Tag: feminism

Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases birth rates

Contractual freedom to agree about child support rights

Many women want to have a baby, but, for some reason, don’t find the appropriate man or husband. A man willing to the father and take on fatherly duties. The typical solution is to “forget” to take the pill or just let the man falsely assume she is taking birth control.

child-support-hearing1) Women should have right to renounce rights to father’s child support

We propose that

a) A woman should be empowered to contractually agree with a man to have his baby and not demand any child support.

Advantages:

  1. In most developed countries, more babies are urgently needed. This probably will lead to higher birth rates. The richer, more educated, more capacitated women will have children of their choice, that are wanted.
  2. No manipulation needed, no dishonesty about accidentally “forgotten birth control” to get pregnant against the man’s expressed wish
  3. female empowerment: the woman can have her wish, pick the father of her choice and have a baby.
      1. Most men would feel honored to be chosen as a father, without being obliged to support the baby nor having to get along with the woman for the next 20 years.
      2. many men would, voluntarily, by mutual agreement give some aid and support in child raising, in spite of the waiver.
  4. funny-pictures-child-support-catIt fixes our perverted system in which
    1. the most irresponsible and uncontrolled, least intelligent and poorest men have the most offspring
      1. these people are the most unfit genetically (their offspring will be less intelligent and have less self control)
      2. these people are also most unfit as parents and educators: they are less responsible, less intelligent
      3. these people are less unfit financially to provide a good home
    2. society pays for these offspring, with welfare that often encourages the poor to have more offspring to receive more money. These children are not welcome and loved, they are either accidents or planned to increase welfare income. A bad and traumatic start of a life for a baby.
    3. The well-to-do fear child support payments. Poor deadbeats that are unable to pay, and anonymous one night stances can get unlimited offspring without legal and financial responsibility

    5. island-child-supportb) A man should be allowed to contractually assume all child care and support obligations after birth

    Equally, a man can agree to take a child, after birth, assuming all child care and support.

    This might convince a woman to forego abortion, or to become pregnant.

    This ultimately empowers women, because it still is fully her choice to decide to terminate a pregnancy. She might find it attractive to have a baby without obligations.

    Or she might do it as favor for the man, almost like a surrogate pregnancy.

    All this would help to increase birth rate and reduce the population shortage problem in developed countries.

    Who will pay for children’s needs?

    If one party was relieved of his/her obligation, the other party.

    1. The party that took up the contractual obligation, mostly the mother. After all are women not empowered and independent? Don’t women have professions, salary, self sufficiency. Women did this for centuries and millennia, before the advent of liberated professional women and welfare.
    2. Welfare support. Government already pays support for children of deadbeat dads and moms in poverty. Why can’t they pay for the honest working tax paying father? Whoever took up the responsibility should pay him/herself, unless they are below poverty level.

    Your comments are welcome

    All this is a suggestion and, of course, open to discussion. Please comment

    Contractual freedom to agree about child support rights

    Many women want to have a baby, but, for some reason, don’t find the appropriate man or husband. A man willing to the father and assume fatherly duties. The typical solution is to dupe a man into fatherhood by lying about birth control.

    child-support-hearing1) Women should have right to renounce rights to father’s child support

    We propose that

    a) A woman should be empowered to contractually agree with a man to have his baby and not demand any child support.

    Advantages:

    1. In most developed countries, more babies are urgently needed. This probably will lead to higher birth rates. The richer, more educated, more capacitated women will have children of their choice, that are wanted.
    2. No manipulation needed, no dishonesty about accidentally "forgotten birth control" to get pregnant against the man’s expressed wish
    3. female empowerment: the woman can have her wish, pick the father of her choice and have a baby.
      1. Most men would feel honored to be chosen as a father, without being obliged to support the baby nor having to get along with the woman for the next 20 years.
      2. many men would, voluntarily, by mutual agreement give some aid and support in child raising, in spite of the waiver.
  5. funny-pictures-child-support-catIt fixes our perverted system in which
    1. the most irresponsible and uncontrolled, least intelligent and poorest men have the most offspring
      1. these people are the most unfit genetically (their offspring will be less intelligent and have less self control)
      2. these people are also most unfit as parents and educators: they are less responsible, less intelligent
      3. these people are less unfit financially to provide a good home
    2. society pays for these offspring, with welfare that often encourages the poor to have more offspring to receive more money. These children are not welcome and loved, they are either accidents or planned to increase welfare income. A bad and traumatic start of a life for a baby.
    3. The well-to-do fear child support payments. Poor deadbeats that are unable to pay, and anonymous one night stances can get unlimited offspring without legal and financial responsibility

    6. island-child-supportb) A man should be allowed to contractually assume all child care and support obligations after birth

    Equally, a man can agree to take a child, after birth, assuming all child care and support.

    This might convince a woman to forego abortion, or to become pregnant.

    This ultimately empowers women, because it still is fully her choice to decide to terminate a pregnancy. She might find it attractive to have a baby without obligations.

    Or she might do it as favor for the man, almost like a surrogate pregnancy.

    All this would help to increase birth rate and reduce the population shortage problem in developed countries.

    Who will pay for children’s needs?

    If one party was relieved of his/her obligation, the other party.

    1. The party that took up the contractual obligation, mostly the mother. After all are women not empowered and independent? Don’t women have professions, salary, self sufficiency. Women did this for centuries and millennia, before the advent of liberated professional women and welfare.
    2. Welfare support. Government already pays support for children of deadbeat dads and moms in poverty. Why can’t they pay for the honest working tax paying father? Whoever took up the responsibility should pay him/herself, unless they are below poverty level.

