Posts tagged ‘child pornography’

 

Child Porn claims to scare sites into taking down photos

Olympic gymnast McKayla Maroney claimed her nude photos are child porn, to scare web sites into removing her photos. 

Maroney’s lawyers confirmed that the leaked nude images of the U.S. gymnast were taken at the time when she was not yet 18. This means that the people who are involved in the leak and those who are storing copies of the images on their PCs could face a lawsuit on child abuse  Tech Times

But: Children photographing themselves are child porn producers

Little was McKayla Maroney aware she was incriminating herself of a heinous crime: "McKayla Maroney may be a victim of the leaked photo scandal, but she could be facing felony charges for child pornography." [2].  Any 17 or under "child" that takes photo of herself in any indecent pose, is a producer of child pornography (sexting). And mere possession of child pornography is punishable up to life in prison [3] [4

Child pornography can be fully dressed photos of 17 year olds

Deliberately posed pictures of children [up to 17 years of age] fully clothed, partially clothed or naked can be child pornography. If the dirty mind of a district attorney or policeman officer considers baby’s pose indecent, then Family pictures of nude baby bath can cause ruinous child porn prosecution.

Use a Polaroid, not the "cloud"

"Stars who want to take nude photos without getting hacked: Use a Polaroid: To keep private pictures private, never upload them online."[Fox News].

 

Will anyone question the stupidity of child pornography laws?

Only Human-Stupidity dares to ridicule voodoo theory, to  denounce child porn hysteria in 70 posts, to cite Milton Diamond‘s peer reviewed research and infamous Rind Study 

  

Share

Vogue-kids-brasilFamous Magazine Vogue has a Brazilian "kids" fashion edition once a year.  Fully dressed children’s photos can be child porn (See copine scale), which according to the Voodoo theory of child pornography scars children for life each time someone looks at the picture.

"Vogue Kids" Magazine Accused of Publishing Sexualized Images of Children

"Vogue Kids" magazine, distributed this month with "Vogue", was criticized on social networks and accused by an institute for publishing photos of underage girls in sexy poses, dressed in a bikini. In some images, they are lying down with their legs open.

Complaints about the "Shade and Fresh Water" photo shoot spread in social networks sites and found their way, on Thursday (11), to state and federal prosecutors as well as the Federal Police. The agencies will evaluate the case.

A court issued an injunction demanding the distribution of the magazine issue to be stopped and already sold issues to be collected. (links follow below, after trigger warning)

"These are girls in sexy poses and [there is] a clear premature sexualization of these children," says psychologist Lais Fontenelle, which is part of the entity.

To the psychologist, the girls are doing clothing ads, which is vetoed by Conanda (National Council for the Rights of Children and Adolescents), linked to the Secretariat of Human Rights of the Presidency.

This year’s agency resolution prohibits advertisement targeted to children. Folha de São Paulo

The photos in question could be Copine scale level 5: "Deliberately posed pictures of fully, partially clothed or naked children in sexualised or provocative poses."

Senators demand punishment: "They want to call the parents of the children that were photographed, and punishment of all involved. Aruda agrees with the colleague and says that the country urgently needs to fight child abuse.  Public prosecutors must hold responsible  the company’s executives for this crime.  The magazine abused children, notwithstanding parental consent. We can not allow our children to make sensual poses in magazines that seek only economic exploitation.

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Vogue Kids Brazil confiscated for Child Porn Content’ » »
Vogue Kids Brazil confiscated for Child Porn Content » continues here »

Share

Wikipedia has a quite frank discussion of child porn laws. Even Human-Stupidity is cited.  

We reprint the entire Wikipedia article here because we fear this will be repressed and edited out. Further down, after the reprint we point out where we would go much further then this Wikipedia article dares to tread.


Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Main article: Laws regarding child pornography

While laws criminalizing child sexual abuse now exist in all countries of the world,[1][2] more diversity of views exists on questions like exactly how young those depicted in pornography should be allowed to be, whether the mere possession of child pornography should be a crime, or whether sentences for such possession should be modified.

