King," Ellis said. "If you say, ‘No, Mandela started a guerrilla army, he was a communist, he did this, he did that,’ they just don’t get it. They don’t know what you’re talking about."

Yet even later, as South African president from 1994 to 1999, Mandela would irk his friends in the West by expressing solidarity with leaders such as Cuba’s Castro and Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, as well as finding common cause with the Palestinians in their struggle for statehood.

 

Our falsified politically correct science and policy do not even help the disadvantaged. Blacks are in full control of Detroit, have the major, police chief. And Detroit is one of the most corrupt and inept cities in the USA. 

Crime and poverty in Africa on the rise

(Reuters) – In a country cursed by one of the world’s highest murder rates, being a white farmer makes a violent death an even higher risk.

Whether attacks have been motivated by race or robbery, a rising death rate from rural homicides is drawing attention to the lack of change on South Africa’s farms nearly two decades after the end of apartheid – and to the tensions burgeoning over enduring racial inequality.

Some of South Africa’s predominantly white commercial farmers go as far as to brand the farm killings a genocide.

On the other side of the divide, populists are seizing on the discontent among the black majority to demand a forced redistribution of white-owned farms along the lines of neighbouring Zimbabwe. Reuters

Zimbabwe was a grain exporting bread basket before the land distribution to Blacks

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Nelson Mandela – worse than Apartheid?” »
Nelson Mandela – worse than Apartheid?
» continues here »

US cities dangerous, warn French, British Governments

 

16 American cities foreign governments warn their citizens about |`
Washington Post

Planning a trip abroad? It’s probably best to check out the State Department’s list of travel warnings for countries with unsafe political situations. At the moment, the State Department has issued travel warnings for 34 countries, from the Central African Republic and El Salvador to Iraq and North Korea.

Well, just as State warns Americans about dangerous places to travel, so too do foreign ministries in other countries — and some countries warn their citizens to avoid heading to certain cities in the U.S. France, in particular, warns travelers to be careful in a large number of specific cities.

Here’s what other countries, mostly France, say about American cities:

New York: Be wary in Times Square and at the Statue of Liberty, and don’t go to Harlem, the Bronx or Central Park at night.

Washington: Northeast and Southeast should be avoided, and Union Station is dangerous at night. “Le quartier Anacostia n’est pas recommandable de jour comme de nuit.” Translation: Don’t go to Anacostia, day or night.   […]

Detroit: “The center is not recommended after the close of business.” […]

Strangely, nobody mentions if this has anything to do with race.

New Orleans: Northwest of Dauphine Street, northeast of Ursulines Avenue, north of St. Charles Avenue and south of Magazine Street are areas of concern.

Read the rest of: 16 American cities foreign governments warn their citizens about

Africa in Our Midst :

The world reacted with astonishment to sights it never expected to see in America. “Anarchy in the USA,” read the headline in Britain’s best-selling newspaper, The Sun. “Apocalypse Now,” said Handelsblatt in Germany. Mario de Carvalho, a veteran Portuguese cameraman, who coveres the world’s trouble spots, said he saw the bodies of babies and old people along the highways leading out of New Orleans. “It’s a chaotic situation. It’s terrible. It’s a situation we generally see in other countries, in the Third World,” he said.

Some Third-Worlders would have been insulted. “I am absolutely disgusted,” said Sajeewa Chinthaka, 36, of the looters. The Sri Lanka native added: “After the tsunami our people, even the ones who lost everything, wanted to help the others who were suffering. Not a single tourist caught in the tsunami was mugged. Now with all this happening in the U.S. we can easily see where the civilized part of the world’s population is.”  […]

Ninety-nine percent of the white people left New Orleans when the evacuation order went out. Some 80,000 blacks could not or would not leave. Whites did not “leave them behind,” as the editorial writers keep telling us. No one could have gotten some of them to leave — a number of men cheerfully admitted they stayed in town to loot — but if it was anyone’s job to give them the option, it was that of the black-run city government. Of the blacks who stayed, probably only a minority committed crimes, but they were enough to turn the city into a hell hole. Some did unspeakable things: loot hospitals, fire on rescue teams, destroy ambulances. No amount of excuse-making and finger-pointing can paper over degeneracy like that. Black people — and only black people — did these things.

EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech – urge former heads of state

 

Sophia Kuby, spokesman for European Dignity Watch, said the Framework betrays the essentially totalitarian mindset of significant elements within the European Union’s apparatus. The document, if adopted by the European Parliament, she said, “could lead to situations in which vague or unwarranted accusations are leveled against individuals and groups.”
Former heads of state call on EU to set up state surveillance of ‘intolerant’ citizens 

  • EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech
  • UN demands Germany repress free Speech.
  •  

    Thanks to avoiceformen for calling attention to

     Former heads of state urge EU to outlaw anti-feminism

     

    Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism,  colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia. 4

    Political correctness dominates the United Nations and the European Union.  Hate speech laws went down the slippery slope from outlawing incitement of violence and lynching to hampering discussion and even academic research about race and iq, domestic violence, wage gap, immigration law.

     

    A prime example: it must be understood that demonstrations (in  exercise of freedom of assembly) need not be tolerated when they are likely to  degenerate into riots or infringe on the rights of others 4

    Unfortunately, this includes peaceful demonstrators that will create violent backlash counter-demonstrations. We are sure this will not be interpreted that Trayvon Martin or other Black rioters will be prevented from demonstrating. Not will violent feminists be constrained, but non-violent anti-feminists. After all, anti-feminists are criminalized by this law.

    Example s: tolerance does not denote acceptance of such practices as female circumcision,

    male circumcision is not only ok but required due to to mandatory tolerance for millennia-old religious mutilation in Jewish and Muslim holy rites

    forced marriage, polygamy

    polyandry is ok? And what is so terrible about polygamy that it needs to be outlawed at all costs and can not be left to local governments? Of course, the Muslims will oppose this

    or any form of exploitation or domination of women

    note that men can be exploited and dominated. For example by women and their family courts that reduce men to slave labor to provide life long comfortable income to women

    This text was prepared under the aegis of the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation by a Group of Experts composed of Yoram Dinstein (Chair), Ugo Genesio, Rein Mȕllerson, Daniel Thȕrer and Rȕdiger Wolfrum  4

    We at Human-Stupidity bemoan that Men’s Right’s Activists and Race Realists do not embrace each other and see that they face the same problems:   Gender Quotas, Race Quotas, "reverse discrimination", Hate Speech Laws, and systematic privileges for women, colored races, immigrants and non-native religions.

    Intelligence, Race, Criminality: Taboo Poll in Nature Magazine

    Shocking questions. Should scientists refrain from studying topics for fear of PC (political correctness)? Is political correctness more important then finding the scientific truth about important issues of our modern life (crime, intelligence, scientific and economic progress, etc.).

    Though we disagree with the idea of censorship, we thank Nature Magazine for bringing out the issue into the open.

    This is much better then Canadian law, where even the discussion of censorship is censored by hate speech laws. See Canada

     


    NATURE Magazine Has A Poll (That You Can Vote In!) On "Taboo Genetics"

    Ethics: Taboo genetics

    Probing the biological basis of certain traits ignites controversy. But some scientists choose to cross the red line anyway.

    Erika Check Hayden

    02 October 2013

    Scientists cited or quoted include Steve Hsu, Geoffrey Miller, Christopher Chabris, Francis Galton, Robert Plomin, and Bruce Lahn.

    And here is Nature’s tut-tutting editorial:

    Dangerous work

    Behavioural geneticists must tread carefully to prevent their research being misinterpreted.

    Here are the four questions in Nature’s poll.

    • Should scientists refrain from studying the genetics of intelligence?

    • Should scientists refrain from studying the genetics of race?