    Your comments are welcome

    All this is a suggestion and, of course, open to discussion. Please comment

    Contractual freedom to agree about child support rights

    Many women want to have a baby, but, for some reason, don’t find the appropriate man or husband. A man willing to the father and assume fatherly duties. The typical solution is to dupe a man into fatherhood by lying about birth control.

    child-support-hearing1) Women should have right to renounce rights to father’s child support

    We propose that

    a) A woman should be empowered to contractually agree with a man to have his baby and not demand any child support.

    Advantages:

    1. In most developed countries, more babies are urgently needed. This probably will lead to higher birth rates. The richer, more educated, more capacitated women will have children of their choice, that are wanted.
    2. No manipulation needed, no dishonesty about accidentally "forgotten birth control" to get pregnant against the man’s expressed wish
    3. female empowerment: the woman can have her wish, pick the father of her choice and have a baby.
      1. Most men would feel honored to be chosen as a father, without being obliged to support the baby nor having to get along with the woman for the next 20 years.
      2. many men would, voluntarily, by mutual agreement give some aid and support in child raising, in spite of the waiver.
  6. funny-pictures-child-support-catIt fixes our perverted system in which
    1. the most irresponsible and uncontrolled, least intelligent and poorest men have the most offspring
      1. these people are the most unfit genetically (their offspring will be less intelligent and have less self control)
      2. these people are also most unfit as parents and educators: they are less responsible, less intelligent
      3. these people are less unfit financially to provide a good home
    2. society pays for these offspring, with welfare that often encourages the poor to have more offspring to receive more money. These children are not welcome and loved, they are either accidents or planned to increase welfare income. A bad and traumatic start of a life for a baby.
    3. The well-to-do fear child support payments. Poor deadbeats that are unable to pay, and anonymous one night stances can get unlimited offspring without legal and financial responsibility

    7. island-child-supportb) A man should be allowed to contractually assume all child care and support obligations after birth

    Equally, a man can agree to take a child, after birth, assuming all child care and support.

    This might convince a woman to forego abortion, or to become pregnant.

    This ultimately empowers women, because it still is fully her choice to decide to terminate a pregnancy. She might find it attractive to have a baby without obligations.

    Or she might do it as favor for the man, almost like a surrogate pregnancy.

    All this would help to increase birth rate and reduce the population shortage problem in developed countries.

    Who will pay for children’s needs?

    If one party was relieved of his/her obligation, the other party.

    1. The party that took up the contractual obligation, mostly the mother. After all are women not empowered and independent? Don’t women have professions, salary, self sufficiency. Women did this for centuries and millennia, before the advent of liberated professional women and welfare.
    2. Welfare support. Government already pays support for children of deadbeat dads and moms in poverty. Why can’t they pay for the honest working tax paying father? Whoever took up the responsibility should pay him/herself, unless they are below poverty level.

    Your comments are welcome

    All this is a suggestion and, of course, open to discussion. Please comment

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases birth rates” »
    Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases bi…
    » continues here »

    Jezebel sucks: feminist excuse female child killer LaShanda Armstrong, instantly delete dissent

    LaShanda Armstrong killed herself, tried to kill her four children. One managed to escape her grip.
    Jezebel-sucks.com is trying to psycho-analyze the poor woman.

    Blame Husband’s infidelity

    Bossip.com even finds a way to blame the father’s infidelity for it: The serial cheater who berated his longtime girlfriend just before she drowned herself and their three kids in the Hudson River won’t face any charges in the tragic deaths

    Jezebel-sucks deletes dissent

    Human-Stupidity posted a comment on Jezebel that this is a psycho assassin infanticidal mother. We mentioned that feminists would not look for psychological explanations if the father were the assassin like father shot family dead.
    It took Jezebel.com-sucks 8 entire minutes, at 7 am, to delete our comment. Admirable efficiency. Dissenting opinions are not welcome. 

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    Armstrong, 25, drowned along with 5-year-old Landon, 2-year-old Lance and 11-month-old Lainaina. Only her 10-year-son Lashaun escaped the tan van turned death trap NY Daily News

    Of course we, unwisely, could not refrain from mentioning that if the father had slightly fondled the kids in wrong ways, they would not try to find deep motivations in the father’s past but rather want to jail him for 20 years.
    (no, we don’t condone inappropriate fondling of children, but we think that assassination is a much more serious crime. See our teenage sexuality and child porn witch hunt topics)

    River Murder-Suicide Mom’s Tragic Final Moments

    Tragic final moments of the murderer?  a multiple child assassin? What about the tragic moment of the drowning kids? And the grieving father?

    Anna North — A day after a Newburgh, New York mom killed herself and her children by driving into the Hudson River, interviews with survivors reveal some clues about her emotional state — and the family problems she was struggling with. River Murder-Suicide Mom’s Tragic Final Moments | Jezebel sucks

    Her emotional thought? that is the fist thing feminists at Jezebel-sucks think after a multiple child assassination. Pre-meditated. Even announced it on Facebook!

    lashanda-armstrong-facebook

    According to her surviving son, ten-year-old Lashaun, she told her kids "I’m sorry, I’m going to do something crazy," and "If I’m going to die, you’re going to die with me." But just before Lashaun escaped the sinking van, she grabbed his pant leg and said, "I made a mistake."

    jezebel-sucks-ashandra-armstrong-suicide3While your car is sinking you hold your kid by the pant legs to have a chat? Probably she tried to hold him by the pant leg so he would drown too. My suspicion is confirmed by the MSNBC TV report. Obviously she was not sorry enough so she would try to save the kids.

    Initial reports made it sound like Armstrong had intentionally let Lashaun out of the car, but it now appears that he slid out through a window and swam back to shore,

    No, she wanted to kill the fourth child too.