Specific laws

In 1999, in the case of R. v. Sharpe, British Columbia’s highest court struck down a law against possessing child pornography as unconstitutional.[3] That opinion, issued by Justice Duncan Shaw, held, "There is no evidence that demonstrates a significant increase in the danger to children caused by pornography," and "A person who is prone to act on his fantasies will likely do so irrespective of the availability of pornography." [4]

Academic Milton Diamond has shown that availability of child pornography REDUCES child abuse, because pedophiles can act out their fantasies and possibly masturbate to fantasy child porn acts. His suggestion is, for this purpose, to create specific artificial child pornography under circumstances that does not traumatize children.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia’ » »
Debate regarding child pornography laws | Wikipedia » continues here »

Share

 

 Edathy pornography affair: The story so far

Among the ring’s customers was Edathy, who is said to have ordered material from the site between 2005 and 2010. The material consisted of pictures of naked boys assumed to be between nine and 14, in various poses, but not involved in sexual activity. The possession of such pictures is not illegal in Germany.

That is interesting. In Germany, possession of harmless photos of young children naked is not a crime yet. You can see such young children live on the innumerous nude beaches in Germany.

Human Stupidity has trouble understanding, or explaining to children, why photos of 100% legal acts, or cartoons of such acts, can be such a terrible crime. On the other hand, videos of terrorist beheadings, made exactly for the impact on the viewer and the publicity,  are legal.

The scientific truth is that accessible porn reduces rape and prostitution, countering the voodoo theory. Of course, the child sex trauma myth lobby can only ask for harder punishments

Germany’s Child Protection Agency demands that any commerce with pictures of naked children must be penalized. Justice Minister Heiko Maas also comes out in favor of stricter laws.

A huge international police inquiry because of a few photos of naked boys, which happens to be legal in Germany. Have we no other problems? Millions of obese and sedentary children have their health and future destroyed. The Euro crisis causes massive unemployment and might lead to civil war. And we care about a few nude photos?

Watch this video, one would never think that these were simple nude photos, no sexual activity or abuse.

Unfortunately, outside Germany we are not allowed to see or show the photos to understand what all the fuzz is about (Disclaimer)

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Nudist non-sexual child photos, legal in Germany: trouble for MP Sebastian Edathy and Merkel’s government’ » »
Nudist non-sexual child photos, legal in Germany: trouble for MP S… » continues here »

Share

Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it were not

 

Although a man who was 32 wasn’t breaking the law by having sex with a 17-year-old girl in 2008, he was by photographing the act, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

Marshall Hollins was convicted in Stephenson County of making child pornography and sentenced to 8 years in prison.

Is this not sad? It brings me to tears.

A good black man’s life destroyed, a girl’s boy friend taken away. All to protect her from "abuse". 

Where is Al Sharpton?

Where is President Barack Obama. I know, if he had a son, it would be a street fighting thug like Trayvon Martin. Where are men’s rights activists?

Where are the feminists, for the girl’s rights to have a boy friend, and to have her pictures taken?

 

He admitted he had sex with the girl when she was 17, which is the age of sexual consent in Illinois.

In a 5-2 ruling, the high court said that although the law allows 17-year-olds to consent to sex, they are still minors, making photos or video of such sex child porn.

This is nothing new:

The two dissenting justices said that because the photos don’t show an illegal act, they shouldn’t be illegal.

The dissenting minority has a bit of decency and common sense.

‘There was nothing unlawful about the production of the photographs taken by defendant in this case because the sexual conduct between defendant and (the girl) was entirely legal,’ wrote Justice Anne Burke, who was joined by Justice Charles Freeman.

‘The photographs are therefore not child pornography as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court for purposes of the First Amendment.

Due to voodoo theory and falsified research about the child sex trauma myth (Rind Study), the US supreme court made an EXCEPTION to constitutional rights of the First Amendment.

In the above case, no "*child" has been harmed through an illegal act, so there should be no reason to make an exception to constitutional first amendment rights.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was legal… but pictures of it cost him 8 years in prison’ » »
Court rules that 32-year-old man’s sex with 17-year-old was … » continues here »

Share

Millions of children watch child porn daily when they look into their bath room mirror. If they do so while posing sexy, or masturbating, it is even higher on the copine scale of child porn, for "children" as old as 17.

Practically every single person under 18 sees LIVE child porn on a daily basis. What they see in the mirror would qualify as child pornography, if photographed or filmed.