    • Should scientists refrain from studying the genetics of violence?

    • Should scientists refrain from studying the genetics of sexuality?


    Human-Stupidity has described politically correct censorship in academic research about Domestic violence, Race and IQ, childhood sexuality (Rind study, child sex trauma myth).

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Intelligence, Race, Criminality: Taboo Poll in Nature Magazine” »
    Intelligence, Race, Criminality: Taboo Poll in Nature Magazine
    » continues here »

    EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech

    EU to ban anti-feminist speech

    • and ban any "defamatory comments" of the following kind.

    racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia

     

    • Governments MUST  "Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia."
    • Governments MUST give special privileges to underprivileged genders, races, sexual orientations, etc.:  "The special protection afforded to members of vulnerable and disadvantaged groups may imply a preferential treatment. Strictly speaking, this preferential treatment goes beyond mere respect and acceptance lying at the root of tolerance "

    The texts quoted and highlighted above are from the EU (Europan Union) document itself. I kid you not.

     

    We at Human-Stupidity bemoan that Men’s Right’s Activists and Race Realists do not embrace each other and see that they face the same problems:   Gender Quotas, Race Quotas, "reverse discrimination", Hate Speech Laws, and systematic privileges for women, colored races, immigrants and non-native religions. 

    EU to ban anti-feminist speech continues >>


    The EU’s latest document is a called: “The European framework national statute for the promotion of tolerance”[4] which is a document elaborated with a view to being enacted by the legislatures of all the 28 unfortunate nations that are members of this club.

    What’s wrong with “promotion of tolerance” one might ask. As you will see in the following lines, “promotion of tolerance” means something entirely different than what it means to reasonable people. And basically the entire document looks more like a statue of the Thought Police and the Ministry of Truth.

    In the Section 1 of the document, the EU defines its terms. So terms like “hate crime”, “group” and “tolerance” are being introduced. Of particular interest is the EU’s definition of “group libel”[5]:

    Group libel” means: defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group as defined in paragraph (a) – or members thereof – with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges.

    As we will soon see, feminists are also de facto part of the “group” notion – so holding feminists to ridicule, as they deserve, will now be a crime.


    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech” »
    EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech
    » continues here »

    George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O’Mara’s toothless defense is the culprit

    Zimmerman’s guilt could not be proven

    Top: 5 years ago little Trayvon and Geore on his booking photo  looked like thisGeorge Zimmerman is considered guilty in the public opinion. George, vigorously pursued little weak innocent Trayvon Martin, and gunned down an unarmed teenager who only carried skittles and ice tea and who dreamed of . Defense lawyer Marc O’Mara managed to raise reasonable doubt. Thus the jury had to acquit, because Zimmerman’s guilt could not clearly be proven beyond reasonable doubt. Zimmerman is guilty, but the prosecution just failed to to convincingly prove Zimmerman’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

    George Zimmerman‘s lawyer Marc O’Mara’s defense won a battle but lost the war. George Zimmerman is a world-wide pariah. We read the press in Germany and Brazil.

     

    trayvon-with-babyMSN Brazil calls Zimmermann Assassin.
  • Press media’s lies, deceit about George Zimmermann trial
  • George Zimmermann Acquitted: Victim of Government and Black Racism ("Der Spiegel" lügt: George Zimmerman, Opfer von schwarzem Rassismus und Verleumdungen)

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Below recent photos of Martin and Zimmerman

    Sheep succumbs to attack dog
    Aggressive, well trained Al Sharpton

    faces off with toothless lawyer Marc O’Mara

    Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

     

    Al Sharpton Grills George Zimmerman’s Attorney In Long, Contentious Interview

    How civil rights activists and the press would like to picture Trayvon Martin and George ZimmermannA firmly convinced partisan Al Sharpton

    Sharpton asked O’Mara how Zimmerman can plead self-defense if, as heard in the 911 tape, he was actively pursuing Martin, contrary to the advice of the operator.

