Tag: political correctness

Intelligence, Race, Criminality: Taboo Poll in Nature Magazine

Shocking questions. Should scientists refrain from studying topics for fear of PC (political correctness)? Is political correctness more important then finding the scientific truth about important issues of our modern life (crime, intelligence, scientific and economic progress, etc.).

Though we disagree with the idea of censorship, we thank Nature Magazine for bringing out the issue into the open.

This is much better then Canadian law, where even the discussion of censorship is censored by hate speech laws. See Canada

 

NATURE Magazine Has A Poll (That You Can Vote In!) On "Taboo Genetics"

Ethics: Taboo genetics

Probing the biological basis of certain traits ignites controversy. But some scientists choose to cross the red line anyway.

Erika Check Hayden

02 October 2013

Scientists cited or quoted include Steve Hsu, Geoffrey Miller, Christopher Chabris, Francis Galton, Robert Plomin, and Bruce Lahn.

And here is Nature’s tut-tutting editorial:

Dangerous work

Behavioural geneticists must tread carefully to prevent their research being misinterpreted.

Here are the four questions in Nature’s poll.

  • Should scientists refrain from studying the genetics of intelligence?

  • Should scientists refrain from studying the genetics of race?

  • Should scientists refrain from studying the genetics of violence?

  • Should scientists refrain from studying the genetics of sexuality?

Human-Stupidity has described politically correct censorship in academic research about Domestic violence, Race and IQ, childhood sexuality (Rind study, child sex trauma myth).

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Intelligence, Race, Criminality: Taboo Poll in Nature Magazine” »
Intelligence, Race, Criminality: Taboo Poll in Nature Magazine
» continues here »

"They fight like girls" is prohibited by BBC speech code

 

On Saturday the BBC made its football commentator and former Liverpool striker Robbie Fowler apologise on air for describing two footballers as "fighting like girls". It made for uncomfortable viewing. It was obvious to any viewer with more than one brain cell that Fowler’s comment, made about a tussle between Fernando Torres and Jan Vertonghen during the Tottenham-Chelsea game, was entirely innocent, intended only to condemn Torres and Vertonghen’s childish antics and not to slander the female sex. Yet minutes later, having clearly had a word in his ear from PC producers, a red-faced Robbie was making an embarrassing climbdown and telling the nation he was "deeply sorry" for apparently offending womankind. It was an ugly and humiliating spectacle.

It is not just football. Harassment laws have poisoned the work place for male expression and freedom of thought. Street harassment will soon be a crime too. Speech codes protect every conceivable minority, and even the majority (women are over 50% of the population).  Racial jokes, ethnic jokes, even academic research on taboo topics are censored (Rind study, race and iq)

In Scotland, the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Act makes it a crime for Celtic and Rangers fans to sing “sectarian” or even political songs. Last month it was announced that every single footballer in the Premier League will have to attend lessons about the use of homophobic and racist language, presumably to cleanse their dumb, working-class brains of their foul prejudices. The Football Association has declared war on the use of homophobic language at football grounds, which includes obliterating not only offensive words like “queer” but also, once again, jokey phrases about “girls” and “manning up”. The FA is also trying to stop Tottenham Hotspur fans from referring to themselves as Yids and the Yid Army, something they’ve done for years. The Crown Prosecution Service itself has warned football clubs not to allow their fans to “cross the line [into] inappropriate crowd behaviour and chanting”. But who decides what is appropriate and inappropriate chanting? Surely it should be fans themselves rather than the snobby, censorious suits and PC phrase-police who have become an ugly blot on the beautiful game in recent years?

Source: The BBC’s humiliation of Robbie Fowler shows that football is fair game for censorship

Thanks to the antifeminist for the above link.

God praise the US constitution, with its freedom of speech clauses. Freedom of speech is less curtailed in the US then elsewhere. See

Behavior in general gets over criminalized. Children in the US get expelled for carrying a half inch micro replica of a gun, or for shooting pellet guns in the privacy of their back yard. And of course, anything sexual, teenage sexuality or child porn which often is neither porn (see copine scale) nor a child (17).

Political correctness slowly but surely curtails our freedom and instates a reign of harassment and terror.