This is not the only example where live pictures are legal, but pictures of legal behavior are not

And no, publication and distribution of the illegal pictures are not necessary for it to be a crime


If a teen makes a sexy pose in front of the mirror, what s/he sees is a live version of level 4 child pornography, according to the copine scale "Deliberately posed pictures of children fully clothed, partially clothed or naked (where the amount,context and organisation suggests sexual interest)."

If they look  straight at their genitals, they see  a live version of copine level 6 CP: "Pictures emphasizing genital areas, where the child is either naked, partially clothed or fully clothed."

They see level 7 , If they touch themselves, with their eyes open,: "Pictures that depict touching, mutual and self-masturbation, oral sex and intercourse by a child, not involving an adult."


 

This is why it is so hard to explain children why sexting is such a huge crime. But possessing one’s own photo in the privacy of one’s own cell phone is production and possession of child pornography. According to the voodoo theory of CP, it victimizes the child who took its own photo.

We ought to outlaw bathroom mirrors. Because what these children see in the bathroom mirror is a live version of what would be child porn, if photographed or filmed.

 

 


  1. Watching depictions of a child being beheaded by Muslim terrorists, or stoned to death for extramarital sex,  a child being clubbed to death by US inner city gang bangers is totally legal. Distribution of such movies by for-profit web sites or TV networks is legal too.  Now if there is nudity, if in the movie the kid is not clubbed to death but makes love, or masturbates, then a child is being victimized.  We fail to understand this logic.

  2. Committing actual physical violence against children carries lower penalties then possession of photos: Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (40 years)

  3. Why would children or adolescents get victimized by mere watching? “Watching child porn victimizes the child”. The Voodoo science of child pornography laws

  4. Should some kind of child pornography (that does not victimize children) be encouraged, for reducing real crimes against children? Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii)


See also

Share

George Zimmerman is an assassin. MSN Brazil spreads this slanderous news in their Brazilian version. George Zimmerman was acquitted and thus must not be called a murderer or assassin. 

Not satisfied with the normal lies and deceit in the George Zimmerman case, MSN resort to illegal slander. Good for George, to get multi million dollar lawsuit against msn. Before, CBS had doctored the 911 tapes and is being sued by George Zimmerman

Americanos saem às ruas para pedir justiça contra assassino de Trayvon Martin

IMG_21072013_081229

George Zimmerman has been the victim of a concerted defamation campaign ever since black civil rights leaders got wind of the case.

 

They lied to you, hid evidence.
Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

 

Dear Jurors,

you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

[It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

  1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
  2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
  3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
  4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
  5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
  6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture
Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?’ » »
MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow? » continues here »

Share

Dear Jurors,

you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

[It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

  1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
  2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
  3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
  4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
  5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
  6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture

 

 

 

(1) The trial could only start due to criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey

.There never was a case that an honest prosecutor could have brought to court, and that an unbiased judge would have allowed to proceed.

 

In reference to the George Zimmerman trial’s whistleblower who lost his job at the State Attorney’s Office, Dershowitz says Angela Corey should face “disciplinary action” for “deliberately withholding and suppressing” evidence submitted to George Zimmerman’s defense and the judge. He claims Corey “withheld other evidence in the course of the pretrial and trial proceedings.”  7

You would arrive at the conclusion that Zimmermann is innocent beyond reasonable doubt, and that Trayvon Martin is a murderous aggressor, beyond reasonable doubt.

 

(2) Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at the place where he had been 240 seconds earlier.

Path and time line

The final fight and the killing happened about 60 yards from Zimmerman’s car and 60 yards from Trayvon Martin’s destination. Trayvon Martin, without any doubt, returned to where he was a few minutes before. This is inevitable logic, because the fight happened where Zimmermann was originally.

Two maps trying to explain George’s and Trayvon’s path

trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-map-with-911-call-timing-v-3-1

 

 

If the prosecution and the press were right, out of shape Zimmermann  chased after football athlete Trayvon.

Trayvon could have simply entered his house, but chose not to do so. Trayvon could have simply outrun Zimmerman but chose not to do so.

 

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading ‘They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors’ » »
They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman&#8… » continues here »

Share