    The newspaper quoted Ryan as saying that Lashaun’s mother held her children as the minivan slipped into the river, saying: "If I’m going to die, you’re going to die with me." MSNBC

    It is the father’s fault!

    It is unbelievable. We thought Jezebel was bad. It can get worse:

    Epitome Of A Bad Father: Deadbeat Dad Won’t Face Charges Even Though His Restraining Order Violation Drove Ex To Drown Herself And Their Kids

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Jezebel sucks: feminist excuse female child killer LaShanda Armstrong, instantly delete dissent” »
    Jezebel sucks: feminist excuse female child killer LaShanda Armstr…
    » continues here »

    "Objectifying gaze" makes helpless women lose math ability. Feminist researchers want to persecute men, not empower women

    "Objectifying gaze" (ogling women’s breasts) causes women to helplessly lose their math abilities and get significantly lower math test results. Women who suffer through an objectifying gaze perform worse on math tasks right afterwards. But, interestingly, they are also more willing to accept an invitation by the "perpetrator" of the gaze.

    Such findings yielded Feminist research psychologist Professor Dr. Sarah J. Gervais from the University of Nebraska a coveted feminist prize: the Georgia Babladelis Best Paper Award, Psychology of Women (division 35 of the American Psychological   Association), 2010-2011. 

    Women Can’t Think When You’re Looking At Our Tits

    A blogger’s refreshingly short summary of Dr. Gervais’ research.

    Maybe women’s psyche needs to be empowered, so their intelligence does not get derailed by a simple short ogling stare. Empowering women, of course, is not the goal of feminist study. Rather, new laws are needed to further punish and curtail male behavior. Harassment laws already severely restrict free speech at the work place (Freedom of Speech and Appellate Review in Workplace Harassment Cases)

    Video showing Objectifying Gaze Research and an interview

    Compare  a very insightful Sexual Harassment spoof on YouTube.

    Original Research paper

    Gervais, S. J. Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (in press).  When what you see is what you get:  The consequences of the objectifying gaze for men and women.  Psychology of Women Quarterly. (abstract, entire pdf)

    Winner: Georgia Babladelis Best Paper Award, Psychology of Women (division 35 of the American Psychological   Association), 2010-2011.

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    Professor Sarah Gervais’ Subtle Prejudice Lab analyzes subtle prejudice against women while engaging in serious prejudice against men (who need control and punishment) and women (who need protective laws instead of empowerment)

    Download objectifying gaze research video with Dr. Gervais

    Why women who are ogled at work do not perform as well in the office

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “"Objectifying gaze" makes helpless women lose math ability. Feminist researchers want to persecute men, not empower women” »
    "Objectifying gaze" makes helpless women lose math abili…
    » continues here »

    Sexual harassment is in the eye of the beholder. No fright, no distress.

    "Harassment" perceived as non-threatening isn’t distressing

     For women, sexual harassment was distressing when they saw it as frightening, but not when they saw it as bothersome. "We were surprised by this finding," Settles said. "We thought women would be negatively impacted if they saw their harassment as frightening or bothersome."[…]
    Study Finds Surprising Gender Differences Related to Sexual Harassment |Science Daily

    The same come-on perceived as non-threatening and thus non-threatening and non-traumaticSurprise. Open-minded researcher Isis H. Settles from Michigan State University and colleagues get unexpected results that don’t fit the feminist mold.

    All depends on how the victim perceives the harassment. The enclosed two cartoons depicts how the same harassing behavior can elicit either shock and terror, or, in the second  picture, below, mild amusement.

    This of course makes us wonder if the feminist hysteria is not self-fulfilling. Women in "macho" cultures, who were never indoctrinated in feminist hysteria and never knew that cat calls or invitation to sex were something frightening, don’t get distressed by such action.  So the solution to the harassment problem would be to empower women, not to get frightened easily.

    Of course, undue influence using violence or strong coercion is something different.  Feminists tend to confound clearly violent illegal criminal rape and harassment with normal or slightly disturbing but non-violent and non-abusive behavior.

    Definition of Harassment

    Sexual harassment is defined as unwanted gender-based comments or behaviors (Fitzgerald, 1996) with three subtypes. Gender harassment refers to behaviors that disparage an individual on the basis of her or his gender (e.g., comments that insult women s intelligence; comments regarding behaviors a real man would do). Unwanted sexual attention refers to unwanted touching or attempts to establish a sexual relationship (e.g., repeated requests for dates). Finally, sexual coercion refers to attempts to coerce a sexual relationship in exchange for job-related threats or benefits (e.g., promising a promotion if the target engages in sexual activities). Frightened or Bothered: Two Types of Sexual Harassment Appraisals

    Maybe we are ill informed. It seems that mere looks (See Gervais’ "objectifying gaze"), compliments, innuendo, bantering is enough to qualify as sexual harassment.

    Great unexpected results! Teasing and "harassing" in non-threatening environment is not frightening. Probably because Dr. Isis Settles’ subjects were not distraught feminist-indoctrinated damsels in college freshmen experiments but empowered women in the armed forces.

    In other words: a creepy guy in a deserted forest coming on strong, that is frightening. Or your boss threatening to immediately fire you if you don’t yield to his/her advances. Workplace bantering mostly is not frightening but just bothersome. Like so many things in life. If a person gets frightened by workplace innuendo, then Human-Stupidity suggests to that  the problem is in the mind of the perceiver who feels frightened by harmless non-dangerous situations. 

