In a note emailed to Google employees on Monday, Pichai said employees have a right to express themselves but ‘to suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not OK.‘ GOOGLE CEO SUNDAR PICHAI’S NOTE TO EMPLOYEES [Read more: Daily Mail]
By Royal decree, like the medieval pope, Pichai decided which scientific facts may be discussed, and which not. Googles CEO decided that sex differences or race differences are offensive and thus must not be mentioned.
In the past, Google profited from hiring only the Best and Brightest and most Motivated.
This has been a very difficult time. I wanted to provide an update on the memo that was circulated over this past week.
First, let me say that we strongly support the right of Googlers to express themselves, and much of what was in that memo is fair to debate, regardless of whether a vast majority of Googlers disagree with it. However, portions of the memo violate our Code of Conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace. Our job is to build great products for users that make a difference in their lives. To suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not OK. It is contrary to our basic values and our Code of Conduct, which expects “each Googler to do their utmost to create a workplace culture that is free of harassment, intimidation, bias and unlawful discrimination.”
Daniel Holtzclaw, a white policeman, raping disadvantaged black criminal women. The perfect PC narrative. This stacks all odds against him. The usual anti-racist race mongers
Daniel Ken Holtzclaw (born December 10, 1986) is a former Oklahoma City Police Department patrol officer who was convicted in December 2015 of multiple counts of rape, sexual battery, forcible oral sodomy, and other charges.
Of the thirteen women whom Holtzclaw assaulted, several had criminal histories such as drug arrests; all of the women were black. According to the police investigators, Holtzclaw used his position as an officer to run background checks to find information that could be used to coerce sex. During the trial, the defense questioned the victims’ credibility during cross-examination, bringing up their criminal records. However, the prosecution argued that victims were deliberately chosen by Holtzclaw for this very reason.
Holtzclaw pleaded not guilty to all charges. On December 10, 2015, an all-white jury convicted him on 18 of 36 charges, and on January 21, 2016, he was sentenced to 263 years in prison. [Wikipedia]
36 charges of rape, that must be true. Backed by DNA evidence. One DNA evidence in one case caused the jury to lend credence to all other cases. Who would defend such a slime bag, he must be guilty. Dozens of women can not lie.
Actually, multiple unproven uncorroborated accusations can all be wrong. Add to that jury intimidation, jury misinformation, shoddy falsely explained DNA evidence.
According to Michelle Malkin, police hunted for accusers, and picked especially drug addicts, prostitutes and convicted felons. Investigators strongly suggested to potential victims what the crime was, forgave blatant errors like "victims" describing tall Caucasian Holtzclaw as short and black. Witnesses were still believed after being found blatantly lying. They did not tell the jury that at least one of the witness was convicted of perjury, that many witness stories were so outlandish and blatantly false that they had to be dropped. While Wikipedia claims that feminists and race activists were not active, Michelle Malkin shows photos of Black Panther activists in full military garb inside the court room and says Jury was exposed to screams "give him life" from street protesters.
Target customers, kindergarteners, high school students all have the right to use the bath room of the sexual identity of their choice. This choice can be trans-gender, or ever changing gender-fluid. These trans-gender civil rights are being enforced by the Obama government. It is only just to concede the same rights to prisoners.
Biological males who identify as females can
shower with women in homeless shelters:“One of the guests at a rescue mission overheard someone on the street saying, ‘Dude, if you go down to the rescue mission and tell them you’re transgender, you can sleep in the women’s dorm and even shower with them,’” Ashmen told the paper. “So that idea is out there, but I don’t know of any missions that have called the police because of it.
bunk with high school coeds on school outings (proofs and links follow below)
use women’s bath rooms in schools and businesses.
use women’s dorms in colleges
So biological males have the right to use women’s bath rooms, showers, toilets and dorms, if they decide to identify as women.
The perceived or true safety of cis-gender (normal) women in these dorms, showers, toilets is of no concern to the promoters of transsexual human rights like Obama.
What is allowed in colleges must be allowed in prisons.
Human-Stupidity demands human rights for prisoners to choose the prison of their gender identity. Biological males that declare they identify as female must be allowed to use women’s prisons.
It must not be an obstacle that heterosexual men might want to identify as transsexual Lesbians (biological men that are sexually attracted to women). A few very feminine transgender will escape rape in men’s prisons.
It is of no concern that other biological males will continue to be raped in men’s prisons, nor that more females will be raped in women’s prisons.