Impunity for violent criminal feminists, MRA charged $ 964 police protection fee at U of Toronto

Men’s Rights Activists (MRA) have to pay $ 964 "security fee" for police protection against feminists who engage in criminal mischief to crash MRA events

the Canadian Association for Equality has learned that the administration will force a mandatory $964 security fee on our allied campus group to cover costs of police they have deemed necessary next Friday. This means the event “Caring About University Men: Why We Need Campus Men’s Centres in a Time of Crisis, with Miles Groth” is currently in serious jeopardy.

This is the culmination of Political Correctness Hate Speech Laws.  While speech can not be repressed with hate speech law, make it impossibly expensive. Blame the victim of violent demonstration,, make them pay for their right to free speech.

The politically correct interpretation is different. Hate speech by the privileged patriarchy does not deserve free speech rights.

.MRA, part of the patriarchy, are offensive to feminists, who represent the historically disadvantaged group "women".  So it is the MRA’s fault if the offended women feel compelled to act against them, blocking entrances, pushing, shoving, spitting at police. Or they feel compelled to even pull fire-alarms, in their justified despair and frustration about the offensive event /sarcasm

"… therefore we should not be allowed to speak, and that, from their perspective is not an abridgement of freedom of speech, it is rather the prevention of hate speech." -Warren Farrell

 

Janice FIamengo: What’s Wrong With Women’s Studies? A CAFE Event by EqualityCanadaTV

 

Human-Stupidity Analysis

Not only does Political correctness brainwash children and adolescents in school and University, adults through press indoctrination. Political correctness now actively shuts down all critical speech by outlawing it. This is enforced top-down,by international organizations.

We are appalled and shocked. Freedom of speech has been the hallmark of most Western constitutions and liberties. Political correctness has restricted such freedom in colleges, at the work place. But to make this official policy of 28 countries, is unimaginable. EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech The United Nations also is very active in such subject matters. UN demands Germany repress free Speech.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Impunity for violent criminal feminists, MRA charged $ 964 police protection fee at U of Toronto” »
Impunity for violent criminal feminists, MRA charged $ 964 police …
» continues here »

EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech

EU to ban anti-feminist speech

  • and ban any "defamatory comments" of the following kind.

racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia

 

  • Governments MUST  "Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia."
  • Governments MUST give special privileges to underprivileged genders, races, sexual orientations, etc.:  "The special protection afforded to members of vulnerable and disadvantaged groups may imply a preferential treatment. Strictly speaking, this preferential treatment goes beyond mere respect and acceptance lying at the root of tolerance "

The texts quoted and highlighted above are from the EU (Europan Union) document itself. I kid you not.

 

We at Human-Stupidity bemoan that Men’s Right’s Activists and Race Realists do not embrace each other and see that they face the same problems:   Gender Quotas, Race Quotas, "reverse discrimination", Hate Speech Laws, and systematic privileges for women, colored races, immigrants and non-native religions. 

EU to ban anti-feminist speech continues >>

The EU’s latest document is a called: “The European framework national statute for the promotion of tolerance”[4] which is a document elaborated with a view to being enacted by the legislatures of all the 28 unfortunate nations that are members of this club.

What’s wrong with “promotion of tolerance” one might ask. As you will see in the following lines, “promotion of tolerance” means something entirely different than what it means to reasonable people. And basically the entire document looks more like a statue of the Thought Police and the Ministry of Truth.

In the Section 1 of the document, the EU defines its terms. So terms like “hate crime”, “group” and “tolerance” are being introduced. Of particular interest is the EU’s definition of “group libel”[5]:

“Group libel” means: defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group as defined in paragraph (a) – or members thereof – with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges.

As we will soon see, feminists are also de facto part of the “group” notion – so holding feminists to ridicule, as they deserve, will now be a crime.

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech” »
EU to ban anti-feminist, racist, homophobic speech
» continues here »

Baby born to man, without female help, has no mother

A biological miracle happened in Berlin. A man gave birth to a child.

He chose home birth, because in Germany, hospitals are required, by law, to inform the name of the mother to the registry.