    Our feminist laws repress men and protect women like defenseless victims

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Sexual harassment is in the eye of the beholder. No fright, no distress.” »
    Sexual harassment is in the eye of the beholder. No fright, no dis…
    » continues here »

    Cute child photo scares Reddit’s men’s rights into child porn frenzy

    Child Porn or Cutsie child photo? with-this-i-am-going-to-control-your-life

    Reddit men’s rights is one of the most powerful sites countering feminist indoctrination and propaganda on the web. Even mens rights proponents are scared out of their wits about the greatest taboo on earth, the child porn witch hunt.

    The founder and moderator of reddit’s r/mensrights reported this photo to authorities. If men’s rights movement joins the witch hunt that jails mainly men for decades for mere possession of photos often almost as harmless as the one in question here, who will defend men’s rights to liberty? Note that the photo has a deeper meaning, about how men’s “pussy obsession” allows women’s to have power in men’s life.

    He is worried about this:

    “r/mensrights, a forum for over 21,000 disgruntled misogynists, claims that they seek to rescind laws that protect rape victims, molested children, and battered women in order to ‘restore equality to men.’ Given the shocking content that is being called ‘pornographic’ that was posted and endorsed by its fan base, it seems only fitting that their motives be called into question. the image is reported to contain two very young children exploring each other’s sexual organs. Does this community really wish to do justice for ‘oppressed’ men? Or do they just want carte-blanche to victimize children and rape their wives?”

    Femimedia would eat that kind of shit up.

    The reddit r/mensrights moderator might be right. It is worse saying anything in defense of “child porn” then saying “the earth revolves around the sun, the bible got that wrong” during the middle age inquisition. It is a sure way to get ostracized and to detract from any fact and topic one might want to focus on.

    I am begging users, if you see sexual images involving children, report it immediately to ASACP. No one should want that shit in here. submitted by kloo2yoo

    A post was up for 12 hours or so, while I was away. No one had sent a message to the modqueue, and no one had reported it. that user has been banned, and the post reported to law enforcement, and to the Reddit admins.

    http://www.asacp.org/

    I’m fucking disgusted and I’m fucking pissed, and I almost closed and locked the forum, but I don’t want to take it out on all 21,546 other users. don’t do that shit.

    Now reporting this to child porn persecution authorities, that really is going overboard. But, asacp probably think kloo2you is pulling their leg and will not report this to police, afraid of making themselves a laughing stock. So maybe not much damage is being done.

    Imagine if this same image was posted on a feminist forum, would the asacp need to be involved? LOL! of course not!

    Only men are pedophiles!

    Thanks for keeping up the stereotype get a kloo2yoo.

    There is a major rift in the “Men’s rights movement”. Most men’s righters are conservative fathers who are worried about the false domestic violence accusation industry, about debtor’s prison for fathers unable to pay the alimony that reduces them to work slaves. They could care less about the thousands men being locked up in prison for 20 years for often inadvertent possession of photos, often of mere nude adolescent erotica  (read more here) or for having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl that was in a over-21-bar thanks to a fake ID.

    20 years ago I overheard leading academic authorities in sexology “Child Porn is the new witch hunt”.  So is adolescent sexuality.

    So if mainstream men’s rights thinks they need to join the unjust persecution of men for possession of harmless photos, they should re-name themselves “father’s rights”. And a “free men’s sexuality” movement is urgently needed.  Human-Stupidity is one of the few sites daring to stare down the sex offender persecution monster.

    Please read more in human stupidity’s child porn witch hunt section.

    Child Porn or Cutsie child photo? with-this-i-am-going-to-control-your-life

    Reddit men’s rights is one of the most powerful sites countering feminist indoctrination and propaganda on the web. Even mens rights proponents are scared out of their wits about the greatest taboo on earth, the child porn witch hunt.

    The founder and moderator of reddit’s r/mensrights reported this photo to authorities. If men’s rights movement joins the witch hunt that jails mainly men for decades for mere possession of photos often almost as harmless as the one in question here, who will defend men’s rights to liberty? Note that the photo has a deeper meaning, about how men’s "pussy obsession" allows women’s to have power in men’s life.

    He is worried about this:

    "r/mensrights, a forum for over 21,000 disgruntled misogynists, claims that they seek to rescind laws that protect rape victims, molested children, and battered women in order to ‘restore equality to men.’ Given the shocking content that is being called ‘pornographic’ that was posted and endorsed by its fan base, it seems only fitting that their motives be called into question. the image is reported to contain two very young children exploring each other’s sexual organs. Does this community really wish to do justice for ‘oppressed’ men? Or do they just want carte-blanche to victimize children and rape their wives?"

    Femimedia would eat that kind of shit up.

    The reddit r/mensrights moderator might be right. It is worse saying anything in defense of "child porn" then saying "the earth revolves around the sun, the bible got that wrong" during the middle age inquisition. It is a sure way to get ostracized and to detract from any fact and topic one might want to focus on.

    I am begging users, if you see sexual images involving children, report it immediately to ASACP. No one should want that shit in here. submitted by kloo2yoo

    A post was up for 12 hours or so, while I was away. No one had sent a message to the modqueue, and no one had reported it. that user has been banned, and the post reported to law enforcement, and to the Reddit admins.

    http://www.asacp.org/

    I’m fucking disgusted and I’m fucking pissed, and I almost closed and locked the forum, but I don’t want to take it out on all 21,546 other users. don’t do that shit.

    Now reporting this to child porn persecution authorities, that really is going overboard. But, asacp probably think kloo2you is pulling their leg and will not report this to police, afraid of making themselves a laughing stock. So maybe not much damage is being done.

    Imagine if this same image was posted on a feminist forum, would the asacp need to be involved? LOL! of course not!

    Only men are pedophiles!

    Thanks for keeping up the stereotype get a kloo2yoo.