We would not expect pregnancies to occur between cisgender biological females and transsexual females (biological males). Gender is a social construct. Certainly the transsexual’s sperms will correctly self-identify as eggs.
Transsexual females in a male body must be allowed go to female prisons
It is only fair that a convicted rapist can renounce his violent male identity and identify as a female. Of course, he must be accepted by a women’s prison. Prisons cannot remain as bastions of trans-phobia.
Except, don’t believe or support the survivors of her husband’s sexual assaults, of course.
Hillary Clinton accused Donald Trump as a sexist enemy of women (4).
Donald Trump reminded Hillary of her sexist past. Of pressuring and disbelieving survivors of husband Bill Clinton’s of sexual assaults (2) and that
Hillary Clinton had not believed nor supported the survivors of sexual assault by husband Bill Clinton (3)
Accusing Donald Trump can backfire badly.
Politically correct people with double standards should not accuse Donald Trump.
this is not about Bill Clinton’s past,
this is not about the veracity of the accusation against Bill.
This is about Hillary Clinton imposing her feminist standards (“accusers are to be believed”) upon all men except her own husband.
2) Hillary Clinton pressured Bill Clinton’s accusers
Hillary stood by Bill through all of this, and reportedly pressured many of these women to back off of their accusations. Willey and Broaddrick, particularly, have voiced accusations against Hillary the mainstream media has been reluctant to report. Here’s Broaddrick’s recollection: […]
None of that even touches Hillary’s representation of a child rapist; she joked about it in 1975, on tape, stating that she knew he was guilty: “I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.” Hillary pushed the story that the 12-year-old victim “sought out older men” and was “emotionally unstable.”
But Hillary is the great banner-carrier for sexual assault victims.
[…] On the very day upon which Breitbart News reported that former Bill Clinton sexual assault accuser Juanita Broaddrick had spoken out about Hillary’s candidacy, Hillary decided to pretend that she’s an advocate for the little people who get raped. Broaddrick alleged on national television that Clinton had raped her in 1978: […]
In the aftermath of the rape, Hillary approached her and essentially threatened her in order to keep her silent, Broaddrick has said.
She told Breitbart News’ Aaron Klein yesterday, “Shame on you, Hillary, that’s disgusting. Shame on you, Hillary. It’s time to be truthful.”
Two men, and a French boy who was raised by the wrong father have been awarded nearly €2m (£1.5m) in damages.
The clinic who –for "ethical reasons"- did not inform the husband that he was not be the father, was ordered to compensate the boy – now a man – and the cuckolded husband. The biological father, and the boy’s real siblings were also compensated for having been deprived of a family member.
The fraud was only discovered when the boy felt he did not look like his father
STOP. This can not be true. I admit, I inverted the genders.
In my gender-inverted story no woman was harmed. Due do female privilege, family court verdicts usually hand down verdicts favoring females. Rarely do family courts care about male suffering caused by females. In our feminist gynocracy’s women are not even held accountable if they spend child support on their own fashion shoes.
Intentional paternity fraud (cuckolding) is not a crime in Western democracies. On the contrary, some countries outlaw genetic testing by the father. Frequently courts force proven non-fathers to continue paying child support for another man’s children. Women routinely ignore court orders and keep children away from their fathers with impunity. No efforts are made to locate the real biological father.
High schools have stopped to even mention blood group testing, in order to avoid embarrassing discoveries of cuckolding 111213. And I have never heard of a man getting a financial court verdict because a woman hid his paternity from him.
Follows the true story. Here the verdict benefits mainly daughters and mothers.
In the US and Europe, attempts to expel convicted felon illegal foreigners rarely succeed. Felons, ISIS terrorists, mercenaries rarely get denied visas and rarely get kicked out of countries. Hooligans, street brawlers, convicted robbers rarely get kicked out of Australia or blocked entry into Brazil. So the Julien Blanc case is a demonstration of the awesome power of feminist activism! Feminist power, like the license to kill husbands and impunity for Lorena Bobbitt‘s penis slicing.
I renounce all my female legal and societal privilege, in in an irrevocable, legally binding notarized declaration. As a strong, empowered woman, I am deeply offended by unequal treatment on the basis of gender on issues, like lifetime alimony, child support, DNA testing and paternity fraud, "domestic violence only against women act", rape shield and harassment laws. I can not change feminist anti-male laws. But I can renounce my female privilege    and I suggest every honest egalitarian woman to do the same.
I hereby irrevocably renounce any privileges I enjoy by virtue of my female gender  and I refuse to engage in discrimination against men . Especially