He insisted to be registered as the father, creating major confusion in the bureaucracy of the official birth registry.  The German civil law code allows him to legally be a man, though s/he is biologically a woman. It is a humane gesture, to save him/her the pain and trouble to undergo sex change operation and still have the sex gender he wishes. It requires only two psychologists

He wanted to hide the gender sex of the baby, but was obliged to register the baby with his/her correct sex. Officials at the registry worry: if the baby is a girl, will s/he educate her as a boy?

Human-Stupidity Analysis

The slippery slope of political correctness always overshoots. Giving someone a chance to live his life as if he were a different sex may be a friendly humane gesture.

But political correctness is about creating legally enforceable special RIGHTS. Making this sex change a legal right to wreak havoc with our legal system, to oblige schools to re-emit diplomas with the "correct" new gender. We occupy courts with her/his legal rights, their offended if someone addresses them by the wrong gender. Our father is of the female sex but of the male gender.

Imagine this bizarre case (double sex change)

Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “Baby born to man, without female help, has no mother” »
Baby born to man, without female help, has no mother
» continues here »

George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O’Mara’s toothless defense is the culprit

Zimmerman’s guilt could not be proven

Top: 5 years ago little Trayvon and Geore on his booking photo looked like thisGeorge Zimmerman is considered guilty in the public opinion. George, vigorously pursued little weak innocent Trayvon Martin, and gunned down an unarmed teenager who only carried skittles and ice tea and who dreamed of . Defense lawyer Marc O’Mara managed to raise reasonable doubt. Thus the jury had to acquit, because Zimmerman’s guilt could not clearly be proven beyond reasonable doubt. Zimmerman is guilty, but the prosecution just failed to to convincingly prove Zimmerman’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

George Zimmerman‘s lawyer Marc O’Mara’s defense won a battle but lost the war. George Zimmerman is a world-wide pariah. We read the press in Germany and Brazil.

 

trayvon-with-babyMSN Brazil calls Zimmermann Assassin.
  • Press media’s lies, deceit about George Zimmermann trial

    • George Zimmermann Acquitted: Victim of Government and Black Racism ("Der Spiegel" lügt: George Zimmerman, Opfer von schwarzem Rassismus und Verleumdungen)

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Below recent photos of Martin and Zimmerman

    Sheep succumbs to attack dog
    Aggressive, well trained Al Sharpton

    faces off with toothless lawyer Marc O’Mara

    Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

     

    Al Sharpton Grills George Zimmerman’s Attorney In Long, Contentious Interview

    How civil rights activists and the press would like to picture Trayvon Martin and George ZimmermannA firmly convinced partisan Al Sharpton

    Sharpton asked O’Mara how Zimmerman can plead self-defense if, as heard in the 911 tape, he was actively pursuing Martin, contrary to the advice of the operator.

    Al Sharpton firmly tells a damaging narrative "Zimmerman chased Martin". Sharpton is firm and convinced, and thus convincing. Sharpton does not care about evidence, proof, or if his story is true or not. He firmly believes what he says and thus convincing( Robert Trivers: Self deception, Robert Kurzban).  He is unimpeded by doubts, reasonableness, fairness. A partisan. Al Sharpton does not care if it is true or not.

    A pondering, objective, unsure O’MaraHow Media would like to depict them (Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman)

    O’Mara argued that there’s no conclusive evidence to suggest continued pursuit, nor is there evidence Zimmerman initiated any physical confrontation

    O’Mara’s lame reply comes over like this: "Well, Zimmerman is guilty, he chased down the poor teenager and started the fight. But it can not be conclusively proven. Of course, I understand and respect your opinion, Mr. Sharpton, but you can not prove it"

    OK, he did not say this, but that is what it sounds to an unsophisticated TV viewer that has been exposed to the relentless smear campaign against George Zimmerman.

    Marc O’Mara seems to be trying himself to figure out what really happened and who started the fight. A reasoned, legalese, open minded opinion behooves a judge, not a defense lawyer, much less a TV propagandist.