    There is a major rift in the "Men’s rights movement". Most men’s righters are conservative fathers who are worried about the false domestic violence accusation industry, about debtor’s prison for fathers unable to pay the alimony that reduces them to work slaves. They could care less about the thousands men being locked up in prison for 20 years for often inadvertent possession of photos, often of mere nude adolescent erotica  (read more here) or for having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl that was in a over-21-bar thanks to a fake ID.

    20 years ago I overheard leading academic authorities in sexology "Child Porn is the new witch hunt".  So is adolescent sexuality.

    So if mainstream men’s rights thinks they need to join the unjust persecution of men for possession of harmless photos, they should re-name themselves "father’s rights". And a "free men’s sexuality" movement is urgently needed.  Human-Stupidity is one of the few sites daring to stare down the sex offender persecution monster.

    Please read more in human stupidity’s child porn witch hunt section.

  7. Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (11 years) by: admin (1)

    March 17, 2011, 15:47

      Greenburgh nanny sentenced for shaking baby two years in state prison and three years of post release supervision on her July 2008 guilty plea to reckless assault on a child in the first degree. As a result of the violent shaking, the baby suffered a subdural hematoma and diffuse rental hemorrhages,…

  8. Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse! by: Agent Provocateur (2)

    March 15, 2011, 13:39

    "Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children."             …

  9. "Operation Protect Our Children" mistakenly shuts down 84,000 Sites with no child porn by: admin (2)

    February 18, 2011, 06:25

    What if you woke up one morning and your blog’s URL pointed to a Department of Homeland Security page that said, "Website seized for trafficking in child pornography"? That’s what happened to 84,000 innocent site owners this week, and there’s no guarantee it won’t happen again. Over the past few…

  10. 17 year old "children"? United Nations confesses political manipulation of "child" definition by: Devils Advocate (5)

    February 1, 2011, 03:55

    The United Nations manipulated the definition of "child" on purpose! So child protection laws could be extended to adolescent youth without need to be voted again. Human-Stupidity.com found the smoking gun. Proof is on the United Nations web site. Q – What does the UN mean by "youth," and…

  11. Couple stoned to death by Taliban Video. 17 year old girl stoned to death, too. by: Devils Advocate (4)

    January 30, 2011, 07:54

    The two people have been publicly stoned to death in Afghanistan’s once peaceful north over an alleged love affair.  Warning: Don’t worry: only legal depictions of killing and gore,, no offensive illegal nudity, eroticism or sex.! © ABC News Television The alleged lovers,…

  12. Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail. by: admin (5)

    January 20, 2011, 10:16

    A young man got arrested for possession of child porn, depicting a 12 year boy old masturbating. It is his own video: he recorded himself when he was 12 years old. Mandatory minimum jail sentence: 2 years. Think hard: maybe you took some indecent photos of yourself. Or your family album contains nunde photos mom…

  13. Eek! A Male! Pedophile hysteria hurts and kills children by: Devils Advocate

    January 14, 2011, 05:15

    Imagine, putting ointment on a 3 month old’s vagina.  Every man is a suspect for pedophilia. Soon no father will dare to change his daughter’s diapers. Avid consumers of child abuse books on Amazon have a dirty mind. 30 years ago, before the pedophilia hysteria, the idea of abusing a 1 year old would not even have…

  14. "Watching child porn victimizes the child". The Voodoo science of child pornography laws by: Devils Advocate (20)

    December 26, 2010, 05:00

       "However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” Senior gets jail time, probation for having single image of child pornography  We at Human-Stupidity…

  15. Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii) by: admin (4)

    December 11, 2010, 08:53

    Legalizing child pornography is linked to lower rates of child sex abuse Study carried out in Czech Republic confirms similar results in Japan and Denmark Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA),…

  16. Cruel child porn laws kill, "destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by: Devils Advocate (7)

    November 1, 2010, 20:22

    Airline safety is compromised because "nude airport scanner" violates child porn laws. 32 men committed suicide in one CP case alone. Toddlers die because men are afraid to help them. Jack B. Weinstein: A reasonable judge opposing cruel mandatory child porn jail terms for mere possession

  17. Hollywood movies glorify criminal heroes: how romantic! by: admin (1)

    September 28, 2010, 05:18

    Romantic Hollywood movies are full of illegal (criminal) actions, perpetrated by movie heroes, our role models!  Interestingly, most of these illegalities are considered highly romantic (when perpetrated by a heartthrob movie star) "When done in real life, many of the tricks used by onscreen singletons to successfull…

  18. Brooke Shields nude: exploited pedophile magnet? by: admin

    September 26, 2010, 17:33

    Brooke Shields, now 44, posed for a nude photo when she was 10 years old. Now Richard Prince’s photograph of the picture, called "Spiritual America," has been yanked from a major exhibition at the Tate Modern. If pedophiles didn’t already know about "Spiritual America," the Richard Prince photo taken of a nude,…

  19. Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime.. by: admin (5)

    August 31, 2010, 06:04

    The beating last month of a 15-year-old girl in the transit tunnel at Westlake Center as security personnel watched without intervening is prompting a review of King County Metro’s policies for its unarmed guards. The incident — which was partially captured on surveillance video — happened about 7:15 p.m.…

  20. Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photosKinderpornografie: by: Devils Advocate (6)

    August 1, 2010, 02:18

    More child porn insanity! Children nowadays need legal counsel to know if and how they can photograph themselves or have relations with other teenagers, or else they can spend years in jail and remain the rest of their lives on sex offender lists. US court on ‘sexting’: Child porn or child’s play? 01/15/2010…

  21. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy by: Devils Advocate (7)

    July 3, 2010, 06:21

    Junk food makes our children fat, obese and unhealthy which leads to disease and premature death. It does not kill instantly, only in the long run. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy. A 17 year-old cannot consent to sex  (hence consensual sex with a minor is rape). A…

  22. EU Requests To Retain User Data From Search Engines to protect children from pedophiles by: admin (1)

    June 29, 2010, 23:11

    23. Child Porn or Cutsie child photo? with-this-i-am-going-to-control-your-life

    Reddit men’s rights is one of the most powerful sites countering feminist indoctrination and propaganda on the web. Even mens rights proponents are scared out of their wits about the greatest taboo on earth, the child porn witch hunt.