    Al Sharpton firmly tells a damaging narrative "Zimmerman chased Martin". Sharpton is firm and convinced, and thus convincing. Sharpton does not care about evidence, proof, or if his story is true or not. He firmly believes what he says and thus convincing( Robert Trivers: Self deception, Robert Kurzban).  He is unimpeded by doubts, reasonableness, fairness. A partisan. Al Sharpton does not care if it is true or not.

    A pondering, objective, unsure O’MaraHow Media would like to depict them (Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman)

    O’Mara argued that there’s no conclusive evidence to suggest continued pursuit, nor is there evidence Zimmerman initiated any physical confrontation

    O’Mara’s lame reply comes over like this: "Well, Zimmerman is guilty, he chased down the poor teenager and started the fight. But it can not be conclusively proven. Of course, I understand and respect your opinion, Mr. Sharpton, but you can not prove it"

    OK, he did not say this, but that is what it sounds to an unsophisticated TV viewer that has been exposed to the relentless smear campaign against George Zimmerman.

    Marc O’Mara seems to be trying himself to figure out what really happened and who started the fight. A reasoned, legalese, open minded opinion behooves a judge, not a defense lawyer, much less a TV propagandist.

     

    Marc O’Mara lacks aggressive forward defense and counter attack

    1) tell the truth

    Mr. Sharpton, you are dreaming. Mr. Zimmerman stopped and waited, Trayvon Martin came back and viciously assaulted and attacked George. 

    obama-if-i-had-a-son-hed-look-like-trayvon-birth-certificate-sad-hill-news-33

    2) challenge: Sharpton’s story is preposterous and makes no sense

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O’Mara’s toothless defense is the culprit” »
    George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O&…
    » continues here »

    MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?

    George Zimmerman is an assassin. MSN Brazil spreads this slanderous news in their Brazilian version. George Zimmerman was acquitted and thus must not be called a murderer or assassin. 

    Not satisfied with the normal lies and deceit in the George Zimmerman case, MSN resort to illegal slander. Good for George, to get multi million dollar lawsuit against msn. Before, CBS had doctored the 911 tapes and is being sued by George Zimmerman

    Americanos saem às ruas para pedir justiça contra assassino de Trayvon Martin

    IMG_21072013_081229

    George Zimmerman has been the victim of a concerted defamation campaign ever since black civil rights leaders got wind of the case.

     

    They lied to you, hid evidence.
    Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

     

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?” »
    MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?
    » continues here »

    They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture

     

     

     

    (1) The trial could only start due to criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey

    .There never was a case that an honest prosecutor could have brought to court, and that an unbiased judge would have allowed to proceed.

     

    In reference to the George Zimmerman trial’s whistleblower who lost his job at the State Attorney’s Office, Dershowitz says Angela Corey should face “disciplinary action” for “deliberately withholding and suppressing” evidence submitted to George Zimmerman’s defense and the judge. He claims Corey “withheld other evidence in the course of the pretrial and trial proceedings.”  7

    You would arrive at the conclusion that Zimmermann is innocent beyond reasonable doubt, and that Trayvon Martin is a murderous aggressor, beyond reasonable doubt.

     

    (2) Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at the place where he had been 240 seconds earlier.

    Path and time line

    The final fight and the killing happened about 60 yards from Zimmerman’s car and 60 yards from Trayvon Martin’s destination. Trayvon Martin, without any doubt, returned to where he was a few minutes before. This is inevitable logic, because the fight happened where Zimmermann was originally.

    Two maps trying to explain George’s and Trayvon’s path

    trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-map-with-911-call-timing-v-3-1

     

     

    If the prosecution and the press were right, out of shape Zimmermann  chased after football athlete Trayvon.

    Trayvon could have simply entered his house, but chose not to do so. Trayvon could have simply outrun Zimmerman but chose not to do so.

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors” »
    They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman&#8…
    » continues here »