     

    Marc O’Mara lacks aggressive forward defense and counter attack

    1) tell the truth

    Mr. Sharpton, you are dreaming. Mr. Zimmerman stopped and waited, Trayvon Martin came back and viciously assaulted and attacked George. 

    obama-if-i-had-a-son-hed-look-like-trayvon-birth-certificate-sad-hill-news-33

    2) challenge: Sharpton’s story is preposterous and makes no sense

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O’Mara’s toothless defense is the culprit” »
    George Zimmerman verdict: guilty in public opinion. Lawyer Mark O&…
    » continues here »

    MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?

    George Zimmerman is an assassin. MSN Brazil spreads this slanderous news in their Brazilian version. George Zimmerman was acquitted and thus must not be called a murderer or assassin. 

    Not satisfied with the normal lies and deceit in the George Zimmerman case, MSN resort to illegal slander. Good for George, to get multi million dollar lawsuit against msn. Before, CBS had doctored the 911 tapes and is being sued by George Zimmerman

    Americanos saem às ruas para pedir justiça contra assassino de Trayvon Martin

    IMG_21072013_081229

    George Zimmerman has been the victim of a concerted defamation campaign ever since black civil rights leaders got wind of the case.

     

    They lied to you, hid evidence.
    Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

     

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?” »
    MSN calls Zimmermann Assassin. Defamation lawsuit.to follow?
    » continues here »

    They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors

    Dear Jurors,

    you have been lied to, misled, deceived. Above all, judge and lawyers withheld relevant information from you.

    Nevertheless, the George Zimmerman case was so clear cut, that you, the Jury, still arrived at the right verdict.  In spite of relentless attempts to mislead you, and in spite of relevant facts having been hidden from you.

    But, sadly, you had and still have doubts as to Zimmerman’s innocence. You were far from totally convinced of George Zimmerman‘s innocence, beyond reasonable doubt.

    [It is the] media’s claim last year that a neighborhood-watch captain in Florida [George Zimmerman] had hunted down a black teenager [Trayvon Martin] and shot him dead just for wearing a hoodie. 1

    1. If it were not for criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey this trial would not exist
    2. Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at a place where he had been 4 minutes earlier.
    3. The media and the prosecution never came up with a coherent story of what they think has happened.
    4. Trayvon Martin, on suspension for drugs, for punching bus driver. A violent burglar upset about being followed?  Texts show Trayvon Martin ‘hostile’ day of shooting
    5. The prosecution’s main witnesses are Martin’s intimate friends and family that have been carefully prepared by "civil rights activists" and lawyers as to what to say (or lie).
    6. (6) Trayvon Martin’s shady thuggish character, Black crime and ghetto rap culture

     

     

     

    (1) The trial could only start due to criminal lies and withholding of evidence by prosecutor Angela Corey

    .There never was a case that an honest prosecutor could have brought to court, and that an unbiased judge would have allowed to proceed.

     

    In reference to the George Zimmerman trial’s whistleblower who lost his job at the State Attorney’s Office, Dershowitz says Angela Corey should face “disciplinary action” for “deliberately withholding and suppressing” evidence submitted to George Zimmerman’s defense and the judge. He claims Corey “withheld other evidence in the course of the pretrial and trial proceedings.”  7

    You would arrive at the conclusion that Zimmermann is innocent beyond reasonable doubt, and that Trayvon Martin is a murderous aggressor, beyond reasonable doubt.

     

    (2) Trayvon returned and walked in circles. He was shot at the place where he had been 240 seconds earlier.

    Path and time line

    The final fight and the killing happened about 60 yards from Zimmerman’s car and 60 yards from Trayvon Martin’s destination. Trayvon Martin, without any doubt, returned to where he was a few minutes before. This is inevitable logic, because the fight happened where Zimmermann was originally.

    Two maps trying to explain George’s and Trayvon’s path

    trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-map-with-911-call-timing-v-3-1

     

     

    If the prosecution and the press were right, out of shape Zimmermann  chased after football athlete Trayvon.

    Trayvon could have simply entered his house, but chose not to do so. Trayvon could have simply outrun Zimmerman but chose not to do so.

     

    Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading “They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman’s jurors” »
    They lied to you, hid evidence. Open letter to George Zimmerman&#8…
    » continues here »