    The founder and moderator of reddit’s r/mensrights reported this photo to authorities. If men’s rights movement joins the witch hunt that jails mainly men for decades for mere possession of photos often almost as harmless as the one in question here, who will defend men’s rights to liberty? Note that the photo has a deeper meaning, about how men’s "pussy obsession" allows women’s to have power in men’s life.

    He is worried about this:

    "r/mensrights, a forum for over 21,000 disgruntled misogynists, claims that they seek to rescind laws that protect rape victims, molested children, and battered women in order to ‘restore equality to men.’ Given the shocking content that is being called ‘pornographic’ that was posted and endorsed by its fan base, it seems only fitting that their motives be called into question. the image is reported to contain two very young children exploring each other’s sexual organs. Does this community really wish to do justice for ‘oppressed’ men? Or do they just want carte-blanche to victimize children and rape their wives?"

    Femimedia would eat that kind of shit up.

    The reddit r/mensrights moderator might be right. It is worse saying anything in defense of "child porn" then saying "the earth revolves around the sun, the bible got that wrong" during the middle age inquisition. It is a sure way to get ostracized and to detract from any fact and topic one might want to focus on.

    I am begging users, if you see sexual images involving children, report it immediately to ASACP. No one should want that shit in here. submitted by kloo2yoo

    A post was up for 12 hours or so, while I was away. No one had sent a message to the modqueue, and no one had reported it. that user has been banned, and the post reported to law enforcement, and to the Reddit admins.

    http://www.asacp.org/

    I’m fucking disgusted and I’m fucking pissed, and I almost closed and locked the forum, but I don’t want to take it out on all 21,546 other users. don’t do that shit.

    Now reporting this to child porn persecution authorities, that really is going overboard. But, asacp probably think kloo2you is pulling their leg and will not report this to police, afraid of making themselves a laughing stock. So maybe not much damage is being done.

    Imagine if this same image was posted on a feminist forum, would the asacp need to be involved? LOL! of course not!

    Only men are pedophiles!

    Thanks for keeping up the stereotype get a kloo2yoo.

    There is a major rift in the "Men’s rights movement". Most men’s righters are conservative fathers who are worried about the false domestic violence accusation industry, about debtor’s prison for fathers unable to pay the alimony that reduces them to work slaves. They could care less about the thousands men being locked up in prison for 20 years for often inadvertent possession of photos, often of mere nude adolescent erotica  (read more here) or for having consensual sex with a 17 year old girl that was in a over-21-bar thanks to a fake ID.

    20 years ago I overheard leading academic authorities in sexology "Child Porn is the new witch hunt".  So is adolescent sexuality.

    So if mainstream men’s rights thinks they need to join the unjust persecution of men for possession of harmless photos, they should re-name themselves "father’s rights". And a "free men’s sexuality" movement is urgently needed.  Human-Stupidity is one of the few sites daring to stare down the sex offender persecution monster.

    Please read more in human stupidity’s child porn witch hunt section.

  23. Woman causes permanent brain damage in infant: 2 years. Kills baby: 4 years. Man possesses photos: priceless (11 years) by: admin (1)

    March 17, 2011, 15:47

      Greenburgh nanny sentenced for shaking baby two years in state prison and three years of post release supervision on her July 2008 guilty plea to reckless assault on a child in the first degree. As a result of the violent shaking, the baby suffered a subdural hematoma and diffuse rental hemorrhages,…

  24. Unborn Child Porn is Unborn Child Abuse. Outlaw fetal abuse! by: Agent Provocateur (2)

    March 15, 2011, 13:39

    "Unborn child pornography is unborn child abuse. In any of its forms, it is an affront to humanity. Any delay in reporting unborn child pornography gives a green light to those who take pleasure from the rape of unborn children."             …

  25. "Operation Protect Our Children" mistakenly shuts down 84,000 Sites with no child porn by: admin (2)

    February 18, 2011, 06:25

    What if you woke up one morning and your blog’s URL pointed to a Department of Homeland Security page that said, "Website seized for trafficking in child pornography"? That’s what happened to 84,000 innocent site owners this week, and there’s no guarantee it won’t happen again. Over the past few…

  26. 17 year old "children"? United Nations confesses political manipulation of "child" definition by: Devils Advocate (5)

    February 1, 2011, 03:55

    The United Nations manipulated the definition of "child" on purpose! So child protection laws could be extended to adolescent youth without need to be voted again. Human-Stupidity.com found the smoking gun. Proof is on the United Nations web site. Q – What does the UN mean by "youth," and…

  27. Couple stoned to death by Taliban Video. 17 year old girl stoned to death, too. by: Devils Advocate (4)

    January 30, 2011, 07:54

    The two people have been publicly stoned to death in Afghanistan’s once peaceful north over an alleged love affair.  Warning: Don’t worry: only legal depictions of killing and gore,, no offensive illegal nudity, eroticism or sex.! © ABC News Television The alleged lovers,…

  28. Jailed for possession of video of himself masturbating when he was 12. Another victim of child porn laws faces minimum 2 year jail. by: admin (5)

    January 20, 2011, 10:16

    A young man got arrested for possession of child porn, depicting a 12 year boy old masturbating. It is his own video: he recorded himself when he was 12 years old. Mandatory minimum jail sentence: 2 years. Think hard: maybe you took some indecent photos of yourself. Or your family album contains nunde photos mom…

  29. Eek! A Male! Pedophile hysteria hurts and kills children by: Devils Advocate

    January 14, 2011, 05:15

    Imagine, putting ointment on a 3 month old’s vagina.  Every man is a suspect for pedophilia. Soon no father will dare to change his daughter’s diapers. Avid consumers of child abuse books on Amazon have a dirty mind. 30 years ago, before the pedophilia hysteria, the idea of abusing a 1 year old would not even have…

  30. "Watching child porn victimizes the child". The Voodoo science of child pornography laws by: Devils Advocate (20)

    December 26, 2010, 05:00

       "However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” Senior gets jail time, probation for having single image of child pornography  We at Human-Stupidity…

  31. Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii) by: admin (4)

    December 11, 2010, 08:53

    Legalizing child pornography is linked to lower rates of child sex abuse Study carried out in Czech Republic confirms similar results in Japan and Denmark Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA),…

  32. Cruel child porn laws kill, "destroying lives unnecessarily” (Judge Jack B. Weinstein) by: Devils Advocate (7)

    November 1, 2010, 20:22

    Airline safety is compromised because "nude airport scanner" violates child porn laws. 32 men committed suicide in one CP case alone. Toddlers die because men are afraid to help them. Jack B. Weinstein: A reasonable judge opposing cruel mandatory child porn jail terms for mere possession

  33. Hollywood movies glorify criminal heroes: how romantic! by: admin (1)

    September 28, 2010, 05:18

    Romantic Hollywood movies are full of illegal (criminal) actions, perpetrated by movie heroes, our role models!  Interestingly, most of these illegalities are considered highly romantic (when perpetrated by a heartthrob movie star) "When done in real life, many of the tricks used by onscreen singletons to successfull…

  34. Brooke Shields nude: exploited pedophile magnet? by: admin

    September 26, 2010, 17:33

    Brooke Shields, now 44, posed for a nude photo when she was 10 years old. Now Richard Prince’s photograph of the picture, called "Spiritual America," has been yanked from a major exhibition at the Tate Modern. If pedophiles didn’t already know about "Spiritual America," the Richard Prince photo taken of a nude,…

  35. Movie of 15 year old girl repeatedly brutally stomped on head: prime time news. Depicting the same girl posing nude would be child porn, a heinous crime.. by: admin (5)

    August 31, 2010, 06:04

    The beating last month of a 15-year-old girl in the transit tunnel at Westlake Center as security personnel watched without intervening is prompting a review of King County Metro’s policies for its unarmed guards. The incident — which was partially captured on surveillance video — happened about 7:15 p.m.…

  36. Sexting: Courts victimize Teens with child porn charges for exchanging their own nude photosKinderpornografie: by: Devils Advocate (6)

    August 1, 2010, 02:18

    More child porn insanity! Children nowadays need legal counsel to know if and how they can photograph themselves or have relations with other teenagers, or else they can spend years in jail and remain the rest of their lives on sex offender lists. US court on ‘sexting’: Child porn or child’s play? 01/15/2010…

  37. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy by: Devils Advocate (7)

    July 3, 2010, 06:21

    Junk food makes our children fat, obese and unhealthy which leads to disease and premature death. It does not kill instantly, only in the long run. "Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy. A 17 year-old cannot consent to sex  (hence consensual sex with a minor is rape). A…

  38. EU Requests To Retain User Data From Search Engines to protect children from pedophiles by: admin (1)

    June 29, 2010, 23:11

    39. Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Cute child photo scares Reddit’s men’s rights into child porn frenzy” »
    Cute child photo scares Reddit’s men’s rights into chi…
    » continues here »

    Feminist rape laws don’t apply to male prison rape victims

    A prisoner is under the control and mercy of gangs of violent felons, all day long, unable to escape.  Under the guardianship and responsibility of government. Feminist anti-rape activists are not concerned about the grave injustice of prison rape, which is on-going long term year-long power, humiliation, and sexual violence. Prison rape accusations get ignored. Even "voluntary" sex in prison is often rape, due to power differential and serious consequences of saying "no". Why this deafening silence of the feminists regarding prison rape? Only Human-Stupidity points out that prison rape epidemic is only the tip of the iceberg: has a hidden prison-rape-by-intimidation part larger then the know forcible rape cases.

    compare: Stop Prison Rape! Legalize Corporal Punishment (Whipping) 

    The following article shows a light at the end of the tunnel. US authorities are starting to take the prison rape epidemic more seriously.

    Raped and extorted by a prison gang, Scott Howard was called a "drama queen" by corrections officials 

    This is a lengthy 8 page report. Read it all, don’t get stuck on the first page only

    I served time in the Colorado Department of Corrections, and it was there that I was repeatedly raped, assaulted and extorted by members of a large, notorious gang." […]

    "I spent well over a year trying to get protection by writing to officials," he said. "My efforts to report were mostly fruitless — and often put me at greater risk. Because I am openly gay, officials blamed me for the attacks. They said as a homosexual I should expect to be targeted by one gang or another."

    Howard didn’t tell the whole squalid story. He didn’t mention the evidence of staff involvement with the gang that made his efforts to seek protection even dicier. He didn’t go into how, once he finally started "naming names," as prison investigators demanded, they accused him of crying rape to cover up his own criminal activities. He barely referred to his last day as a Colorado prisoner, when, he says, he was put in a cell with one of the gang leaders and sexually assaulted again. Despite being a bare summary, the statement was still graphic — and powerful. At times his voice choked up, but Howard kept reading.

     

    Human-Stupidity Analysis

    Prison rape is comparable to being locked for years in Mr. Fritzl’s rape dungeon. Years under the power of rapists with nowhere to escape. Prison rape is aggravated because

    • the victim is under the threat of violence and repeated rape for hours, days, weeks, months, and years. No escape possible
    • At all times, while sleeping, while in the shower. The threat is always there
    • gangs gang up on him. No chance to resist.
    • The perpetrators continuously have power over the victim. It is not a "one shot crime". It is constant and repeated.
    • Many many prison rape victims are never seen as rape victims. They probably don’t even see themselves as rape victims. Many just give in and become long term sex slaves in order to avoid gang rapes and gang beatings.
      • females that suffer the slightest, barely noticeable, coercion, are rape victims
      • I have never heard of "voluntary" sex slaves in prison being called "rape victims". By feminist rape standards, a prisoner is unable to consent to sex, because he has no safe option to say "no". Unless he is willing to fight to death, is a member of a gang, etc, his "no" just puts him into more danger
    • the victim is under the power and protection of the state. The government is locking him together with felons, the government is responsible for his safety
    • There is a popular misconception: "he is a criminal, he deserves to get ass-raped". Problems
      • this is cruel and unusual punishment through the back door.
      • If you think people deserve corporal punishment, be honest and adopt the Sharia or something similar.Stop Prison Rape! Legalize Corporal Punishment (Whipping) 
      • In the case of legalized flogging, the corporal punishment follows due process and does not transmit Aids.
      • Usually the serious criminal gangs prey upon the first time light criminal (drug users, people who did not pay their parking tickets). So the wrong ones get punished

     

    Clearly double standards for female and male rape victims

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Feminist rape laws don’t apply to male prison rape victims” »
    Feminist rape laws don’t apply to male prison rape victims
    » continues here »

    Wikipedia discriminates against women? Or gender differences are real?

    Surveys suggest that less than 15 percent of the online encyclopedia’s hundreds of thousands of contributors are female. […]

    Sue Gardner, the executive director of the foundation, has set a goal to raise the share of female contributors to 25 percent by 2015, but she is running up against the traditions of the computer world and an obsessive fact-loving realm that is dominated by men and, some say, uncomfortable for women.

    Her effort is not diversity for diversity’s sake, she says. “This is about wanting to ensure that the encyclopedia is as good as it could be,”  

    Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia’s Contributor List

    Is Wikipedia creating a glass ceiling, actively blocking women from participating? Well, or maybe women are different. Or maybe men really are the gender that creates knowledge, wealth, public services, etc?

    I would imagine that if less than 15% of the contributors are women, then much less than 15% of the work is done by women.

    Considering that almost nobody gets paid for Wikipedia, the most obvious thing that can be said about its existence from a gender point of view is that the human race owes a debt of gratitude to the male sex.

    [… men see the point] n working for free to expand access to information for people they don’t know. But blaming any problem, even one as exiguous as women not contributing much unpaid labor to Wikipedia, on women is a no-no, so the fault must lie with “misogynists.”

    Guys Create Wikipedia For Free: That’s A Problem
    Related articles
    Enhanced by Zemanta

    Gynocentrism (male chivalry) was the norm, not Patriarchism

    • "women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." (Hillary Clinton). Well, sure – losing family members to horrible deaths is so much worse than actually having to die those horrible deaths.
    • The traditional idea under discussion is male sacrifice for the benefit of women, which we term Gynocentrism. This is the historical norm, and it was the way of the world long before anything called ‘feminism’ made itself known
    • men perfectly accustomed to the idea of dying for the sake of their women. It is an idea that has outlived nearly every other, and endures to this day in our American Empire. That men should sacrifice themselves utterly – their very essence, their being and their identity, to save women that they do not even know – is neatly encapsulated in that popular phrase, ‘women and children first.’
    • feminism equals female supremacism
    • The feminist movement is taken very seriously indeed by those with the power to enforce its core aims:
      • (1) The expropriation of resources from men to women.
      • (2) The punishment of men.
      • (3) To increase (1) and (2) in terms of scope and intensity indefinitely.

    The quotes above are from a very interesting lecture series:

    Gynocentrism Theory 

                           (all lectures above in the RSS link)

    1. Staring Out From the Abyss   Lecture No. 1
    2. The Same Old Story   Lecture No. 2
    3. Refuting the Appeal to Dictionary
    4. Pig Latin
    5. Anatomy of a Victim Ideology

     

     

    Staring Out From the Abyss  (Lecture 1)

    This weblog aims to encourage the intellectual crystallization of what we are calling the Men’s Rights Movement, by taking a narrow lens across a broad range of topics. This weblog is dedicated to the elucidation of Gynocentrism Theory.

    What is Gynocentrism Theory? To put it simply, it is a system which explains social relations between the sexes. It supersedes Patriarchy Theory, the cornerstone of all feminist thought. Now memetic, Patriarchy Theory has proved a remarkable tool in denying men their rights, including their most basic human rights to dignity and bodily integrity, on the pretense that all men are oppressors (or at least, allied with oppressive men from whom they receive benefits) and that all women are victims of male power. Gynocentrism Theory is the articulation of many years of effort by various thinkers in the Men’s Rights sphere to describe a vision of the world which more accurately reflects the experiences of men – and many women, too.

     

    The Same Old Story   Lecture No. 2

    Allow me to clarify. The traditional idea under discussion is male sacrifice for the benefit of women, which we term Gynocentrism. This is the historical norm, and it was the way of the world long before anything called ‘feminism’ made itself known

    .

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Gynocentrism (male chivalry) was the norm, not Patriarchism” »
    Gynocentrism (male chivalry) was the norm, not Patriarchism
    » continues here »